This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 10.85 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8
77.75605 -55.39879 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 10.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.07 23:27:19.16 -01:35:51.4
81.09198 -57.46896 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:19.16 -01:35:51.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:19.16 -01:35:51.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.10 23:32:01.61 -00:47:17.6
83.74832 -57.48900 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 -0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:01.61 -00:47:17.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:01.61 -00:47:17.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.15 23:35:15.35 -01:38:30.5
84.10807 -58.64820 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:15.35 -01:38:30.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:15.35 -01:38:30.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.32 23:35:18.81 -04:08:40.0
81.27741 -60.70327 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:18.81 -04:08:40.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:18.81 -04:08:40.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.80 23:20:32.17 +00:12:53.4
80.58929 -55.00278 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 0 0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:32.17 +00:12:53.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:32.17 +00:12:53.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 13.93 23:27:44.18 +00:23:19.8
83.34672 -55.91186 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -0 0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:44.18 +00:23:19.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:44.18 +00:23:19.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 14.21 23:34:26.84 -00:01:04.1
85.47106 -57.18045 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.440 Theodora -0 1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:26.84 -00:01:04.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:26.84 -00:01:04.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2713 2461301.7713 14.80 23:27:51.87 -04:05:54.0
78.37842 -59.53397 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.461 Saskia 0 0 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:51.87 -04:05:54.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:51.87 -04:05:54.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7713,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2713 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461301.77164947 18.09.2026 06:31:00.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5247
Objects passed selection criteria: 5245
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5022
Average stars matched: 4792.25 (95.4251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 01:53:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461301.77164947 18.09.2026 06:31:00.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27513
Objects passed selection criteria: 27443
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26510.8
Average stars matched: 25565.8 (96.4354 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 01:55:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.77101872
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00907 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ok2Gu5JANk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EdEbYj9HQN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XWmDRl0Cj2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UF715la81U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.9 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.9 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ok2Gu5JANk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EdEbYj9HQN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XWmDRl0Cj2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=387, bad_region=1519, passed=6903
Got 6903 stars (including 5129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6903 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5333)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=6.633 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4849 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.383 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.383 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1644 n_q2=843 n_q3=1515 n_q4=847 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UF715la81U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, bad_region=1530, passed=6946
Got 6946 stars (including 5154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=6.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4857 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.393 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.374
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.393 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1651 n_q2=846 n_q3=1512 n_q4=848 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.148
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.051
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4849 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4857 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.4: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:59:24.13 -02:53:06.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.5: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.1: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:59:24.13 -02:53:06.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.4: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.97 +00:24:25.1: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0418 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:24.13 -02:53:06.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1394 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:26.75 -03:04:03.4: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8271 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0741 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 20212_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 20215_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 20221_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.138 -01:59:54.24
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:33.024 -02:00:22.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00907 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QmzY87D7XZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cGYiYDyzvs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FnsE83X6rI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uNiQk50P6f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QmzY87D7XZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cGYiYDyzvs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FnsE83X6rI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2030, bad_region=5735, passed=30991
Got 30991 stars (including 24290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=6.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.377 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.365
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1653 n_q2=815 n_q3=1543 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uNiQk50P6f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2084, bad_region=5794, passed=31051
Got 31051 stars (including 24300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31051 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=6.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.376 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.391
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1649 n_q2=820 n_q3=1544 n_q4=839 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-30-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_014416_TTUQ2b1x1_1598644_H1DaCi5c/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.9: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:22.15 -04:43:34.9: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:19.16 -01:35:51.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:50.80 +00:27:21.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:15.35 -01:38:30.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:32.39 -01:46:38.1: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:18.81 -04:08:40.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:01.61 -00:47:17.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:32.17 +00:12:53.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.9: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:18.81 -04:08:40.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:22.15 -04:43:34.9: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:19.16 -01:35:51.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:32.39 -01:46:38.1: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:15.35 -01:38:30.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:01.61 -00:47:17.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:50.80 +00:27:21.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.13 -05:12:46.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0247 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:22.15 -04:43:34.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5999 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:32.39 -01:46:38.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7005 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3988 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:50.80 +00:27:21.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0053 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:32.17 +00:12:53.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:44.18 +00:23:19.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:46.03 -06:08:43.8: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:39.15 -02:16:32.0: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.24 -00:58:11.2: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:26.84 -00:01:04.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:44.18 +00:23:19.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.24 -00:58:11.2: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:39.15 -02:16:32.0: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:46.03 -06:08:43.8: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:26.84 -00:01:04.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.15 -02:16:32.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1091 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:46.03 -06:08:43.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3733 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.24 -00:58:11.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0599 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:20.26 -02:59:06.5: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.8: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:22.47 -03:24:14.9: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:20.26 -02:59:06.5: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:20.26 -02:59:06.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2079 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.8: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1668 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:22.47 -03:24:14.9: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:22.47 -03:24:14.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2011 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:53.37 -01:23:37.8: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:02.0: 15.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.35 -03:02:20.7: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:02.0: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:53.37 -01:23:37.8: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:35.01 -01:39:02.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4714 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:53.37 -01:23:37.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5312 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.35 -03:02:20.7: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.35 -03:02:20.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3428 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.65 -01:06:23.0: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.70 +01:48:15.8: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:07.16 -01:17:41.9: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.65 -01:06:23.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.70 +01:48:15.8: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.65 -01:06:23.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5521 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.70 +01:48:15.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4977 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:07.16 -01:17:41.9: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:07.16 -01:17:41.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3764 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:17.85 -00:43:17.7: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.12 -05:55:30.1: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.9: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:17.85 -00:43:17.7: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.12 -05:55:30.1: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:17.85 -00:43:17.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6702 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.12 -05:55:30.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5041 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6438 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.69 +01:03:30.6: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:12.10 -03:17:09.5: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:32.94 -06:01:41.7: 15.02 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.69 +01:03:30.6: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:12.10 -03:17:09.5: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:32.94 -06:01:41.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.69 +01:03:30.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5450 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:12.10 -03:17:09.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5753 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:32.94 -06:01:41.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6221 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:05.38 -03:08:49.4: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.64 -02:57:42.1: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:14.19 -00:00:45.4: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.64 -02:57:42.1: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:05.38 -03:08:49.4: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.64 -02:57:42.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5906 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:05.38 -03:08:49.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7257 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:14.19 -00:00:45.4: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:14.19 -00:00:45.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6495 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:51.87 -04:05:54.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:37.03 +01:21:00.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:16.16 -02:10:46.6: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:51.87 -04:05:54.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:37.03 +01:21:00.9: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:37.03 +01:21:00.9: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7596 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:16.16 -02:10:46.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:16.16 -02:10:46.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6520 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:55.12 -04:48:02.3: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:27.01 -04:33:19.8: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:55.12 -04:48:02.3: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:55.12 -04:48:02.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6842 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:27.01 -04:33:19.8: 15.11 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:27.01 -04:33:19.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6906 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:56.01 +00:18:36.8: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:49.41 -06:04:05.1: 15.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:56.01 +00:18:36.8: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:56.01 +00:18:36.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6471 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:49.41 -06:04:05.1: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:49.41 -06:04:05.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6636 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:03.20 -06:06:08.8: 14.96 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.58 -00:31:12.4: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:03.20 -06:06:08.8: 15.24 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:03.20 -06:06:08.8: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6468 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.58 -00:31:12.4: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.58 -00:31:12.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6035 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:18.48 +00:31:56.1: 15.40 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:22.51 -03:44:19.0: 15.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:18.07 -02:26:36.1: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:46.84 +01:24:26.5: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:18.48 +00:31:56.1: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:22.51 -03:44:19.0: 15.50 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:18.48 +00:31:56.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8132 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:22.51 -03:44:19.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8044 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:18.07 -02:26:36.1: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:32.36 -01:08:35.8: 15.37 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:18.07 -02:26:36.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6292 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:46.84 +01:24:26.5: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:46.84 +01:24:26.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7542 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:56.07 -06:09:16.4: 15.49 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:32.36 -01:08:35.8: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:32.36 -01:08:35.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8834 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:56.07 -06:09:16.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:56.07 -06:09:16.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7486 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.49 -03:42:39.1: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:41.31 -01:40:14.8: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:30.28 +01:29:29.4: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.63 -05:14:30.2: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:31.62 -03:41:18.3: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.49 -03:42:39.1: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.49 -03:42:39.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6340 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:41.31 -01:40:14.8: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:41.31 -01:40:14.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8102 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.63 -05:14:30.2: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.63 -05:14:30.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7672 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:30.28 +01:29:29.4: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:30.28 +01:29:29.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6470 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.75 +00:13:44.5: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:31.62 -03:41:18.3: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:32.39 -01:44:27.8: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:31.62 -03:41:18.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6825 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:02.17 -03:33:53.4: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:44.18 -01:41:22.5: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.75 +00:13:44.5: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:32.39 -01:44:27.8: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.75 +00:13:44.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6911 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.39 -01:44:27.8: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7283 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:02.17 -03:33:53.4: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:02.17 -03:33:53.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8345 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.15 -03:44:37.5: 15.19 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:06.18 -00:53:00.0: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:44.18 -01:41:22.5: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:34.31 -04:51:17.6: 15.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:44.18 -01:41:22.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8810 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.6: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:08.1: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:43.75 -04:31:26.1: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.15 -03:44:37.5: 15.32 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.15 -03:44:37.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7981 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:34.31 -04:51:17.6: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:06.18 -00:53:00.0: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:34.31 -04:51:17.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8756 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:06.18 -00:53:00.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8862 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:08.1: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.6: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:12.03 -05:33:08.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7715 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7890 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:43.75 -04:31:26.1: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:43.75 -04:31:26.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8972 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:06.40 -04:28:30.6: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:10:54.33 -05:17:15.2: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:06.40 -04:28:30.6: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:06.40 -04:28:30.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8852 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:10:54.33 -05:17:15.2: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:54.33 -05:17:15.2: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8870 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52532.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52661.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52499_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52505_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52508_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:24.84 -01:05:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52521_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52530_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52531_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52535_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52543_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52543_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52578_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52588_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52595_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52599_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52601_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52602_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52612_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52620_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52621_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52624_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52625_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52628_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52633_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52638_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52641_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52642_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52645_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52646_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52656_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52658_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 52661_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52664_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52666_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52667_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52671_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52679_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52680_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52686_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52689_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52691_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52696_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52702_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52709_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52710_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52711_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52713_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52715_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52719_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52724_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52730_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52732_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52733_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52734_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52744_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52749_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52750_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52753_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52815_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 52832_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50168_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303
The candidate 50168_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-31-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0303 did not pass the final checks
