Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 17.4420  2461300.9420  11.28  23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8
 87.38744 -66.53128 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      1       1  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8:  15.37 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -crosshair 5261.79541 1688.11560 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -crosshair 5258.82812 1686.37305 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44205 23 57 25.60 -07 27 43.8          11.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44180 23 57 25.61 -07 27 43.6          11.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44229 23 57 25.59 -07 27 44.0          11.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 17.4420*  23 57 25.60 -07 27 43.8  11.3 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9420,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4420 11.28CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 17.4420  2461300.9420  11.95  23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3
 70.50204 -69.45716 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0     -1       1  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3:  15.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -crosshair 6853.91699 5558.28125 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -crosshair 6850.85498 5556.42041 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44205 23 44 54.11 -13 41 02.3          11.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44180 23 44 54.13 -13 41 02.2          11.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44229 23 44 54.09 -13 41 02.4          12.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 17.4420*  23 44 54.11 -13 41 02.3  11.9 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9420,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4420 11.95CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 17.4420  2461300.9420  13.26  00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3
 88.73892 -70.93406 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0      0       0  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -crosshair 3518.17188 3707.34741 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -crosshair 3515.23462 3705.65552 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44205 00 08 19.62 -10 58 55.3          13.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44180 00 08 19.64 -10 58 55.0          13.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 17.44229 00 08 19.61 -10 58 55.6          13.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 17.4420*  00 08 19.62 -10 58 55.3  13.3 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9420,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4420 13.26CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461300.94229372 17.09.2026 10:36:44.177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4230
Objects passed selection criteria:  4227
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3794.25
Average stars matched: 3707.5 (97.7136 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Sep 17 05:38:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461300.94229372 17.09.2026 10:36:44.177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 174
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  22486
Objects passed selection criteria:  22431
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 20584
Average stars matched: 19680.5 (95.6107 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   246204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Sep 17 05:39:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 778910 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 778910 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1567.1137
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 458.2169
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1561.1791
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 458.9844
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.0474
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-17T05:36:01.3668991' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-17T10:36:01.3668991' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61300.441682477 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-17T10:36:11.2689477' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61300.4417970832 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999951005106 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99974554336597 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     23.3386111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     239.183055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.51103905959225 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               907.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)

Spent 0.470032 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-17T05:36:44.1771790' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-17T10:36:44.1771790' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61300.4421779746 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-17T10:36:54.0825267' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61300.4422926158 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999950979921 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99974554632264 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     23.2133333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             239.3125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.52366976204743 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               907.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)

Spent 0.468172 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.94179822
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gbv3Gs6hSQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HLBHQBsBhO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fK6Lo0xYiI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9F2uvFSkGa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.82

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.82

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.8 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Gbv3Gs6hSQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HLBHQBsBhO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fK6Lo0xYiI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=178, bad_region=0, passed=3249
Got 3249 stars (including 3071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3249 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6378 through 0 to 8.1602, gap 8.1602 to 351.6378
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2988 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6376
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2988 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 2986 stars left (next iteration limit 3284)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2986 robust_rms=12.149 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.254 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2986 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2986 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2986 robust_rms_before=1.152 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=2986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=722 n_q2=801 n_q3=674 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9F2uvFSkGa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=184, bad_region=0, passed=3306
Got 3306 stars (including 3116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3306 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6379 through 0 to 8.1602, gap 8.1602 to 351.6379
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3034 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6377
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3034 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3032 stars left (next iteration limit 3335)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3032 robust_rms=11.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3032 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3032 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3032 robust_rms_before=1.150 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.337 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.363
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=3032 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=709 n_q2=830 n_q3=716 n_q4=777 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.105
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083_astrometric_residuals.png (2986 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (3032 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3:  15.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8:  15.37 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20317.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20285_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 20285_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 20317_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    10.04    00:02:07.38 -14:40:33.2   4294 5984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.37 -14:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    10.53    00:13:45.96 -07:48:34.7   2810 1753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.95 -07:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8
23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:57.369 -10:00:33.24
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:56.112 -10:00:42.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v9VBXFnpU0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lfLrEiZZRJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WN608aDiMB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mDfe7MauNb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 152 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  13.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.v9VBXFnpU0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lfLrEiZZRJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WN608aDiMB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=455, bad_region=32, passed=18208
Got 18208 stars (including 17691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5997 through 0 to 8.1629, gap 8.1629 to 351.5997
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5995 through 0 to 8.1633, gap 8.1633 to 351.5995
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=11.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.570 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.366 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mDfe7MauNb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=484, bad_region=35, passed=18704
Got 18704 stars (including 18153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5996 through 0 to 8.1602, gap 8.1602 to 351.5996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5994 through 0 to 8.1606, gap 8.1606 to 351.5994
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=10.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4853 robust_rms_before=1.156 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.385
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1256 n_q2=1298 n_q3=1138 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:28.05 -08:53:58.8:  14.03 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:28.05 -08:53:58.8:  14.26 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:28.05 -08:53:58.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2790 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.71 -07:36:47.7:  12.84 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.63 -05:38:19.7:  12.78 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.8:  13.26 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.71 -07:36:47.7:  13.03 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.71 -07:36:47.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1975 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.63 -05:38:19.7:  12.97 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.8:  13.22 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.63 -05:38:19.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3602 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5062 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.96 -06:55:29.1:  13.37 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.96 -06:55:29.1:  13.41 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.96 -06:55:29.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5067 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.24 -09:01:10.9:  13.65 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:24.94 -07:01:49.2:  14.44 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.35 -08:18:31.4:  14.49 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:42.99 -13:59:25.6:  14.09 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:04:28.44 -05:15:43.9:  14.84 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:49:53.25 -04:55:01.0:  14.78 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.6:  14.37 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.24 -09:01:10.9:  13.81 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:24.94 -07:01:49.2:  14.55 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.24 -09:01:10.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8691 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:24.94 -07:01:49.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2182 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:42.99 -13:59:25.6:  14.48 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.35 -08:18:31.4:  14.41 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:04:28.44 -05:15:43.9:  14.57 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.35 -08:18:31.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2246 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.99 -13:59:25.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8441 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:28.44 -05:15:43.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3430 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:49:53.25 -04:55:01.0:  14.64 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:53.25 -04:55:01.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2558 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.6:  14.33 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3672 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:04.46 -09:33:55.6:  14.53 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:04.46 -09:33:55.6:  14.41 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:18.31 -09:41:11.2:  14.68 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:04.46 -09:33:55.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1092 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:18.31 -09:41:11.2:  14.83 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:18.31 -09:41:11.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4084 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32708.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32354_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32354_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.17    23:55:28.08 -08:53:58.7   5496 2571   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.53    23:55:28.01 -08:53:58.9   5494 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.19    00:07:52.65 -14:45:36.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    10.24    00:31:08.25 -10:28:36.4   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32384_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32384_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    10.12    00:27:11.59 -13:30:03.0   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.45    23:59:09.44 -05:39:19.2   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.36    23:57:25.58 -07:27:44.1   5259 1686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  23:57:25.59 -07:27:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.25    00:10:55.24 -12:27:52.0   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32428_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32428_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.51    00:19:12.77 -06:38:38.1   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32444_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32444_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.74    23:54:17.34 -07:26:55.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32451_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32451_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.55    00:00:38.55 -15:05:17.3   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32457_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.01    00:04:01.98 -07:48:56.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32459_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.01    23:38:04.17 -06:47:28.6   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32464_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32464_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.82    23:44:54.09 -13:41:02.5   6851 5556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32474_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32474_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.13    00:29:36.39 -05:19:58.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.25    00:01:09.43 -04:54:43.7   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32502_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32502_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    11.74    23:55:12.93 -13:38:31.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32517_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.43    00:05:10.83 -05:41:48.5   4166 0550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  00:05:10.85 -05:41:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32535_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32535_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.34    00:25:56.71 -09:12:24.0   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.36    00:04:27.38 -12:58:20.8   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.56    23:59:54.02 -09:18:06.2   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.57    00:29:22.30 -12:29:13.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32563_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32563_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.82    00:21:12.40 -06:42:23.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32565_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32565_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.48    00:30:33.44 -12:08:41.3   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32566_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32566_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.44    00:29:53.84 -12:57:31.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32577_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32577_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.85    00:25:59.48 -05:25:07.7   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32579_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32579_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.42    00:05:53.53 -13:04:17.6   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32584_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32584_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.66    00:06:40.77 -11:56:35.5   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32589_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32589_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.43    00:26:12.16 -14:02:39.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32594_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32594_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.81    00:26:43.83 -06:43:46.3   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32599_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32599_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.94    23:34:15.90 -06:04:34.3   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32601_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32601_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.88    00:24:55.90 -08:46:57.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32607_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32607_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.87    00:22:48.84 -09:40:44.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32612_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32612_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.92    00:27:06.86 -10:28:46.0   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32615_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32615_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.91    00:31:09.57 -07:32:02.7   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32619_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.78    23:30:44.58 -09:59:20.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32622_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32622_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.01    00:30:21.80 -08:40:58.6   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32625_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32625_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.01    23:31:37.36 -07:49:41.2   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32627_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32627_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.79    00:29:31.02 -11:18:09.8   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32636_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32636_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.17    00:11:34.25 -06:05:53.1   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32640_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32640_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.78    23:30:36.33 -14:16:51.9   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.14    23:35:20.69 -07:09:24.0   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.09    23:31:13.96 -08:02:36.1   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32656_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32656_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.04    23:28:59.80 -14:03:41.8   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32663_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32663_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    13.20    23:48:06.73 -07:36:47.0   6645 1869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.19    23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.3   6642 1868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32677_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32677_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    12.92    00:30:40.15 -10:33:34.4   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32678_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32678_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.13    00:20:10.45 -05:28:38.7   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32679_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32679_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.07    00:10:00.34 -14:12:03.0   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32684_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32684_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.35    23:38:49.51 -07:11:58.8   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32688_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32688_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.09    23:35:22.28 -13:57:14.3   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32690_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32690_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.28    23:55:16.05 -05:05:25.3   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32691_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32691_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.31    00:26:41.65 -07:14:23.9   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32695_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32695_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.11    00:20:49.73 -14:28:01.4   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32697_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32697_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.20    23:55:12.03 -07:21:01.1   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32708_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 32708_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32714_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32714_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.22    00:16:30.09 -11:57:47.9   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32715_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32715_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.35    00:30:31.11 -07:18:54.5   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32725_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32725_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    13.46    23:51:01.65 -05:38:19.4   6293 0649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.29    23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.1   6290 0647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32727_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32727_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    13.44    23:52:48.91 -06:31:09.1   5988 1164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.59    23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.6   5985 1162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32732_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32732_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.03    23:36:43.58 -11:24:30.6   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32733_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32733_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.40    23:42:58.97 -07:22:48.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32734_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32734_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.39    00:24:47.87 -06:50:53.3   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32736_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32736_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.37    00:26:09.35 -12:38:39.5   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32745_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32745_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.15    00:24:02.99 -15:06:05.1   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32751_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32751_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.51    00:06:14.04 -09:10:29.0   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32755_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32755_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.19    00:18:45.43 -14:15:49.8   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32756_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32756_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.16    23:32:17.98 -05:44:45.1   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32758_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32758_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.17    23:30:44.71 -10:59:24.6   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32763_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32763_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.55    23:58:04.36 -07:34:46.5   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32767_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32767_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.07    23:51:49.64 -12:38:20.0   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32786_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32786_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.29    23:30:59.27 -09:44:16.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32789_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32789_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.31    23:36:08.51 -14:18:22.0   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32790_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.51    00:09:18.75 -10:56:33.0   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32793_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32793_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.63    23:37:28.35 -06:18:44.2   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32796_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32796_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.43    23:46:37.94 -08:56:34.3   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32800_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32800_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    13.64    23:44:45.01 -06:55:31.0   7179 1489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.43    23:44:44.92 -06:55:27.1   7176 1486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32817_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32817_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.77    23:36:20.02 -06:08:44.6   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32824_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32824_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.05    00:14:49.82 -07:38:11.6   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32836_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32836_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.34    23:48:59.48 -12:13:28.4   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32842_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32842_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.69    23:32:08.24 -10:35:34.7   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32843_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32843_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.31    00:12:03.26 -15:01:53.5   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32844_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32844_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.93    23:28:56.53 -12:25:12.8   9278 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32845_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32845_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.78    23:36:23.98 -11:00:39.3   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32850_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32850_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.37    00:26:18.68 -14:26:17.3   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32858_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32858_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.72    00:24:32.37 -10:49:29.4   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32865_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32865_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.27    23:33:26.29 -05:11:37.0   8973 0554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32871_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32871_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.65    00:31:18.11 -08:25:18.8   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32876_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32876_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.44    23:36:51.50 -10:52:39.5   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32877_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32877_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.86    23:41:18.34 -05:56:40.8   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32882_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.93    00:24:06.38 -05:50:09.0   1306 0473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32887_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32887_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.79    00:22:49.73 -11:07:22.7   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32899_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32899_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.83    00:11:04.17 -08:13:03.5   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32903_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32903_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.59    00:08:51.16 -05:13:45.7   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32907_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32907_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.70    23:37:31.48 -11:03:23.9   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32911_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32911_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.27    00:31:03.67 -07:55:48.0   0195 1697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32912_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32912_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.76    23:41:18.20 -11:34:24.1   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32913_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32913_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.43    23:48:41.95 -14:46:54.6   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32914_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32914_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.15    23:33:49.39 -05:19:46.7   8907 0633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32916_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32916_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.23    00:25:24.28 -05:50:40.8   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32917_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32917_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.65    00:06:08.59 -09:57:57.1   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32918_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32918_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.78    00:18:16.38 -13:27:48.4   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32920_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32920_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.79    00:29:22.13 -08:44:29.1   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32921_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32921_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.70    23:44:05.98 -06:23:17.3   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32925_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32925_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.90    00:10:04.93 -08:22:36.7   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32928_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32928_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.64    00:08:56.15 -14:35:49.1   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32934_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32934_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.92    00:03:32.33 -06:19:42.8   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32938_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32938_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.85    23:55:51.29 -11:45:32.6   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32950_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.76    23:36:24.99 -13:16:32.8   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32955_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32955_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.43    00:25:16.45 -08:24:14.0   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32958_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32958_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.11    23:59:34.34 -08:56:49.1   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32964_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32964_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.76    23:55:57.68 -09:48:55.9   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32965_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.75    23:38:51.44 -10:57:36.9   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32973_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32973_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.04    00:00:47.26 -09:01:11.2   4703 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.76    00:00:47.22 -09:01:10.5   4700 2592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32975_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32975_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.12    23:37:24.97 -07:01:52.0   8278 1630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.39    23:37:24.91 -07:01:46.3   8275 1627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32979_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32979_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.25    00:28:36.11 -07:43:12.3   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32987_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32987_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    13.88    00:30:43.03 -13:59:27.0   0104 5391   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.82    00:30:42.95 -13:59:24.2   0101 5389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32994_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32994_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.14    23:43:59.37 -08:18:30.8   7230 2331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.37    23:43:59.32 -08:18:32.0   7227 2329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.29    00:04:28.46 -05:15:43.8   4290 0295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.42    00:04:28.42 -05:15:43.9   4287 0293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32999_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 32999_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.30    23:32:17.56 -09:30:29.1   8924 3185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33001_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33001_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.91    00:02:58.94 -11:18:04.5   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33002_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33002_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.87    00:23:06.33 -15:08:35.3   1203 6128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33003_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.88    00:18:00.69 -11:01:57.3   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33006_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33006_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.26    23:49:53.23 -04:55:00.6   6496 0222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.25    23:49:53.26 -04:55:01.3   6493 0220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.11    00:22:32.79 -06:51:49.3   1516 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33010_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33010_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.37    23:41:53.89 -05:33:13.4   7672 0688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.36    23:41:53.99 -05:33:11.8   7669 0685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33011_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33011_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.82    00:13:47.56 -14:22:21.9   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33012_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33012_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.30    23:48:53.93 -06:37:18.3   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33015_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33015_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.08    23:46:00.79 -05:58:20.0   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33018_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33018_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.61    23:55:08.38 -08:02:38.9   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33021_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33021_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.03    23:59:07.51 -11:01:45.4   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33023_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33023_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.14    00:28:04.47 -09:33:57.8   0613 2713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.09    00:28:04.45 -09:33:53.4   0610 2710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33027_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33027_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.84    00:12:36.37 -12:01:20.7   2849 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33030_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33030_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.21    00:10:32.80 -11:53:20.5   3157 4234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33047_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.26    23:34:17.58 -14:30:38.4   8375 6190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33048_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33048_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.92    00:22:02.14 -11:10:39.2   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33055_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33055_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.17    00:24:29.44 -08:34:58.5   1177 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33056_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33056_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.93    23:41:17.01 -13:17:27.3   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.37    23:30:26.95 -08:17:54.9   9266 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33066_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33066_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.37    23:32:33.66 -11:06:50.4   8802 4153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33068_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33068_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.69    00:25:05.13 -13:50:18.5   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33069_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33069_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.20    23:43:50.84 -09:17:46.0   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33074_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33074_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.38    23:56:54.03 -10:15:20.7   5228 3369   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33081_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.38    23:59:20.94 -09:47:35.6   4884 3069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33085_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33085_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 17.44180    2461300.94180    14.30    23:57:18.38 -09:41:10.9   5193 3026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.67    23:57:18.25 -09:41:11.5   5190 3024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33089_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33089_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.29    23:46:52.75 -11:54:08.4   6638 4460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33097_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.14    23:35:50.95 -12:28:21.7   8244 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33112_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33112_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    13.96    23:55:30.38 -12:50:56.4   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33122_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33122_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.08    23:42:24.46 -13:42:58.2   7216 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.10    00:17:02.78 -12:54:58.3   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33131_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33131_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.10    23:44:09.12 -11:56:09.7   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33141_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 33141_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    14.35    23:57:40.11 -12:51:12.3   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    9.98    00:02:07.37 -14:40:33.3   4294 5984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.36 -14:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 17.44229    2461300.94229    10.62    00:13:45.96 -07:48:34.7   2810 1753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053719_TTUQ1b1x1_3705580_xyxxBnXZ/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-36-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.95 -07:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8
23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3
00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3
########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8
23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3
00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3
###################################################################################
23:57:25.60 -07:27:43.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:44:54.11 -13:41:02.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:08:19.62 -10:58:55.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461300.94179822 -observatory V36
12:39:02.48 -04:15:45.4 Mercury (-0.4mag)
13:58:18.09 -17:58:03.1 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:40:53.76 +22:12:49.8 Mars (1.2mag)
09:17:12.04 +16:22:32.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:49:12.78 +02:21:08.5 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:37.79 +21:01:51.6 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:45.38 -00:09:51.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:58.06 -23:41:36.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
16:23:06.01 -26:55:56.6 Moon (-10.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 17 05:38 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461300.94179822:
09:17:18.62 +16:21:59.6 Io (6.0mag)
09:17:16.61 +16:22:10.2 Europa (6.2mag)
09:16:59.01 +16:23:41.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:17:28.35 +16:21:09.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:15:23.69 +16:42:46.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:17:16.30 +16:22:12.2 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:14:51.94 +16:36:56.2 Elara (17.7mag)
09:20:48.03 +15:47:28.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:17:32.77 +16:43:07.9 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:23.80 +02:20:41.5 Titan (8.3mag)
00:49:13.33 +02:20:47.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:48:58.85 +02:22:08.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:48:59.15 +02:21:22.8 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:47:49.56 +02:10:01.0 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 17 05:38 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461300.94179822:
23:29:32.56 +10:55:07.6 JWST
16:59:13.84 +41:35:04.6 Chandra
13:03:43.08 -62:21:40.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 17 05:38 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461300.94179822 -observatory V36
03:45:15.75 +19:44:54.3 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:07:24.89 -34:00:57.9 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:26:44.23 -70:53:08.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:32.74 +33:58:13.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:02:38.47 +46:47:30.8 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:05:43.85 +27:21:52.9 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:17:26.09 +25:47:44.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:58:47.07 +26:53:12.8 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:54:59.49 +05:10:32.5 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:36.86 -16:32:06.8 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:46:47.54 +33:34:00.4 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:08:15.43 +15:12:49.3 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:28:30.73 +42:43:32.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:13:06.61 +48:37:00.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:40:25.20 -13:11:08.5 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:14:27.74 +16:27:40.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:40.21 +17:57:48.1 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:28:16.82 -00:42:50.3 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:11:23.05 +72:10:22.9 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:59:29.09 +45:41:05.5 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:22:46.02 +12:06:50.2 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:34:36.67 -35:08:26.9 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:35:16.43 +38:46:31.7 17.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:55:00.73 -06:14:40.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:28:59.73 -08:16:03.6 17.8mag 63P/Wild
06:58:13.75 +18:24:36.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:07.74 +15:01:41.1 17.3mag 88P/Howell
06:12:43.98 +32:25:17.7 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:01:04.92 +22:01:40.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:50:17.88 +18:40:24.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:09:20.42 -24:47:53.7 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:29:06.46 +20:17:42.1 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:37:58.28 -15:29:03.0 14.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:32:34.16 +08:39:13.7 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:56.50 +07:31:00.1 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:14:24.10 +39:19:32.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:58:20.33 +34:32:24.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:32:15.05 -01:22:37.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:36:23.75 +16:20:13.6 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 17 05:38 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 17 05:38 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 17 05:38 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:15:50.170 -00:21:47.12  AT 2026zta  2026-08-18.74 22.24
02:46:12.842 +06:11:52.33  AT 2026zsz  2026-08-23.78 19.3
22:38:13.667 +15:06:36.55  AT 2026zsy  2026-08-19.88 18.99
16:29:10.420 +50:17:23.09  SN 2026zsx  2026-08-23.92 18.643
00:30:37.105 +16:40:45.90  AT 2026zsw  2026-08-22.04 19.582
00:15:59.164 +45:15:18.02  AT 2026zsv  2026-08-15.37 21.2462
18:01:12.850 +23:06:59.14  AT 2026zsu  2026-08-12.17 20.552
16:34:01.788 +10:33:21.97  AT 2026zst  2026-08-05.18 20.8897
07:35:51.970 +14:30:02.34  AT 2026zss  2026-08-23.51 19.3532
12:34:19.746 +36:30:42.03  AT 2026zsr  2026-08-18.15 16.215
13:54:24.090 +08:32:46.11  AT 2026zsq  2026-08-17.15 19.6164
14:02:03.482 +00:12:24.13  AT 2026zsp  2026-08-18.15 20.1377
14:26:57.209 +16:14:29.77  AT 2026zso  2026-08-18.15 19.8733
15:19:36.047 +10:32:58.31  AT 2026zsn  2026-08-24.15 19.7907
14:53:08.508 -01:21:20.01  AT 2026zsm  2026-08-06.17 20.2832
23:26:24.962 -03:37:54.53  AT 2026zsl  2026-08-22.08 20.35
23:49:47.831 -44:13:09.26  AT 2026zsk  2026-08-23.60 17.63
03:00:56.094 +06:15:25.68  SN 2026zsj  2026-08-14.49 20.5067
01:07:44.807 +15:37:35.66  AT 2026zsi  2026-08-16.46 21.3122
01:56:39.058 -03:54:29.73  AT 2026zsh  2026-08-18.46 20.8101
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 17 05:38 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Sep 17 05:38:01 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 20s (0.33 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 39s (0.65 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 28s (0.47 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q1b1x1: 78s (1.30 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 82s (1.37 min)
Finished: Thu Sep 17 05:39:23 CDT 2026