This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4170 2461300.9170 12.51 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0
69.14597 -8.29744 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J203644.28+270159.2
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.477 g Y 2.327 g 2458359.77060 457.760339800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203644.28+270159.2,2461300.9170,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203644.28+270159.2 20260917.4170 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4170 2461300.9170 12.34 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6
82.81568 -13.75299 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.724+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9170,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4170 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4170 2461300.9170 11.63 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2
68.26327 -10.14548 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J2041031+251404
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.422 R1 Y 0.522 R1 254.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2041031+251404,2461300.9170,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2041031+251404 20260917.4170 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4170 2461300.9170 12.94 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9
82.68519 -13.65536 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.724+/-0.026 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9170,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4170 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4170 2461300.9170 12.77 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9
82.77679 -13.76299 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.543+/-0.034 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9170,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4170 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461300.91733258 17.09.2026 10:00:47.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30013
Objects passed selection criteria: 29793
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18001.8
Average stars matched: 17434.2 (96.8475 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 05:02:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461300.91733258 17.09.2026 10:00:47.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 79
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 210230
Objects passed selection criteria: 209424
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 133074
Average stars matched: 126624 (95.1531 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 669648 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 05:03:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.91670303
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 942.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:55.957 +29:58:19.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 20:59:55.957 +29:58:19.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93
Second-epoch second image center 20:59:55.957 +29:58:19.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SB9WWefN2i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvQmqaTC6P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vOUjn4tFS9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O3lEaJNxfy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec +24.4805 to +35.2437 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec 24.4805 to 35.2437 deg
Loaded 23048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16593 out of 18147 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18147 out of 32492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.721900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.721900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec +24.4805 to +35.2437 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec 24.4805 to 35.2437 deg
Loaded 23048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16593 out of 18147 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18147 out of 32492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 32141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.5305 to 324.5114 deg, Dec +24.4935 to +35.2596 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.5305 to 324.5114 deg, Dec 24.4935 to 35.2596 deg
Loaded 23070 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16511 out of 18056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18056 out of 32141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SB9WWefN2i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3057, bad_region=0, passed=32492
Got 32492 stars (including 29403 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1333 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JvQmqaTC6P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3111, bad_region=0, passed=32140
Got 32140 stars (including 29003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1331 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vOUjn4tFS9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=148, bad_region=0, passed=3860
Got 3860 stars (including 3707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3860 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3661 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3663 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 3596 stars left (next iteration limit 3955)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3596 robust_rms=4.921 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=80.859 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3596 robust_rms=0.705 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3596 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3596 robust_rms_before=1.388 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.656 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.598
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.656 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=3596 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=429 n_q2=1049 n_q3=244 n_q4=1874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O3lEaJNxfy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=150, bad_region=0, passed=3991
Got 3991 stars (including 3835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 3720 stars left (next iteration limit 4093)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3720 robust_rms=5.023 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=86.136 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3720 robust_rms=0.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.712 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3720 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.618 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3720 robust_rms_before=1.335 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.567 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.686 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.618
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:55.889 +29:58:19.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3991 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3364393.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.335 -> 0.515 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 3720 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3551 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 3551 pairs (3720 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3551 robust_rms=4.786 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=87.745 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3551 robust_rms=0.641 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.699 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3551 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3551 robust_rms_before=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.610 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.609
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:55.889 +29:58:19.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3991 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3364506.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.510 -> 0.509 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=3551 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=355 n_q2=1120 n_q3=243 n_q4=1833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.539 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.590 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new1=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.551 worst_q_ratio=1.318
new2=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.512 worst_q_ratio=1.219
reference average sigma_overall=0.5645 worst_q_ratio=1.1945
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (3596 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3551 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52180_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52180_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:23.06 +25:49:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02967_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 02967_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:44.12 +25:44:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 942.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:55.889 +29:58:19.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 20:59:55.889 +29:58:19.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:59:53.499 +29:58:54.93
Second-epoch second image center 20:59:55.889 +29:58:19.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01319 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bY60ImkthT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yBlhLJLmKM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dxr7nNewGM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MOKuQZeg1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 229888 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec +24.4686 to +35.2504 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec 24.4686 to 35.2504 deg
Loaded 23152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12712 out of 18800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18800 out of 229888 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 229888 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec +24.4686 to +35.2504 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec 24.4686 to 35.2504 deg
Loaded 23152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12712 out of 18800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18800 out of 229888 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 233857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4658 to 324.5196 deg, Dec +24.4841 to +35.2641 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4658 to 324.5196 deg, Dec 24.4841 to 35.2641 deg
Loaded 23175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12668 out of 18746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18746 out of 233857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.1 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.4 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bY60ImkthT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=56, blended=37082, bad_region=2, passed=229832
Got 229832 stars (including 192479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 229832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1329 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yBlhLJLmKM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=14, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=37728, bad_region=2, passed=233767
Got 233767 stars (including 195764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 233767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1337 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Dxr7nNewGM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1506, bad_region=35, passed=35028
Got 35028 stars (including 33391 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=5.907 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=59.109 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.717 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=1.348 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.551 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.694 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.616
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.348 -> 0.500 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4850 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4658 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4658 pairs (4850 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4658 robust_rms=5.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=63.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4658 robust_rms=0.696 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4658 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.601 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4658 robust_rms_before=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.601
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.493 -> 0.493 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=4658 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=665 n_q2=1280 n_q3=381 n_q4=2332 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MOKuQZeg1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1610, bad_region=35, passed=36372
Got 36372 stars (including 34671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=5.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=77.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.730 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.622 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.620
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.622 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=589 n_q2=1443 n_q3=373 n_q4=2446 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-59-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_050134_TTUQ1b1x1_3355835_zQMIscVv/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:35:05.75 +28:26:22.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:51:07.98 +27:02:08.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:34:11.78 +31:07:01.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:42:59.29 +25:35:20.5: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:37:54.28 +31:36:37.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:37:13.46 +31:24:16.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:40:41.55 +29:01:17.0: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:18.61 +31:43:08.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:30:17.10 +29:32:07.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:40:41.55 +29:01:17.0: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:51:07.98 +27:02:08.3: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:37:54.28 +31:36:37.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:18.61 +31:43:08.4: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:35:05.75 +28:26:22.2: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:30:17.10 +29:32:07.5: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:37:13.46 +31:24:16.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:42:59.29 +25:35:20.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.55 +29:01:17.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9202 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:34:11.78 +31:07:01.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:18.61 +31:43:08.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5620 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:07.98 +27:02:08.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8274 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:54.28 +31:36:37.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8956 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:05.75 +28:26:22.2: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9228 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:17.10 +29:32:07.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1732 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.29 +25:35:20.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7678 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:13.46 +31:24:16.6: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7430 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:11.78 +31:07:01.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3243 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:28:21.26 +31:30:51.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:52.49 +32:31:56.7: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:28:46.73 +32:29:29.7: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:29:55.61 +30:33:49.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:39:05.82 +30:22:03.2: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:24:51.55 +26:58:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:43:15.69 +27:15:16.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:28:21.26 +31:30:51.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:52.49 +32:31:56.7: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:28:46.73 +32:29:29.7: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:21.26 +31:30:51.5: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0449 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:39:05.82 +30:22:03.2: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:43:15.69 +27:15:16.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:24:51.55 +26:58:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:51.55 +26:58:44.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:52.49 +32:31:56.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5842 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:29:55.61 +30:33:49.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:46.73 +32:29:29.7: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9967 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:15.69 +27:15:16.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4709 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:05.82 +30:22:03.2: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6691 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:55.61 +30:33:49.2: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5779 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:25:01.03 +26:32:04.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:36:52.01 +31:42:27.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:25:01.03 +26:32:04.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:01.03 +26:32:04.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:36:52.01 +31:42:27.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:52.01 +31:42:27.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7590 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:39:42.86 +31:36:06.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:37:38.65 +31:00:11.8: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:28:58.87 +34:54:12.3: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:27:21.36 +28:20:03.9: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:36:32.24 +26:24:26.2: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:37:27.74 +30:58:34.6: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:37:38.65 +31:00:11.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:39:42.86 +31:36:06.9: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:38.65 +31:00:11.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8518 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:28:58.87 +34:54:12.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:27:21.36 +28:20:03.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:42.86 +31:36:06.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9607 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:58.87 +34:54:12.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1277 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:21.36 +28:20:03.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8943 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:36:32.24 +26:24:26.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:32.24 +26:24:26.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9791 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:27.30 +33:37:23.2: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:37:27.74 +30:58:34.6: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:27.74 +30:58:34.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0444 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:38:31.49 +29:43:54.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:27.30 +33:37:23.2: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:36:27.30 +33:37:23.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6267 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:38:31.49 +29:43:54.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:31.49 +29:43:54.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5541 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:36.17 +34:11:03.3: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:36:44.28 +27:01:58.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5037 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:36:43.93 +33:33:06.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3357 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:41:03.28 +25:14:02.2: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6293 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:36.17 +34:11:03.3: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:36.17 +34:11:03.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0466 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:36:09.02 +33:37:22.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:35:58.10 +33:32:06.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8821 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:36:38.02 +33:31:06.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7656 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:36:09.02 +33:37:22.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:09.02 +33:37:22.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9065 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out265102.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out181478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182643.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263664_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263664_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:59.45 +33:30:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263671_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263671_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263682_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263682_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263688_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263688_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263693_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263693_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263695_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263695_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263696_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263696_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263697_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263697_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263700_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263700_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263709_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263709_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:05.95 +25:04:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263712_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263712_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263713_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263713_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:08.16 +32:57:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263719_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263719_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263720_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263720_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263779_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263779_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:32.27 +25:13:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263948_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263948_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263973_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 263973_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264000_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264000_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264016_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264016_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:22.52 +31:09:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264208_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264208_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:57.17 +30:08:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264340_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264340_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264359_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264359_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264367_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264367_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:03.15 +30:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264370_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264370_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:33.35 +26:12:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264374_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264374_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:50.64 +29:00:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264467_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264467_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:17.87 +33:33:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264489_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264489_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264501_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264501_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264513_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264513_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:30.95 +34:12:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264521_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264521_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:33.68 +32:32:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264539_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264539_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264548_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264548_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:50.44 +26:32:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264661_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264661_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:14.64 +25:47:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264670_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264670_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264683_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264683_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264698_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264698_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:19.70 +27:50:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264707_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264707_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264761_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264761_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:13.88 +34:20:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264764_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264764_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:07.61 +25:41:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264774_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 264774_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:00.64 +33:04:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265071_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 265071_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:37.44 +29:44:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265102_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 265102_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:36:27.30 +33:37:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.641 1950200926629154688 324.11333142200 +33.62281720060 14.3430 13.7523 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.641#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265112_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 265112_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265141_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 265141_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18343_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 18343_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:44.11 +25:44:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125278_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 125278_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:01.24 +30:39:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247254_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247254_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:14.66 +25:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44410_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 44410_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181478_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 181478_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19771_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 19771_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:23.06 +25:49:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10511_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 10511_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217191_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 217191_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100572_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 100572_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:33.54 +29:27:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27393_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 27393_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:12.33 +26:12:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22428_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 22428_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182393_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 182393_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182643_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 182643_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 172619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180347_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 180347_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12433_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 12433_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_05-00-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
