This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4072 2461300.9072 12.84 07:15:12.78 +16:00:38.7
201.11124 12.37762 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:12.78 +16:00:38.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:12.78 +16:00:38.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9072,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4072 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4072 2461300.9072 13.29 07:28:46.95 +12:45:42.8
205.56342 13.97742 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis -1 1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:28:46.95 +12:45:42.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:28:46.95 +12:45:42.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9072,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4072 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4072 2461300.9072 13.21 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6
199.23283 13.70185 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 1 1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9072,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4072 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461300.90753657 17.09.2026 09:46:41.160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24841
Objects passed selection criteria: 24802
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20355
Average stars matched: 19978.8 (98.1516 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:49:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461300.90753657 17.09.2026 09:46:41.160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 89 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 168178
Objects passed selection criteria: 167781
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 140743
Average stars matched: 137603 (97.7692 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 638800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:52:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.90686809
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:56.871 +13:59:55.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:56.871 +13:59:55.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0611 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:56.871 +13:59:55.03
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01331 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6bsyJXFwQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t57LeBKFFB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DMHc8NtJW5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qgARw4Vl35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.0 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.6bsyJXFwQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t57LeBKFFB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DMHc8NtJW5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=644, bad_region=0, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 13046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=8.585 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.774 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.835 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.385 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.311
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:56.866 +13:59:54.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13701 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2910121.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.835 -> 0.294 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4769 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4573 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4573 pairs (4769 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=8.025 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4573 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.306 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:56.866 +13:59:54.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13701 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2910600.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.290 -> 0.289 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4573 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4573 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=4573 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1232 n_q3=923 n_q4=1147 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qgARw4Vl35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=665, bad_region=0, passed=13880
Got 13880 stars (including 13207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=9.199 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.118 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=0.858 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.364 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1358 n_q2=1260 n_q3=981 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.080
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4573 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.78 +16:09:06.5: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.78 +16:09:06.5: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.78 +16:09:06.5: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1615 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:12.96 +09:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.20 +10:57:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30941_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30941_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.40 +17:58:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30942_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30942_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:04.49 +18:15:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 31098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.70 +10:45:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31168_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 31168_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.65 +12:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 31172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31194_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 31194_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:39.84 +10:58:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31262_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 31262_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.59 +10:01:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.35 +11:44:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:56.866 +13:59:54.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:56.866 +13:59:54.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0611 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:56.866 +13:59:54.36
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:54.467 +14:00:27.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01343 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1FGr4JsUou
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ORQLs5h0p1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9aJkfTvgdY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.18B5MX4N1a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 109 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1FGr4JsUou (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ORQLs5h0p1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9aJkfTvgdY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=6897, bad_region=26, passed=91037
Got 91037 stars (including 84026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=8.976 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.315 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.315 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1327 n_q2=1256 n_q3=978 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.18B5MX4N1a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=6978, bad_region=31, passed=92473
Got 92473 stars (including 85368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=9.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.105 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.410 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.851 -> 0.299 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4781 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4573 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4573 pairs (4781 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=9.081 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.579 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4573 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4573 robust_rms_before=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.332 vs 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4573 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4573 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4573 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1281 n_q2=1190 n_q3=952 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-45-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_044719_TTUQ1b1x1_2844676_te1363EN/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:34.30 +14:35:31.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:15.99 +14:03:42.9: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:22.34 +15:52:40.7: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:29.04 +11:03:58.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.71 +12:16:30.5: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:32.27 +15:28:42.7: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:09.6: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:28.37 +13:27:48.2: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:43.06 +15:03:37.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:34.30 +14:35:31.7: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:32.27 +15:28:42.7: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:09.6: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:22.34 +15:52:40.7: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:34.30 +14:35:31.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4425 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.71 +12:16:30.5: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:15.99 +14:03:42.9: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:29.04 +11:03:58.0: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:32.27 +15:28:42.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5695 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.71 +12:16:30.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6082 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:09.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5659 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:15.99 +14:03:42.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4934 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:22.34 +15:52:40.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3718 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:29.04 +11:03:58.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0680 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:28.37 +13:27:48.2: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:28.37 +13:27:48.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3882 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:43.06 +15:03:37.8: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:43.06 +15:03:37.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4190 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:12.79 +09:36:30.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:38.39 +14:33:32.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.37 +16:15:50.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.03 +16:15:57.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.77 +16:09:06.7: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:12.79 +09:36:30.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:38.39 +14:33:32.4: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:12.79 +09:36:30.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7339 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.37 +16:15:50.3: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:38.39 +14:33:32.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0874 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.37 +16:15:50.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4428 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.03 +16:15:57.3: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.03 +16:15:57.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1829 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.77 +16:09:06.7: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.77 +16:09:06.7: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1765 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:30.3: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:12.78 +16:00:38.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:28:27.80 +17:21:40.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:30.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:30.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4142 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:12.78 +16:00:38.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:28:27.80 +17:21:40.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:27.80 +17:21:40.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8676 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:37.27 +13:03:22.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:43.96 +18:19:26.9: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:37.27 +13:03:22.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.27 +13:03:22.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0039 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:43.96 +18:19:26.9: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:43.96 +18:19:26.9: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0024 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:35.52 +15:19:06.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:08.15 +14:38:43.1: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:28:46.95 +12:45:42.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:08.15 +14:38:43.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:08.15 +14:38:43.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1748 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:35.52 +15:19:06.2: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:35.52 +15:19:06.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1024 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:28:46.95 +12:45:42.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:35:55.48 +14:11:47.6: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:27.95 +12:48:56.9: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:17:02.58 +18:13:36.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.2040 delta=1.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:27.95 +12:48:56.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:35:55.48 +14:11:47.6: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:27.95 +12:48:56.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2548 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:55.48 +14:11:47.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0098 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:23.72 +17:08:09.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:44.72 +18:02:57.4: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:19.41 +09:39:38.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:23.72 +17:08:09.3: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:23.72 +17:08:09.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3969 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:44.72 +18:02:57.4: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:44.72 +18:02:57.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2670 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:19.41 +09:39:38.1: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:19.41 +09:39:38.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5714 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:02.29 +12:10:33.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:02.29 +12:10:33.5: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:02.29 +12:10:33.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4877 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:26.21 +13:39:15.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:22.79 +11:38:52.9: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:26.21 +13:39:15.4: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:26.21 +13:39:15.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5495 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:22.79 +11:38:52.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:22.79 +11:38:52.9: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6459 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:40.87 +13:26:12.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:53.73 +10:50:42.2: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:40.87 +13:26:12.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:40.87 +13:26:12.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0456 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:53.73 +10:50:42.2: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:53.73 +10:50:42.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5326 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out228766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229392.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227498_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227498_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:01.44 +09:50:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:01.55 +14:47:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.79 +17:52:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227518_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227518_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:58.80 +12:32:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:58.75 +16:17:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227539_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227539_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227542_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227542_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:24.96 +12:53:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227543_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227543_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:18.96 +15:32:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.91 +11:00:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227556_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227556_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227557_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227557_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:50.96 +16:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227558_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227558_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:46.65 +17:48:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227560_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227560_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227565_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227565_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:10.95 +18:24:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227566_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227566_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.11 +16:43:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227568_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227568_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.40 +17:58:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227735_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227735_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.78 +16:09:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227801_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227801_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227898_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 227898_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.65 +16:11:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228307_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228307_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.09 +15:07:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228325_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228325_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.78 +09:18:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228326_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228326_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.04 +12:33:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228330_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228330_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.49 +12:07:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228360_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228360_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:07.38 +12:46:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228419_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228419_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.07 +12:08:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.32 +10:59:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.69 +09:15:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228516_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228516_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228574_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228574_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.39 +14:14:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228724_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228724_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.08 +14:13:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228731_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228731_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.72 +16:55:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.04 +12:25:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228766_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 228766_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.52 +13:57:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228904_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228904_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.30 +16:42:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228916_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228916_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:00.02 +14:14:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228927_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228927_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.46 +16:09:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228977_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228977_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.81 +16:34:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228984_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228984_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:23.74 +10:37:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228986_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228986_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.42 +10:56:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228990_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228990_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:45.59 +10:57:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 228997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.48 +12:20:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229013_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229013_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:19.26 +13:20:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229032_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229032_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229080_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229080_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:49.14 +09:36:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229094_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229094_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:48.06 +09:36:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:44.52 +10:41:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229139_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229139_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.94 +11:00:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229149_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229149_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:25.11 +16:09:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229216_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229216_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:55.97 +17:47:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229230_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229230_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:40.98 +15:51:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229273_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229273_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229302_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229302_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229316_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229316_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.07 +10:54:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:29.48 +10:51:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229369_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 229369_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229374_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229374_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.98 +09:30:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229384_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229384_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.61 +15:18:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229392_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 229392_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229434_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229434_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.51 +15:47:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229557_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229557_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:31.27 +10:12:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229570_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229570_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:18.33 +17:59:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:56.94 +13:42:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.83 +18:10:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229697_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229697_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229727_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229727_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.30 +13:44:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:56.33 +13:47:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229808_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229808_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:59.49 +13:05:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229864_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229864_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:21.17 +12:36:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229869_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229869_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229877_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229877_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:52.35 +13:23:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229937_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229937_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:09.55 +18:24:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.64 +15:48:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229960_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229960_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:43.37 +16:56:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 229999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230025_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 230025_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230097_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 230097_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.28 +17:27:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 230100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.07 +17:59:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:50.03 +12:12:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.34 +11:44:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121758_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 121758_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.65 +13:18:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:44.19 +11:24:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 68738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:55.84 +12:05:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95633_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 95633_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.72 +10:45:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172257_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 172257_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.44 +18:06:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.63 +12:22:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-46-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks