This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.76 05:00:56.51 +28:32:50.8
174.79655 -8.31295 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 155689540823726208
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.990 G 18.120 G
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia -0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:56.51 +28:32:50.8: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:56.51 +28:32:50.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.4002* 05 00 56.51 +28 32 50.8 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 155689540823726208,2461300.9002,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 155689540823726208 20260917.4002 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.81 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1
172.85237 -6.39126 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.787+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1: 14.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1: 14.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.87 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3
173.62785 -5.25668 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.263+/-0.030 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3: 14.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.86 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7
172.68183 -5.60739 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: A7V (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.957+/-0.031 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7: 14.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.85 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8
173.84004 -6.51989 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.463+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.82 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6
173.06282 -6.09765 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J050418.83+311519.0
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.242 r Y 0.052 r 2458468.78750 0.746709900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6: 14.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J050418.83+311519.0,2461300.9002,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J050418.83+311519.0 20260917.4002 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.70 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7
172.10014 -6.32599 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.881+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7: 14.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7: 14.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.62 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2
173.36924 -6.41465 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J075.9922+30.8197 | 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2: 14.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J075.9922+30.8197,2461300.9002,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J075.9922+30.8197 20260917.4002 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.62 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0
174.73316 -6.71123 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" Gaia DR3 156226038075288192
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.640 G 13.670 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0: 14.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 156226038075288192,2461300.9002,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 156226038075288192 20260917.4002 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.53 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9
173.39255 -5.47120 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 157259231112403328
Type: SR|M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.720 G 14.130 G 63.330000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9: 14.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 157259231112403328,2461300.9002,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 157259231112403328 20260917.4002 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.63 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3
173.02951 -6.39712 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.852+/-0.033 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3: 14.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.9002,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.4002 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4002 2461300.9002 13.80 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9
173.94526 -6.39421 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CSS_J050539.4+302231
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.690 CV Y 0.710 CV 0.757885000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS_J050539.4+302231,2461300.9002,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS_J050539.4+302231 20260917.4002 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461300.90059126 17.09.2026 09:36:41.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15388
Objects passed selection criteria: 15330
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12177.8
Average stars matched: 11845 (97.2676 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:39:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461300.90059126 17.09.2026 09:36:41.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 88 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 118052
Objects passed selection criteria: 117844
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 94522.8
Average stars matched: 91031 (96.3059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:41:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.89985084
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.452 +29:59:50.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.452 +29:59:50.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.769 +30:00:22.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.769 +30:00:22.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0143 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.452 +29:59:50.74
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.769 +30:00:22.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01302 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VjiZT63WNZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oxJV0IX0I4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wJzqnJviLA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D14oyM1ihi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.VjiZT63WNZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oxJV0IX0I4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wJzqnJviLA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=0, passed=8022
Got 8022 stars (including 7584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8022 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=4.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=75.157 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.339 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=0.956 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.463 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.339
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.461 +29:59:49.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8022 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1821080.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.956 -> 0.293 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4809 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4601 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4601 pairs (4809 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4601 robust_rms=4.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=74.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4601 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4601 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4601 robust_rms_before=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.331
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.331 vs 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4601 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=401 n_q2=899 n_q3=623 n_q4=2678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D14oyM1ihi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=0, passed=8379
Got 8379 stars (including 7974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=4.149 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=60.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.467 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.340
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.779 +30:00:21.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8379 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1820991.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.003 -> 0.302 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4804 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4592 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4592 pairs (4804 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=3.910 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=59.856 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4592 robust_rms_before=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.336 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.336 vs 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=4592 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=390 n_q2=1040 n_q3=604 n_q4=2558 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.201
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (4601 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (4592 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:28.36 +30:30:13.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:33.44 +32:12:31.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:49.70 +29:47:58.2: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:28.29 +34:07:22.5: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:07.70 +34:09:24.7: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:07.70 +34:09:24.7: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:49.70 +29:47:58.2: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:28.36 +30:30:13.1: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:28.29 +34:07:22.5: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:33.44 +32:12:31.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:07.70 +34:09:24.7: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6770 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:49.70 +29:47:58.2: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9303 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:28.36 +30:30:13.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1482 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:28.29 +34:07:22.5: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8064 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:33.44 +32:12:31.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3479 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21142_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21142_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.36 +35:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21208_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21208_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.06 +34:07:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21213_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21213_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21244_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21244_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.43 +28:42:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 21286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 03501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:54.20 +33:30:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.55 +30:42:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.461 +29:59:49.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.461 +29:59:49.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0032 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.779 +30:00:21.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.779 +30:00:21.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.461 +29:59:49.80
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.779 +30:00:21.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01301 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fmoKwl4eGo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BUQMoulBMN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fvVrTHXXX2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDvT0Zj9ls
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fmoKwl4eGo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BUQMoulBMN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fvVrTHXXX2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4151, bad_region=38, passed=60712
Got 60712 stars (including 56418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=4.804 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=70.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4808 robust_rms_before=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.348 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.345
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.348 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=462 n_q2=1005 n_q3=712 n_q4=2629 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wDvT0Zj9ls (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4138, bad_region=44, passed=61970
Got 61970 stars (including 57714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=4.699 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=66.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4805 robust_rms_before=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=453 n_q2=1138 n_q3=663 n_q4=2551 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-35-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_043719_TTUQ1b1x1_1731411_qQ8PoB8I/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:52.04 +31:00:33.0: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:10.41 +28:15:15.1: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:45.51 +34:10:35.3: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:11.14 +30:14:23.9: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:43.51 +24:43:13.9: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:57.05 +33:47:21.0: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:59.01 +29:14:28.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:37.55 +32:42:24.1: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:03.21 +34:11:11.4: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:45.51 +34:10:35.3: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:10.41 +28:15:15.1: 14.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:43.51 +24:43:13.9: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:11.14 +30:14:23.9: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:59.01 +29:14:28.5: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:57.05 +33:47:21.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:52.04 +31:00:33.0: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:45.51 +34:10:35.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6363 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:10.41 +28:15:15.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0028 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:43.51 +24:43:13.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3460 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:11.14 +30:14:23.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5084 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:59.01 +29:14:28.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7535 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:57.05 +33:47:21.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4958 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:52.04 +31:00:33.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2991 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:37.55 +32:42:24.1: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:03.21 +34:11:11.4: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:37.55 +32:42:24.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2427 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:03.21 +34:11:11.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0581 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:07.79 +34:09:23.6: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:28:55.16 +32:26:11.9: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:08:13.09 +32:28:20.5: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:26.56 +34:06:20.7: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:07.79 +34:09:23.6: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:07.79 +34:09:23.6: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7258 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:36.53 +30:33:51.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:26.56 +34:06:20.7: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:28:55.16 +32:26:11.9: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:08:13.09 +32:28:20.5: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:26.56 +34:06:20.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6986 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:55.16 +32:26:11.9: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8015 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:13.09 +32:28:20.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4629 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:36.53 +30:33:51.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:36.53 +30:33:51.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9087 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:53.11 +30:28:34.1: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:47.71 +30:15:40.1: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:50.79 +32:54:11.1: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:52.98 +31:14:42.8: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:27.54 +30:39:38.0: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:53.11 +30:28:34.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:53.11 +30:28:34.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3549 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:47.71 +30:15:40.1: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:47.71 +30:15:40.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3689 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:21.11 +29:22:13.2: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:35.48 +29:13:06.3: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:07.19 +31:46:47.2: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:21.23 +28:21:01.6: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:50.79 +32:54:11.1: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:50.79 +32:54:11.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6545 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:52.98 +31:14:42.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:52.98 +31:14:42.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5882 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:27.54 +30:39:38.0: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:27.54 +30:39:38.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6770 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:56.51 +28:32:50.8: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:21.11 +29:22:13.2: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:21.11 +29:22:13.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7001 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:35.48 +29:13:06.3: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:07.19 +31:46:47.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:35.48 +29:13:06.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5962 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:07.19 +31:46:47.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7132 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:21.23 +28:21:01.6: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:21.23 +28:21:01.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8114 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:41.48 +32:07:34.5: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:56.51 +28:32:50.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:08:06.06 +29:52:13.8: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:41.80 +31:11:50.4: 16.16 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:44.45 +31:23:00.6: 16.12 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:41.48 +32:07:34.5: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:41.48 +32:07:34.5: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1833 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1: 14.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:13:01.19 +31:43:35.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:08:06.06 +29:52:13.8: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:41.80 +31:11:50.4: 15.72 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:06.06 +29:52:13.8: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4222 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.86 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:11:41.80 +31:11:50.4: ref_mag=15.86 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6023 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:44.45 +31:23:00.6: 15.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:07:44.45 +31:23:00.6: ref_mag=15.78 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6511 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3: 14.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7: 14.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1: 14.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:13:01.19 +31:43:35.0: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:02:37.68 +31:14:42.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7989 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:01.19 +31:43:35.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0297 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:02.58 +31:18:20.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8599 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:05:05.09 +31:51:09.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8275 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6: 14.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:54.03 +30:23:01.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8326 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:18.85 +31:15:18.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8275 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7: 14.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7: 14.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:23.98 +30:05:16.4: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:00:44.49 +31:52:43.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6981 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:33.14 +30:55:21.5: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:05.75 +32:40:46.1: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:23.98 +30:05:16.4: 14.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:23.98 +30:05:16.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6951 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:33.14 +30:55:21.5: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:33.14 +30:55:21.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5684 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:05.75 +32:40:46.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:05.75 +32:40:46.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7137 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:08:18.25 +30:52:08.6: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:08:18.25 +30:52:08.6: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:18.25 +30:52:08.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5808 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2: 14.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:03:59.21 +30:49:16.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6010 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0: 14.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:06:38.18 +29:33:28.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6197 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9: 14.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:07:35.00 +31:22:00.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5239 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3: 14.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:03:06.20 +31:06:04.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6381 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:59.02 +32:13:08.2: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:59.02 +32:13:08.2: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:59.02 +32:13:08.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6317 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:51.76 +31:00:19.5: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:51.76 +31:00:19.5: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:51.76 +31:00:19.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3605 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:05:39.45 +30:22:30.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8028 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:56:24.89 +28:30:14.1: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:21.61 +31:21:24.3: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:56:24.89 +28:30:14.1: 14.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:24.89 +28:30:14.1: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8428 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:21.61 +31:21:24.3: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:21.61 +31:21:24.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1282 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152311.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152373.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152379.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56096.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71069.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 164s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:43.18 +30:14:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:19.60 +33:19:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.26 +33:17:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:22.41 +33:12:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.35 +35:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.74 +34:10:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.53 +34:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.49 +33:11:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151488_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151488_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.68 +26:10:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151534_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151534_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.43 +32:33:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.71 +30:29:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:37.88 +33:31:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151599_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151599_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.17 +33:59:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.92 +33:11:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.57 +34:00:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151679_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151679_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.77 +30:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:34.78 +33:55:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.43 +32:25:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151730_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151730_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:23.87 +33:30:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151753_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151753_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.83 +32:25:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151803_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151803_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.27 +31:59:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.20 +31:15:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:09.09 +33:24:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151862_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151862_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:25.02 +29:23:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:43.85 +30:15:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151928_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151928_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151986_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 151986_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152007_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152007_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.13 +31:01:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152035_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152035_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152078_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152078_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 152189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:41.48 +32:07:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.352 157542149197034880 076.17294521770 +32.12622553166 14.6727 13.7299 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.352#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152340_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152340_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:41.80 +31:11:50.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.343 180457384566296704 077.92368539459 +31.19783747572 15.0858 14.1974 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.343#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 152379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:44.45 +31:23:00.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.652 157259613364693632 076.93521653086 +31.38304118575 14.8348 13.6908 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58252_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 58252_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 50287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 56745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49529_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 49529_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.24 +32:10:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.14 +30:48:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 70957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58011_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 58011_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.45 +26:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.20 +32:02:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.82 +29:15:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 49447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75562_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 75562_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62593_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 62593_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36702_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 36702_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63135_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 63135_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49463_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 49463_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:45.46 +31:50:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.40 +28:42:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.40 +33:50:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 64389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 82935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56096_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 56096_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 60259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77450_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 77450_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:28.84 +29:54:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 43921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34377_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 34377_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 54048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:45.92 +31:32:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 61352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.29 +31:29:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71069_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 71069_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23543_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 23543_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:54.20 +33:30:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128210_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 128210_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 56333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
