This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 11.49 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0
61.30176 -3.28734 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J195909+2319.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.482 V Y 0.919 V 1.002627000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195909+2319.8,2461300.8676,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195909+2319.8 20260917.3676 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.05 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5
61.44446 -4.14947 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J200239.89+230000.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.280 V 14.410 V 2457484.00000 375.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200239.89+230000.4,2461300.8676,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200239.89+230000.4 20260917.3676 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.02 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9
62.05647 -0.92011 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2026699856148343168 | 19:51:57.98 +25:12:03.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.687+/-0.033 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2026699856148343168,2461300.8676,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2026699856148343168 20260917.3676 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.01 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0
61.34832 -4.69514 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200427.30+223749.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.430 V 14.650 V 2458195.00000 265.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200427.30+223749.7,2461300.8676,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200427.30+223749.7 20260917.3676 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.45 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9
60.71583 -5.66375 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200633.08+213454.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.700 g Y 0.630 g 2459154.74200 67.250000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200633.08+213454.9,2461300.8676,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200633.08+213454.9 20260917.3676 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.92 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0
62.11963 -16.19704 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.709+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.3676* 20 46 49.59 +16 50 03.0 12.9 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8676,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3676 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.11 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8
61.69975 -3.98438 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200238.32+231813.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.790 V 15.340 V 2457119.10000 66.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200238.32+231813.6,2461300.8676,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200238.32+231813.6 20260917.3676 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.12 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5
66.07979 -6.23538 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J2021231+254415
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.586 R1 Y 0.525 R1 131.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2021231+254415,2461300.8676,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2021231+254415 20260917.3676 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.21 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5
62.28155 -2.45943 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J195817.57+243554.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.690 V 14.860 V 2457241.00000 71.320000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195817.57+243554.2,2461300.8676,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195817.57+243554.2 20260917.3676 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.94 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1
62.21647 0.91077 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J194518.40+261559.3
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.350 g Y 0.650 g 2458695.64000 29.127000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194518.40+261559.3,2461300.8676,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194518.40+261559.3 20260917.3676 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.94 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9
60.73692 -3.33613 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0361 Vul
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 V 14.700 V 2458592.13330 219.219516700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0361 Vul,2461300.8676,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0361 Vul 20260917.3676 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.91 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6
62.08358 -2.11111 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J195631.68+243638.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.080 g Y 0.500 g 2458728.86400 31.090000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195631.68+243638.1,2461300.8676,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195631.68+243638.1 20260917.3676 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.97 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9
61.41824 -2.27644 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J195538.31+235721.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.510 V 14.990 V 2458356.76230 66.701713900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195538.31+235721.6,2461300.8676,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195538.31+235721.6 20260917.3676 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.94 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3
61.44585 -14.48836 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J309.8484+17.2885 | 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.3676* 20 39 25.37 +17 17 36.3 12.9 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J309.8484+17.2885,2461300.8676,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J309.8484+17.2885 20260917.3676 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 13.01 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0
62.93902 0.58442 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 8389420
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.961 g Y 0.450 R1 2458638.51120 96.742503400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8389420,2461300.8676,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8389420 20260917.3676 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.93 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8
62.36902 -16.24096 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 1811201113318946048
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.310 G 13.320 G 0.019321000000 K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.3676* 20 47 33.66 +17 00 09.8 12.9 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1811201113318946048,2461300.8676,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1811201113318946048 20260917.3676 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.94 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5
61.40971 -2.36726 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J195557.43+235407.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.451 r Y 0.396 r 2458628.48710 218.612603700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J195557.43+235407.6,2461300.8676,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J195557.43+235407.6 20260917.3676 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.87 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4
62.12771 -16.13105 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" Gaia DR3 1811204789811017088
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.660 G 14.700 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4: 13.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.3676* 20 46 37.29 +16 52 44.4 12.9 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1811204789811017088,2461300.8676,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1811204789811017088 20260917.3676 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.62 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9
61.18855 -4.08328 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J200150.13+224903.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.331 r Y 0.632 r 2458645.83710 224.700029700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200150.13+224903.6,2461300.8676,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200150.13+224903.6 20260917.3676 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.68 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9
65.90260 -7.61483 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J202558.63+244844.4
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.020 V 14.940 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J202558.63+244844.4,2461300.8676,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J202558.63+244844.4 20260917.3676 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3676 2461300.8676 12.38 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5
62.11907 -1.48593 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J1954147+245751
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.384 g Y 2.922 g 2458658.79710 293.626660100000 M5/7e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5: 15.53 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1954147+245751,2461300.8676,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1954147+245751 20260917.3676 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.93627802 17.05.2026 10:28:04.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
First image: 2461177.93627802 17.05.2026 10:28:04.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Last image: 2461300.86786003 17.09.2026 08:49:33.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31163
Objects passed selection criteria: 30961
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19871.5
Average stars matched: 19275.8 (97.002 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255104 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 03:51:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 768 -> 967, 20.579% > 20%; fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits vs fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits) - possible passing clouds or a bad plate solution; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.93627802 17.05.2026 10:28:04.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
First image: 2461177.93627802 17.05.2026 10:28:04.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Last image: 2461300.86786003 17.09.2026 08:49:33.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 220
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 234779
Objects passed selection criteria: 234017
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 159820
Average stars matched: 153177 (95.8436 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 691720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 03:55:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.86725462
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.691 +21:59:52.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12
Second-epoch image center 20:18:28.691 +21:59:52.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:25.865 +22:00:20.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12
Second-epoch image center 20:18:25.865 +22:00:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:18:28.691 +21:59:52.06
Second-epoch second image center 20:18:25.865 +22:00:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits &> /tmp/tmp.avKrwCf5C9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1N1Mtz4uYy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vopBJDsnKM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W8qcAN68Rd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8709 to 313.3596 deg, Dec +16.5674 to +27.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8709 to 313.3596 deg, Dec 16.5674 to 27.2667 deg
Loaded 23585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16848 out of 18578 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18578 out of 33800 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8709 to 313.3596 deg, Dec +16.5674 to +27.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8709 to 313.3596 deg, Dec 16.5674 to 27.2667 deg
Loaded 23585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16848 out of 18578 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18578 out of 33800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 33277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8453 to 313.3591 deg, Dec +16.6021 to +27.2756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8453 to 313.3591 deg, Dec 16.6021 to 27.2756 deg
Loaded 23594 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16804 out of 18487 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18487 out of 33277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
2.3 pix Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
15.1 mag. Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.avKrwCf5C9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3526, bad_region=0, passed=33800
Got 33800 stars (including 30252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=1331 n_q2=1186 n_q3=1162 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits -region wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1N1Mtz4uYy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3468, bad_region=0, passed=33277
Got 33277 stars (including 29783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=1339 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits -region wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vopBJDsnKM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=0, passed=6596
Got 6596 stars (including 6297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=5.135 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.253 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.521 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.430
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.709 +21:59:52.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6596 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky599098.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.620 -> 0.363 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4886 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4672 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4672 pairs (4886 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=4.873 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.339 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4672 robust_rms_before=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.421 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.709 +21:59:52.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6596 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky599358.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.358 -> 0.355 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4672 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=768 n_q2=1652 n_q3=1601 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W8qcAN68Rd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=1, passed=6270
Got 6270 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=5.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.624 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.439 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.513 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.427
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:25.883 +22:00:20.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6270 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky599048.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.624 -> 0.357 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4881 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4670 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4670 pairs (4881 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=5.215 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.948 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4670 robust_rms_before=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:25.883 +22:00:20.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6270 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky599272.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.351 -> 0.350 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4670 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=967 n_q2=1577 n_q3=1561 n_q4=565 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits sigma_overall=0.604 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits sigma_overall=0.612 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new1=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.143
new2=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.191
reference average sigma_overall=0.608 worst_q_ratio=1.1655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 768 -> 967, 20.579% > 20%; fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits vs fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits) - possible passing clouds or a bad plate solution; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (4672 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (4670 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vul-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 52154_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:37.40 +26:53:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52220_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 52220_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:52.82 +23:37:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52229_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 52229_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:23.63 +20:31:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 52251_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:58.96 +21:42:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02659_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 02659_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:38.96 +17:27:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vul-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:28.709 +21:59:52.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12
Second-epoch image center 20:18:28.709 +21:59:52.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0041 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:18:25.883 +22:00:20.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:18:28.107 +22:00:04.12
Second-epoch image center 20:18:25.883 +22:00:20.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:18:28.709 +21:59:52.16
Second-epoch second image center 20:18:25.883 +22:00:20.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01345 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WHr7U3WczI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hvovv6TkOt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0m3yQzOXpF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t4NJSIiZDl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits and wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 259704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8326 to 313.3599 deg, Dec +16.5621 to +27.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8326 to 313.3599 deg, Dec 16.5621 to 27.2667 deg
Loaded 23642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13023 out of 19880 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19880 out of 259704 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.563200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.563200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 259704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8326 to 313.3599 deg, Dec +16.5621 to +27.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8326 to 313.3599 deg, Dec 16.5621 to 27.2667 deg
Loaded 23642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13023 out of 19880 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19880 out of 259704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 257685 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8192 to 313.3592 deg, Dec +16.5791 to +27.2807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8192 to 313.3592 deg, Dec 16.5791 to 27.2807 deg
Loaded 23656 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13143 out of 19885 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19885 out of 257685 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 167 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
2.1 pix Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
15.2 mag. Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WHr7U3WczI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=45560, bad_region=3, passed=259628
Got 259628 stars (including 213759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 259628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 259628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 259628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 259628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=1293 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1138 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits -region wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hvovv6TkOt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=59, blended=44498, bad_region=1, passed=257626
Got 257626 stars (including 212874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 257626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 257626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 257626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 257626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.694 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1137 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits -region wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0m3yQzOXpF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4046, bad_region=34, passed=63253
Got 63253 stars (including 59116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63253 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=5.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.412 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=838 n_q2=1676 n_q3=1714 n_q4=662 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t4NJSIiZDl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3815, bad_region=36, passed=61571
Got 61571 stars (including 57665 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=5.711 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.419 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1015 n_q2=1626 n_q3=1661 n_q4=587 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_035019_TTUQ1b1x1_587715_m7wFoEJr/wcs_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vul-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:52:03.86 +25:20:01.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:08:46.63 +21:09:28.2: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:34:09.04 +22:17:30.7: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:30:59.93 +22:27:25.0: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:03:16.34 +22:46:07.5: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:41:33.71 +20:54:47.0: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:48:47.16 +17:06:47.7: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:30:59.93 +22:27:25.0: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:08:46.63 +21:09:28.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:52:03.86 +25:20:01.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:03:16.34 +22:46:07.5: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:34:09.04 +22:17:30.7: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:59.93 +22:27:25.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8250 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:46.63 +21:09:28.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0405 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:03.86 +25:20:01.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8607 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:16.34 +22:46:07.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2147 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:09.04 +22:17:30.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1954 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:41:33.71 +20:54:47.0: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:03:06.04 +22:34:58.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:33.71 +20:54:47.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0839 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:48:47.16 +17:06:47.7: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:47.16 +17:06:47.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0910 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:03:06.04 +22:34:58.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:06.04 +22:34:58.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8130 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:40:23.11 +20:53:17.3: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:16:53.58 +26:09:43.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:47:52.84 +26:02:15.3: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:57:54.87 +23:28:20.5: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:39:28.17 +17:12:10.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:41:04.45 +16:42:02.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:40:23.11 +20:53:17.3: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:23.11 +20:53:17.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8335 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:47:52.84 +26:02:15.3: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:52.84 +26:02:15.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3972 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:59:34.29 +22:42:26.7: 12.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:57:54.87 +23:28:20.5: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:16:53.58 +26:09:43.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:53:11.60 +26:10:53.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:54.87 +23:28:20.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0779 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:53.58 +26:09:43.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7505 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:39:28.17 +17:12:10.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:28.17 +17:12:10.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5674 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:41:04.45 +16:42:02.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:04.45 +16:42:02.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:59:34.29 +22:42:26.7: 12.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:53:11.60 +26:10:53.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:11.60 +26:10:53.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:34.29 +22:42:26.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.7081 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:53:10.00 +26:10:45.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:43:44.25 +18:57:15.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:15:25.30 +26:18:08.8: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:33:15.19 +22:09:16.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:47:41.65 +16:45:26.4: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:53:10.00 +26:10:45.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:10.00 +26:10:45.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:41:29.12 +16:46:58.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:43:44.25 +18:57:15.0: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:33:15.19 +22:09:16.6: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:15:25.30 +26:18:08.8: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:44.25 +18:57:15.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6849 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:15.19 +22:09:16.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9094 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:25.30 +26:18:08.8: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8380 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:47:41.65 +16:45:26.4: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:41.65 +16:45:26.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5579 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:19:14.51 +25:54:15.0: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:38:31.68 +21:09:47.9: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:38:33.72 +21:24:12.2: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:41:29.12 +16:46:58.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:29.12 +16:46:58.6: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6277 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:19:14.51 +25:54:15.0: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:14.51 +25:54:15.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1034 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:38:31.68 +21:09:47.9: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:31.68 +21:09:47.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9502 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:38:33.72 +21:24:12.2: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:33.72 +21:24:12.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1202 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:04:21.41 +22:35:17.5: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:26:06.09 +22:48:08.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:10.55 +22:50:27.3: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:04:21.41 +22:35:17.5: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:21.41 +22:35:17.5: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9757 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:48:29.20 +16:45:35.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:26:06.09 +22:48:08.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:54:21.17 +22:35:14.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:06.09 +22:48:08.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0668 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:10.55 +22:50:27.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:10.55 +22:50:27.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9752 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:08:38.44 +22:09:59.3: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:48:29.20 +16:45:35.6: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:48:29.20 +16:45:35.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2345 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:48:00.53 +16:46:01.3: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:54:21.17 +22:35:14.9: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:21.17 +22:35:14.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1855 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:08:38.44 +22:09:59.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:38.44 +22:09:59.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2152 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:48:00.53 +16:46:01.3: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:48:00.53 +16:46:01.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2545 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:43:57.16 +17:22:24.7: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:43:57.16 +17:22:24.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:57.16 +17:22:24.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8777 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4833 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0508 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0166 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0035 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4447 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8826 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0821 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:53:51.32 +23:48:32.8: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:53:51.32 +23:48:32.8: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:53:51.32 +23:48:32.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1097 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1269 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:45:04.28 +17:09:46.4: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:45:04.28 +17:09:46.4: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:04.28 +17:09:46.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0729 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:46:13.08 +16:58:35.7: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:46:13.08 +16:58:35.7: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:46:13.08 +16:58:35.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0587 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2120 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9239 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9383 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:58:55.23 +23:57:50.7: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9686 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9153 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:58:55.23 +23:57:50.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:55.23 +23:57:50.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0470 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8943 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0037 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9212 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4: 13.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9392 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:54:51.65 +24:24:43.2: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:07:58.57 +21:15:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:54:51.65 +24:24:43.2: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8573 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:51.65 +24:24:43.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9929 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:07:58.57 +21:15:48.9: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:58.57 +21:15:48.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8167 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6192 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1315.fits at 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6839 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-28-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1316.fits at 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5: 15.53 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.3547 delta=2.84 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out07194.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out274468.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out295031.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out295259.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13483.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out164480.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out165443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169232.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out179347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192693.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193961.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207048.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207606.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out209555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out237980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out255402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293481_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293481_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293522_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293522_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293525_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293525_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293530_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293530_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:48.14 +26:00:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293551_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293551_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:05.36 +25:35:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293552_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293552_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293554_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293554_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293556_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293556_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:18.14 +20:05:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293558_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293558_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:15.76 +20:45:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293560_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293560_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293561_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293561_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293562_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293562_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293566_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293566_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293571_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293571_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:01.08 +26:13:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293572_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293572_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:55.98 +20:44:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293573_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293573_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:24.68 +20:53:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293580_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293580_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:28.97 +25:11:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293582_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293582_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293583_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293583_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:03.21 +20:54:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293586_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293586_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:01.84 +23:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293588_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293588_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:34.79 +24:52:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293590_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293590_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293593_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293593_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:54.82 +24:46:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293594_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293594_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:23.27 +21:00:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293600_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293600_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:36.28 +16:48:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293603_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293603_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:45.14 +18:50:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293604_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293604_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:38.61 +21:47:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293605_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293605_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293608_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293608_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293616_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293616_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293620_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293620_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293621_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293621_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:35.42 +16:59:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293625_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293625_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:21.86 +20:52:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293821_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293821_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293879_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293879_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:11.14 +23:04:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293939_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293939_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 293993_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 293993_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294012_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294012_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:11.51 +16:53:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294052_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294052_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294110_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294110_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:15.46 +23:07:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294117_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294117_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:15.24 +26:10:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294184_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294184_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:29.12 +17:43:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294214_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294214_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:34.36 +20:46:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294235_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294235_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:56.07 +23:28:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294238_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294238_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:24.35 +25:35:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294286_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294286_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:32.53 +18:27:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294296_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294296_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:41:56.67 +20:40:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294313_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294313_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294327_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294327_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:08.25 +20:27:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294339_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294339_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:20.85 +17:54:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294375_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294375_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:14.56 +24:00:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294393_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294393_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:44.43 +24:03:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294406_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294406_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294409_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294409_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:57.19 +21:02:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294486_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294486_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294493_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294493_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294517_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294517_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294519_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294519_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:32.69 +22:40:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294602_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294602_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:15.50 +26:35:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294625_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294625_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:20.00 +25:29:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294634_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294634_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:31.46 +16:53:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294645_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294645_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294684_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294684_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:39.08 +26:55:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294688_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294688_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:45.79 +26:05:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294700_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294700_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294704_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294704_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294712_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294712_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:33.23 +16:53:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294715_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294715_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294716_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294716_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:29.57 +16:55:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294718_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294718_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:49.04 +25:49:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294733_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294733_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.39 +26:21:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294742_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294742_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:13.17 +26:34:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294810_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294810_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:34.45 +24:06:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294832_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294832_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294839_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294839_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:07.51 +26:18:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294845_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294845_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:03.02 +24:55:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294856_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294856_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294867_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294867_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:07.09 +25:08:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294927_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294927_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294982_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 294982_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:16.79 +25:29:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295018_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295018_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:26.54 +25:23:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295031_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295031_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:29.20 +16:45:35.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.182 1763154997805729408 312.12161417287 +16.75989329475 13.9463 13.4447 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.182#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295040_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295040_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:53.64 +23:29:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295045_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295045_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295073_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295073_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:09.54 +22:59:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295094_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295094_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:35.38 +24:34:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295100_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295100_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:41:12.82 +21:02:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295117_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295117_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295154_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295154_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295186_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295186_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:36.63 +21:05:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295239_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295239_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:08.80 +21:56:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295259_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295259_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:00.53 +16:46:01.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.638 1763150221801986304 312.00206851338 +16.76714375409 13.7506 13.0277 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.638#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295322_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295322_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:26.55 +22:03:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 295399_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 295399_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:59.43 +25:17:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16105_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 16105_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102725_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 102725_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:06.84 +20:39:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148144_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 148144_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:06.34 +22:13:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179347_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 179347_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172347_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 172347_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:52.04 +23:07:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169232_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 169232_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237980_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 237980_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73880_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 73880_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:00.10 +19:38:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178005_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 178005_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:28.19 +23:16:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158859_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 158859_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05302_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05302_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:24.44 +16:52:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09804_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 09804_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:03.29 +17:04:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130256_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 130256_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116065_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 116065_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:07.85 +21:05:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05039_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05039_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:49.76 +16:51:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07181_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07181_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:42.86 +16:58:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05706_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05706_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:59.09 +16:54:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05025_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05025_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:48.24 +16:52:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04004_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 04004_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23463_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 23463_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:39.23 +17:37:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05502_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05502_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:49.96 +16:53:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07626_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07626_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:57.99 +16:58:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177033_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 177033_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276116_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 276116_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:52.17 +19:20:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275862_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 275862_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:24.82 +20:52:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275267_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 275267_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:53.59 +16:55:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274468_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 274468_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:51.32 +23:48:32.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.581 1828361019514273920 298.46409431933 +23.80947961052 11.6876 10.0492 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.581#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230694_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 230694_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229823_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 229823_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:15.83 +25:45:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11153_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11153_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138867_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 138867_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:59.53 +21:53:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07194_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07194_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:13.08 +16:58:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.335 1811209634534206208 311.55478000217 +16.97683973450 13.5199 12.6329 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.335#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158837_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 158837_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:58.00 +22:35:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134505_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 134505_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:59.02 +21:42:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231213_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 231213_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:48.47 +25:33:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207048_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 207048_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182326_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 182326_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:37.90 +23:33:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68588_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 68588_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39031_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 39031_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213587_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 213587_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04853_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04853_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:31.88 +16:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165443_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 165443_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207606_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 207606_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193961_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 193961_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193449_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 193449_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99388_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 99388_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:23.63 +20:31:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05445_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05445_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:13.36 +16:52:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185999_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 185999_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:09.15 +23:39:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13483_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 13483_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208602_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 208602_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:37.10 +24:46:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255402_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 255402_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08041_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 08041_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235428_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 235428_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:57.10 +25:21:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06846_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 06846_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:07.45 +16:56:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04327_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04327_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:48.61 +16:50:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15623_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 15623_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:42.19 +17:21:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187069_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 187069_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:52.88 +23:37:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04077_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04077_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:41.98 +16:49:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192693_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 192693_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05185_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 05185_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203976_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 203976_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17489_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 17489_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:38.97 +17:27:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120679_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 120679_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237111_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 237111_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:40.61 +25:26:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227113_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 227113_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12855_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 12855_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:10.46 +17:13:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164480_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 164480_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06869_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 06869_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:01.96 +16:56:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09451_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 09451_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:45.45 +17:04:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92503_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 92503_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:31.81 +20:18:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209555_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 209555_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243960_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 243960_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257312_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 257312_fd_Vul-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_03-49-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:37.41 +26:53:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 34s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vul-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0
########### Completed Vul-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5
###################################################################################
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1 -- a known variable star
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0 -- a known variable star
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9 -- not a known variable star
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5 -- a known variable star
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9 -- a known variable star
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5 -- a known variable star
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6 -- a known variable star
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9 -- a known variable star
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5 -- a known variable star
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0 -- a known variable star
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9 -- a known variable star
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8 -- a known variable star
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5 -- a known variable star
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0 -- a known variable star
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9 -- a known variable star
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5 -- a known variable star
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9 -- a known variable star
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3 -- not a known variable star
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4 -- a known variable star
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0 -- not a known variable star
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8 -- a known variable star
Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
21 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
19:45:18.79 +26:15:55.1
19:48:11.89 +26:43:32.0
19:51:57.90 +25:12:01.9
19:54:15.08 +24:57:49.5
19:55:38.28 +23:57:20.9
19:55:57.53 +23:54:05.5
19:56:31.70 +24:36:36.6
19:58:02.93 +22:49:27.9
19:58:17.39 +24:35:52.5
19:59:08.73 +23:19:52.0
20:01:50.12 +22:49:03.9
20:02:38.27 +23:18:11.8
20:02:39.81 +22:59:59.5
20:04:27.21 +22:37:48.0
20:06:33.19 +21:34:54.9
20:21:23.01 +25:44:13.5
20:25:58.63 +24:48:43.9
20:39:25.37 +17:17:36.3
20:46:37.29 +16:52:44.4
20:46:49.59 +16:50:03.0
20:47:33.66 +17:00:09.8
20:46:13.08 +16:58:35.7
19:53:51.32 +23:48:32.8
20:48:29.20 +16:45:35.6
20:48:00.53 +16:46:01.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461300.86725462 -observatory V36
12:38:37.28 -04:12:29.7 Mercury (-0.4mag)
13:58:09.46 -17:56:43.4 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:40:42.15 +22:13:12.4 Mars (1.2mag)
09:17:08.53 +16:22:47.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:49:13.98 +02:21:16.5 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:37.90 +21:01:51.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:45.84 -00:09:48.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:58.31 -23:41:36.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
16:17:48.67 -26:52:13.7 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 17 03:51 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461300.86725462:
09:17:14.14 +16:22:19.8 Io (6.0mag)
09:17:14.30 +16:22:19.2 Europa (6.2mag)
09:16:55.06 +16:23:58.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:17:25.50 +16:21:21.5 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:15:19.97 +16:43:00.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:17:12.45 +16:22:28.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:14:48.30 +16:37:09.7 Elara (17.7mag)
09:20:44.68 +15:47:44.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:17:29.59 +16:43:21.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:24.85 +02:20:48.9 Titan (8.3mag)
00:49:13.97 +02:20:56.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:49:00.27 +02:22:17.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:49:00.57 +02:21:31.4 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:47:50.83 +02:10:09.4 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 17 03:51 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461300.86725462:
23:29:13.01 +10:52:06.8 JWST
16:45:43.32 +43:19:22.8 Chandra
12:00:56.00 -61:26:17.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 17 03:51 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461300.86725462 -observatory V36
03:45:14.28 +19:44:45.0 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:07:22.45 -34:01:03.7 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:26:41.23 -70:52:51.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:32.52 +33:58:05.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:02:35.56 +46:46:58.1 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:05:47.12 +27:22:29.3 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:17:23.13 +25:47:49.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:58:42.99 +26:53:20.8 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:54:56.75 +05:10:34.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:37.30 -16:31:43.5 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:46:44.07 +33:33:40.7 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:08:14.50 +15:12:51.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:28:32.35 +42:43:46.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:13:11.95 +48:37:22.7 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:40:23.40 -13:11:03.7 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:14:26.83 +16:28:37.2 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:32.64 +17:58:09.6 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:28:12.83 -00:42:28.0 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:11:08.07 +72:11:19.2 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:59:32.56 +45:41:21.2 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:22:41.75 +12:06:28.0 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:34:32.99 -35:08:42.2 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:35:09.96 +38:45:57.0 17.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:54:57.67 -06:14:19.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:28:50.66 -08:14:40.7 17.8mag 63P/Wild
06:58:05.82 +18:25:00.5 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:09.19 +15:01:42.9 17.3mag 88P/Howell
06:12:28.55 +32:23:39.0 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:00:52.43 +22:02:58.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:50:08.07 +18:41:23.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:09:10.11 -24:46:24.2 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:29:01.63 +20:17:51.7 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:38:30.59 -15:30:36.1 14.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:32:31.34 +08:40:58.7 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
03:30:54.78 +07:31:28.5 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:14:13.25 +39:18:16.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:58:09.02 +34:32:56.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:32:11.72 -01:22:07.6 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:36:20.02 +16:20:26.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 17 03:51 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 17 03:51 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 17 03:51 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:15:50.170 -00:21:47.12 AT 2026zta 2026-08-18.74 22.24
02:46:12.842 +06:11:52.33 AT 2026zsz 2026-08-23.78 19.3
22:38:13.667 +15:06:36.55 AT 2026zsy 2026-08-19.88 18.99
16:29:10.420 +50:17:23.09 SN 2026zsx 2026-08-23.92 18.643
00:30:37.105 +16:40:45.90 AT 2026zsw 2026-08-22.04 19.582
00:15:59.164 +45:15:18.02 AT 2026zsv 2026-08-15.37 21.2462
18:01:12.850 +23:06:59.14 AT 2026zsu 2026-08-12.17 20.552
16:34:01.788 +10:33:21.97 AT 2026zst 2026-08-05.18 20.8897
07:35:51.970 +14:30:02.34 AT 2026zss 2026-08-23.51 19.3532
12:34:19.746 +36:30:42.03 AT 2026zsr 2026-08-18.15 16.215
13:54:24.090 +08:32:46.11 AT 2026zsq 2026-08-17.15 19.6164
14:02:03.482 +00:12:24.13 AT 2026zsp 2026-08-18.15 20.1377
14:26:57.209 +16:14:29.77 AT 2026zso 2026-08-18.15 19.8733
15:19:36.047 +10:32:58.31 AT 2026zsn 2026-08-24.15 19.7907
14:53:08.508 -01:21:20.01 AT 2026zsm 2026-08-06.17 20.2832
23:26:24.962 -03:37:54.53 AT 2026zsl 2026-08-22.08 20.35
23:49:47.831 -44:13:09.26 AT 2026zsk 2026-08-23.60 17.63
03:00:56.094 +06:15:25.68 SN 2026zsj 2026-08-14.49 20.5067
01:07:44.807 +15:37:35.66 AT 2026zsi 2026-08-16.46 21.3122
01:56:39.058 -03:54:29.73 AT 2026zsh 2026-08-18.46 20.8101
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 17 03:54 tns_transients_list.txt
