This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.14 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9
121.27197 21.45170 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.21 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9
123.79704 21.83276 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.28 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8
122.31483 21.83063 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.58 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1
122.99533 21.07328 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.64 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0
126.08499 21.74528 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.63 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4
125.69645 20.61753 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3035 2461298.8035 14.81 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4
128.78694 24.12645 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461298.8035,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260915.3035 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last image: 2461298.80376377 15.09.2026 07:17:15.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13002
Objects passed selection criteria: 12962
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9837.5
Average stars matched: 9174.75 (93.263 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 02:19:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last image: 2461298.80376377 15.09.2026 07:17:15.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 174
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80932
Objects passed selection criteria: 80745
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 64820.2
Average stars matched: 60068.8 (92.6697 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 475504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 02:20:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.80324907
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0507 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02
Second-epoch second image center 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00068 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00068 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gKAZMydpY6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZvkU8FNtVK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vaRUe4qIw6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CZcMZ2Um55
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg
Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.gKAZMydpY6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096
Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZvkU8FNtVK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185
Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vaRUe4qIw6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, bad_region=1, passed=7969
Got 7969 stars (including 7446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0344 through 0 to 179.9681, gap 179.9681 to 180.0344
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0287 through 0 to 179.9665, gap 179.9665 to 180.0287
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=8.958 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=27.021 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.342 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.348
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1661 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1287 n_q4=758 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.021
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CZcMZ2Um55 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, bad_region=0, passed=7322
Got 7322 stars (including 6841 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0299 through 0 to 179.9686, gap 179.9686 to 180.0299
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0266 through 0 to 179.9660, gap 179.9660 to 180.0266
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=9.111 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.322 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.336 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.342
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1753 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1304 n_q4=754 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.021
new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.070
reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 20723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:05.07 +86:52:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21177_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 21177_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:25.84 +80:04:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:15.85 +81:08:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0507 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:55:50.954 +85:01:38.02
Second-epoch second image center 05:55:49.090 +85:01:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00068 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00068 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dr8ZAJ1M8a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ozv45RID89
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m48qOUvQrW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.idrEsS9pPr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 156 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Dr8ZAJ1M8a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560
Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ozv45RID89 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103
Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.m48qOUvQrW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2669, bad_region=21, passed=57518
Got 57518 stars (including 54708 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57518 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0294 through 0 to 179.9904, gap 179.9904 to 180.0294
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0264 through 0 to 179.9912, gap 179.9912 to 180.0264
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=9.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=0.919 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1664 n_q2=1213 n_q3=1261 n_q4=777 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.023
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.idrEsS9pPr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2357, bad_region=19, passed=52771
Got 52771 stars (including 50293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0136 through 0 to 179.9972, gap 179.9972 to 180.0136
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0015 through 0 to 179.9880, gap 179.9880 to 180.0015
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=9.196 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.184 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.906 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1742 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1290 n_q4=771 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_021754_TTUQ1b1x1_3252182_ScKFsYFL/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:58:50.65 +80:38:10.9: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:36:19.63 +86:05:58.2: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:23:29.57 +81:18:19.9: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:22:10.84 +81:18:39.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:27:02.78 +80:16:57.1: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:45:22.82 +81:29:03.1: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:32:35.22 +81:52:33.8: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:45:47.32 +83:47:43.7: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:58:50.65 +80:38:10.9: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:45:22.82 +81:29:03.1: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:32:35.22 +81:52:33.8: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:22:10.84 +81:18:39.3: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:36:19.63 +86:05:58.2: 15.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:27:02.78 +80:16:57.1: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:50.65 +80:38:10.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5035 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:22.82 +81:29:03.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3612 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:35.22 +81:52:33.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4790 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:10.84 +81:18:39.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5741 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:19.63 +86:05:58.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6267 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:45:47.32 +83:47:43.7: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:02.78 +80:16:57.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6762 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:23:29.57 +81:18:19.9: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:47.32 +83:47:43.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0876 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:29.57 +81:18:19.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6263 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:00:23.35 +81:28:41.6: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:36:57.83 +81:47:12.9: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:36:57.83 +81:47:12.9: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:00:23.35 +81:28:41.6: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:57.83 +81:47:12.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1213 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:23.35 +81:28:41.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3702 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:14:15.35 +84:05:54.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:11:18.71 +81:51:36.7: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:58:54.57 +83:11:42.0: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:36:52.30 +82:23:03.7: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:43:52.82 +83:34:20.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:11:18.71 +81:51:36.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:58:54.57 +83:11:42.0: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:14:15.35 +84:05:54.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:18.71 +81:51:36.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1461 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:54.57 +83:11:42.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8583 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:15.35 +84:05:54.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0504 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:36:52.30 +82:23:03.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:36:52.30 +82:23:03.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8174 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:13:03.02 +83:59:01.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:01:26.80 +81:35:22.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:08:37.35 +81:56:00.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:43:52.82 +83:34:20.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:52.82 +83:34:20.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5078 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:13:03.02 +83:59:01.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:01:26.80 +81:35:22.9: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:03.02 +83:59:01.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5526 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:26.80 +81:35:22.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5901 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:08:37.35 +81:56:00.0: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:37.35 +81:56:00.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5589 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:09:38.93 +83:34:31.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:51:23.99 +82:32:27.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:09:38.93 +83:34:31.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:38.93 +83:34:31.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8576 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:56:31.55 +80:59:29.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:51:23.99 +82:32:27.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:23.99 +82:32:27.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9600 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:56:31.55 +80:59:29.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:31.55 +80:59:29.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3294 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:01:28.77 +84:21:57.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9789 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:47:59.95 +80:54:24.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:01:28.77 +84:21:57.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:58:12.40 +84:50:41.0: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:28.77 +84:21:57.0: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0481 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:46:59.06 +81:46:33.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:47:59.95 +80:54:24.0: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.95 +80:54:24.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6449 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:58:12.40 +84:50:41.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:12.40 +84:50:41.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4503 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:46:59.06 +81:46:33.4: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:59.06 +81:46:33.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8065 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:04:28.16 +81:52:03.7: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:10:33.69 +81:42:20.1: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:22:51.78 +80:09:53.8: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:12:21.98 +87:11:02.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:15:25.52 +81:57:33.2: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0001 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:04:28.16 +81:52:03.7: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:10:33.69 +81:42:20.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:28.16 +81:52:03.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0531 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:33.69 +81:42:20.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9668 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:22:51.78 +80:09:53.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:51.78 +80:09:53.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0545 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:12:21.98 +87:11:02.6: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:21.98 +87:11:02.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9141 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:16:45.62 +85:11:26.5: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:58:10.24 +81:20:35.9: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:15:25.52 +81:57:33.2: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:25.52 +81:57:33.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1651 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:02:33.31 +82:42:01.0: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:50:20.73 +84:07:31.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:16:45.62 +85:11:26.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:58:10.24 +81:20:35.9: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:45.62 +85:11:26.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9006 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:10.24 +81:20:35.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0893 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:48:01.43 +85:12:36.2: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:14:10.96 +80:26:47.1: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:02:33.31 +82:42:01.0: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:33.31 +82:42:01.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2988 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:48:01.43 +85:12:36.2: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:01.43 +85:12:36.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0721 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:14:10.96 +80:26:47.1: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:10.96 +80:26:47.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1711 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:06:45.97 +81:09:03.5: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:18:55.15 +80:17:19.2: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:49:35.63 +82:16:49.2: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:32:32.80 +81:22:31.3: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:25:59.77 +84:38:46.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:06:45.97 +81:09:03.5: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:18:55.15 +80:17:19.2: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:45.97 +81:09:03.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5490 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:55.15 +80:17:19.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5524 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:45:03.69 +80:52:40.0: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:49:35.63 +82:16:49.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:32:32.80 +81:22:31.3: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:32.80 +81:22:31.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7150 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:35.63 +82:16:49.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4203 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:32:09.39 +81:45:36.8: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:45:03.69 +80:52:40.0: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:03.69 +80:52:40.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6154 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:26:42.67 +84:40:21.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:32:09.39 +81:45:36.8: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:09.39 +81:45:36.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5097 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:41:44.22 +82:29:11.1: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:27:32.04 +82:32:09.7: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:53:40.89 +83:56:41.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:46:23.34 +83:54:01.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:41:44.22 +82:29:11.1: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:44.22 +82:29:11.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7036 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:27:32.04 +82:32:09.7: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:32.04 +82:32:09.7: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8196 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:13:19.85 +80:49:42.0: 15.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:31:20.20 +80:44:50.3: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:31:20.20 +80:44:50.3: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:20.20 +80:44:50.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7338 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:13:19.85 +80:49:42.0: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:19.85 +80:49:42.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7109 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:18:37.08 +83:00:59.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:56:24.48 +82:02:53.6: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:26:29.64 +80:37:31.1: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:30:01.21 +85:52:46.2: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:56:24.48 +82:02:53.6: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:24.48 +82:02:53.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8527 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:26:29.64 +80:37:31.1: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:30:01.21 +85:52:46.2: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:29.64 +80:37:31.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8742 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:01.21 +85:52:46.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7047 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:58:06.61 +83:55:42.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:37:11.95 +84:41:55.1: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:30:46.52 +84:00:14.1: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:37:11.95 +84:41:55.1: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:11.95 +84:41:55.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5609 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:30:46.52 +84:00:14.1: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:46.52 +84:00:14.1: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9129 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102573.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 25s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91205_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91205_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91219_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91219_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91228_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91228_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91230_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91230_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91234_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91234_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91236_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91236_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91242_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91242_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:44.15 +81:09:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91243_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91243_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91247_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91247_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91249_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91249_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:31.37 +82:54:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91250_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91250_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91251_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91251_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:38.41 +82:31:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91255_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91255_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91256_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91256_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91259_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91259_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91268_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91268_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91272_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91272_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91273_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91273_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91276_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91276_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:09.43 +81:26:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91277_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91277_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:03:44.17 +81:10:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91281_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91281_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91283_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91283_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:20.87 +81:29:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91284_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91284_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91287_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91287_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:44.69 +88:11:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91288_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91288_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91292_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91292_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91294_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91294_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91296_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91296_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:31.03 +86:52:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91298_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91298_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91299_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91299_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:32.48 +81:49:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91300_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91300_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91301_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91301_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91302_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91302_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91303_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91303_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91304_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91304_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91305_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91305_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:08.31 +81:07:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91310_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91310_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:53.38 +80:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91311_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91311_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91689_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91689_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91692_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91692_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91880_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 91880_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92296_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92296_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92298_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92298_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92332_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92332_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92515_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92515_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92710_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92710_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92725_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92725_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92757_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 92757_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93151_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 93151_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93211_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 93211_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93753_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 93753_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94031_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94031_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94378_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94378_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:17.29 +82:48:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94390_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94390_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94412_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94412_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94806_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94806_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94828_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94828_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:23.68 +80:51:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94894_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 94894_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95098_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 95098_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 95103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95389_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 95389_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95677_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 95677_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95982_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 95982_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96131_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96131_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96228_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96228_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96279_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96279_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96294_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96294_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:07.68 +82:23:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96445_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96445_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96449_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96449_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96491_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96491_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96831_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 96831_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97490_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97490_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97511_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97511_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97527_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97527_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97687_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97687_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97774_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 97774_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98123_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98123_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98345_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98345_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98486_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98486_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.85 +79:19:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98626_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 98626_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99162_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99162_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99235_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99235_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99238_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99238_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:34.16 +82:08:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99307_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99307_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99502_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99502_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99570_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 99570_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99623_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99623_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99791_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99791_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99814_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99814_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99908_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99908_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 99917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100014_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 100014_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100045_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 100045_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100323_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 100323_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100879_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 100879_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100896_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 100896_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101000_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101000_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101032_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101032_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101059_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 101059_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101122_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101122_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101289_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101289_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101419_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101419_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101446_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101446_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101665_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101665_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101784_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101784_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101787_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101787_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 101852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101875_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101875_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 101888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102001_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102001_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102042_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102042_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102047_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 102047_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102314_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102314_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102345_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102345_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102414_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 102414_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102423_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102423_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102445_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102445_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102451_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102451_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102476_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102476_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102573_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 102573_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102740_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102740_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102784_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102784_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102791_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102791_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102821_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102821_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 102917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102968_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
Preparing report for the candidate 102968_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103024_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 103024_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103125_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 103125_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:25.82 +80:04:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90604_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 90604_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30994_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 30994_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:15.85 +81:08:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33397_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 33397_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23865_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293
The candidate 23865_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks
