FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last  image: 2461298.67704933 15.09.2026 04:14:47.062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6294
Objects passed selection criteria:  6274
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5230.5
Average stars matched: 5110.25 (97.701 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 01:09:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last  image: 2461298.67704933 15.09.2026 04:14:47.062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  32541
Objects passed selection criteria:  32438
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 29548.8
Average stars matched: 28696.2 (97.1149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   255044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 01:10:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 887001 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 887001 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits_preview.png'

UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits


renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits_preview.png'

UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1239.8953
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 431.0465
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1246.8442
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 432.2992
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.81182
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T23:14:01.6424374' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T04:14:01.6424374' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61298.1764078937 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T04:14:11.5465897' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.1765225232 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     205.712323839337 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9996249135803 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     20.9022222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     331.658055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.78410267647182 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 39.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             27.00216 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits :)

Spent 0.683121 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T23:14:47.0629140' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T04:14:47.0629140' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61298.176933588 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T04:14:56.9648641' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.1770481942 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      205.71232390023 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9996249507034 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                20.83 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     331.708611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.79317729440256 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 39.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             27.00216 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits :)

Spent 0.701952 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits



fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.67652363
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00225 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aS8Mx3bSGZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y0P06uBJkq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvHS7Jd6nr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1JaVOreqz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.30

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.30

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 15.3 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  11.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.aS8Mx3bSGZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y0P06uBJkq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pvHS7Jd6nr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=274, bad_region=0, passed=4020
Got 4020 stars (including 3743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3654 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3654 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3654 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3654 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 3654 stars left (next iteration limit 4019)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3654 robust_rms=10.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.251 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3654 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3654 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3654 robust_rms_before=0.919 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.444 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.454
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=3654 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=1030 n_q2=832 n_q3=1018 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q1JaVOreqz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=273, bad_region=0, passed=4002
Got 4002 stars (including 3727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3637 stars left (next iteration limit 3999)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=10.248 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=0.549 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3637 robust_rms_before=0.923 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.438
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=3637 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1014 n_q2=822 n_q3=1033 n_q4=768 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.161
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (3654 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (3637 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  13:43:19.631 +62:00:42.14
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:20.714 +62:00:39.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00225 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mZiVtdbf8i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iuPjvpnyyh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VVSf2L7jwF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MVsYJaYoBa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mZiVtdbf8i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iuPjvpnyyh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VVSf2L7jwF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=769, bad_region=11, passed=25946
Got 25946 stars (including 25116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=9.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.916 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.449 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.449 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1303 n_q4=990 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MVsYJaYoBa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=791, bad_region=8, passed=25706
Got 25706 stars (including 24862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=9.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.890 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.915 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.437 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.438
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.437 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1303 n_q4=996 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:09:03.93 +65:55:40.3:  13.30 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:22.38 +62:11:28.9:  12.41 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:36:18.79 +64:38:31.9:  13.59 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:44:38.68 +64:53:30.0:  12.68 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:34:54.35 +61:41:35.2:  13.55 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:36:18.79 +64:38:31.9:  13.62 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:22.38 +62:11:28.9:  12.39 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:18.79 +64:38:31.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6104 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:44:38.68 +64:53:30.0:  12.75 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:22.38 +62:11:28.9: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5457 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:09:03.93 +65:55:40.3:  13.33 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:38.68 +64:53:30.0: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8936 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:03.93 +65:55:40.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6171 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:34:54.35 +61:41:35.2:  13.45 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:54.35 +61:41:35.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.1966 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:12.92 +56:31:09.6:  13.51 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:43:40.57 +57:34:42.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:12.92 +56:31:09.6:  13.62 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:12.92 +56:31:09.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6831 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:07:16.98 +65:48:15.6:  13.50 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:43:40.57 +57:34:42.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:43:40.57 +57:34:42.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:15:01.17 +62:58:22.1:  13.67 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:07:16.98 +65:48:15.6:  13.61 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:16.98 +65:48:15.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9331 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:15:01.17 +62:58:22.1:  13.63 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:01.17 +62:58:22.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9917 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:57:23.68 +59:58:04.2:  14.13 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:45:41.82 +60:01:40.8:  13.60 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:39:27.04 +57:45:33.6:  15.04 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:57:23.68 +59:58:04.2:  13.99 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:56.90 +58:27:28.1:  14.55 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:23.68 +59:58:04.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2072 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:32:17.04 +60:27:49.9:  14.73 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:41:43.44 +65:08:33.5:  14.40 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:45:41.82 +60:01:40.8:  13.59 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:39:27.04 +57:45:33.6:  14.93 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:27.04 +57:45:33.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5517 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:41.82 +60:01:40.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0990 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:36:32.34 +66:18:19.2:  14.39 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:32:17.04 +60:27:49.9:  15.00 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:56.90 +58:27:28.1:  14.54 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:17.04 +60:27:49.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6405 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:56.90 +58:27:28.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3595 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:07.18 +59:03:42.8:  15.14 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:41:43.44 +65:08:33.5:  14.49 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:41.00 +60:46:05.3:  14.46 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:43.44 +65:08:33.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1319 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:36:32.34 +66:18:19.2:  14.49 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:32.34 +66:18:19.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0735 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:49.94 +58:55:49.9:  15.03 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:07.18 +59:03:42.8:  15.13 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:41.00 +60:46:05.3:  14.67 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:07.18 +59:03:42.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7622 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:41.00 +60:46:05.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6099 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:14.16 +64:25:31.8:  14.81 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:49.94 +58:55:49.9:  15.04 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:49.94 +58:55:49.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5955 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:40:54.66 +66:24:41.0:  14.61 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:24:31.96 +66:51:49.3:  15.21 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:14.16 +64:25:31.8:  14.63 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:14.16 +64:25:31.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2620 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:24:31.96 +66:51:49.3:  15.34 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:24:31.96 +66:51:49.3: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5437 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:40:54.66 +66:24:41.0:  14.64 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:40:54.66 +66:24:41.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1471 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52255_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52255_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.19    13:34:54.16 +61:41:33.6   5376 3416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.20    13:34:54.53 +61:41:36.9   5377 3415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52261_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52261_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.65    12:36:18.77 +64:38:32.6   9228 1318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.58    12:36:18.81 +64:38:31.3   9229 1318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52263_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.71    13:44:11.74 +66:53:49.4   4935 0249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  13:44:11.74 +66:53:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52264_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.43    12:45:10.53 +65:49:01.2   8543 0718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  12:45:10.53 +65:49:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.74    14:09:03.99 +65:55:41.0   3373 0654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.55    14:09:03.87 +65:55:39.7   3375 0654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52267_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52267_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.11    12:47:07.84 +63:44:38.4   8609 1983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  12:47:07.96 +63:44:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52268_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.23    13:39:04.81 +65:50:00.9   5205 0911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  13:39:04.79 +65:50:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52270_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52270_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    12.87    12:44:38.56 +64:53:29.3   8664 1269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.92    12:44:38.80 +64:53:30.8   8665 1268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52271_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52271_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    12.55    12:39:22.48 +62:11:28.7   9296 2823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.54    12:39:22.29 +62:11:29.0   9298 2822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52273_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.89    14:30:48.08 +62:45:36.7   1585 2230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:30:48.07 +62:45:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52275_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52275_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.43    13:55:38.09 +65:26:07.8   4160 1067   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  13:55:38.16 +65:26:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52276_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52276_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.56    14:21:55.30 +62:15:59.5   2122 2664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:21:55.21 +62:15:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52307_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    10.44    14:33:15.20 +57:47:20.5   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52308_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    10.53    14:46:14.06 +60:29:33.7   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52328_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    10.66    13:41:35.22 +66:22:03.2   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.19    13:35:34.35 +58:06:57.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.01    12:46:57.49 +64:10:07.1   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52382_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.44    13:47:28.71 +57:29:59.2   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52385_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.82    14:28:52.51 +64:54:07.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    11.69    13:30:24.09 +64:32:31.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.09    14:15:48.86 +56:40:26.8   1894 6077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:15:48.83 +56:40:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52428_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.07    13:46:41.32 +67:06:26.1   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52432_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.09    13:42:29.10 +64:49:53.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52447_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.01    13:06:22.36 +61:47:11.5   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52456_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.31    13:43:17.49 +62:43:16.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52458_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.34    13:51:48.91 +59:01:36.5   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52471_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.03    12:40:20.24 +63:17:33.1   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52485_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.46    13:34:19.64 +66:56:45.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52489_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.95    14:34:36.24 +56:20:11.9   0298 5939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:34:36.24 +56:20:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52497_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.27    12:42:06.53 +65:09:13.2   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.80    14:17:02.70 +59:37:50.5   2147 4295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:17:02.70 +59:37:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52515_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.61    13:39:09.19 +64:26:28.4   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52562_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.07    14:22:32.84 +57:30:15.0   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52572_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.34    14:55:53.12 +65:32:01.6   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.40    14:27:41.36 +59:05:20.6   1270 4444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:27:41.37 +59:05:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.25    14:15:33.21 +59:46:00.5   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52621_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.29    13:57:23.34 +57:11:53.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52626_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.78    13:44:26.46 +56:56:04.4   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52657_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.66    14:38:47.91 +62:51:41.3   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52658_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.12    12:30:20.91 +66:04:45.7   9428 0377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  12:30:20.91 +66:04:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52659_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.54    14:13:31.71 +58:29:48.9   2286 5020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:13:31.69 +58:29:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52662_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.45    14:10:57.10 +56:34:08.1   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52667_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.63    14:32:45.48 +60:32:29.6   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52674_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.68    14:34:12.91 +56:31:10.1   0358 5838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.68    14:34:12.92 +56:31:09.2   0360 5839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52689_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.72    14:32:46.88 +66:13:26.5   1985 0163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:32:46.99 +66:13:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52693_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.66    14:14:29.33 +63:16:44.9   2749 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52694_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.96    14:38:34.04 +62:02:32.1   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52725_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.97    14:30:44.36 +56:32:47.5   0650 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52726_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.16    12:43:40.62 +57:34:42.8   9455 5648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    12.98    12:43:40.52 +57:34:41.5   9456 5647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52729_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.43    13:38:56.24 +59:10:01.1   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52750_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.53    13:34:28.67 +58:21:50.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52775_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.98    14:33:12.98 +58:17:42.7   0724 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:33:12.92 +58:17:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52785_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.10    14:38:55.61 +58:39:22.4   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52789_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.24    14:30:38.93 +57:18:30.6   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52803_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.83    14:24:29.27 +60:16:20.9   1675 3800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:24:29.37 +60:16:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52808_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.93    14:07:17.05 +65:48:15.7   3470 0746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.93    14:07:16.92 +65:48:15.4   3471 0746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52817_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.99    14:33:19.03 +64:44:26.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    13.99    14:15:01.28 +62:58:21.7   2678 2343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.99    14:15:01.05 +62:58:22.4   2679 2343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52831_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.17    14:26:08.51 +63:45:23.9   2039 1721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  14:26:08.53 +63:45:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52836_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.20    12:52:20.14 +64:40:24.2   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52843_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.94    14:47:17.10 +65:42:25.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52862_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52862_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.52    14:48:44.98 +62:16:16.3   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52878_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    13.74    12:58:37.92 +60:52:54.9   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52879_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.20    14:35:30.41 +56:49:00.2   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52884_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.40    14:48:38.35 +64:25:48.2   0704 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52888_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.37    14:39:01.15 +58:10:02.5   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52906_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.11    14:41:44.37 +58:55:02.1   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52932_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.20    13:57:23.56 +59:58:04.3   3652 4325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.22    13:57:23.80 +59:58:04.1   3654 4325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52946_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.14    13:45:41.79 +60:01:41.2   4532 4373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.07    13:45:41.85 +60:01:40.3   4533 4373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52947_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.19    14:31:17.20 +61:45:02.0   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52961_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.53    14:45:09.15 +60:26:35.8   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52975_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.55    14:39:27.06 +57:45:33.1   0144 4994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.55    14:39:27.01 +57:45:34.1   0146 4993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52983_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.46    14:23:56.80 +58:27:27.9   1468 4882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.29    14:23:57.00 +58:27:28.3   1470 4882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52994_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.56    14:32:16.78 +60:27:49.8   1131 3551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.76    14:32:17.31 +60:27:50.1   1132 3550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53004_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.55    14:11:43.68 +65:44:26.9   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53016_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.07    12:41:43.50 +65:08:33.8   8825 1086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.21    12:41:43.39 +65:08:33.3   8827 1085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53023_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.39    13:52:45.04 +64:10:58.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53036_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.10    12:36:32.35 +66:18:20.1   9021 0326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.05    12:36:32.33 +66:18:18.3   9022 0325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53043_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.72    14:41:06.97 +59:03:43.4   0243 4193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.82    14:41:07.39 +59:03:42.1   0243 4193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53050_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.69    14:37:41.24 +60:46:04.6   0788 3268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.55    14:37:40.77 +60:46:06.0   0790 3268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53057_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.62    14:23:49.94 +58:55:50.1   1541 4604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.58    14:23:49.93 +58:55:49.7   1543 4604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53065_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.73    14:37:43.89 +60:00:55.1   0661 3707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53076_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.20    12:39:14.45 +64:25:31.7   9062 1486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.35    12:39:13.87 +64:25:31.9   9063 1485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53099_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.48    13:56:29.88 +60:01:39.1   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53120_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53120_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.31    12:40:54.71 +66:24:41.8   8744 0315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.08    12:40:54.62 +66:24:40.2   8745 0314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 53171_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.17652    2461298.67652    14.79    13:24:32.05 +66:51:48.9   6099 0304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    14.41    13:24:31.87 +66:51:49.6   6100 0303   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.17705    2461298.67705    9.38    12:37:45.97 +65:33:20.9   9032 0790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_231523_TTUQ1b1x1_491183_OBjOOFLs/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_23-14-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits

**** FOUND  12:37:45.97 +65:33:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.67652363 -observatory V36
12:26:12.49 -02:35:32.8 Mercury (-0.5mag)
13:53:58.44 -17:16:28.5 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:34:58.57 +22:24:18.5 Mars (1.2mag)
09:15:25.07 +16:30:17.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:49:48.35 +02:25:11.0 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:40.49 +21:01:58.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:58.95 -00:08:21.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:05.66 -23:41:13.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:24:11.84 -20:15:21.8 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 15 01:09 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.67652363:
09:15:22.24 +16:30:32.6 Io (6.0mag)
09:15:16.66 +16:31:00.5 Europa (6.2mag)
09:15:25.15 +16:30:15.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:15:53.98 +16:27:52.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:13:30.17 +16:49:51.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:15:24.54 +16:30:19.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:13:00.94 +16:43:50.8 Elara (17.7mag)
09:19:05.63 +15:55:44.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:15:55.75 +16:50:14.5 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:50.52 +02:24:34.4 Titan (8.3mag)
00:49:45.49 +02:25:16.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:49:40.94 +02:26:37.4 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:49:44.09 +02:25:34.1 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:48:27.25 +02:14:14.2 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 15 01:09 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.67652363:
23:10:59.05 +08:51:46.8 JWST
17:35:52.64 +36:06:03.8 Chandra
09:52:41.88 -55:10:46.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 15 01:09 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.67652363 -observatory V36
03:44:24.15 +19:40:04.9 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:06:14.74 -34:03:40.9 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:25:11.51 -70:45:03.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:24.69 +33:54:31.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:23.83 +27:40:04.7 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:15:54.12 +25:50:06.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:56:43.38 +26:57:27.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:53:36.19 +05:11:18.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:53.91 -16:20:17.9 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:45:00.40 +33:24:23.1 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:49.09 +15:14:10.1 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:29:25.07 +42:50:10.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:15:52.11 +48:47:41.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:39:27.37 -13:08:48.0 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:13:57.25 +16:56:09.7 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:30:52.56 +18:08:44.6 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:26:17.48 -00:31:35.8 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:04:04.68 +72:37:43.1 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:07.70 +45:48:38.2 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:20:37.69 +11:55:38.9 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:32:39.61 -35:13:11.0 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:31:47.17 +38:27:11.4 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:53:28.52 -06:04:07.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:24:25.95 -07:33:59.3 17.7mag 63P/Wild
06:54:08.84 +18:36:35.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:42.24 +15:02:19.2 17.2mag 88P/Howell
06:04:53.24 +31:35:31.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:54:41.90 +22:41:02.8 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:45:20.33 +19:10:14.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:04:10.94 -24:02:24.9 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:26:36.59 +20:22:36.8 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:53:11.28 -16:10:52.9 14.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:31:39.22 +09:35:19.5 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:52.02 +07:45:06.1 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:08:44.24 +38:41:03.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:52:34.21 +34:48:49.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:30:36.29 -01:07:39.4 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:34:30.08 +16:27:01.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 15 01:09 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 15 01:09 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 15 01:09 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
03:31:11.092 -14:38:09.71  AT 2026zoh  2026-08-19.79 20.03
21:18:35.112 -33:20:37.95  AT 2026zog  2026-08-20.54 19.38
02:00:38.724 -25:30:59.99  AT 2026zof  2026-08-22.74 20.44
03:40:37.734 -13:59:47.56  AT 2026zoe  2026-08-22.77 20.28
17:12:00.510 +15:14:17.16  AT 2026zod  2026-08-20.90 19.56
04:37:28.142 -54:56:45.16  AT 2026zoc  2026-08-23.08 18.717
06:44:08.250 -56:40:58.08  AT 2026zob  2026-08-23.13 18.404
02:16:27.519 -59:56:34.64  SN 2026zoa  2026-08-23.02 16.98
00:44:55.141 -61:04:41.30  AT 2026znz  2026-08-22.98 18.786
16:44:30.848 +29:10:48.11  AT 2026zny  2026-08-21.88 18.992
19:34:31.665 -67:53:50.86  AT 2026znx  2026-08-16.88 19.089
21:40:58.884 -12:14:28.04  SN 2026znw  2026-08-22.30 19.7661
14:36:38.726 +06:11:30.81  AT 2026znv  2026-08-15.16 20.4096
16:46:20.418 +09:07:40.25  AT 2026znu  2026-08-18.21 20.6423
14:48:34.457 +47:05:03.76  AT 2026znt  2026-08-18.16 19.9941
15:14:38.314 +53:22:00.35  AT 2026zns  2026-08-22.18 19.8897
14:05:20.302 +38:19:03.24  AT 2026znr  2026-08-17.16 20.531
13:50:33.306 +56:21:40.12  AT 2026znq  2026-08-04.19 20.1833
15:56:19.573 +73:27:02.03  AT 2026znp  2026-08-17.17 19.9239
14:27:30.459 +52:28:49.49  AT 2026zno  2026-08-18.16 19.6953
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 15 01:09 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Sep 15 01:09:13 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 32s (0.53 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 51s (0.85 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 17s (0.28 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 42s (0.70 min)
FIELD_UMa-05-Q1b1x1: 109s (1.82 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 112s (1.87 min)
Finished: Tue Sep 15 01:11:05 CDT 2026