This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,6.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 6.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3715 2461297.8715 11.14 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6
197.00026 17.29921 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,7.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 7.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3715 2461297.8715 13.04 07:37:59.67 +24:01:29.5
195.65022 20.46553 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:59.67 +24:01:29.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:37:59.67 +24:01:29.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3715 2461297.8715 13.62 07:30:21.11 +23:54:44.5
195.07299 18.80262 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 -0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:21.11 +23:54:44.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:21.11 +23:54:44.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3715 2461297.8715 14.04 07:32:14.06 +21:29:04.2
197.61510 18.27895 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.171 Ophelia -0 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:14.06 +21:29:04.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:14.06 +21:29:04.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3715 2461297.8715 13.28 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8
198.69104 12.94830 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -2 -0 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8: 15.50 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8: 16.03 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8715,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3715 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461297.87180841 14.09.2026 08:55:14.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18210
Objects passed selection criteria: 18138
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12577.8
Average stars matched: 11342.2 (90.1771 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 04:32:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461297.87180841 14.09.2026 08:55:14.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 124095
Objects passed selection criteria: 123719
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88879
Average stars matched: 79452.5 (89.394 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 04:33:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.87112366
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0285 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0430 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01570 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Tb1TM88o2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nAaUaCE4pp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bEA2Js0atk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VaAY0GWQlr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.3Tb1TM88o2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nAaUaCE4pp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bEA2Js0atk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=637, bad_region=1216, passed=10890
Got 10890 stars (including 9076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=5.747 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.228 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.634 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.531 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.602 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.568
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.602 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1795 n_q2=613 n_q3=1731 n_q4=635 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VaAY0GWQlr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=692, bad_region=1243, passed=10919
Got 10919 stars (including 9040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=5.684 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.480 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.548 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.597 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.598
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.597 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1795 n_q2=620 n_q3=1727 n_q4=631 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.175
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454_astrometric_residuals.png (4774 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455_astrometric_residuals.png (4773 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: 10.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: 11.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1700 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3334 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6511 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 30880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31106_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31106_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32936_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32936_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.55 +24:13:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 33141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33289_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 33289_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33708_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 33708_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.58 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0285 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0430 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:11.206 +21:59:51.51
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:14.641 +21:59:21.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01570 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sxAEFyR5K7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.quH4tOwGdx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PDZHEaxtz0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MQDTdkws7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 119 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sxAEFyR5K7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.quH4tOwGdx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PDZHEaxtz0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4492, bad_region=5640, passed=72411
Got 72411 stars (including 62478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72411 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=5.703 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.647 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.556 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.560
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.556 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1798 n_q2=612 n_q3=1708 n_q4=656 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MQDTdkws7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=4685, bad_region=5703, passed=74443
Got 74443 stars (including 64231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=5.640 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.584 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=1.484 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.562 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.584
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1805 n_q2=602 n_q3=1698 n_q4=663 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042901_TTUQ2b1x1_1320166_62qBFNmr/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:17.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.47 +19:46:44.8: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:39.91 +18:49:27.6: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:41.92 +23:51:01.3: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:26.70 +22:26:48.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.6: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.24 +25:15:44.9: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:39.91 +18:49:27.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:26.70 +22:26:48.3: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:41.92 +23:51:01.3: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:17.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.47 +19:46:44.8: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:39.91 +18:49:27.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0922 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:26.70 +22:26:48.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8367 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:41.92 +23:51:01.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0910 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1082 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:17.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4634 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.47 +19:46:44.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5030 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.24 +25:15:44.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.24 +25:15:44.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6841 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6708 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.82 +22:50:50.7: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.82 +22:50:50.7: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.82 +22:50:50.7: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.4804 delta=-1.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.2: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3698 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5107 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.8: 12.92 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:59.67 +24:01:29.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.76 +23:15:05.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.31 +22:51:12.1: 13.71 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:01.50 +20:29:00.3: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.8: 13.00 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4811 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:37:59.67 +24:01:29.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.76 +23:15:05.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.76 +23:15:05.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5665 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.97 +20:13:25.3: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:27.02 +23:56:43.0: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.31 +22:51:12.1: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.31 +22:51:12.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5444 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:01.50 +20:29:00.3: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.50 +20:29:00.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5379 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.97 +20:13:25.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:27.02 +23:56:43.0: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.97 +20:13:25.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3012 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:27.02 +23:56:43.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4518 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.16 +18:36:01.0: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:48.78 +25:12:11.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:04.16 +18:36:01.0: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.16 +18:36:01.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1467 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:48.78 +25:12:11.0: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:48.78 +25:12:11.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8068 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.91 +22:52:12.5: 11.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:24.17 +25:25:48.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:54.7: 13.59 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:54.43 +22:07:18.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:21.11 +23:54:44.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:27.69 +18:17:30.7: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:16.15 +23:55:46.3: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:24.17 +25:25:48.0: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.91 +22:52:12.5: 11.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:54.7: 13.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:27.69 +18:17:30.7: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:24.17 +25:25:48.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4841 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:18.91 +22:52:12.5: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9099 delta=-2.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:54.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.8858 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:25:54.43 +22:07:18.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:27.69 +18:17:30.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8481 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:21.11 +23:54:44.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:54.43 +22:07:18.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4604 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:12.18 +24:25:15.6: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:16.15 +23:55:46.3: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:16.15 +23:55:46.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7694 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.41 +22:46:27.2: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:12.18 +24:25:15.6: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:12.18 +24:25:15.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9028 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:32.9: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.41 +22:46:27.2: 13.64 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.41 +22:46:27.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.9687 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.73 +22:55:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.33 +23:28:22.8: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:32.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:32.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7918 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:58.14 +22:58:19.7: 10.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.73 +22:55:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.73 +22:55:56.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:24.76 +24:48:06.7: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.33 +23:28:22.8: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.33 +23:28:22.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0190 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.64 +23:01:54.3: 13.12 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: 11.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:58.14 +22:58:19.7: 11.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:58.14 +22:58:19.7: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0476 delta=-3.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:24.76 +24:48:06.7: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:24.76 +24:48:06.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0293 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:47.61 +23:03:44.4: 14.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:14.06 +21:29:04.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: 11.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.64 +23:01:54.3: 13.11 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3171 delta=-2.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.64 +23:01:54.3: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.2847 delta=-1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:26.02 +23:03:09.6: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:47.61 +23:03:44.4: 14.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:14.06 +21:29:04.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:26.02 +23:03:09.6: 14.31 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:26.02 +23:03:09.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=14.4194 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8: 15.50 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8: 16.03 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:13:13.94 +18:23:36.8: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.2722 delta=2.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196258.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196307.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.07 +24:07:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.35 +19:58:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.80 +21:39:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.75 +24:28:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.20 +19:25:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 171816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 174112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:22.41 +21:38:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174192_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 174192_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 174583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.58 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175664_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 175664_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 175809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175849_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 175849_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.12 +22:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 176791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.37 +22:56:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 177771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179296_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179296_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180001_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180001_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.89 +23:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180424_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180424_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.92 +22:42:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180758_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180758_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.42 +21:18:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 181141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 181189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.11 +22:10:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 181763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.31 +21:47:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.38 +18:39:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.13 +22:43:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.38 +20:30:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.12 +22:57:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.84 +18:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.16 +22:52:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183010_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 183010_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.77 +23:56:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.63 +22:49:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.64 +22:58:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.09 +20:06:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.46 +19:28:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.30 +24:26:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.62 +24:54:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.59 +19:19:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.39 +21:31:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186124_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186124_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.12 +22:57:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186181_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 186181_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186397_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186397_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.33 +24:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.68 +20:31:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186832_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186832_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186899_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186899_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.18 +22:51:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.10 +24:08:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:41.02 +21:33:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187419_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187419_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.84 +22:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187514_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187514_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.72 +19:03:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187765_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187765_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.46 +25:56:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.60 +22:39:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:45.79 +22:54:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.11 +22:50:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.86 +19:56:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.57 +20:00:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.58 +25:49:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.04 +22:39:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.85 +19:37:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189306_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189306_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.14 +24:22:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.55 +20:26:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.64 +21:21:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190012_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190012_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.45 +20:05:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190101_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190101_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.78 +24:19:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.11 +21:35:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.82 +22:50:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.64 +21:27:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.20 +22:57:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191238_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191238_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.27 +24:47:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.87 +24:17:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.53 +25:10:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192016_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192016_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192093_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192093_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192526_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 192526_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193016_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193016_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.75 +22:47:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193077_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193077_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.12 +22:55:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.79 +22:58:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193712_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193712_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.64 +23:02:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.70 +22:51:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.28 +22:48:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194043_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194043_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.79 +20:49:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.91 +22:52:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194477_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194477_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.80 +24:10:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:32.12 +22:51:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.65 +22:47:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195423_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195423_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.87 +23:00:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196258_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196258_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:47.61 +23:03:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.502 3368424137358468864 106.44894225617 +23.06187437711 14.8500 14.2893 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.502#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196307_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 196307_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196314_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196314_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.59 +24:13:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 171031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_03-55-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
