This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 11.67 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2
153.01072 -45.32617 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia 0 0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3613* 02 16 04.92 +12 32 41.2 11.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 12.37 01:42:58.18 +10:05:22.7
143.22784 -50.74020 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste -0 -0 0 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:58.18 +10:05:22.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:58.18 +10:05:22.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 12.84 01:39:43.34 +16:14:07.6
139.45253 -45.08183 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:39:43.34 +16:14:07.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:39:43.34 +16:14:07.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 13.62 01:53:46.43 +16:00:34.8
144.07736 -44.28764 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.295 Theresia 0 0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:46.43 +16:00:34.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:46.43 +16:00:34.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3613* 01 53 46.43 +16 00 34.8 13.6 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 13.71 01:52:55.33 +09:50:50.1
146.97485 -50.13228 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.167 Urda -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:55.33 +09:50:50.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:55.33 +09:50:50.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 13.79 01:42:44.19 +16:05:15.7
140.49536 -45.02748 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1317 Silvretta -0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:44.19 +16:05:15.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:44.19 +16:05:15.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 13.86 01:37:25.95 +15:09:26.3
139.09230 -46.26621 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.517 Edith 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:37:25.95 +15:09:26.3: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:37:25.95 +15:09:26.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 14.02 01:51:05.74 +15:21:41.8
143.52129 -45.11182 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1572 Posnania -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:05.74 +15:21:41.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:05.74 +15:21:41.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3613* 01 51 05.74 +15 21 41.8 14.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 14.03 01:52:09.66 +13:40:34.3
144.67394 -46.61615 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.147 Protogeneia 1 -0 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:09.66 +13:40:34.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:09.66 +13:40:34.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3613* 01 52 09.66 +13 40 34.3 14.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3613 2461297.8613 14.31 02:05:48.82 +10:33:57.6
150.99120 -48.21213 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.401 Ottilia -0 0 0 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:05:48.82 +10:33:57.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:05:48.82 +10:33:57.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3613* 02 05 48.82 +10 33 57.6 14.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8613,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3613 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461297.86163863 14.09.2026 08:40:35.578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8043
Objects passed selection criteria: 8038
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7567
Average stars matched: 7301.75 (96.4946 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 03:44:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461297.86163863 14.09.2026 08:40:35.578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 154
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42458
Objects passed selection criteria: 42347
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40575
Average stars matched: 38746.2 (95.4929 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 265756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 03:46:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.86096116
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:44.297 +13:59:08.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:44.297 +13:59:08.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:41.643 +13:59:39.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:41.643 +13:59:39.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0115 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:44.297 +13:59:08.24
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:41.643 +13:59:39.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01388 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a9R8nXTvk6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvN24WzgFp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zB6YqL93u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W61DU4xPR3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec +8.6053 to +19.2739 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec 8.6053 to 19.2739 deg
Loaded 4732 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3812 out of 4016 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4016 out of 6762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.a9R8nXTvk6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=7679
Got 7679 stars (including 7121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.200 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1216 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pvN24WzgFp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=6762
Got 6762 stars (including 6236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.449
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8zB6YqL93u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=544, bad_region=0, passed=8019
Got 8019 stars (including 7469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8019 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=10.809 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.244 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1209 n_q2=1171 n_q3=1240 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W61DU4xPR3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=7983
Got 7983 stars (including 7424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=10.710 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.860 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.310 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.082 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.321 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.310
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1171 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.365
ref2=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.449
new1=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.044
new2=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.038
reference average sigma_overall=0.2655 worst_q_ratio=1.407
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-39-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_2151058_FNity5y1/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:58.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:58.18 +10:05:22.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:32.61 +14:15:32.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:04:15.28 +11:14:09.1: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:07.89 +14:51:02.9: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:04:15.28 +11:14:09.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:32.61 +14:15:32.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:58.18 +10:05:22.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:58.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:15.28 +11:14:09.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1214 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:32.61 +14:15:32.1: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6946 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:58.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4265 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4414 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:07.89 +14:51:02.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:07.89 +14:51:02.9: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4475 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4678 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20093_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20093_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:33.86 +12:25:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20095_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20095_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20096_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20096_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:05.40 +18:32:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20097_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20097_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:36.38 +14:39:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 20189_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20190_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20249_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 20249_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20265_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:13.50 +11:32:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 20268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51696_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51696_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51698_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51698_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51699_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51699_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51703_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51703_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51704_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51704_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51705_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51705_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51707_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51707_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51712_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51712_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:51.94 +09:46:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51713_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51713_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51714_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51714_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51716_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51716_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:20.51 +17:42:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51718_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51718_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51719_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51719_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51720_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51720_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:56.82 +10:39:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51722_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51722_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:03.43 +10:55:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51818_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51818_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:04.92 +12:32:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:58.17 +10:05:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51958_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 51958_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52124_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52124_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52130_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52130_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52178_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52178_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52195_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52195_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:54.08 +08:56:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52269_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:42.65 +12:53:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52333_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:56.31 +16:36:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52360_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52363_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52429_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52449_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52457_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52494_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52516_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52531_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52542_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52551_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52554_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52560_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52563_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52564_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52568_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52575_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52589_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52599_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52606_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52609_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52612_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52626_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52627_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52628_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52630_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52634_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52635_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52637_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52647_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52660_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52668_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52669_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52670_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52677_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52681_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52682_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52683_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52689_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52690_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52690_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52697_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52698_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52698_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52699_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52701_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52702_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52724_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52729_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52730_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52732_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52741_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52742_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52746_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52746_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52749_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52751_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52752_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52756_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52757_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52761_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52764_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52765_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52766_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52779_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52780_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52782_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52784_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52785_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52791_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52794_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52801_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52806_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52808_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52809_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52810_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52816_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52821_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52823_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52828_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52831_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52832_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52833_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52834_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52845_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52846_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52860_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52863_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52868_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52875_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52876_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52877_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:25.27 +11:34:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52920_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52956_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53010_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 53069_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_03-40-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
