NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-05-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 652529 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 652529 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1193.1100 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 456.3807 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1195.3566 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 456.1178 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.0734 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T01:56:21.4882089' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T06:56:21.4882089' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.2891375925 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T06:56:31.3895984' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.2892521876 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999897161842 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997681719947 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1394444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 358.863888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75473318812542 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits :) Spent 0.766496 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T01:57:23.3846606' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T06:57:23.3846606' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.2898539817 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T06:57:33.2867073' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.2899685879 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999897236995 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997682425113 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 358.924444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75524334379602 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits :) Spent 0.646568 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.78925333 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.8' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0672 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 Second-epoch second image center 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00901 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uSIGypgyRF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9WBOQz99zX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tTmuzL2BcC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zQgm7EXWQl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.uSIGypgyRF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.9WBOQz99zX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.tTmuzL2BcC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5857 Got 5857 stars (including 5498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5857 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=11.512 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.788 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.599 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.631 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.837 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.390 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.486 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.390 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1324 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zQgm7EXWQl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=0, passed=5812 Got 5812 stars (including 5440 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5812 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=11.651 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.970 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.829 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.422 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.422 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1338 n_q2=1389 n_q3=1103 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.057 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.048 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.8' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0672 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:01:12.105 +77:29:15.29 Second-epoch second image center 12:01:10.031 +77:29:47.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00901 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ALEd6T4Ibf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ht1OlTViP5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5whdwXVRwd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r5OtuzHbKn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ALEd6T4Ibf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Ht1OlTViP5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.5whdwXVRwd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1377, bad_region=20, passed=37244 Got 37244 stars (including 35765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37244 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=11.329 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.993 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.592 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.629 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1321 n_q2=1404 n_q3=1083 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.r5OtuzHbKn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1353, bad_region=24, passed=37161 Got 37161 stars (including 35711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37161 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=11.600 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.833 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.473 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.817 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.414 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.473 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.414 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1331 n_q2=1400 n_q3=1087 n_q4=1072 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:03.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:42:54.46 +78:59:41.6: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:41:57.47 +79:59:04.3: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:11:44.74 +80:45:32.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:11:27.36 +78:27:05.0: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:03.8: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:41:57.47 +79:59:04.3: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:11:44.74 +80:45:32.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:57.47 +79:59:04.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7997 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:03.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3931 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:44.74 +80:45:32.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9173 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:42:54.46 +78:59:41.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:54.46 +78:59:41.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3713 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:11:27.36 +78:27:05.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:27.36 +78:27:05.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2869 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:03:13.66 +73:24:21.7: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:04:51.60 +78:40:30.1: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:03:13.66 +73:24:21.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:13.66 +73:24:21.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2451 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:04:51.60 +78:40:30.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:04:51.60 +78:40:30.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3577 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4239 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:36:28.40 +79:13:31.0: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:41:10.93 +79:00:33.4: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:08:41.10 +82:18:09.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:41:57.22 +79:19:58.6: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:36:28.40 +79:13:31.0: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:28.40 +79:13:31.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9936 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:41:57.22 +79:19:58.6: 15.43 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:41:10.93 +79:00:33.4: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:57.22 +79:19:58.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6939 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:10.93 +79:00:33.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6647 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:08:41.10 +82:18:09.3: 15.49 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:41.10 +82:18:09.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69549_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69549_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.81    12:41:57.08 +79:59:03.4   3838 1531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.79    12:41:57.87 +79:59:05.1   3837 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69557_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69557_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.40    12:25:21.05 +75:42:03.9   3825 4159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.39    12:25:20.89 +75:42:03.6   3823 4164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.77    12:50:30.27 +81:12:41.4   3824 0766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 12:50:30.34 +81:12:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.38    13:42:54.73 +78:59:42.3   2060 1469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.37    13:42:54.19 +78:59:40.8   2059 1474   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69571_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69571_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.08    13:14:53.74 +79:25:28.7   2888 1582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:14:53.90 +79:25:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69575_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69575_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.99    13:26:40.43 +81:24:32.3   3091 0362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:26:40.85 +81:24:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69577_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69577_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.27    13:39:39.14 +75:59:02.6   1284 3125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:39:39.07 +75:59:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69578_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69578_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    13.91    10:11:44.76 +80:45:33.5   7522 0789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.93    10:11:44.73 +80:45:32.4   7521 0795   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69579_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69579_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.55    13:50:32.15 +80:03:51.3   2196 0808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:50:31.95 +80:03:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69583_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69583_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.61    12:04:48.44 +81:25:18.6   4869 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 12:04:48.58 +81:25:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69587_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69587_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    13.29    13:11:27.71 +78:27:05.1   2767 2159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.29    13:11:27.00 +78:27:04.8   2766 2164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69591_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69591_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.04    11:45:34.08 +81:51:52.8   5302 0581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 11:45:34.18 +81:51:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69594_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69594_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    12.80    10:45:10.52 +78:29:20.3   7096 2386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:45:10.42 +78:29:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69597_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69597_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    12.47    10:30:05.00 +78:50:03.5   7468 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:30:05.05 +78:50:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69625_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69625_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    10.25    14:03:49.29 +74:50:32.7   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69773_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69773_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    12.77    13:11:43.43 +80:27:50.1   3196 1029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:11:43.52 +80:27:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69828_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69828_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    12.94    13:56:27.19 +76:35:18.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69842_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69842_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.30    14:24:36.91 +78:33:56.8   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.35    13:39:06.22 +75:18:32.6   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    13.26    11:03:13.81 +73:24:21.8   7114 5515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.23    11:03:13.51 +73:24:21.6   7113 5521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69904_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69904_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.49    14:38:45.86 +79:42:39.8   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.35    10:57:15.49 +74:22:17.9   7247 4900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:57:15.30 +74:22:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.44    10:59:45.72 +79:39:33.8   6531 1792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.73 +79:39:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69907_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69907_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.35    13:49:50.22 +73:27:49.4   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69908_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69908_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.38    13:52:23.88 +74:19:37.3   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69914_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69914_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    13.48    10:04:51.55 +78:40:30.0   8202 1868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.27    10:04:51.65 +78:40:30.3   8201 1873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69916_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69916_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    13.39    12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.8   3477 4624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.47    12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.1   3475 4630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.46    10:23:47.97 +78:20:02.0   7746 2281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:23:48.17 +78:20:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69918_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69918_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.39    14:00:59.98 +79:20:34.8   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69930_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69930_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.31    13:42:42.45 +72:48:47.9   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69961_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69961_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.81    14:01:39.60 +74:49:53.3   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69969_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69969_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.67    13:56:18.09 +77:04:52.8   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.67    13:40:54.76 +76:31:39.5   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70007_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70007_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.71    13:50:28.46 +75:19:59.4   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70010_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70010_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.91    14:18:33.35 +78:09:22.4   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70012_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70012_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.61    14:17:05.32 +76:27:04.4   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70021_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70021_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.24    14:30:50.08 +78:28:50.6   0704 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.93    14:10:47.68 +80:31:29.8   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.10    13:03:06.31 +76:29:44.6   2618 3364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 13:03:06.66 +76:29:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70059_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70059_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.98    10:55:47.28 +77:05:43.3   6960 3281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 10:55:46.93 +77:05:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70071_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70071_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.10    11:15:45.70 +78:15:58.8   6208 2694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 11:15:45.58 +78:15:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70088_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70088_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.05    12:36:28.27 +79:13:32.1   3879 2011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    13.96    12:36:28.53 +79:13:29.8   3878 2016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70124_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70124_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.22    14:15:15.55 +78:44:45.9   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70151_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70151_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.15    13:33:10.09 +73:29:13.8   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70163_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70163_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.41    13:31:09.64 +75:12:35.5   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70280_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70280_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.62    12:45:37.06 +80:24:27.4   3809 1266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits **** FOUND 12:45:37.07 +80:24:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70346_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70346_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.67    12:41:10.40 +79:00:33.1   3719 2107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.66    12:41:11.46 +79:00:33.7   3717 2112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70358_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70358_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.82    11:08:41.07 +82:18:10.4   6048 0250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    15.03    11:08:41.12 +82:18:08.1   6047 0256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.28925    2461297.78925    14.82    09:41:57.63 +79:19:58.7   8613 1207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0292.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.61    09:41:56.82 +79:19:58.5   8612 1212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70395_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 The candidate 70395_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.28997    2461297.78997    14.40    13:14:06.73 +75:43:14.5   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015810_TTUQ1b1x1_1053395_bgvhz4NT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-57-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.78925333 -observatory V36 12:21:06.26 -01:55:40.8 Mercury (-0.5mag) 13:52:10.92 -16:59:20.2 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:32:38.82 +22:28:38.7 Mars (1.2mag) 09:14:42.90 +16:33:19.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:50:01.99 +02:26:45.0 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:41.26 +21:01:59.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:04.22 -00:07:46.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:08.74 -23:41:04.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:42:11.94 -15:56:08.2 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 14 02:25 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.78925333: 09:14:48.06 +16:32:54.2 Io (6.0mag) 09:14:40.54 +16:33:33.2 Europa (6.2mag) 09:14:54.40 +16:32:20.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:15:11.74 +16:30:56.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:12:45.56 +16:52:36.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:14:41.84 +16:33:25.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:12:17.24 +16:46:33.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:18:25.14 +15:58:59.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:15:17.46 +16:53:02.6 Carme (18.9mag) 00:49:59.44 +02:26:10.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:50:05.39 +02:26:40.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:49:57.17 +02:28:20.8 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:50:02.23 +02:27:06.8 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:48:41.72 +02:15:52.4 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 14 02:25 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.78925333: 23:02:32.87 +08:01:39.5 JWST 15:23:16.79 +51:17:02.1 Chandra 06:04:13.25 +28:15:57.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 14 02:25 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.78925333 -observatory V36 03:44:01.76 +19:38:06.8 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:48.71 -34:04:42.7 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:24:34.47 -70:41:56.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:21.02 +33:53:05.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:08:03.58 +27:47:06.1 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:15:17.32 +25:51:03.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:55:54.88 +26:59:10.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:53:03.39 +05:11:37.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:01.90 -16:15:39.4 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:44:17.70 +33:20:43.1 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:39.41 +15:14:42.7 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:29:48.45 +42:52:39.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:16:58.38 +48:51:38.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:39:03.66 -13:07:55.0 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:13:44.20 +17:07:13.8 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:29:24.16 +18:13:00.4 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:25:31.32 -00:27:12.6 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:01:18.34 +72:47:57.6 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:01:44.07 +45:51:22.1 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:19:47.70 +11:51:16.9 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:31:53.02 -35:14:07.3 13.6mag 10P/Tempel 01:30:24.00 +38:19:00.6 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:52:52.61 -06:00:00.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:22:38.89 -07:17:26.0 17.7mag 63P/Wild 06:52:31.72 +18:41:11.4 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:16:52.69 +15:02:25.9 17.2mag 88P/Howell 06:01:50.25 +31:15:54.4 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:52:10.60 +22:56:11.1 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:43:23.54 +19:21:51.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:02:10.65 -23:44:26.8 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:25:36.88 +20:24:30.4 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:58:36.00 -16:24:40.2 14.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:31:35.62 +09:58:50.6 12.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:23.05 +07:50:27.5 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 05:06:28.93 +38:25:47.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 08:50:17.54 +34:55:07.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:58.38 -01:01:46.3 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:33:45.36 +16:29:41.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 14 02:25 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 14 02:25 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 14 02:25 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:45:35.880 +38:33:43.85 SN 2026zkk 2026-08-18.90 17.23 04:53:33.581 -37:44:08.19 AT 2026zkj 2026-08-19.11 18.412 04:33:11.557 -27:00:23.12 AT 2026zki 2026-08-21.62 19.445 01:25:32.323 -38:34:11.66 AT 2026zkh 2026-08-21.51 19.306 20:45:57.860 -19:30:34.01 AT 2026zkg 2026-08-15.29 20.7465 19:53:00.400 -05:25:51.19 AT 2026zkf 2026-08-15.20 20.945 00:49:43.392 -19:44:08.50 SN 2026zke 2026-08-19.38 20.2324 03:05:48.468 -05:17:22.75 AT 2026zkd 2026-08-16.45 20.4311 06:08:49.579 +42:47:00.29 AT 2026zkc 2026-08-18.50 19.8574 21:17:07.485 +01:30:33.19 AT 2026zkb 2026-08-16.25 20.5984 00:01:01.044 -18:02:57.76 AT 2026zka 2026-08-15.40 20.6822 21:30:19.982 +02:15:49.72 AT 2026zjz 2026-08-15.33 20.8602 04:20:07.500 -42:27:00.50 AT 2026zjy 2026-08-21.36 15.4 01:46:22.348 +15:27:02.25 AT 2026zjx 2026-08-19.38 20.8195 01:38:07.380 -17:17:41.98 AT 2026zjw 2026-08-21.38 19.6105 01:15:47.199 -22:02:12.71 AT 2026zjv 2026-08-21.51 18.299 23:48:25.941 -23:10:06.92 AT 2026zju 2026-08-21.48 19.278 00:19:28.362 -35:04:25.00 AT 2026zjt 2026-08-21.50 19.116 01:13:44.393 -16:46:03.60 AT 2026zjs 2026-08-21.46 19.164 20:02:51.248 -01:02:45.77 AT 2026zjr 2026-08-20.88 19.23 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 14 02:25 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C