NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    11.32    23:59:48.25 -07:13:52.8   4769 4867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.30    23:59:48.22 -07:13:52.4   4764 4872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 14.2558  2461297.7558  11.31  23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6
 88.95910 -66.63446 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       0  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6:  15.39 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6:  15.45 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    11.82    23:48:03.88 -13:27:40.8   3020 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.82    23:48:03.83 -13:27:41.3   3016 1101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 14.2558  2461297.7558  11.82  23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0
 72.50399 -69.85191 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0     -0       0  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0:  15.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    13.57    00:11:08.74 -10:47:20.6   6443 2701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    13.72    00:11:08.67 -10:47:21.4   6438 2706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 14.2558  2461297.7558  13.64  00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0
 90.88085 -71.10913 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0     -0       1  13.5    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.13    23:33:16.78 -05:58:04.9   0750 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.14    23:33:16.81 -05:58:03.6   0746 5640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 14.2558  2461297.7558  14.13  23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2
 78.12243 -61.83572 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
981 Martina                 -2      1       2  14.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2:  15.14 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2:  15.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 615923 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 615906 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1490.8588 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 514.5186 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1488.6074 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 513.3477 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.94778 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T01:07:44.9952448' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T06:07:44.9952448' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.2553818864 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T06:07:54.8962526' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.2554964814 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.995907652254 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99946448598609 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 43.4919444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 156.545833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.45138227191523 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20484 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20484 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 16.601328 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits :) Spent 0.644365 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.9099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-14T01:08:37.1313482' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T06:08:37.1313482' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.2559853126 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T06:08:47.0349888' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.2560999305 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.995907637446 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99946448277479 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 43.5636111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 156.824166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.44947965709775 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20484 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20484 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.9099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.9099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 16.601328 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits :) Spent 0.692947 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.75549763 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.87bjm8geE4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yTLDUl3rcm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AAx3LTWxDA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YHho3xH15o Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.87bjm8geE4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.yTLDUl3rcm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AAx3LTWxDA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=866, passed=4228 Got 4228 stars (including 3116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4228 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9542 through 0 to 8.0760, gap 8.0760 to 351.9542 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3033 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3032 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3516 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9540 through 0 to 8.0758, gap 8.0758 to 351.9540 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3033 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3031 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3516 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3031 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3516 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 3031 stars left (next iteration limit 3335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3031 robust_rms=6.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.979 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3031 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.777 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3031 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3031 robust_rms_before=4.512 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.436 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.436 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.436 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=3031 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=986 n_q2=547 n_q3=1015 n_q4=483 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.YHho3xH15o (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=864, passed=4214 Got 4214 stars (including 3123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4214 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9541 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3035 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3034 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3034 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3034 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9542 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9542 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3035 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3033 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3033 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 3033 stars left (next iteration limit 3337) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3033 robust_rms=6.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.681 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3033 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.744 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3033 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.427 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3033 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.427 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=3033 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=995 n_q2=545 n_q3=1023 n_q4=470 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.114 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.119 reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288_astrometric_residuals.png (3031 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (3033 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8743 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20190.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20191.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 Preparing report for the candidate 20190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 Preparing report for the candidate 20191_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 20192_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    11.88    23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.7   0702 4371   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.87    23:32:49.47 -08:01:55.6   0697 4376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    10.66    00:13:45.95 -07:48:34.6   6856 4505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.94 -07:48:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.619 -09:59:45.88 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.515 -10:00:19.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SNo4Cry4dJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h9qXG4Xlpg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iThgqzvZtV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FEYafU2sN7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.SNo4Cry4dJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724 Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.h9qXG4Xlpg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.iThgqzvZtV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=849, bad_region=4555, passed=23577 Got 23577 stars (including 18346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23577 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9470 through 0 to 8.0880, gap 8.0880 to 351.9470 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20083 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9468 through 0 to 8.0878, gap 8.0878 to 351.9468 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20083 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20083 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4829 stars left (next iteration limit 5314) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=6.673 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.407 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.758 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.454 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4829 robust_rms_before=4.378 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.439 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.454 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.439 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4829 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1579 n_q2=894 n_q3=1518 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.FEYafU2sN7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=844, bad_region=4540, passed=23513 Got 23513 stars (including 18301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9466 through 0 to 8.0969, gap 8.0969 to 351.9466 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9467 through 0 to 8.0973, gap 8.0973 to 351.9467 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5315) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=6.710 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.264 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.743 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.467 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.436 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.467 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.436 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1593 n_q2=896 n_q3=1509 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:41.36 -06:46:14.2: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.60 -08:03:52.9: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:53.94 -12:53:49.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:57.96 -14:09:53.4: 14.23 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.12 -10:46:14.2: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:12.0: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:27.42 -10:44:46.8: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:54.88 -10:48:26.2: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:12.0: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.60 -08:03:52.9: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:57.96 -14:09:53.4: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:41.36 -06:46:14.2: 13.81 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:53.94 -12:53:49.0: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.12 -10:46:14.2: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.60 -08:03:52.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1198 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:57.96 -14:09:53.4: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0801 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:12.0: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9290 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.36 -06:46:14.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0370 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:53.94 -12:53:49.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0038 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.12 -10:46:14.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9876 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:27.42 -10:44:46.8: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:54.88 -10:48:26.2: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.42 -10:44:46.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2248 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:54.88 -10:48:26.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2707 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:53.85 -10:28:23.3: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:48.81 -13:17:41.6: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:43.41 -06:40:26.2: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:04.12 -12:51:52.0: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:53.85 -10:28:23.3: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:43.41 -06:40:26.2: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:04.12 -12:51:52.0: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:48.81 -13:17:41.6: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:53.85 -10:28:23.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3530 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:43.41 -06:40:26.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2467 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:04.12 -12:51:52.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4189 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:48.81 -13:17:41.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4004 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32126_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.03    23:33:41.38 -06:46:13.6   0821 5143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.04    23:33:41.34 -06:46:14.9   0817 5148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32129_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    12.91    00:10:53.91 -12:53:49.2   6390 1424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    13.13    00:10:53.98 -12:53:48.8   6386 1430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.32    23:59:48.22 -07:13:52.4   4764 4872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits **** FOUND 23:59:48.23 -07:13:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32137_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.78    23:48:03.84 -13:27:41.2   3016 1101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits **** FOUND 23:48:03.85 -13:27:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32140_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32140_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    11.97    00:17:43.38 -11:13:12.4   7419 2423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    11.89    00:17:43.34 -11:13:11.6   7415 2429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32161_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 Preparing report for the candidate 32161_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32169_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    13.97    00:03:22.17 -10:46:14.2   5287 2724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.02    00:03:22.07 -10:46:14.3   5283 2730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.08    23:37:57.92 -14:09:53.1   1525 0644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.08    23:37:57.99 -14:09:53.7   1521 0650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 Preparing report for the candidate 32176_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32182_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32182_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.13    23:56:09.61 -08:03:53.1   4221 4364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.12    23:56:09.60 -08:03:52.6   4216 4370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32186_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32186_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.21    23:32:27.39 -10:44:46.5   0672 2715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.24    23:32:27.45 -10:44:47.0   0668 2720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32196_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32196_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.27    23:37:54.91 -10:48:27.3   1496 2691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.27    23:37:54.86 -10:48:25.1   1492 2696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.31    23:52:43.44 -06:40:26.4   3705 5208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.19    23:52:43.38 -06:40:26.1   3701 5214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32201_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.32    23:35:53.83 -10:28:22.5   1190 2890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.40    23:35:53.86 -10:28:24.1   1186 2895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32215_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32215_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.34    23:48:48.87 -13:17:41.2   3130 1197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.52    23:48:48.75 -13:17:42.0   3126 1203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32216_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 32216_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 14.25550    2461297.75550    14.32    23:43:04.10 -12:51:52.4   2278 1450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    14.59    23:43:04.14 -12:51:51.5   2273 1456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 14.25610    2461297.75610    10.65    00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.7   6856 4505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_015057_TTUQ2b1x1_3093600_eeAYhuhF/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-14_01-08-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2 ################################################################################### 23:59:48.24 -07:13:52.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:48:03.86 -13:27:41.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:11:08.70 -10:47:21.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:33:16.80 -05:58:04.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.75549763 -observatory V36 12:20:54.47 -01:54:09.4 Mercury (-0.5mag) 13:52:06.56 -16:58:41.4 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:32:33.45 +22:28:48.2 Mars (1.2mag) 09:14:41.27 +16:33:26.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:50:02.51 +02:26:48.5 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:41.29 +21:01:59.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:04.42 -00:07:44.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:08.86 -23:41:03.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:40:02.79 -15:47:34.1 Moon (-9.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 14 03:32 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.75549763: 09:14:46.98 +16:32:58.4 Io (6.0mag) 09:14:39.47 +16:33:37.3 Europa (6.2mag) 09:14:53.12 +16:32:26.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:15:10.06 +16:31:03.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:12:43.84 +16:52:43.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:14:41.09 +16:33:28.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:12:15.56 +16:46:40.0 Elara (17.7mag) 09:18:23.57 +15:59:07.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:15:15.98 +16:53:09.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:49:59.79 +02:26:14.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:50:06.07 +02:26:43.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:49:57.80 +02:28:24.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:50:02.92 +02:27:10.2 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:48:42.28 +02:15:56.1 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 14 03:32 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.75549763: 23:02:28.36 +07:59:43.4 JWST 15:12:11.75 +52:10:21.3 Chandra 05:39:27.57 +37:05:06.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 14 03:32 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.75549763 -observatory V36 03:44:00.90 +19:38:01.9 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:47.74 -34:04:45.3 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:24:33.04 -70:41:49.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:20.87 +33:53:01.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:08:05.12 +27:47:22.1 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:15:15.89 +25:51:05.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:55:53.01 +26:59:14.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:53:02.13 +05:11:37.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:02.21 -16:15:28.9 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:44:16.04 +33:20:34.7 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:39.04 +15:14:44.0 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:29:49.38 +42:52:45.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:17:00.94 +48:51:47.2 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:39:02.75 -13:07:53.0 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:13:43.67 +17:07:38.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:29:20.77 +18:13:10.1 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:25:29.56 -00:27:02.6 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:01:12.07 +72:48:21.5 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:01:45.46 +45:51:27.8 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:19:45.78 +11:51:06.9 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:31:51.52 -35:14:09.1 13.6mag 10P/Tempel 01:30:21.01 +38:18:40.5 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:52:51.22 -05:59:51.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:22:34.78 -07:16:48.2 17.7mag 63P/Wild 06:52:27.98 +18:41:21.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:16:53.08 +15:02:25.8 17.2mag 88P/Howell 06:01:43.27 +31:15:08.8 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:52:04.78 +22:56:45.2 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:43:19.05 +19:22:18.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:02:06.04 -23:43:45.8 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:25:34.58 +20:24:34.5 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:58:48.14 -16:25:09.6 14.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:31:35.46 +09:59:45.2 12.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:21.95 +07:50:39.4 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 05:06:23.76 +38:25:11.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 08:50:12.27 +34:55:22.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:56.93 -01:01:32.8 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:33:43.64 +16:29:48.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 14 03:32 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 14 03:32 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 14 03:32 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:02:00.172 +38:05:26.27 AT 2026zko 2026-08-12.18 20.7064 15:57:37.112 +23:51:58.15 AT 2026zkn 2026-08-17.16 19.8515 17:29:19.548 +41:42:49.74 AT 2026zkm 2026-08-21.84 18.47 03:46:22.830 +30:25:47.20 AT 2026zkl 2026-08-18.77 18.14 22:45:35.880 +38:33:43.85 SN 2026zkk 2026-08-18.90 17.23 04:53:33.581 -37:44:08.19 AT 2026zkj 2026-08-19.11 18.412 04:33:11.557 -27:00:23.12 AT 2026zki 2026-08-21.62 19.445 01:25:32.323 -38:34:11.66 AT 2026zkh 2026-08-21.51 19.306 20:45:57.860 -19:30:34.01 AT 2026zkg 2026-08-15.29 20.7465 19:53:00.400 -05:25:51.19 AT 2026zkf 2026-08-15.20 20.945 00:49:43.392 -19:44:08.50 SN 2026zke 2026-08-19.38 20.2324 03:05:48.468 -05:17:22.75 AT 2026zkd 2026-08-16.45 20.4311 06:08:49.579 +42:47:00.29 AT 2026zkc 2026-08-18.50 19.8574 21:17:07.485 +01:30:33.19 AT 2026zkb 2026-08-16.25 20.5984 00:01:01.044 -18:02:57.76 AT 2026zka 2026-08-15.40 20.6822 21:30:19.982 +02:15:49.72 AT 2026zjz 2026-08-15.33 20.8602 04:20:07.500 -42:27:00.50 AT 2026zjy 2026-08-21.36 15.4 01:46:22.348 +15:27:02.25 AT 2026zjx 2026-08-19.38 20.8195 01:38:07.380 -17:17:41.98 AT 2026zjw 2026-08-21.38 19.6105 01:15:47.199 -22:02:12.71 AT 2026zjv 2026-08-21.51 18.299 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 14 03:32 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C