This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,8.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 8.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 11.87 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1
98.54770 -64.97894 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -3 -2 4 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 11.99 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7
89.66381 -61.33660 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.06 23:34:46.22 -00:28:04.4
85.14306 -57.60217 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:46.22 -00:28:04.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:46.22 -00:28:04.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.10 23:38:48.09 -01:33:58.2
85.62055 -59.07143 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:48.09 -01:33:58.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:48.09 -01:33:58.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.13 23:29:59.27 -01:04:16.6
82.66963 -57.43186 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:59.27 -01:04:16.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:59.27 -01:04:16.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.38 23:38:33.83 -03:37:46.8
83.23870 -60.75577 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 -0 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:33.83 -03:37:46.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:33.83 -03:37:46.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.60 00:17:04.89 +01:46:55.6
105.60002 -59.92847 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud 0 1 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:17:04.89 +01:46:55.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:17:04.89 +01:46:55.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.89 23:30:51.76 +00:46:06.0
84.88418 -56.03294 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:51.76 +00:46:06.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:51.76 +00:46:06.0: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.80 23:33:16.25 -05:58:08.3
78.11716 -61.83517 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 1 0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:16.25 -05:58:08.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:16.25 -05:58:08.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 14.09 23:38:25.20 +00:22:39.0
87.41689 -57.37067 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.440 Theodora -1 -0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:25.20 +00:22:39.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:25.20 +00:22:39.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.94 23:58:14.15 -02:50:30.8
93.00025 -62.58044 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase -0 1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:14.15 -02:50:30.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:14.15 -02:50:30.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 13.94 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2
98.31167 -57.22304 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461297.7704,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260914.2704 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 14.33 23:54:55.43 -02:56:32.6
91.31065 -62.29279 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa -0 -0 0 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:55.43 -02:56:32.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:55.43 -02:56:32.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.2704 2461297.7704 14.63 23:30:47.29 -03:45:36.2
79.92603 -59.71790 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.461 Saskia 1 1 2 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:47.29 -03:45:36.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:47.29 -03:45:36.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.7704,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.2704 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461297.77060823 14.09.2026 06:29:30.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6057
Objects passed selection criteria: 6054
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5708.75
Average stars matched: 5450.75 (95.4806 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 01:33:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461297.77060823 14.09.2026 06:29:30.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31479
Objects passed selection criteria: 31387
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29981.2
Average stars matched: 28339.8 (94.5249 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255496 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 01:34:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.77012267
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00092 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00092 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ETLR4wksue
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HG94SjaJfa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6hNrUqTzTA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MnAk01uuO2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.1 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ETLR4wksue (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HG94SjaJfa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6hNrUqTzTA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=0, passed=5984
Got 5984 stars (including 5613 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1148, gap 8.1148 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8563 through 0 to 8.1154, gap 8.1154 to 351.8563
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=9.874 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.273 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.993 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.295 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.300
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.295 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1311 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MnAk01uuO2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=0, passed=6044
Got 6044 stars (including 5656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1147, gap 8.1147 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8564 through 0 to 8.1154, gap 8.1154 to 351.8564
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=9.893 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1304 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.029
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.018
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:41.17 -01:44:55.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:41.17 -01:44:55.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.4: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=11.9923 delta=2.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8673 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.4: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1079 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:41.17 -01:44:55.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9836 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.88 +00:47:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 20277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 20423_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20429_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20429_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:14.93 -02:45:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 20436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20438_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20440_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20440_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.45 -01:12:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20446_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:44:04.75 +00:22:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:11:06.69 -04:02:02.1
23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.511 -01:56:29.80
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.725 -01:56:30.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00092 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00092 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n9VRsmqDXZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mRRmotAFBx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MYTuECfEr8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.unuwElx2Cq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=5.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to +3.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to 3.2772 deg
Loaded 113502 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3314 out of 3546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3546 out of 30046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 156 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.n9VRsmqDXZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1084, bad_region=0, passed=29266
Got 29266 stars (including 28140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1387 through 0 to 7.8962, gap 7.8962 to 352.1387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mRRmotAFBx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1265, bad_region=0, passed=30031
Got 30031 stars (including 28725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1258 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1258
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1262 through 0 to 7.8768, gap 7.8768 to 352.1262
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MYTuECfEr8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1091, bad_region=11, passed=30753
Got 30753 stars (including 29594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8321 through 0 to 8.1235, gap 8.1235 to 351.8321
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8317 through 0 to 8.1241, gap 8.1241 to 351.8317
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=9.764 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.084 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.283 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.297
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.283 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1125 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.unuwElx2Cq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1096, bad_region=15, passed=30808
Got 30808 stars (including 29645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8319 through 0 to 8.1237, gap 8.1237 to 351.8319
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8315 through 0 to 8.1245, gap 8.1245 to 351.8315
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=9.795 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.252 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.284 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.284 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1286 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-28-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_013029_TTUQ1b1x1_538845_iIO2OCEx/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:43:09.54 -00:15:44.5: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.5: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:16:01.45 -05:25:03.6: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:43.10 -00:26:11.1: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:57:47.32 +01:16:21.5: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:21:54.41 -03:02:10.7: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:24:01.38 -01:18:07.5: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:30.82 -04:35:31.5: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:36.28 +00:12:19.9: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:16:01.45 -05:25:03.6: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:43.10 -00:26:11.1: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:57:47.32 +01:16:21.5: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:43:09.54 -00:15:44.5: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:24:01.38 -01:18:07.5: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:30.82 -04:35:31.5: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:01.45 -05:25:03.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1486 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:43.10 -00:26:11.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3912 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:47.32 +01:16:21.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5475 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:30.84 -04:38:51.3: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:01.38 -01:18:07.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4114 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:09.54 -00:15:44.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4698 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.82 -04:35:31.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4772 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.5: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:36.28 +00:12:19.9: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7134 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:21:54.41 -03:02:10.7: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:36.28 +00:12:19.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5984 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:54.41 -03:02:10.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4431 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:30.84 -04:38:51.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:30.84 -04:38:51.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3918 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:56.13 +01:54:08.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:56.13 +01:54:08.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:56.13 +01:54:08.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0213 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:03.08 +02:51:52.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2543 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:45:11.95 +02:18:06.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.4: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:46.22 -00:28:04.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.4: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4274 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:48.09 -01:33:58.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:45:11.95 +02:18:06.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:59.27 -01:04:16.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:11.95 +02:18:06.5: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7177 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:46.22 -00:28:04.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:48.09 -01:33:58.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:59.27 -01:04:16.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:33.83 -03:37:46.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:27.62 -00:35:54.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:17:04.89 +01:46:55.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:33.83 -03:37:46.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4061 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:27.62 -00:35:54.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:27.62 -00:35:54.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4773 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:17:04.89 +01:46:55.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:51.76 +00:46:06.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:16.25 -05:58:08.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:51.76 +00:46:06.0: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:56.0: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:29.36 -00:58:12.1: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:16.25 -05:58:08.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:56.0: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:29.36 -00:58:12.1: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.27 +00:02:56.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0266 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.36 -00:58:12.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0090 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:30.65 -07:10:03.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7558 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:25.20 +00:22:39.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:48:43.27 +02:54:32.5: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:25.20 +00:22:39.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:14.15 -02:50:30.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:48:43.27 +02:54:32.5: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:43.27 +02:54:32.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0857 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:14.15 -02:50:30.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:38.10 +00:26:04.7: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:38.10 +00:26:04.7: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:38.10 +00:26:04.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1307 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:13.26 +03:07:53.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:07.9: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:33.98 -05:59:44.2: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:42.61 -06:02:28.9: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:07.9: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:33.98 -05:59:44.2: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:33.98 -05:59:44.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0366 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:07.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2198 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:42.61 -06:02:28.9: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.61 -06:02:28.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0557 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:59.08 -06:47:21.4: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:41:18.65 -03:06:34.0: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:59.08 -06:47:21.4: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:59.08 -06:47:21.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1366 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:41:18.65 -03:06:34.0: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:18.65 -03:06:34.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2143 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:34.08 +01:44:45.8: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:30.19 -04:41:34.8: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:31.11 -01:09:45.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3833 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:36.03 -01:45:49.6: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:34.08 +01:44:45.8: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:18.52 +01:51:10.8: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:34.08 +01:44:45.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3888 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:30.19 -04:41:34.8: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:30.19 -04:41:34.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2740 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:28.34 +02:52:51.0: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:26.76 -06:54:34.3: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:18.52 +01:51:10.8: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:18.52 +01:51:10.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4356 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:36.03 -01:45:49.6: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:36.03 -01:45:49.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5167 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:26.76 -06:54:34.3: 15.14 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:28.34 +02:52:51.0: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:28.34 +02:52:51.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4266 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:55.43 -02:56:32.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:26.76 -06:54:34.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2809 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:38.63 -06:14:48.9: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:48.00 -01:06:19.8: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:16.29 -00:11:16.2: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:55.43 -02:56:32.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:38.63 -06:14:48.9: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:38.63 -06:14:48.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2910 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:12.82 +03:03:41.5: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:48.00 -01:06:19.8: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:48.00 -01:06:19.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4765 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:16.29 -00:11:16.2: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:20:00.32 -06:11:53.9: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:16.29 -00:11:16.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4810 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:57:20.39 -06:06:31.6: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:12.82 +03:03:41.5: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:12.82 +03:03:41.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5037 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:20:00.32 -06:11:53.9: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:00.32 -06:11:53.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2148 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:57:20.39 -06:06:31.6: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:20.39 -06:06:31.6: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4355 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:08.23 -01:48:28.2: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:55.48 +02:11:38.1: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:40.06 -03:09:07.9: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:47.29 -03:40:26.5: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:54.3: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:55.48 +02:11:38.1: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:08.23 -01:48:28.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:55.48 +02:11:38.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6109 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.23 -01:48:28.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4184 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:40.06 -03:09:07.9: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:47.29 -03:40:26.5: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:40.06 -03:09:07.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5111 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:47.29 -03:40:26.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4114 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:54.3: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:23.46 +02:19:54.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6503 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:28.7: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:22.73 +02:32:44.7: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:03.81 -02:54:49.9: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:22.73 +02:32:44.7: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:22.73 +02:32:44.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6077 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:28.7: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:28.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6187 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:47.29 -03:45:36.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:03.81 -02:54:49.9: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:03.81 -02:54:49.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6324 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:25.64 +00:37:56.9: 15.15 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:43.60 -02:05:31.3: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:56.13 +02:59:51.8: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:25.64 +00:37:56.9: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:51.87 -03:27:18.7: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:47.29 -03:45:36.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:25.64 +00:37:56.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5736 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:43.60 -02:05:31.3: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:43.60 -02:05:31.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6185 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:56.13 +02:59:51.8: 15.04 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:56.13 +02:59:51.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7065 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:27.99 -06:59:50.5: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:51.87 -03:27:18.7: 14.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:54.83 -00:15:40.7: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:51.87 -03:27:18.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5164 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:52:10.57 +02:50:00.2: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:27.99 -06:59:50.5: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:27.99 -06:59:50.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4101 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:54.83 -00:15:40.7: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:54.83 -00:15:40.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6025 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:52:10.57 +02:50:00.2: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:10.57 +02:50:00.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6178 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:47.09 -06:47:29.0: 15.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:23.10 +02:59:16.2: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:16.88 -04:43:59.6: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:17.37 +01:28:22.7: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:13.33 +02:15:16.5: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:47.09 -06:47:29.0: 15.31 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:26.20 -06:24:09.7: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:55.97 -02:18:16.7: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:16.88 -04:43:59.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:17.37 +01:28:22.7: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:23.10 +02:59:16.2: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:16.88 -04:43:59.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4161 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:17.37 +01:28:22.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7137 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:47.09 -06:47:29.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5157 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:23.10 +02:59:16.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6805 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:13.33 +02:15:16.5: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:13.33 +02:15:16.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7088 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:55.97 -02:18:16.7: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:55.97 -02:18:16.7: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6462 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:26.20 -06:24:09.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:26.20 -06:24:09.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4138 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:15.34 -05:51:24.1: 15.32 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:57.94 -04:19:09.8: 15.02 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:37.34 +02:57:03.0: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:24.41 -04:19:38.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:20.67 -03:27:51.9: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:15.34 -05:51:24.1: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:15.34 -05:51:24.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4401 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:37.34 +02:57:03.0: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:57.94 -04:19:09.8: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.94 -04:19:09.8: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4775 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:37.34 +02:57:03.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5645 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:52:50.27 +02:59:50.7: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:46.42 +02:43:50.8: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:24.41 -04:19:38.9: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:20.67 -03:27:51.9: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:52:50.27 +02:59:50.7: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:24.41 -04:19:38.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4938 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:20.59 -04:41:07.5: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:20.67 -03:27:51.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5211 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:50.27 +02:59:50.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6138 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:46.42 +02:43:50.8: 15.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:46.42 +02:43:50.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6300 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:20.59 -04:41:07.5: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:20.59 -04:41:07.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5118 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:27.52 -06:21:47.6: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:08.75 -01:16:25.6: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:53.92 -00:05:05.7: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:27.52 -06:21:47.6: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:27.52 -06:21:47.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5003 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:08.75 -01:16:25.6: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:08.75 -01:16:25.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7391 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:38.76 -06:54:16.9: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:50.82 -06:06:38.5: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:57:26.78 +00:55:35.7: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:07.03 +01:36:26.0: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:09.54 -04:44:17.5: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:53.92 -00:05:05.7: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:03.68 -04:19:14.4: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:53.92 -00:05:05.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7160 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:38.76 -06:54:16.9: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:38.76 -06:54:16.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4161 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:50.82 -06:06:38.5: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:57:26.78 +00:55:35.7: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:50.82 -06:06:38.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5850 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:26.78 +00:55:35.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6310 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:07.03 +01:36:26.0: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:07.03 +01:36:26.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5882 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:09.54 -04:44:17.5: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:09.54 -04:44:17.5: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5346 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:03.68 -04:19:14.4: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:03.68 -04:19:14.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6332 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:46.08 -01:35:01.2: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:47.42 -03:27:49.0: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:46.08 -01:35:01.2: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:02.26 -05:19:58.7: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:46.08 -01:35:01.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7210 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:30.35 -03:50:28.1: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:38.69 -05:17:56.7: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:04.39 -04:26:09.0: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:47.42 -03:27:49.0: 15.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.42 -03:27:49.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6457 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:20:48.21 -05:32:25.0: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:29.86 -02:37:32.2: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:02.26 -05:19:58.7: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:23.20 -03:50:08.4: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:02.26 -05:19:58.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6001 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:30.35 -03:50:28.1: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:38.69 -05:17:56.7: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:30.35 -03:50:28.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5493 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:04.39 -04:26:09.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:38.69 -05:17:56.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5779 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:04.39 -04:26:09.0: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4987 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:20:48.21 -05:32:25.0: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:29.86 -02:37:32.2: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:48.21 -05:32:25.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6465 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:29.86 -02:37:32.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6771 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:23.20 -03:50:08.4: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:23.20 -03:50:08.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6332 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:47.12 -04:41:54.2: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:15:36.52 -07:12:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:31.58 -04:10:19.0: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:47.12 -04:41:54.2: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.12 -04:41:54.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5699 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:36.34 -02:59:15.3: 15.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:06.18 -07:06:21.9: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:15:36.52 -07:12:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:36.52 -07:12:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:41.64 -04:58:26.8: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:36.34 -02:59:15.3: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:36.34 -02:59:15.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6257 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:06.18 -07:06:21.9: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:31.58 -04:10:19.0: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:06.18 -07:06:21.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4859 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:31.58 -04:10:19.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6777 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:41.64 -04:58:26.8: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:41.64 -04:58:26.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6789 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33177.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33676.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 32s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32816_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32816_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32817_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32818_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32818_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32822_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32822_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32824_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32824_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32826_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32826_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32827_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32827_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32828_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32828_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32895_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32895_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 32990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33094_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33094_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33173_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33173_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33206_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33206_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33232_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33232_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33257_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33257_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33293_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33293_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33304_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33304_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33371_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33371_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33373_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33386_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33417_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33417_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33457_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33457_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33464_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33464_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33467_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33467_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33476_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33476_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33478_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33478_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33487_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33487_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33488_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33488_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33497_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33508_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33508_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33516_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33516_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33528_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33528_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33557_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33557_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33562_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33563_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33563_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33572_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33576_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33584_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33584_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33604_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33609_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33609_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33630_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33630_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33640_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33640_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33645_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33648_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33648_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33653_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33653_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33654_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33654_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33657_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33657_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33660_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33660_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33669_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33669_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33676_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33676_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33679_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33679_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33686_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33686_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33693_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33693_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33696_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33696_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33697_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33697_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33698_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33698_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33700_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33700_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33712_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33712_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33722_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33722_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33728_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33732_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33732_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33743_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33743_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33744_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33744_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33746_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33746_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33748_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33748_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33755_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 33758_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33763_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33763_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33764_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33764_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33765_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33765_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33767_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33767_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33773_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33773_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33774_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33774_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33775_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33775_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33781_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33781_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33783_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33783_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33784_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33792_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33792_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33793_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33793_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33795_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33795_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33799_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33799_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33801_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33801_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33811_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33811_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33813_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33813_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33818_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33818_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33825_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33825_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33856_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33856_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33873_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33873_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33877_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33877_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33885_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33885_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33894_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33894_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:57.43 -06:36:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33916_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33916_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33918_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33918_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33992_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 33992_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 34009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34015_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 34015_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34069_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 34069_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12894_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 12894_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:21.47 -02:28:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 12026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:14.93 -02:45:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_01-29-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
