######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 421030 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 421030 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1297.3009
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 467.3526
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1298.7437
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 470.8140
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.68748
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 30.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-13T22:16:33.6755895' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T03:16:33.6755895' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.136500868 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T03:16:43.5773902' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.1366154747 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.996319833063 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998190413153 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.0611111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.715 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.37271315259819 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29519 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29519 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 30.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 17.601408 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)
Spent 0.617706 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 30.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-13T22:17:20.4435907' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-14T03:17:20.4435907' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61297.1370421643 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-14T03:17:30.3443712' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61297.1371567594 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.996319855357 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.999819089711 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.99 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.78 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.38608769076149 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29519 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29519 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 30.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 17.601408 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits :)
Spent 0.568354 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.63661661
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0338 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oaLrUn2o67
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7EqKuLHmiw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2HToxHrrJX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3hYaS0rair
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg
Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.oaLrUn2o67 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332
Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7EqKuLHmiw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282
Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2HToxHrrJX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=234, bad_region=0, passed=4218
Got 4218 stars (including 3975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 3892 stars left (next iteration limit 4282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3892 robust_rms=10.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.987 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3892 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.721 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3892 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.547 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3892 robust_rms_before=1.106 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.455 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.547
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.455 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=3892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1047 n_q2=987 n_q3=987 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3hYaS0rair (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, bad_region=0, passed=4250
Got 4250 stars (including 3968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4250 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 3886 stars left (next iteration limit 4275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3886 robust_rms=10.897 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3886 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.719 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3886 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3886 robust_rms_before=1.092 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.460 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.530
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.460 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=3886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1054 n_q2=995 n_q3=972 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.245
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (3892 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085_astrometric_residuals.png (3886 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0338 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.567 +61:59:58.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.643 +62:00:25.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CBDJwt0Y98
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9m5sLD1j7E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mD8yeQsIXH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kAiWthRkbF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg
Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
14.8 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CBDJwt0Y98 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315
Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1318 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9m5sLD1j7E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476
Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mD8yeQsIXH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=786, bad_region=2, passed=23716
Got 23716 stars (including 22885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=9.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.706 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.535 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.116 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.441 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.535
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.441 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kAiWthRkbF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=897, bad_region=3, passed=23943
Got 23943 stars (including 23011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=9.254 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.737 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=1.108 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.458 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.458 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1394 n_q2=1248 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1001 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:28:06.36 +66:12:56.9: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:03:33.97 +67:05:35.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:03:33.97 +67:05:35.8: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:28:06.36 +66:12:56.9: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:06.36 +66:12:56.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9288 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:33.97 +67:05:35.8: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5707 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.54 +61:33:08.6: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.54 +61:33:08.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.54 +61:33:08.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4026 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:44.25 +61:47:30.9: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:07:17.51 +61:59:16.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:29:27.07 +66:19:07.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:44.25 +61:47:30.9: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:44.25 +61:47:30.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0217 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:07:17.51 +61:59:16.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:17.51 +61:59:16.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:00:28.44 +64:17:02.0: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:29:27.07 +66:19:07.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:27.07 +66:19:07.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0643 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:00:28.44 +64:17:02.0: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:00:28.44 +64:17:02.0: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8331 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52575_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 13.85 | 12:28:06.44 +66:12:56.5 | 3274 0458 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.09 | 12:28:06.29 +66:12:57.4 | 3276 0463 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.64 | 12:18:38.41 +63:15:53.1 | 3607 2319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:18:38.35 +63:15:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52582_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.96 | 11:28:32.86 +58:33:48.7 | 7156 5271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:28:32.72 +58:33:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52584_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 12.61 | 12:03:33.94 +67:05:35.9 | 4798 0114 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.54 | 12:03:33.99 +67:05:35.7 | 4799 0119 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.93 | 12:18:15.37 +64:05:29.8 | 3699 1828 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:18:15.31 +64:05:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52673_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 10.43 | 12:50:20.94 +57:48:04.2 | 0641 5106 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52674_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 10.54 | 13:03:17.79 +60:30:33.6 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52704_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 10.64 | 11:58:30.52 +66:21:51.9 | 5070 0580 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52787_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.13 | 11:03:57.16 +64:08:46.4 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52793_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.41 | 11:59:26.54 +64:49:41.3 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52835_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.47 | 11:51:32.78 +58:21:15.4 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52842_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.62 | 12:15:42.31 +57:00:11.0 | 3336 6094 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:15:42.34 +57:00:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52863_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.91 | 12:45:50.50 +64:54:49.3 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52905_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 11.89 | 11:47:22.01 +64:32:04.1 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53059_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53059_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.26 | 12:08:52.63 +59:01:27.9 | 4015 4935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53131_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.34 | 10:59:05.26 +65:07:49.5 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53151_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.67 | 12:15:28.46 +56:59:08.7 | 3354 6107 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:15:28.46 +56:59:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53186_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.76 | 11:56:07.23 +64:26:11.6 | 5158 1751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53228_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.99 | 12:19:10.94 +65:12:14.8 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.66 | 11:04:04.25 +61:47:49.7 | 8790 3134 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:04:04.24 +61:47:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53297_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.92 | 11:45:01.46 +64:47:36.3 | 5880 1553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:45:01.48 +64:47:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53385_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53385_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.19 | 12:32:36.76 +59:46:23.6 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.20 | 12:29:45.35 +58:23:47.6 | 2341 5095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:29:45.26 +58:23:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53449_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53449_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 12.90 | 11:15:40.51 +60:51:37.5 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 13.40 | 12:35:53.48 +61:33:07.9 | 2244 3131 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.41 | 12:35:53.60 +61:33:09.2 | 2245 3136 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53517_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.67 | 12:49:48.75 +60:33:13.9 | 1110 3496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53544_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.56 | 12:50:42.21 +62:58:08.1 | 1421 2065 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:50:42.29 +62:58:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53553_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53553_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.18 | 12:14:28.53 +57:11:48.7 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53559_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53559_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.57 | 12:05:38.03 +67:01:32.2 | 4674 0150 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53569_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.55 | 12:43:29.35 +65:57:23.6 | 2317 0424 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:43:29.36 +65:57:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.49 | 12:31:29.08 +63:17:09.6 | 2749 2168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53627_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.79 | 12:55:48.79 +62:52:33.8 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53640_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.50 | 11:55:59.74 +59:09:34.9 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53645_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.08 | 12:01:31.70 +56:55:39.3 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53698_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.51 | 11:58:21.08 +61:26:11.0 | 4911 3546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:58:21.13 +61:26:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53733_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.56 | 11:51:14.09 +66:56:26.8 | 5520 0248 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53790_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.31 | 11:21:36.71 +57:04:13.2 | 7780 6137 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:21:36.90 +57:04:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 13.94 | 12:45:44.22 +61:47:30.9 | 1584 2836 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.17 | 12:45:44.29 +61:47:30.9 | 1585 2841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53888_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.96 | 12:08:26.73 +65:19:59.3 | 4411 1156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:08:26.75 +65:19:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53976_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.59 | 11:23:14.64 +58:34:12.2 | 7574 5239 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:23:14.63 +58:34:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54098_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 14.31 | 13:07:17.34 +61:59:15.8 | 0122 2295 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.29 | 13:07:17.68 +61:59:16.4 | 0123 2300 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54169_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54169_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 14.14 | 12:29:27.25 +66:19:07.5 | 3204 0382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.03 | 12:29:26.90 +66:19:08.2 | 3206 0387 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54171_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54171_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.80 | 11:09:18.98 +64:39:11.2 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.16 | 12:23:45.04 +60:55:08.4 | 3047 3665 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:23:44.86 +60:55:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54256_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54256_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 13.81 | 11:46:30.20 +61:30:37.7 | 5762 3528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 11:46:30.12 +61:30:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54313_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54313_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.56 | 13:05:37.60 +64:26:52.2 | 0704 0915 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54389_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54389_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.42 | 12:58:49.34 +58:55:57.0 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54407_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54407_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.51 | 12:49:15.09 +57:02:03.2 | 0609 5582 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 54423_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 14.13662 | 2461297.63662 | 14.84 | 13:00:28.53 +64:17:02.8 | 1000 1110 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-16-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 14.83 | 13:00:28.35 +64:17:01.3 | 1001 1115 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 14.13716 | 2461297.63716 | 8.06 | 12:36:23.31 +59:29:12.4 | 1957 4351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_221801_TTUQ1b1x1_1138915_4wfIzYec/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_22-17-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits |
**** FOUND 12:36:23.29 +59:29:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.63661661 -observatory V36
12:20:12.99 -01:48:47.5 Mercury (-0.5mag)
13:51:51.51 -16:56:25.2 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:32:14.46 +22:29:22.0 Mars (1.2mag)
09:14:35.53 +16:33:51.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:50:04.35 +02:27:01.0 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:41.35 +21:02:00.1 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:05.12 -00:07:40.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:09.30 -23:41:02.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:33:20.06 -15:19:09.3 Moon (-9.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 13 22:25 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.63661661:
09:14:42.59 +16:33:16.3 Io (6.0mag)
09:14:35.78 +16:33:51.5 Europa (6.2mag)
09:14:48.54 +16:32:44.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:15:04.07 +16:31:29.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:12:37.78 +16:53:05.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:14:38.78 +16:33:36.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:12:09.62 +16:47:01.9 Elara (17.7mag)
09:18:18.06 +15:59:33.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:15:10.76 +16:53:31.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:50:01.00 +02:26:27.7 Titan (8.3mag)
00:50:08.37 +02:26:53.8 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:49:59.99 +02:28:38.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:50:05.37 +02:27:22.4 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:48:44.24 +02:16:09.2 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 13 22:25 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461297.63661661:
23:02:06.76 +07:52:10.7 JWST
14:28:47.01 +55:23:44.6 Chandra
00:10:55.88 +63:12:48.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 13 22:25 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461297.63661661 -observatory V36
03:43:57.78 +19:37:44.8 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:05:44.42 -34:04:54.3 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:24:27.97 -70:41:24.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:20.32 +33:52:50.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:10.54 +27:48:18.2 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:15:10.85 +25:51:13.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:55:46.45 +26:59:28.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:52:57.67 +05:11:40.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:28:03.35 -16:14:52.0 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:44:10.16 +33:20:05.3 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:37.77 +15:14:48.7 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:29:52.73 +42:53:06.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:17:10.01 +48:52:18.6 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:38:59.47 -13:07:45.7 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:13:41.78 +17:09:07.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:29:08.86 +18:13:44.6 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:25:23.36 -00:26:27.4 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:00:50.30 +72:49:45.2 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:50.25 +45:51:47.7 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:19:39.01 +11:50:32.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:31:46.17 -35:14:12.2 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:30:10.23 +38:17:27.9 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:52:46.36 -05:59:18.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:22:20.34 -07:14:35.1 17.7mag 63P/Wild
06:52:14.76 +18:41:57.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:54.35 +15:02:25.2 17.2mag 88P/Howell
06:01:18.57 +31:12:28.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:51:44.23 +22:58:45.6 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:43:03.26 +19:23:51.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:01:49.86 -23:41:21.8 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:25:26.43 +20:24:49.1 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:59:30.45 -16:26:51.9 14.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:31:34.97 +10:02:59.0 12.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:17.89 +07:51:21.2 14.5mag 220P/McNaught
05:06:05.33 +38:23:04.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:49:53.71 +34:56:12.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:29:51.89 -01:00:45.5 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:33:37.57 +16:30:09.6 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 13 22:25 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 13 22:25 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 13 22:25 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:17:07.485 +01:30:33.19 AT 2026zkb 2026-08-16.25 20.5984
00:01:01.044 -18:02:57.76 AT 2026zka 2026-08-15.40 20.6822
21:30:19.982 +02:15:49.72 AT 2026zjz 2026-08-15.33 20.8602
04:20:07.500 -42:27:00.50 AT 2026zjy 2026-08-21.36 15.4
01:46:22.348 +15:27:02.25 AT 2026zjx 2026-08-19.38 20.8195
01:38:07.380 -17:17:41.98 AT 2026zjw 2026-08-21.38 19.6105
01:15:47.199 -22:02:12.71 AT 2026zjv 2026-08-21.51 18.299
23:48:25.941 -23:10:06.92 AT 2026zju 2026-08-21.48 19.278
00:19:28.362 -35:04:25.00 AT 2026zjt 2026-08-21.50 19.116
01:13:44.393 -16:46:03.60 AT 2026zjs 2026-08-21.46 19.164
20:02:51.248 -01:02:45.77 AT 2026zjr 2026-08-20.88 19.23
20:58:02.373 -33:33:33.70 AT 2026zjq 2026-07-19.45 19.142
19:41:06.752 +07:37:30.82 AT 2026zjp 2026-08-14.92 19.68
19:50:21.292 +62:21:50.99 AT 2026zjo 2026-08-21.03 19.263
00:37:28.063 +72:20:50.43 SN 2026zjn 2026-08-21.10 19.259
17:15:14.632 +38:28:36.24 AT 2026zjm 2026-08-20.93 19.365
22:21:43.564 +38:05:49.42 AT 2026zjl 2026-08-21.08 19.812
06:24:35.385 -13:29:11.88 SN 2026zjk 2026-08-19.13 17.603
02:01:00.100 +40:33:06.57 AT 2026zjj 2026-08-12.16 19.335
20:04:34.466 +62:38:38.73 SN 2026zji 2026-08-21.02 17.235
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 13 22:25 tns_transients_list.txt