NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-10-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 109749 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 109749 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits

renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1854.4421 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 600.7624 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1807.6720 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 537.8584 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.59231 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.117 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-13T03:52:19.9075621' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-13T08:52:19.9075621' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61296.3696748493 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-13T08:52:29.8119810' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61296.3697894793 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3319941784941 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996096340871 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.5430555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.92 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.63841532100836 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits :) Spent 0.605592 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-13T03:53:42.1909642' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-13T08:53:42.1909642' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61296.3706271993 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-13T08:53:52.0932971' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61296.3707418172 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3319941409125 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996096131778 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.4833333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 192.324166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.64063016211298 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits :) Spent 0.638977 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits


fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461296.86979059 Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01387 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3YnJ59uagk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tbgVjfrWbs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nRAGV0Jl8H Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LScDeJ7Hkx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.3YnJ59uagk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.tbgVjfrWbs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nRAGV0Jl8H (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=1, passed=3836 Got 3836 stars (including 3627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3836 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3560 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3557 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3561 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3559 stars left (next iteration limit 3912) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3559 robust_rms=10.680 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.936 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3559 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3559 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.308 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3559 robust_rms_before=1.074 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.305 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.308 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=3559 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=948 n_q2=860 n_q3=817 n_q4=934 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LScDeJ7Hkx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=3908 Got 3908 stars (including 3695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3908 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3619 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3619 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3623 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3621 stars left (next iteration limit 3980) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3621 robust_rms=10.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.766 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3621 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3621 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.281 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3621 robust_rms_before=1.075 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.290 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.281 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.290 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=3621 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=943 n_q2=876 n_q3=864 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.242 ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.067 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.034 reference average sigma_overall=0.2825 worst_q_ratio=1.1605 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (3559 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (3621 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:25:07.49 -15:31:45.3: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.0: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:07:17.60 -16:51:00.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:25:07.49 -15:31:45.3: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:07:17.60 -16:51:00.5: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:07.49 -15:31:45.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0427 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.4: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9128 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:17.60 -16:51:00.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0524 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.0: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9126 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0122 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20215_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    11.90    00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.1   4147 1976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    11.93    00:58:18.91 -16:02:33.9   4153 1982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20216_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    11.90    00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.4   3936 3595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    11.93    00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.5   3942 3601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20232_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    12.03    01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.7   0967 1689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    12.00    01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.5   0973 1694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20235_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    12.04    01:25:07.48 -15:31:44.9   0238 1506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    12.04    01:25:07.50 -15:31:45.6   0244 1512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20237_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    12.04    01:07:17.59 -16:51:00.9   2826 2398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    12.06    01:07:17.61 -16:51:00.1   2832 2403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20025_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 20025_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    11.04    00:22:31.02 -18:32:46.2   9195 3896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits **** FOUND 00:22:31.00 -18:32:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:22.054 -18:00:05.28 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:24.684 -17:59:32.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01387 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ZCCa6jjcy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hVjTziW4ir Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJNqHxwu8X Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vzeJBSldvk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.8ZCCa6jjcy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280 Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.hVjTziW4ir (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674 Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qJNqHxwu8X (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=564, bad_region=4, passed=19339 Got 19339 stars (including 18735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19339 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19337 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19337 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19337 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=9.901 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.563 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.410 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.324 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.317 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.324 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.317 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1319 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vzeJBSldvk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=595, bad_region=3, passed=19648 Got 19648 stars (including 19018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19648 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=9.977 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.279 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=1.075 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.303 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.303 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1306 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1146 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.4: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:29:35.88 -13:47:25.3: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:14:30.60 -16:52:00.7: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:25.65 -19:09:22.0: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:30.02 -19:24:26.8: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:35.26 -17:53:24.5: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.4: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:35.88 -13:47:25.3: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2868 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.5: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:29:42.20 -19:21:56.1: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:35.88 -13:47:25.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3404 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:05.14 -19:45:28.4: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:14:30.60 -16:52:00.7: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:21.36 -14:32:50.0: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:30.60 -16:52:00.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4509 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:30.02 -19:24:26.8: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:30.02 -19:24:26.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3834 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.5: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3871 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:05.14 -19:45:28.4: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:21.36 -14:32:50.0: 14.33 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:21.36 -14:32:50.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1809 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:42.20 -19:21:56.1: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:05.14 -19:45:28.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9840 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.20 -19:21:56.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7853 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:25.65 -19:09:22.0: 15.20 +/- 0.34 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:25.65 -19:09:22.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2840 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:35.26 -17:53:24.5: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.26 -17:53:24.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3613 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:19:53.80 -16:25:58.1: 15.50 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:23:05.14 -14:48:38.6: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:03.20 -15:13:03.0: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:50.04 -21:22:04.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:23:05.14 -14:48:38.6: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:19:53.80 -16:25:58.1: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.21 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:05.14 -14:48:38.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5805 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:53.80 -16:25:58.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.6001 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:08:03.20 -15:13:03.0: 15.11 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:50.04 -21:22:04.1: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:03.20 -15:13:03.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5328 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:50.04 -21:22:04.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3662 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30805_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 30805_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.25    01:12:45.98 -14:19:23.1   2086 0835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.33    01:12:45.84 -14:19:21.8   2092 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31128_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31128_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    13.37    01:00:30.02 -19:24:27.0   3726 3982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    13.40    01:00:30.03 -19:24:26.5   3732 3988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31253_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31253_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    13.79    00:29:42.22 -19:21:56.0   8104 4280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    13.78    00:29:42.19 -19:21:56.2   8110 4286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31323_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31323_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    13.98    00:47:05.16 -19:45:28.9   5612 4309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    13.99    00:47:05.12 -19:45:28.0   5618 4315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31362_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31362_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.08    00:22:21.31 -14:32:50.2   9467 1469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.36    00:22:21.40 -14:32:49.9   9473 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31415_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31415_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.43    01:14:30.61 -16:51:59.9   1779 2366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.47    01:14:30.60 -16:52:01.4   1785 2372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31416_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31416_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.28    01:03:56.16 -17:30:49.8   3298 2825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits **** FOUND 01:03:56.15 -17:30:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31421_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31421_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.30    00:24:25.71 -19:09:21.0   8875 4229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.27    00:24:25.60 -19:09:22.9   8881 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31423_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31423_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.32    00:29:35.96 -13:47:25.9   8437 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.36    00:29:35.81 -13:47:24.6   8444 0920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31436_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31436_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.35    00:31:35.31 -17:53:25.0   7915 3366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.37    00:31:35.21 -17:53:24.0   7921 3372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31441_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31441_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.37    00:43:42.20 -19:45:40.9   6091 4346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.40    00:43:42.34 -19:45:40.2   6096 4352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31456_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31456_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.59    01:19:53.87 -16:25:57.9   0999 2077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.62    01:19:53.74 -16:25:58.3   1005 2083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31460_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31460_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.58    01:23:05.18 -14:48:38.4   0550 1076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.58    01:23:05.09 -14:48:38.9   0556 1082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31463_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31463_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.54    01:08:03.19 -15:13:03.6   2757 1407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.53    01:08:03.20 -15:13:02.4   2763 1413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31481_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 The candidate 31481_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 13.36979    2461296.86979    14.43    00:36:50.19 -21:22:03.4   6984 5394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 13.37074    2461296.87074    14.34    00:36:49.89 -21:22:04.7   6991 5401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_035428_TTUQ1b1x1_3664977_dfssNfzb/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_03-53-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461296.86979059 -observatory V36 12:15:45.69 -01:14:02.3 Mercury (-0.5mag) 13:50:15.72 -16:41:10.3 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:30:13.37 +22:33:01.7 Mars (1.2mag) 09:13:58.95 +16:36:30.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:50:15.96 +02:28:21.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:41.87 +21:02:01.4 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:09.64 -00:07:09.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:12.01 -23:40:53.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:00:09.22 -10:59:06.5 Moon (-8.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 13 03:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461296.86979059: 09:13:55.54 +16:36:48.4 Io (6.0mag) 09:14:09.51 +16:35:37.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:14:15.92 +16:35:04.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:14:24.62 +16:34:23.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:11:59.15 +16:55:28.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:14:03.31 +16:36:09.6 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:11:31.73 +16:49:23.1 Elara (17.7mag) 09:17:42.87 +16:02:23.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:14:37.52 +16:55:57.3 Carme (18.9mag) 00:50:08.74 +02:27:53.7 Titan (8.3mag) 00:50:19.35 +02:28:02.8 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:50:13.86 +02:30:06.8 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:50:20.73 +02:28:39.4 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:48:56.58 +02:17:33.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 13 03:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461296.86979059: 22:54:07.70 +07:07:58.9 JWST 19:09:50.34 +00:57:40.2 Chandra 11:54:48.61 -61:16:49.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 13 03:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461296.86979059 -observatory V36 03:43:37.27 +19:36:00.2 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:22.69 -34:05:46.4 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:23:55.61 -70:38:44.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:16.87 +33:51:36.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:08:45.14 +27:54:18.9 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:14:38.62 +25:52:03.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:55:04.56 +27:00:58.5 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:52:29.24 +05:11:56.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:11.02 -16:10:50.6 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:43:32.87 +33:16:58.9 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:29.77 +15:15:17.5 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:30:14.06 +42:55:12.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:18:08.01 +48:55:35.9 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:38:38.45 -13:07:00.9 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:13:29.89 +17:18:38.6 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:27:52.91 +18:17:24.9 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:24:43.79 -00:22:40.5 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:58:29.52 +72:58:21.6 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:02:20.50 +45:54:02.4 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:18:55.98 +11:46:46.0 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:31:05.36 -35:14:30.3 13.6mag 10P/Tempel 01:28:57.82 +38:10:05.8 17.7mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:52:15.35 -05:55:46.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:20:47.92 -07:00:14.4 17.7mag 63P/Wild 06:50:50.15 +18:45:53.6 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:01.66 +15:02:26.4 17.2mag 88P/Howell 05:58:41.20 +30:55:27.9 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:49:32.80 +23:11:41.4 15.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:41:22.22 +19:33:52.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:00:06.44 -23:25:45.4 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:24:34.28 +20:26:26.3 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:03:54.44 -16:37:36.2 14.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:09:56.03 +37:18:05.4 16.5mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:31:42.28 +10:24:14.8 13.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:28:50.82 +07:55:53.3 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 05:04:07.31 +38:09:46.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 08:47:54.96 +35:01:36.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:19.54 -00:55:39.4 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:32:58.82 +16:32:29.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep 13 03:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 13 03:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 13 03:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 02:34:40.939 +11:29:01.73 AT 2026zhs 2026-08-16.18 20.38 00:06:27.710 -42:59:59.51 AT 2026zhr 2026-08-13.97 17.978 22:15:35.625 -80:38:43.32 AT 2026zhq 2026-08-20.04 18.351 17:58:22.424 -86:55:56.22 AT 2026zhp 2026-08-16.83 19.182 01:43:25.365 -80:23:54.49 AT 2026zho 2026-08-14.07 18.558 23:16:01.325 -41:57:55.14 AT 2026zhn 2026-08-20.17 18.943 23:07:30.879 -67:00:48.59 AT 2026zhm 2026-08-20.07 18.916 00:52:12.375 -58:22:08.73 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-20.13 17.801 00:39:52.355 +03:55:55.21 AT 2026zhk 2026-08-07.32 17.8794 23:48:06.315 +08:48:24.68 AT 2026zhj 2026-08-12.44 20.7977 03:11:32.085 -07:13:41.59 AT 2026zhi 2026-08-07.75 19.73 03:47:50.700 -13:23:38.20 AT 2026zhh 2026-08-07.76 20.24 03:34:14.398 -29:40:47.85 AT 2026zhg 2026-08-19.79 20.11 02:19:14.333 -35:57:34.60 AT 2026zhf 2026-08-06.74 19.89 03:22:56.866 -13:06:39.74 SN 2026zhe 2026-08-15.81 19.92 04:00:32.743 -08:48:10.25 AT 2026zhd 2026-08-18.80 19.31 02:16:11.122 -35:21:41.09 AT 2026zhc 2026-08-19.77 19.78 02:13:56.802 -25:48:46.13 AT 2026zhb 2026-08-18.76 19.66 03:52:53.306 -14:19:29.84 SN 2026zha 2026-08-18.78 18.94 03:44:03.331 -29:49:21.39 AT 2026zgz 2026-08-18.78 20.07 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 13 03:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C