This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 12.28 04:46:06.44 +25:27:38.3
175.20276 -12.81649 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -1 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:46:06.44 +25:27:38.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:46:06.44 +25:27:38.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2645* 04 46 06.44 +25 27 38.3 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7645,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2645 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 13.49 04:30:59.79 +27:31:24.8
171.34253 -14.07721 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:59.79 +27:31:24.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:59.79 +27:31:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2645* 04 30 59.79 +27 31 24.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7645,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2645 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 12.88 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6
174.00046 -7.63110 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J050114.77+293516.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.244 r Y 0.364 r 2458367.60120 93.443727100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050114.77+293516.0,2461296.7645,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050114.77+293516.0 20260913.2645 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 12.71 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0
175.06642 -6.31186 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0509004+293140
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 r Y 0.313 r 2458480.68340 64.578834100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0509004+293140,2461296.7645,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0509004+293140 20260913.2645 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 12.71 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3
176.98517 -0.95889 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J083.6217+30.9796 | 05:34:28.47 +30:58:51.0 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.612+/-0.027 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J083.6217+30.9796,2461296.7645,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J083.6217+30.9796 20260913.2645 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 12.41 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0
176.91339 -4.14643 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 4 1 4 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0: 15.79 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7645,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2645 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2645 2461296.7645 13.53 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0
172.28527 -11.26060 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J044324.87+283919.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.130 g Y 0.650 g 2458769.87400 89.760000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0: 14.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2645* 04 43 24.83 +28 39 17.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044324.87+283919.3,2461296.7645,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044324.87+283919.3 20260913.2645 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461296.76493534 13.09.2026 06:21:20.413 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15216
Objects passed selection criteria: 15136
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11349.8
Average stars matched: 11042.8 (97.2951 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 13 02:03:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461296.76493534 13.09.2026 06:21:20.413 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 86 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116766
Objects passed selection criteria: 116504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86299.8
Average stars matched: 83063.2 (96.2497 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 13 02:06:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461296.76415233
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 944.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01400 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FB4TKVkjwl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bLkmd1dPLC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eMvYl3YZKA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDfjtTjzXm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FB4TKVkjwl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bLkmd1dPLC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eMvYl3YZKA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, bad_region=0, passed=6433
Got 6433 stars (including 6190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=8.557 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=1.162 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.515 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.528
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.515 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=829 n_q2=620 n_q3=1316 n_q4=2003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wDfjtTjzXm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, bad_region=0, passed=6618
Got 6618 stars (including 6364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=8.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.266 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.508 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=822 n_q2=649 n_q3=1289 n_q4=2014 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.139
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.190
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4774 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.22 +31:27:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.55 +27:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.39 +35:03:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.58 +30:42:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.36 +28:36:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 944.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:58.708 +30:00:59.30
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.455 +30:01:34.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01400 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PnFks4yjtU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r8EL6BvUBe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sHmEyfJ2UV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n6MS5CMoo0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PnFks4yjtU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.r8EL6BvUBe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sHmEyfJ2UV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1971, bad_region=1, passed=44296
Got 44296 stars (including 42255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.4 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.4 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=8.683 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=1.150 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.533
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=853 n_q2=599 n_q3=1361 n_q4=1959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n6MS5CMoo0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1941, bad_region=3, passed=45240
Got 45240 stars (including 43237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.4 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 629 (Dec 24.4 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=8.754 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.158 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=1.258 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.511 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.479
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=848 n_q2=635 n_q3=1330 n_q4=1963 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-20-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_015547_TTUQ1b1x1_3341181_m2UFlCVW/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.20 +32:38:13.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:08.82 +31:55:32.2: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.20 +32:38:13.0: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.20 +32:38:13.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1012 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:08.82 +31:55:32.2: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:08.82 +31:55:32.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6013 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:46:06.44 +25:27:38.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:46:06.44 +25:27:38.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:47.85 +32:14:41.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:47.85 +32:14:41.8: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:47.85 +32:14:41.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1125 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:59.79 +27:31:24.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.12 +29:58:34.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:59.79 +27:31:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.12 +29:58:34.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.12 +29:58:34.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2582 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:01:14.75 +29:35:15.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8836 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:01.05 +29:31:39.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7078 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:34:28.37 +30:58:50.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7049 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0: 15.79 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:22:00.66 +29:16:33.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.4110 delta=2.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0: 14.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:43:24.83 +28:39:17.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5189 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127495.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151317.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55845.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151115_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151115_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.76 +29:52:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.25 +33:27:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:34.28 +30:02:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.05 +26:11:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.37 +35:13:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.84 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.45 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.83 +34:09:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151293_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151293_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.51 +34:49:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.89 +33:06:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 151317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.74 +32:42:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.06 +34:06:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.88 +26:55:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151343_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151343_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.02 +30:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.53 +31:23:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.70 +34:23:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151366_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151366_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.20 +28:37:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.53 +34:07:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.02 +28:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.60 +32:33:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.94 +26:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151473_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151473_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.51 +34:06:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151476_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151476_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.53 +33:11:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151486_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151486_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.69 +29:45:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.88 +29:47:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.12 +34:24:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.15 +30:16:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151511_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151511_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.16 +32:26:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.63 +33:12:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:56.77 +33:57:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.77 +31:24:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151556_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151556_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.66 +26:10:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.95 +33:11:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 151570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:39.77 +33:20:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151586_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.47 +30:33:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.30 +29:33:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151699_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151699_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:01.03 +34:10:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:11.79 +34:12:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.13 +31:04:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:41.60 +26:45:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 82888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.51 +31:18:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:24.11 +26:11:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:02.96 +32:26:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.30 +32:10:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:51.01 +26:46:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.13 +30:48:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 112628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:57.45 +26:25:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.49 +26:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.19 +32:02:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.90 +29:15:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.65 +30:10:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 82910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.95 +30:33:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.77 +27:26:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 55845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.99 +25:22:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.71 +28:10:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.35 +25:24:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.54 +28:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.22 +27:01:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 84346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.50 +26:23:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:38.12 +31:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10334_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 10334_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:02.71 +34:25:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06301_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 06301_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:24.43 +34:42:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.44 +28:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.60 +33:50:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.68 +27:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 20855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:15.67 +33:32:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:39.28 +29:06:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127495_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 127495_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.36 +25:58:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.39 +35:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.83 +29:00:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.40 +26:08:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.24 +32:26:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.89 +30:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.32 +31:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:49.52 +30:24:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.52 +27:22:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.23 +31:03:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.30 +27:03:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.00 +27:27:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.57 +34:37:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:42.62 +30:32:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.34 +29:42:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.46 +28:30:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:02.22 +31:50:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:42.95 +27:43:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.37 +34:08:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.59 +30:42:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:20.03 +34:08:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.39 +28:36:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.71 +34:28:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_01-21-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
