This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4141 2461295.9141 14.71 04:09:59.78 +00:10:57.6
191.56384 -35.09219 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1326 Losaka 0 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:59.78 +00:10:57.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:59.78 +00:10:57.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4141* 04 09 59.78 +00 10 57.6 14.7 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9141,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4141 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4141 2461295.9141 13.31 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2
198.10479 -34.12996 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" [MVD2012] 563
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.030 V Y 0.850 V 2451867.80610 0.539828000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4141* 04 24 43.98 -03 51 35.2 13.3 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[MVD2012] 563,2461295.9141,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[MVD2012] 563 20260912.4141 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461295.91448399 12.09.2026 09:56:41.417 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 114 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9362
Objects passed selection criteria: 9356
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8886.5
Average stars matched: 8616.25 (96.9589 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:03:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461049.67043058 09.01.2026 04:05:15.202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461295.91448399 12.09.2026 09:56:41.417 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 53 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 51650
Objects passed selection criteria: 51538
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48129.5
Average stars matched: 46571.5 (96.7629 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 272364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:06:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.91379049
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0007 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01682 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZO50vlxxfY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YNtRJ7rqcV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UCN3l5brFj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I82Yj2HzGU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to +3.3309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3098 to 3.3309 deg
Loaded 5822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5011 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5011 out of 9074 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3933 to 72.2586 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3286 deg
Loaded 5824 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 5009 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5009 out of 9104 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.0 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.7 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.7 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.4 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ZO50vlxxfY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=748, bad_region=0, passed=9074
Got 9074 stars (including 8321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1419 n_q2=915 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YNtRJ7rqcV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=0, passed=9104
Got 9104 stars (including 8332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1419 n_q2=919 n_q3=1459 n_q4=1100 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UCN3l5brFj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=499, bad_region=0, passed=8820
Got 8820 stars (including 8303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=9.724 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.220 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.269 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.270
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.269 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1352 n_q3=963 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I82Yj2HzGU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, bad_region=0, passed=8802
Got 8802 stars (including 8287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=9.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.818 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.242 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.271 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.271 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1135 n_q2=1357 n_q3=960 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new1=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits sigma_overall=0.250 worst_q_ratio=1.164
reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.3155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:39.02 -02:03:59.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:19:04.27 -02:34:43.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:47:56.75 -04:50:28.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:07.51 -00:48:59.4: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:22:27.51 -00:55:37.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:25:18.48 -01:44:35.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:54.42 -02:15:09.7: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:22:27.51 -00:55:37.6: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:39.02 -02:03:59.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:19:04.27 -02:34:43.9: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:07.51 -00:48:59.4: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:25:18.48 -01:44:35.0: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:54.42 -02:15:09.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:27.51 -00:55:37.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2619 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:47:56.75 -04:50:28.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.02 -02:03:59.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2339 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:04.27 -02:34:43.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2803 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:07.51 -00:48:59.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2339 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:18.48 -01:44:35.0: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2660 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:54.42 -02:15:09.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1559 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:56.75 -04:50:28.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2972 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20720_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20720_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20733_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20733_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20737_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20742_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20744_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20745_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20745_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20752_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20752_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0007 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:09.564 -01:59:59.04
Second-epoch image center 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:09.415 -01:59:57.82
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:12.575 -02:00:35.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01682 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v0R09KCeZt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.07qzyoZk7I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XuHcCAkIvQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lL6PTJCdy6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.806600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.806600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 53209 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3743 to 72.2534 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3357 deg
Loaded 5825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4456 out of 5076 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5076 out of 53209 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 53499 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to +3.3329 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3874 to 72.2632 deg, Dec -7.3133 to 3.3329 deg
Loaded 5831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4443 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 53499 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
1.9 pix Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
15.5 mag. Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.v0R09KCeZt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2903, bad_region=3, passed=53195
Got 53195 stars (including 50206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=1384 n_q2=918 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.07qzyoZk7I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2925, bad_region=5, passed=53480
Got 53480 stars (including 50454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=1403 n_q2=921 n_q3=1488 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XuHcCAkIvQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1816, bad_region=17, passed=43552
Got 43552 stars (including 41653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43552 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=9.825 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.826 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.248 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.280 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.274
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.280 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1141 n_q2=1355 n_q3=970 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lL6PTJCdy6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1846, bad_region=21, passed=43587
Got 43587 stars (including 41661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43587 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=9.616 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.244 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.272 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.272 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1141 n_q2=1359 n_q3=964 n_q4=1441 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-55-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_045721_TTUQ1b1x1_184325_zKTk7Yn3/wcs_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:46:09.05 -07:03:43.7: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:39:32.36 +00:42:00.5: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:55:10.71 -03:02:45.1: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:16:23.98 +00:33:24.0: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:57:55.43 -00:24:10.9: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:53:22.68 +02:03:24.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:23:53.92 +00:18:46.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:56:50.22 -00:52:38.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:57:55.43 -00:24:10.9: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:55:10.71 -03:02:45.1: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:16:23.98 +00:33:24.0: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:55.43 -00:24:10.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4542 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:10.71 -03:02:45.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5124 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:39:32.36 +00:42:00.5: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:23.98 +00:33:24.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1721 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:23:53.92 +00:18:46.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:53:22.68 +02:03:24.6: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:46:09.05 -07:03:43.7: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:56:50.22 -00:52:38.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:53.92 +00:18:46.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1371 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:32.36 +00:42:00.5: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5374 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:50.22 -00:52:38.3: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2881 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:09.05 -07:03:43.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8716 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:22.68 +02:03:24.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3363 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:21:16.79 -01:50:03.6: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:21:16.79 -01:50:03.6: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:16.79 -01:50:03.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5911 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:05:11.85 -00:37:55.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:51:44.91 -03:08:06.7: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:21.39 +00:35:06.5: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:05:11.85 -00:37:55.2: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:22.29 +00:30:38.9: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:51:44.91 -03:08:06.7: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:11.85 -00:37:55.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0628 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:44.91 -03:08:06.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2166 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:21.39 +00:35:06.5: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:21.39 +00:35:06.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9590 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:52:08.32 +00:32:17.0: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:28.08 +01:06:09.4: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:59.78 +00:10:57.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:18:25.32 +02:27:54.4: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:00:22.42 +03:00:10.8: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:22.29 +00:30:38.9: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:22.29 +00:30:38.9: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3407 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:47:17.62 +00:55:31.1: 15.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:52:08.32 +00:32:17.0: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:28.08 +01:06:09.4: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:08.32 +00:32:17.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5633 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:28.08 +01:06:09.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4004 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:59.78 +00:10:57.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:18:25.32 +02:27:54.4: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.32 +02:27:54.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6033 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:00:22.42 +03:00:10.8: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:22.42 +03:00:10.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8132 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:20:20.08 +01:08:49.7: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:06:07.93 -02:55:29.0: 14.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:46:41.87 -02:56:10.0: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:47:17.62 +00:55:31.1: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:17.62 +00:55:31.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7917 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:57:53.18 +02:12:33.0: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:20:20.08 +01:08:49.7: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:20.08 +01:08:49.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6521 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:06:07.93 -02:55:29.0: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:07.93 -02:55:29.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7966 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:46:41.87 -02:56:10.0: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:37:49.25 +02:40:36.2: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:41.87 -02:56:10.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9293 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 03:49:35.99 -02:55:58.5: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:30.93 +02:57:38.8: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:09:11.90 -01:28:35.3: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:57:53.18 +02:12:33.0: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:53.18 +02:12:33.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7729 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:37:49.25 +02:40:36.2: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 03:49:35.99 -02:55:58.5: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:49.25 +02:40:36.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6980 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:35.99 -02:55:58.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8684 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:30.93 +02:57:38.8: 15.73 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:09:11.90 -01:28:35.3: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:30.93 +02:57:38.8: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9637 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:11.90 -01:28:35.3: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7880 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-05-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:24:43.98 -03:51:35.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3167 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68501.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67329_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67329_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67330_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67330_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67334_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67334_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67335_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67335_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67336_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67336_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67337_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67337_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67338_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67338_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67549_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67549_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67863_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67863_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:36.00 -01:31:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67881_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67881_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:41.98 -01:51:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 67949_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68014_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68014_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:02.61 -00:58:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68042_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68042_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.34 +01:00:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68079_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68079_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:43.91 -00:48:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68135_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68135_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68184_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68184_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:17.87 -01:50:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68189_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68189_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68238_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68238_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:13.78 +03:04:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68253_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68253_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:51.43 +01:28:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68263_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68263_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:13.76 +02:07:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68281_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68281_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68325_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68325_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68350_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68350_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:17.93 -03:06:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68376_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68376_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68462_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68462_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68491_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68491_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68501_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
Preparing report for the candidate 68501_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68507_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68507_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68519_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68519_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68555_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68555_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68577_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68577_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68588_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68588_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68620_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68620_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68639_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68639_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68653_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68653_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68663_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68663_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68667_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 68667_fd_Eri-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-56-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks