This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3949 2461295.8949 9.71 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1
182.56394 -16.55729 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.500 V 14.600 V 2445316.00000 168.700000000000 M0e-M4.5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3949* 04 52 02.40 +17 32 16.1 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V Tau,2461295.8949,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V Tau 20260912.3949 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3949 2461295.8949 13.35 05:19:29.46 +17:19:02.1
186.60303 -11.30740 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:19:29.46 +17:19:02.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:19:29.46 +17:19:02.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3949* 05 19 29.46 +17 19 02.1 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8949,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3949 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3949 2461295.8949 13.15 05:46:53.48 +14:51:17.8
192.24192 -7.01821 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.59 Elpis 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:46:53.48 +14:51:17.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:46:53.48 +14:51:17.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3949* 05 46 53.48 +14 51 17.8 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8949,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3949 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3949 2461295.8949 14.15 05:11:08.55 +15:46:23.5
186.78588 -13.82827 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.670 Ottegebe -0 0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:11:08.55 +15:46:23.5: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:11:08.55 +15:46:23.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3949* 05 11 08.55 +15 46 23.5 14.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8949,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3949 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3949 2461295.8949 14.20 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7
191.53661 -11.10368 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.635 Vundtia -1 3 3 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7: 16.01 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7: 15.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3949* 05 30 58.60 +13 20 33.7 14.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8949,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3949 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461295.89518831 12.09.2026 09:28:54.270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 65 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18254
Objects passed selection criteria: 18234
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17032
Average stars matched: 16407.8 (96.3348 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244440 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:36:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461295.89518831 12.09.2026 09:28:54.270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 103 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 124848
Objects passed selection criteria: 124633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112896
Average stars matched: 108344 (95.9684 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 516788 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:39:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.89462523
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.203 +14:01:09.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:07.203 +14:01:09.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:09.596 +14:00:58.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:09.596 +14:00:58.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:07.203 +14:01:09.20
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:09.596 +14:00:58.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01011 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rPFevgoOaK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mCt9oEJ1jD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B9QLhjWQRJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.58XOvkIYmt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.977900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.977900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec +8.4866 to +19.3515 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec 8.4866 to 19.3515 deg
Loaded 8970 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6863 out of 7649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7649 out of 19240 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.1 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.5 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.rPFevgoOaK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1816, bad_region=0, passed=18778
Got 18778 stars (including 16932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1490 n_q2=934 n_q3=1320 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mCt9oEJ1jD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1850, bad_region=0, passed=19240
Got 19240 stars (including 17364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=934 n_q2=1346 n_q3=910 n_q4=1585 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.B9QLhjWQRJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=979, bad_region=0, passed=15300
Got 15300 stars (including 14305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=9.249 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.970 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=0.940 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.396 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.212 +14:01:08.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15300 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1533539.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.940 -> 0.262 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4783 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4604 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4604 pairs (4783 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4604 robust_rms=9.019 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4604 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4604 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4604 robust_rms_before=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.307 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.211 +14:01:08.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15300 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1536403.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.257 -> 0.255 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4604 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1017 n_q2=1216 n_q3=979 n_q4=1392 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.58XOvkIYmt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1009, bad_region=0, passed=15314
Got 15314 stars (including 14291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=9.238 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.988 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.943 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.398 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.308
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:09.609 +14:00:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15315 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1533684.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.943 -> 0.270 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4777 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4594 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4594 pairs (4777 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=9.014 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.264 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4594 robust_rms_before=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.264 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.299 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:09.609 +14:00:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15315 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1538732.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.265 -> 0.264 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4594 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1017 n_q2=1215 n_q3=971 n_q4=1391 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.356
ref2=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.031
new1=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.180
new2=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.1935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346_astrometric_residuals.png (4765 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (4604 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (4594 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:16:17.52 +12:13:41.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:06.90 +13:29:22.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:12:42.81 +13:54:56.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:18:59.96 +13:21:44.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:12:42.81 +13:54:56.7: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:06.90 +13:29:22.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:42.81 +13:54:56.7: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4248 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:16:17.52 +12:13:41.2: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:06.90 +13:29:22.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2834 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:17.52 +12:13:41.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3107 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3766 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:18:59.96 +13:21:44.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:59.96 +13:21:44.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3971 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7120 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22035_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22035_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.54 +15:40:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22083_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22083_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:58.96 +14:34:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22168_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22168_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.08 +17:02:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22204_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22204_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:40.83 +11:59:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22265_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22265_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:36.96 +12:44:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22268_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22268_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:20.19 +15:36:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22280_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22280_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.31 +11:40:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22283_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22283_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:14.41 +13:44:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22289_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22289_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22294_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22294_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22310_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22310_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22311_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22311_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22322_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22322_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.34 +17:54:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03036_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 03036_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.04 +17:45:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.61 +10:19:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:52:02.40 +17:32:16.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.211 +14:01:08.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:07.211 +14:01:08.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:09.609 +14:00:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:09.609 +14:00:57.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:07.211 +14:01:08.35
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:09.609 +14:00:57.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01013 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E4ZkCryFFm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.27eVt9ijLp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A1goBSoPQU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FmMwSVjNAB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7745 out of 133414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.848900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.848900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7745 out of 133414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 134593 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec +8.4624 to +19.3542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec 8.4624 to 19.3542 deg
Loaded 8990 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5766 out of 7720 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7720 out of 134593 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 127 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.7 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E4ZkCryFFm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=13989, bad_region=9, passed=133386
Got 133386 stars (including 119147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 133386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.220 n_q1=1388 n_q2=971 n_q3=1291 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.27eVt9ijLp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=13660, bad_region=5, passed=134562
Got 134562 stars (including 120666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 134562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1302 n_q3=953 n_q4=1496 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A1goBSoPQU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=6561, bad_region=16, passed=92693
Got 92693 stars (including 85986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=9.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.311 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.311 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1076 n_q2=1246 n_q3=1012 n_q4=1433 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FmMwSVjNAB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=6615, bad_region=18, passed=93903
Got 93903 stars (including 87132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93903 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=9.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.271 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1072 n_q2=1254 n_q3=1020 n_q4=1423 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_042944_TTUQ1b1x1_334146_7lG7cm9e/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:12:36.74 +10:17:24.5: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:02:42.43 +10:43:32.7: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:08:01.90 +16:06:10.8: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:15:26.03 +16:20:06.4: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:06:51.82 +10:07:29.2: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:33:10.00 +15:42:36.8: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:02:08.20 +14:18:17.3: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:12:36.74 +10:17:24.5: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:33:10.00 +15:42:36.8: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:15:26.03 +16:20:06.4: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:36.74 +10:17:24.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5052 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:02:42.43 +10:43:32.7: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:06:51.82 +10:07:29.2: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:08:01.90 +16:06:10.8: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:10.00 +15:42:36.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6145 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:26.03 +16:20:06.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8539 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:42.43 +10:43:32.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5457 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:51.82 +10:07:29.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6875 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:01.90 +16:06:10.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5488 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:57:59.49 +10:14:09.7: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:04:14.06 +13:16:08.4: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:41:54.11 +15:32:31.6: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:02:08.20 +14:18:17.3: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:08.20 +14:18:17.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2178 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:57:59.49 +10:14:09.7: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:59.49 +10:14:09.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9801 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:41:54.11 +15:32:31.6: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:04:14.06 +13:16:08.4: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:54.11 +15:32:31.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7254 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:14.06 +13:16:08.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0671 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:53.70 +13:06:24.7: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:03:41.20 +10:06:03.8: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:53.70 +13:06:24.7: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:53.70 +13:06:24.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6072 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:03:41.20 +10:06:03.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:41.20 +10:06:03.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2681 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:19:29.46 +17:19:02.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:46:53.48 +14:51:17.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:01.53 +17:27:39.0: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:44:54.35 +15:37:40.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:19:29.46 +17:19:02.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:46:53.48 +14:51:17.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:44:54.35 +15:37:40.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:01.53 +17:27:39.0: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:54.35 +15:37:40.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4537 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:01.53 +17:27:39.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6444 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:43:08.26 +12:13:42.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:43:08.26 +12:13:42.4: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:08.26 +12:13:42.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6716 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:49:18.39 +13:13:13.3: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:03:00.79 +12:56:38.3: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:01.90 +11:29:57.6: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:03:00.79 +12:56:38.3: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:49:18.39 +13:13:13.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:00.79 +12:56:38.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9354 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:18.39 +13:13:13.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8029 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:11:08.55 +15:46:23.5: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:12.02 +15:58:47.8: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:01.90 +11:29:57.6: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:01.90 +11:29:57.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0251 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.6: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:51:32.35 +18:11:11.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:11:08.55 +15:46:23.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:12.02 +15:58:47.8: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:12.02 +15:58:47.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9688 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:55:22.48 +12:16:03.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:51:32.35 +18:11:11.6: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:32.35 +18:11:11.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1897 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.6: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2884 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:26:38.02 +16:11:47.2: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:55:22.48 +12:16:03.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:22.48 +12:16:03.4: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1536 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:03:03.84 +09:23:58.6: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:26:38.02 +16:11:47.2: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:38.02 +16:11:47.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1057 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:04:44.48 +09:59:41.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:03:03.84 +09:23:58.6: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:03.84 +09:23:58.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1663 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:16.41 +15:49:39.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:04:44.48 +09:59:41.9: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:44.48 +09:59:41.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2695 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:19:13.03 +10:14:53.2: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:16.41 +15:49:39.8: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:16.41 +15:49:39.8: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2397 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:23:02.34 +11:25:58.3: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:19:13.03 +10:14:53.2: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:13.03 +10:14:53.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2552 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:16:00.83 +09:50:03.1: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:29:16.23 +17:41:26.3: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:17:54.02 +15:18:17.2: 16.04 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:23:02.34 +11:25:58.3: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:02.34 +11:25:58.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2615 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:16:00.83 +09:50:03.1: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:00.83 +09:50:03.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3770 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:29:16.23 +17:41:26.3: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:16.23 +17:41:26.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2641 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:17:54.02 +15:18:17.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.04 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:17:54.02 +15:18:17.2: ref_mag=16.04 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.5351 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:31:34.26 +12:03:37.5: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:10:08.45 +12:54:11.1: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:01:36.81 +15:25:17.9: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:31:34.26 +12:03:37.5: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:34.26 +12:03:37.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2958 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:12:23.56 +17:13:12.8: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:18.97 +16:53:33.9: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:10:08.45 +12:54:11.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:01:36.81 +15:25:17.9: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:08.45 +12:54:11.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4703 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:36.81 +15:25:17.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7557 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:05:05.71 +12:58:19.6: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:12:23.56 +17:13:12.8: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:23.56 +17:13:12.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6849 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:18.97 +16:53:33.9: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:18.97 +16:53:33.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7134 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:05:05.71 +12:58:19.6: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:00:22.51 +15:07:05.2: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:05.71 +12:58:19.6: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8601 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:29:45.84 +18:59:27.0: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:00:22.51 +15:07:05.2: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:22.51 +15:07:05.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1286 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:29:45.84 +18:59:27.0: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:45.84 +18:59:27.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9676 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7: 16.01 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7: 15.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:58.60 +13:20:33.7: ref_mag=15.78 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1875 delta=1.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:33:01.15 +13:02:20.6: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:33:01.15 +13:02:20.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:01.15 +13:02:20.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9807 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160356.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158375_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158375_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158377_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158377_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158382_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158382_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158385_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158385_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158391_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158391_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:28.82 +08:59:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158394_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158394_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:28.47 +15:54:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.35 +12:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158399_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158399_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:16.89 +17:20:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:17.11 +12:55:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158404_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158404_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158411_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158411_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:20.81 +13:36:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158412_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158412_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.30 +09:17:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158413_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158413_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158414_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158414_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158420_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158420_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158424_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158424_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158426_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158426_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:07.31 +15:23:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158428_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158428_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:47.49 +17:31:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158429_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158429_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:29.62 +16:44:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158430_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158430_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:33.62 +15:42:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158431_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158431_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:30.72 +09:20:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158432_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158432_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158433_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158433_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.27 +18:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158698_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158698_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:19.02 +09:54:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158900_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158900_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.67 +14:19:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158913_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158913_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.72 +09:43:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158962_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158962_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:47.26 +15:56:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158966_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158966_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:09.55 +11:00:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158998_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158998_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:38.76 +15:48:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159060_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159060_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.90 +18:25:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159091_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159091_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.75 +17:05:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159134_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159134_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:18.66 +17:43:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159140_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159140_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:24.11 +10:29:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159211_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159211_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.87 +17:31:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159227_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159227_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:36.55 +11:29:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159236_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 159236_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159295_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159295_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:40.95 +11:30:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159299_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 159299_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159345_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159345_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:42.21 +12:30:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159424_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159424_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:56.63 +12:31:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159441_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159441_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159472_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159472_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:31.36 +18:36:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159473_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159473_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159488_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159488_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:16.38 +12:21:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159545_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159545_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:16.93 +17:44:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159550_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159550_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:27.53 +18:28:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159570_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159570_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:47.65 +17:17:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159578_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159578_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:21.43 +11:59:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159621_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159621_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:21.01 +15:49:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159675_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159675_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159706_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159706_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:24.58 +18:32:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159708_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159708_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:01.16 +16:19:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159724_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159724_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.01 +10:31:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159728_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159728_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:27.80 +12:39:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159761_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159761_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.37 +12:45:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159763_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159763_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:21.85 +17:17:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159788_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159788_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159810_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159810_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:45.39 +09:12:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159813_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159813_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159818_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159818_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:58.09 +11:19:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:30.53 +13:30:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159839_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159839_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:34.65 +12:31:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159887_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159887_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159898_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159898_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:27.28 +14:24:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159919_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159919_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:22.31 +11:34:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159920_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159920_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:30.32 +18:58:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159931_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 159931_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159947_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159947_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159957_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159957_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:54.80 +16:07:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159982_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159982_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160003_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160003_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160011_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160011_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:53.13 +13:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160028_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160028_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160048_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160048_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:08.00 +09:49:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160074_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160074_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160089_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160089_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:28.12 +14:29:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160090_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160090_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:32.61 +09:37:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160099_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160099_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160103_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160103_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:02.86 +10:20:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160118_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160118_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:48.58 +15:47:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160126_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160126_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:48.47 +16:42:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160132_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160132_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160135_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160135_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:14.07 +10:31:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160145_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160145_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160182_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160182_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.15 +09:23:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160208_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160208_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:16.57 +12:24:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160212_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160212_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160222_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160222_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:30.94 +16:34:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160249_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160249_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:02.14 +16:34:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160258_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160258_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.67 +17:59:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160261_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160261_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.78 +14:22:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160295_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160295_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160320_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160320_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:06.11 +17:50:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160330_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160330_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160336_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160336_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160356_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160356_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:54.02 +15:18:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.826 3393609898596858496 079.47493281902 +15.30460010929 15.0388 13.7671 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.826#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160365_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160365_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:42.39 +15:54:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160390_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160390_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:09.45 +18:20:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160393_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160393_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:15.90 +16:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160422_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160422_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:37.33 +13:58:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160470_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160470_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160481_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160481_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160501_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160501_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:16.07 +17:47:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160534_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160534_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160579_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160579_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160674_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160674_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160703_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160703_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160729_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160729_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126773_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 126773_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:17.84 +12:00:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.88 +11:10:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104791_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 104791_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:36.97 +12:44:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:40.84 +11:59:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81827_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 81827_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75707_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 75707_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:36.90 +13:48:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.61 +10:19:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19883_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 19883_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.03 +17:45:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.34 +17:54:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:58.98 +14:34:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.54 +15:40:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:19.02 +15:45:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:01.91 +12:13:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85270_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 85270_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 44402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:20.36 +16:15:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-28-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
