This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3789 2461295.8789 13.04 07:06:22.24 +16:41:52.3
199.55606 10.74973 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:22.24 +16:41:52.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:22.24 +16:41:52.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8789,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3789 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3789 2461295.8789 13.56 07:10:40.86 +18:30:02.6
198.33222 12.44327 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -1 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:40.86 +18:30:02.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:40.86 +18:30:02.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8789,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3789 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3789 2461295.8789 13.41 07:22:29.81 +13:12:04.3
204.48409 12.77943 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis 0 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:29.81 +13:12:04.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:29.81 +13:12:04.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8789,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3789 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461295.87916142 12.09.2026 09:05:49.547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24973
Objects passed selection criteria: 24930
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20948.5
Average stars matched: 20570.5 (98.1956 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:10:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461295.87916142 12.09.2026 09:05:49.547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 145 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 169806
Objects passed selection criteria: 169399
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 142857
Average stars matched: 139678 (97.7747 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 638800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:15:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.87860831
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0143 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1pJA6XJo8v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JQvm2HiUDk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JuBRQpSr9y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tpaRlJ9g3Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.0 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1pJA6XJo8v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JQvm2HiUDk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JuBRQpSr9y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=798, bad_region=0, passed=14969
Got 14969 stars (including 14157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=6.873 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.843 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.428 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1543 n_q2=787 n_q3=1593 n_q4=858 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tpaRlJ9g3Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=788, bad_region=2, passed=15028
Got 15028 stars (including 14221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=6.971 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.389 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.471 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.477
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.471 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1531 n_q2=795 n_q3=1584 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.206
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:27.15 +15:18:26.2: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:27.15 +15:18:26.2: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:27.15 +15:18:26.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7554 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31144_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31144_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.67 +10:45:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.66 +12:58:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31307_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31307_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.23 +16:51:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31448_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31448_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.40 +11:44:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09963_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 09963_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:50.03 +12:12:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.62 +10:01:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0143 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.047 +13:59:52.99
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.980 +13:59:23.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sZsx4L67aD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BxXFVAjVQf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KfHdeI54Qx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hJlPuzq03q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sZsx4L67aD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BxXFVAjVQf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KfHdeI54Qx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=7714, bad_region=4, passed=95973
Got 95973 stars (including 88146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95973 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=7.024 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.737 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.435 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.435 -> 0.345 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4773 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4561 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4561 pairs (4773 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4561 robust_rms=6.722 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.058 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4561 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4561 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4561 robust_rms_before=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.413 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.337 -> 0.337 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4561 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4561 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4561 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1436 n_q2=758 n_q3=1507 n_q4=860 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hJlPuzq03q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=7748, bad_region=7, passed=96059
Got 96059 stars (including 88193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=7.169 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.025 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=1.395 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.479
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1513 n_q2=793 n_q3=1579 n_q4=898 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_040629_TTUQ1b1x1_2155213_r0aYeSeA/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:55:12.40 +17:59:30.5: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:27.94 +12:47:10.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:46.21 +13:12:37.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:02.34 +14:34:13.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:32.26 +15:28:41.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:48:42.99 +13:10:12.1: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:36:20.34 +12:07:54.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:35:31.24 +15:05:32.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:51.78 +11:38:54.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:02.34 +14:34:13.9: 13.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:48:42.99 +13:10:12.1: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:32.26 +15:28:41.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:27.94 +12:47:10.4: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:02.34 +14:34:13.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6971 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:46.21 +13:12:37.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:42.99 +13:10:12.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8334 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:32.26 +15:28:41.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6246 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:36:20.34 +12:07:54.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:55:12.40 +17:59:30.5: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:27.94 +12:47:10.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7790 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:46.21 +13:12:37.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4997 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:20.34 +12:07:54.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8850 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:12.40 +17:59:30.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5268 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:35:31.24 +15:05:32.2: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:31.24 +15:05:32.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7193 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:51.78 +11:38:54.0: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:51.78 +11:38:54.0: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3611 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:29:28.37 +09:41:36.8: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:31.37 +14:41:59.1: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:32.26 +09:39:57.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:28.45 +13:27:48.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:29:28.37 +09:41:36.8: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:31.37 +14:41:59.1: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:28.37 +09:41:36.8: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5588 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:32.26 +09:39:57.4: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:31.37 +14:41:59.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5303 delta=-1.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:32.26 +09:39:57.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1001 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:28.45 +13:27:48.7: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:28.45 +13:27:48.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2106 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:09.28 +16:44:01.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:09.28 +16:44:01.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:09.28 +16:44:01.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0572 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:40.04 +13:12:34.8: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:52.57 +12:04:30.1: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:22.24 +16:41:52.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:54.71 +18:09:58.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:40.04 +13:12:34.8: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:40.04 +13:12:34.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1028 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:27.94 +12:48:57.1: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:52.57 +12:04:30.1: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:22.24 +16:41:52.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:52.57 +12:04:30.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3907 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:54.71 +18:09:58.4: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:54.71 +18:09:58.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8543 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:53.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:27.94 +12:48:57.1: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:27.94 +12:48:57.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4579 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:05.45 +12:15:15.4: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:53.3: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:53.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9497 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:05.45 +12:15:15.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:05.45 +12:15:15.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3802 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:39.53 +15:10:11.4: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:36.34 +12:27:12.5: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:35.60 +15:19:06.9: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:55:04.00 +13:03:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:39.53 +15:10:11.4: 13.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:39.53 +15:10:11.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5195 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:36.34 +12:27:12.5: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:40.86 +18:30:02.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:36.34 +12:27:12.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3194 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:35.60 +15:19:06.9: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:35.60 +15:19:06.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2335 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:55:04.00 +13:03:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:04.00 +13:03:36.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5539 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:40.86 +18:30:02.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:29.81 +13:12:04.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:29.81 +13:12:04.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:07:24.27 +09:22:13.5: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:07:24.27 +09:22:13.5: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:24.27 +09:22:13.5: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5466 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:53.99 +10:50:43.9: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:53.99 +10:50:43.9: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:53.99 +10:50:43.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3799 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229334.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.35 +18:07:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227477_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227477_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:01.43 +13:45:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227501_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227501_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227504_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227504_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.50 +13:25:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227510_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.78 +10:34:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:37.92 +10:50:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227518_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227518_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227527_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227527_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227529_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227529_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:06.37 +17:52:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:09.47 +12:21:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227538_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227538_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:50.61 +12:12:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227540_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227540_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:36.97 +19:02:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:35.94 +09:00:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227543_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227543_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.80 +16:09:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 227939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228025_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228025_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228194_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228194_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228213_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228213_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228401_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228401_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228433_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228433_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.41 +09:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.75 +09:17:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:58.07 +13:45:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.04 +15:07:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228700_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228700_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:00.01 +14:14:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228708_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228708_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228806_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228806_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.05 +12:33:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.55 +10:36:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.15 +11:24:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228847_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228847_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:28.00 +16:25:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228853_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228853_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:46.99 +09:46:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228932_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228932_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.32 +17:27:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228981_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 228981_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.01 +17:50:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229040_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229040_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:19.41 +18:18:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229045_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229045_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.40 +14:14:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229063_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229063_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.73 +16:55:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229066_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229066_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.27 +16:42:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.73 +09:15:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229118_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229118_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:40.07 +16:32:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.15 +12:08:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:07.60 +12:46:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229142_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229142_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:18.73 +18:49:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.22 +12:40:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229181_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229181_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229187_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229187_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.24 +10:59:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229231_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229231_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:43.61 +13:46:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229262_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229262_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:29.45 +10:51:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 229334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229388_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229388_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:21.33 +12:06:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229407_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229407_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229446_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229446_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.15 +14:13:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:47.46 +09:33:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229487_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229487_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.02 +12:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.48 +15:47:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229573_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229573_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.70 +15:48:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229578_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229578_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:38.88 +15:33:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229613_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229613_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229615_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229615_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.36 +10:56:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229627_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229627_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229628_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229628_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.27 +18:07:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:55.86 +17:23:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229685_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229685_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:52.51 +14:25:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229713_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229713_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229744_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229744_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:45.53 +10:57:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:55.89 +17:47:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229755_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229755_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:16.13 +16:22:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229771_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229771_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:45.34 +11:06:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229777_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229777_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.60 +13:57:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.13 +16:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229844_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229844_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:32.93 +13:59:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229892_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229892_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.52 +16:09:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229926_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229926_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.02 +17:46:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230090_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230090_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:33.21 +15:22:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:56.99 +13:42:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230188_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230188_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:53.92 +17:40:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230236_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230236_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230266_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230266_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.36 +12:20:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230311_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 230311_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230313_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230313_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230385_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230385_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:19.19 +12:01:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230447_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230447_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:27.19 +14:13:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230612_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 230612_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230706_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230706_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230734_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 230734_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:27.95 +11:30:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:50.04 +12:12:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.65 +13:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220247_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 220247_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:44.18 +11:24:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:57.21 +09:50:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.22 +16:51:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.71 +10:45:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172257_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 172257_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.39 +18:06:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.37 +11:44:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.45 +13:56:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.72 +12:22:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:16.56 +09:44:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-05-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks