This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,6.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 6.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3777 2461295.8777 11.10 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5
196.45209 16.40867 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 0 0 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3777 2461295.8777 11.90 07:21:34.07 +23:22:21.4
194.78894 16.73746 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -1 0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:34.07 +23:22:21.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:34.07 +23:22:21.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3777 2461295.8777 13.68 06:52:47.29 +21:53:17.6
193.39315 10.07021 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo 1 -2 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:47.29 +21:53:17.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:47.29 +21:53:17.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3777 2461295.8777 13.51 07:10:40.87 +18:30:02.0
198.33240 12.44324 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 0 -1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:40.87 +18:30:02.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:40.87 +18:30:02.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3777 2461295.8777 13.60 07:27:56.63 +23:55:32.3
194.84100 18.29801 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia -1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:56.63 +23:55:32.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:56.63 +23:55:32.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8777,7.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3777 7.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461295.87806619 12.09.2026 09:04:14.919 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22165
Objects passed selection criteria: 22087
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17501.5
Average stars matched: 17089.2 (97.6445 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:09:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461295.87806619 12.09.2026 09:04:14.919 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 201
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 126 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140509
Objects passed selection criteria: 140103
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110397
Average stars matched: 106397 (96.3767 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605148 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:14:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.87735829
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01180 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qjlHxMAkDA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6QIRTPGTqn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RkZna2gBMW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yYFNGlNKap
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qjlHxMAkDA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6QIRTPGTqn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RkZna2gBMW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=635, bad_region=0, passed=11685
Got 11685 stars (including 11044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=6.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.812 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.440 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.481 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.457
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.481 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1631 n_q2=800 n_q3=1603 n_q4=763 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yYFNGlNKap (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=636, bad_region=1, passed=11720
Got 11720 stars (including 11071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=6.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.961 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4800 robust_rms_before=1.344 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.485 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.484
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.485 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1633 n_q2=808 n_q3=1608 n_q4=751 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.358
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.383
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.358
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:42.8: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:53.04 +21:33:26.4: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:37.21 +22:17:44.9: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:53.04 +21:33:26.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:37.21 +22:17:44.9: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:42.8: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.5: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:53.04 +21:33:26.4: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0814 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:37.21 +22:17:44.9: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9260 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:42.8: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9603 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5360 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.5: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2534 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0942 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.5: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6548 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.62 +22:42:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31360_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 31360_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31375_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31375_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31432_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31432_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.04 +20:02:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.43 +24:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 31505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.55 +22:51:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:31.98 +19:17:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:58.249 +21:59:44.10
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:01.199 +21:59:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01180 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d1JwP0Avz0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tDq0qKy8u2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FsaCyMe5pD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5Bl14ul32g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 194 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d1JwP0Avz0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tDq0qKy8u2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FsaCyMe5pD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4161, bad_region=6, passed=69866
Got 69866 stars (including 65623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=6.622 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.784 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.454 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.467 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.469
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1594 n_q2=808 n_q3=1605 n_q4=780 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.392
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5Bl14ul32g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4084, bad_region=11, passed=69547
Got 69547 stars (including 65361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69547 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=6.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.022 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=1.352 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.469 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.469 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1599 n_q2=810 n_q3=1612 n_q4=762 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-03-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040458_TTUQ1b1x1_1723649_AILAhXW4/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:13.38 +23:47:54.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:02.13 +19:25:40.6: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:58.11 +20:34:08.0: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.36 +24:26:55.8: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.3: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:13.38 +23:47:54.1: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:02.13 +19:25:40.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:13.38 +23:47:54.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7858 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:02.13 +19:25:40.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1367 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:49.00 +23:58:10.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:42.2: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.36 +24:26:55.8: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.36 +24:26:55.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6400 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:58.11 +20:34:08.0: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:58.11 +20:34:08.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2778 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.3: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0903 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:05.59 +19:49:34.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:49.00 +23:58:10.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:42.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:49.00 +23:58:10.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2298 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:42.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2547 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:05.59 +19:49:34.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:05.59 +19:49:34.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8403 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:20.29 +22:06:19.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:48.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:20.29 +22:06:19.2: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:20.29 +22:06:19.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7705 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:48.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:48.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5378 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7314 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:34.07 +23:22:21.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.19 +26:25:33.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.7: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:34.07 +23:22:21.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3288 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.19 +26:25:33.0: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.19 +26:25:33.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3937 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.7: 10.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.7: ref_mag=10.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4590 delta=-1.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:25.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:25.9: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:25.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3839 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:48.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:08.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:22.68 +23:10:37.8: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:48.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:48.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9814 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:08.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:08.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9921 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:22.68 +23:10:37.8: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:22.68 +23:10:37.8: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0209 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.75 +23:15:05.5: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:54.2: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:52.18 +23:32:19.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:53.40 +20:20:55.6: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.75 +23:15:05.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:54.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.75 +23:15:05.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3405 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:54.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3036 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:52.18 +23:32:19.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.18 +23:32:19.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4583 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.6: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:53.40 +20:20:55.6: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:53.40 +20:20:55.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4778 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.6: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.3636 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:30.30 +19:39:09.6: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:22.20 +22:15:09.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:30.30 +19:39:09.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:30.30 +19:39:09.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5926 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:24.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:37.93 +20:47:57.3: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:22.20 +22:15:09.1: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:22.20 +22:15:09.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5916 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:47.29 +21:53:17.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.03 +22:54:24.7: 11.32 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:24.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:24.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2435 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:37.93 +20:47:57.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:37.93 +20:47:57.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4504 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:47.29 +21:53:17.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:01.38 +20:28:59.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.03 +22:54:24.7: 11.33 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:46.03 +22:54:24.7: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.5512 delta=-2.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:01.38 +20:28:59.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.38 +20:28:59.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4697 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:29.72 +22:47:24.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:11.08 +22:30:56.7: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:40.87 +18:30:02.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:13.33 +25:45:28.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:29.72 +22:47:24.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:11.08 +22:30:56.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:29.72 +22:47:24.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2744 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:11.08 +22:30:56.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7047 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:40.87 +18:30:02.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:56.63 +23:55:32.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:46.73 +21:03:33.7: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.65 +26:08:07.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:13.33 +25:45:28.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:13.33 +25:45:28.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7660 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:56.63 +23:55:32.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:46.73 +21:03:33.7: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:58.65 +26:08:07.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:46.73 +21:03:33.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7669 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.65 +26:08:07.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4655 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.7: 13.04 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:14.36 +23:46:00.4: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.33 +22:46:28.2: 13.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.7: 13.00 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.34 +23:28:23.3: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.7: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.0016 delta=-0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:14.36 +23:46:00.4: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:58.12 +22:58:17.5: 10.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:14.36 +23:46:00.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0469 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.33 +22:46:28.2: 13.58 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.33 +22:46:28.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.9640 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.34 +23:28:23.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.34 +23:28:23.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9330 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:58.12 +22:58:17.5: 10.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:58.12 +22:58:17.5: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0547 delta=-3.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:01.23 +16:48:15.9: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:53:01.23 +16:48:15.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:01.23 +16:48:15.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6703 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176882.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175438_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175438_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.37 +21:13:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:29.61 +22:51:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.31 +19:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:25.90 +20:51:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.85 +20:58:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.33 +18:47:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:00.36 +23:33:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.72 +17:06:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.13 +20:16:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.51 +20:07:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.72 +20:54:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.65 +18:14:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.89 +22:54:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.85 +18:23:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.42 +17:19:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.11 +18:43:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.04 +20:45:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.93 +21:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.93 +18:59:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.80 +26:11:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.56 +21:02:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.05 +19:40:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.80 +20:04:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.53 +22:11:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.26 +25:15:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.77 +19:32:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.11 +23:55:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:44.57 +25:12:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175641_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175641_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:57.64 +21:46:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.56 +22:51:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.65 +19:12:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.37 +19:28:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.24 +24:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.17 +22:38:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175784_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175784_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.53 +22:52:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 175792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175848_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175848_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.36 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175891_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175891_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.14 +26:07:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.94 +19:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175952_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175952_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.75 +25:46:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.13 +23:37:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175971_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175971_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.33 +26:03:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.89 +20:58:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176026_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176026_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176042_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176042_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:17.84 +24:27:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.92 +23:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176061_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176061_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.87 +23:25:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.19 +26:51:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176073_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176073_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:46.20 +26:38:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:32.98 +22:42:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.47 +26:22:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176094_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176094_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.04 +18:03:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.82 +23:15:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.64 +25:29:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.79 +23:26:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.50 +18:39:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.47 +22:23:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.16 +22:10:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176240_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176240_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:36.99 +17:45:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176310_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176310_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.68 +24:40:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176318_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176318_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.18 +22:52:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176322_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176322_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.48 +20:30:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176324_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176324_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.36 +21:47:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176329_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176329_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.88 +25:33:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176333_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176333_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.10 +22:43:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.81 +18:51:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.02 +21:45:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.11 +22:57:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.14 +19:29:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.77 +22:49:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.26 +24:32:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.65 +22:49:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.64 +26:19:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 +19:28:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:21.52 +23:00:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.35 +23:05:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.09 +25:18:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.26 +18:07:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.32 +21:31:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:16.92 +26:36:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:36.06 +20:45:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:33.13 +23:13:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.40 +25:56:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.45 +25:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.12 +22:51:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.12 +22:50:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176624_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176624_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.80 +19:37:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176642_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176642_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.64 +20:26:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176657_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176657_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.41 +20:05:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.73 +20:31:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.49 +21:56:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.19 +24:08:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.71 +21:27:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.13 +21:35:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176703_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176703_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.16 +19:14:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176705_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176705_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.27 +22:51:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176706_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176706_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.03 +20:06:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176713_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176713_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.15 +22:57:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:01.23 +20:07:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176720_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176720_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.09 +24:22:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.56 +24:54:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.18 +18:36:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.42 +20:35:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176731_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176731_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.08 +24:28:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:34.69 +20:55:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176745_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176745_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176747_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176747_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.05 +22:39:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 176762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176766_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176766_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.75 +21:21:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:04.77 +18:53:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176800_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176800_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.51 +21:44:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:57.89 +26:41:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176814_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176814_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.48 +19:34:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176822_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176822_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.62 +19:03:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176831_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176831_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.23 +22:55:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176835_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176835_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.98 +26:28:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:58.91 +24:10:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.68 +20:00:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176882_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 176882_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176884_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176884_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.77 +24:19:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176899_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176899_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.68 +22:51:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.09 +22:57:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:23.63 +25:40:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176927_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176927_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.59 +23:06:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176964_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176964_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.59 +20:16:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:47.92 +25:23:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176986_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 176986_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:40.90 +22:08:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177011_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177011_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.94 +22:52:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.74 +20:49:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.75 +22:50:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177102_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177102_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.58 +25:10:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.61 +23:02:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177124_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177124_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177128_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177128_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.34 +22:48:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.68 +22:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:05.23 +22:57:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177182_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177182_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.88 +22:52:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.76 +24:10:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 177207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.83 +23:00:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:07.13 +18:30:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:11.61 +19:32:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.45 +18:06:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 173786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.41 +26:47:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.48 +24:13:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.05 +20:02:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 148925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:36.48 +17:01:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 116684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:24.52 +17:53:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148290_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 148290_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
