This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 11.90 06:30:06.71 +25:26:11.8
187.86703 6.95968 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 -0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:06.71 +25:26:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:06.71 +25:26:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 11.88 07:08:04.72 +30:52:36.9
186.34858 16.82339 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:04.72 +30:52:36.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:04.72 +30:52:36.9: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 12.61 07:18:25.80 +32:37:59.6
185.46106 19.50939 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:25.80 +32:37:59.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:25.80 +32:37:59.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 13.28 06:43:47.56 +32:22:56.0
182.82045 12.65861 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:47.56 +32:22:56.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:47.56 +32:22:56.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 13.81 06:27:52.28 +32:49:57.8
180.95202 9.81499 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis 2 -0 2 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:52.28 +32:49:57.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:52.28 +32:49:57.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3533 2461295.8533 13.82 07:00:46.46 +30:36:40.1
185.98212 15.27106 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala 0 -0 0 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:46.46 +30:36:40.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:46.46 +30:36:40.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8533,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3533 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461295.85361597 12.09.2026 08:29:02.420 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 53 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18416
Objects passed selection criteria: 18361
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14659
Average stars matched: 14333 (97.7761 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:36:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461295.85361597 12.09.2026 08:29:02.420 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 155
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 85 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 131704
Objects passed selection criteria: 131429
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 108831
Average stars matched: 105371 (96.821 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 604772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:39:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.85299878
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Image size: 939.9'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 939.8'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.207 +30:00:37.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.207 +30:00:37.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:50.207 +30:00:37.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01181 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UUedGGLFsY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n5RypL68Tt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0pyfKx62HD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wOzdJeFHNX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UUedGGLFsY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=4438, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 17882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1752 n_q2=820 n_q3=1429 n_q4=767 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n5RypL68Tt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=4407, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 17688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1744 n_q2=821 n_q3=1437 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0pyfKx62HD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=627, bad_region=1566, passed=11348
Got 11348 stars (including 9211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11348 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013054 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010443 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=6.036 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4760 robust_rms_before=1.117 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.514 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.495
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.514 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=1867 n_q2=681 n_q3=1505 n_q4=707 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wOzdJeFHNX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=1578, passed=11354
Got 11354 stars (including 9181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=6.103 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4760 robust_rms_before=1.060 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.534 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.466
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 940.4'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.251 +30:00:36.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11354 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1533369.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.060 -> 0.452 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4760 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4581 pairs (4760 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=5.971 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.209 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4581 robust_rms_before=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.466 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.468 vs 0.466 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4581 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4581 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=4581 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=1783 n_q2=662 n_q3=1441 n_q4=695 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.195
ref2=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.102
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.460 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.178
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422_astrometric_residuals.png (4760 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (4581 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 31199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.84 +27:59:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.94 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Image size: 939.9'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 940.4'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.251 +30:00:36.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.251 +30:00:36.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:52.440 +30:01:08.77
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:50.251 +30:00:36.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01194 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GjDbygObNU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c4PAQU7hRc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E3WkIWWTPJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O4d3L1hsYt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 116 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GjDbygObNU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, bad_region=23130, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 125190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1652 n_q2=856 n_q3=1476 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.c4PAQU7hRc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, bad_region=23158, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 124617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1663 n_q2=845 n_q3=1465 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E3WkIWWTPJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5358, bad_region=7157, passed=81335
Got 81335 stars (including 69207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013054 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010443 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4755 stars left (next iteration limit 5231)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=6.022 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.143 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4755 robust_rms_before=1.130 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.474 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.526 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.492
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.526 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits N_match=4755 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1842 n_q2=693 n_q3=1486 n_q4=734 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O4d3L1hsYt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=5494, bad_region=7272, passed=82914
Got 82914 stars (including 70502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82914 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013061 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010449 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4753 stars left (next iteration limit 5229)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=5.988 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4753 robust_rms_before=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.469 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.471
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.469 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=4753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1840 n_q2=685 n_q3=1480 n_q4=748 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_034634_TTUQ2b1x1_2602410_0ahR4c9Q/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:48:49.39 +29:29:30.4: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:56.04 +32:38:31.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:11.50 +30:33:36.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:22.73 +26:59:54.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:58.39 +30:49:33.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:22.73 +26:59:54.4: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:56.04 +32:38:31.5: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:48:49.39 +29:29:30.4: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:11.50 +30:33:36.6: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:22.73 +26:59:54.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9595 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:56.04 +32:38:31.5: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5860 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:49.39 +29:29:30.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0710 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:11.50 +30:33:36.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7665 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:44.97 +27:34:54.7: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:24.65 +31:46:43.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:31:28.77 +32:36:56.0: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:58.39 +30:49:33.0: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:58.39 +30:49:33.0: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2832 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:05.23 +34:00:02.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:44.97 +27:34:54.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:44.97 +27:34:54.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9348 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:24.65 +31:46:43.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:31:28.77 +32:36:56.0: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:24.65 +31:46:43.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6028 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:28.77 +32:36:56.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0289 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:04.72 +30:52:36.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:06.71 +25:26:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:05.23 +34:00:02.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:05.23 +34:00:02.4: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1538 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:06.71 +25:26:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:04.72 +30:52:36.9: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:25.80 +32:37:59.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:01.85 +31:53:37.4: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:25.80 +32:37:59.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:01.85 +31:53:37.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:01.85 +31:53:37.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8101 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:28.56 +31:28:01.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:47.56 +32:22:56.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.4: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.4: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0530 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:34.05 +26:14:33.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:47.56 +32:22:56.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:28.56 +31:28:01.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:28.56 +31:28:01.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9998 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:34.05 +26:14:33.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:34.05 +26:14:33.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3202 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:09.33 +26:42:18.3: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:09.33 +26:42:18.3: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:09.33 +26:42:18.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4630 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:54.94 +28:21:21.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:54.94 +28:21:21.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:54.94 +28:21:21.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5880 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:12.83 +26:58:26.6: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:55.90 +26:25:57.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:12.83 +26:58:26.6: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:12.83 +26:58:26.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5801 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:55.90 +26:25:57.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:55.90 +26:25:57.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6374 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:52.28 +32:49:57.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:52.28 +32:49:57.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:10.17 +30:00:25.7: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:10.17 +30:00:25.7: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:10.17 +30:00:25.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7268 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:46.46 +30:36:40.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:46.46 +30:36:40.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:55.49 +29:29:35.9: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:55.49 +29:29:35.9: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:55.49 +29:29:35.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0962 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:11.43 +31:09:59.1: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:11.43 +31:09:59.1: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:11.43 +31:09:59.1: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1558 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190142_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190142_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:43.02 +31:23:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190149_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190149_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:26.94 +29:43:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190151_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190151_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190157_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190157_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190166_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190166_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190167_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190167_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190197_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190197_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.70 +32:24:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190198_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190198_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.55 +29:27:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190203_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190203_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.56 +33:49:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:26.79 +27:25:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190207_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190207_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:02.58 +29:16:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190213_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190213_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:27.45 +33:36:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.13 +26:53:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190216_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190216_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:35.16 +28:52:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190218_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190218_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190221_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190221_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.54 +26:48:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.13 +26:05:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190229_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190229_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190230_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190230_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.89 +29:29:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190231_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190231_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.97 +29:19:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190351_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190351_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190366_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190366_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.87 +28:00:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190375_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190375_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.12 +28:18:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190402_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190402_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.40 +28:00:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190404_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190404_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.19 +27:38:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190416_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190416_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.50 +29:47:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190436_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190436_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:50.99 +32:48:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190438_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190438_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.53 +32:29:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190449_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190449_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190453_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190453_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.63 +27:12:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190454_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190454_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.62 +27:12:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190456_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190456_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.76 +33:40:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190466_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190466_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190474_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190474_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.30 +26:03:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190492_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190492_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190505_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190505_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.41 +26:08:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190506_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190506_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.38 +26:07:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190524_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190524_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.68 +33:53:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190543_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190543_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.13 +27:58:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190573_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190573_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.27 +32:38:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190579_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.41 +26:54:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190587_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190588_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190599_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190600_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190600_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.34 +33:13:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190604_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190604_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.19 +27:14:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.94 +31:14:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190621_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.39 +26:22:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190622_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.34 +30:38:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190624_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.63 +30:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190627_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190627_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.64 +28:32:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.13 +27:02:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190651_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190651_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.59 +29:44:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.60 +31:22:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.37 +28:23:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190665_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190665_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.77 +30:31:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190668_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190668_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.51 +26:59:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190671_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190671_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.63 +26:19:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190672_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190672_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.32 +26:27:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.72 +33:20:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190683_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190683_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:07.80 +34:17:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190688_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190688_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:31.02 +33:32:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190691_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190691_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.95 +30:56:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.77 +29:43:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190710_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190710_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.68 +26:58:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190712_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190712_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:30.59 +29:00:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190714_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190714_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.13 +31:07:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190729_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190729_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.79 +32:46:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190736_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190736_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190740_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190740_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:03.69 +31:09:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190743_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190743_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190745_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190745_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.27 +27:44:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190749_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190749_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.10 +32:38:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190754_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190754_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:18.75 +32:26:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190759_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190759_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.31 +26:04:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190768_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190768_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190780_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190780_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.37 +33:42:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190785_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190785_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.47 +26:47:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190786_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190786_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.13 +34:13:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190799_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190799_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.07 +32:38:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:14.37 +32:50:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190803_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190803_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.49 +28:12:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190813_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190813_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.60 +25:50:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190821_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190821_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.94 +33:15:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190829_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190829_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.88 +32:10:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190835_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190835_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190836_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190836_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.90 +27:08:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190846_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190846_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.75 +32:22:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190855_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190855_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:43.72 +31:08:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190856_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190856_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.05 +31:28:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190886_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 190886_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190887_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190887_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:04.94 +34:09:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190914_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190914_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.53 +29:56:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190920_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190920_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.80 +30:35:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190973_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190973_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:38.86 +31:26:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190974_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190974_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:35.92 +31:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190993_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190993_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:42.12 +28:54:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190996_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 190996_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:01.24 +27:13:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191011_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 191011_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:50.31 +29:39:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191017_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 191017_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191021_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 191021_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:12.19 +29:40:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191022_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 191022_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:09.48 +32:24:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71995_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 71995_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.16 +29:06:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179521_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 179521_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.95 +29:41:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.97 +31:35:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.70 +27:15:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-12_03-29-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
