This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 10.19 17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1
5.21827 1.43929 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" OGLE-BLG-ECL-145776
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.399 Ic Y 0.273 Ic 2457000.14000 0.470555000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.19 is 7.9 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.13 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OGLE-BLG-ECL-145776,2461293.5733,10.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OGLE-BLG-ECL-145776 20260910.0733 10.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 9.96 18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1
9.61638 -9.84092 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 0 1 10.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1: 14.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461293.5733,9.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260910.0733 9.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 11.37 18:25:12.77 -22:25:29.1
10.04728 -4.58916 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix This object is listed in tocp_transients_list.txt 0.2" TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1194 Aletta -200 284 348 16.0 -0 -0
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.37 is 4.6 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 16.0 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461293.5733,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260910.0733 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 12.52 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7
8.30799 -7.05286 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V1674 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.509 Ic Y 2.417 Ic 2454650.00000 202.400000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7: 13.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7: 14.44 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1674 Sgr,2461293.5733,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1674 Sgr 20260910.0733 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 12.38 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1
8.54687 -3.11854 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J181632.53-230337.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.170 V 14.020 V 2457081.10000 211.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J181632.53-230337.9,2461293.5733,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J181632.53-230337.9 20260910.0733 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.0733 2461293.5733 11.98 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5
5.84716 -6.12090 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 4052704103706817152
Type: ELL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.890 G 14.940 G M
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 0 -6 6 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4052704103706817152,2461293.5733,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4052704103706817152 20260910.0733 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
First image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Last image: 2461293.57358951 10.09.2026 01:45:48.134 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10921
Objects passed selection criteria: 10913
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9315.25
Average stars matched: 9144.5 (98.167 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 20:47:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
First image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Last image: 2461293.57358951 10.09.2026 01:45:48.134 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 149438
Objects passed selection criteria: 149188
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123538
Average stars matched: 118941 (96.2789 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 561480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 20:49:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461293.57298874
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:40.305 -25:57:24.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:40.305 -25:57:24.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0902 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:42.943 -25:56:56.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:42.943 -25:56:56.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1023 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:40.305 -25:57:24.75
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:42.943 -25:56:56.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01258 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.85xDyBUiNg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D8tNJPqUSY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C7RAci89Wp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H3FsfHuHTd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Loaded 20390 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9648 out of 10098 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10098 out of 13386 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.508000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.508000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Loaded 20390 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9648 out of 10098 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10098 out of 13386 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.5793 to 282.6797 deg, Dec -31.2667 to -20.5444 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.5793 to 282.6797 deg, Dec -31.2667 to -20.5444 deg
Loaded 19144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8594 out of 8954 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8954 out of 11384 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.85xDyBUiNg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=0, passed=13386
Got 13386 stars (including 12341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.613 n_q1=1078 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1422 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D8tNJPqUSY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, bad_region=0, passed=11384
Got 11384 stars (including 10450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.771 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.704 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.780 n_q1=1590 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.C7RAci89Wp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=528, bad_region=0, passed=6099
Got 6099 stars (including 5569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=8.071 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.570 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.662 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=0.989 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.708 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.570 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.861 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.683
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:40.301 -25:57:25.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6099 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky103631.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.989 -> 0.570 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=1540 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1154 n_q4=981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.H3FsfHuHTd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, bad_region=0, passed=6635
Got 6635 stars (including 6064 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 4750 stars left (next iteration limit 5227)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4750 robust_rms=7.938 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4750 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4750 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4750 robust_rms_before=0.985 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.703 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.856 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.651
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:42.938 -25:56:57.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6635 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky103673.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.985 -> 0.565 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4750 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=1517 n_q2=1074 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.141
ref2=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.684 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.639 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new2=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.632 worst_q_ratio=1.118
reference average sigma_overall=0.6105 worst_q_ratio=1.141
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4773 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (4761 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (4750 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:36:08.37 -23:55:02.9: 10.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:36:23.84 -23:54:09.6: 9.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:36:23.84 -23:54:09.6: 9.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1: 14.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:36:08.37 -23:55:02.9: 10.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:23.84 -23:54:09.6: ref_mag=9.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=9.3532 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:08.37 -23:55:02.9: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.3814 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20658.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20648_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20650_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20655_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20655_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.26 -31:08:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20658_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 20658_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20659_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20659_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:22.06 -28:14:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20669_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20669_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.36 -28:06:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20670_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.79 -25:06:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20672_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20672_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:34.16 -23:00:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20475_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20475_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:03.73 -29:58:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.42 -29:04:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:52:06.78 -23:43:21.1
18:44:55.66 -25:09:03.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:40.301 -25:57:25.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:40.301 -25:57:25.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0901 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:42.938 -25:56:57.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:42.938 -25:56:57.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1022 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:40.301 -25:57:25.56
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:42.938 -25:56:57.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i5l1sXmVIR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gr8xzsfWDv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0fUY3QKtL8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SfCURhzJfy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 189904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Loaded 20545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13761 out of 17150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17150 out of 189904 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.283400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.283400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 189904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Loaded 20545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13761 out of 17150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17150 out of 189904 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 164758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.5411 to 282.7371 deg, Dec -31.2682 to -20.5218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.5411 to 282.7371 deg, Dec -31.2682 to -20.5218 deg
Loaded 19228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13933 out of 16959 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16959 out of 164758 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 159 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.i5l1sXmVIR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=19348, bad_region=5, passed=189879
Got 189879 stars (including 170303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 189879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1271 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gr8xzsfWDv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=15659, bad_region=1, passed=164737
Got 164737 stars (including 148912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.710 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=1578 n_q2=1125 n_q3=993 n_q4=1103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0fUY3QKtL8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4022, bad_region=0, passed=68649
Got 68649 stars (including 64556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=8.128 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.037 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.661 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.646 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.649
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.646 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=1352 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1257 n_q4=1085 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SfCURhzJfy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4378, bad_region=0, passed=73502
Got 73502 stars (including 69048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=8.180 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=0.551 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.636 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.655 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.602
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.655 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.778 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1355 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1257 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_204632_TTUQ1b1x1_89884_43EVfzhP/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:03:19.65 -21:38:06.3: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:14:38.09 -28:26:40.6: 12.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:18:10.34 -25:29:58.5: 13.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:46:01.44 -21:08:47.0: 12.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:48:50.44 -21:47:05.6: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:04:39.64 -28:33:46.4: 12.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:07:27.88 -24:00:10.6: 13.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:09:37.79 -26:46:36.7: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:48:50.44 -21:47:05.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:50.44 -21:47:05.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:17:50.41 -29:53:39.1: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:09:37.79 -26:46:36.7: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:04:39.64 -28:33:46.4: 12.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:03:19.65 -21:38:06.3: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:46:01.44 -21:08:47.0: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:18:10.34 -25:29:58.5: 13.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:14:38.09 -28:26:40.6: 12.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:07:27.88 -24:00:10.6: 13.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:37.79 -26:46:36.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4272 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:39.64 -28:33:46.4: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2336 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:19.65 -21:38:06.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4411 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:10.34 -25:29:58.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.5835 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:01.44 -21:08:47.0: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5074 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:38.09 -28:26:40.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2394 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:27.88 -24:00:10.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1886 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:26:47.73 -22:46:06.3: 13.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:17:50.41 -29:53:39.1: 12.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:50.41 -29:53:39.1: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2126 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:13:06.21 -28:26:00.1: 12.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:26:47.73 -22:46:06.3: 13.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:47.73 -22:46:06.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.3941 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:56:09.51 -29:30:20.1: 12.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:11:46.73 -27:35:19.9: 11.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:01:29.74 -28:55:29.3: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:35:20.48 -23:24:30.1: 12.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:42:27.64 -29:34:14.7: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:13:06.21 -28:26:00.1: 11.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:06.21 -28:26:00.1: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1527 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:06:09.52 -27:45:55.6: 11.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:56:09.51 -29:30:20.1: 11.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:35:20.48 -23:24:30.1: 11.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:01:29.74 -28:55:29.3: 12.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:11:46.73 -27:35:19.9: 11.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:42:27.64 -29:34:14.7: 12.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:09.51 -29:30:20.1: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7692 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:20.48 -23:24:30.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0056 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:29.74 -28:55:29.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1149 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:46.73 -27:35:19.9: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0352 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:27.64 -29:34:14.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0522 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:06:09.52 -27:45:55.6: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:09.52 -27:45:55.6: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5327 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:08:08.33 -22:14:49.3: 11.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:03:32.21 -24:25:06.2: 11.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:08:08.33 -22:14:49.3: 11.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:03:32.21 -24:25:06.2: 11.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:08.33 -22:14:49.3: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2257 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:32.21 -24:25:06.2: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.2041 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:02:17.24 -23:03:37.6: 12.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:24:28.20 -24:54:08.1: 12.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:24:28.20 -24:54:08.1: 12.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:02:17.24 -23:03:37.6: 12.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:24:28.20 -24:54:08.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.2118 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:17.24 -23:03:37.6: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.3778 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:28:06.65 -21:13:14.7: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:28:06.65 -21:13:14.7: 12.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:06.65 -21:13:14.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6205 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:18:31.53 -26:10:02.5: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:18:31.53 -26:10:02.5: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7: 13.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7: 14.44 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:31:21.06 -25:05:15.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.5161 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:36:26.94 -23:53:30.6: 9.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:16:32.36 -23:03:39.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.3670 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:36:26.94 -23:53:30.6: 9.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:26.94 -23:53:30.6: ref_mag=9.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=9.4699 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:37:35.80 -22:12:33.0: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:37:35.80 -22:12:33.0: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:35.80 -22:12:33.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5489 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:51:32.93 -23:06:58.9: 13.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:59:21.02 -30:18:22.6: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:51:32.93 -23:06:58.9: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:51:32.93 -23:06:58.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.5741 delta=1.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:59:21.02 -30:18:22.6: 13.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:59:21.02 -30:18:22.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.1929 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:22:42.88 -26:50:30.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.9822 delta=1.46 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159920.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53554.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out99177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111143.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217670_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217670_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217687_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217687_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217701_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217701_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217704_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217704_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217707_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217707_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217714_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217714_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217716_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217716_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217717_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217717_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.04 -30:20:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217718_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217718_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217729_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217729_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:48.01 -26:56:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217733_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217733_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217736_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217736_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217742_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217742_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:11.66 -27:56:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217743_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217743_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217745_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217745_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217754_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217754_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217755_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217755_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:16.77 -21:41:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217759_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217759_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217761_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217761_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217766_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217766_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217770_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217770_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217775_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217775_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:55.62 -25:09:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217776_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217776_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:06.80 -23:43:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217791_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217791_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.91 -29:32:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217796_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217796_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:49.31 -29:48:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217799_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217799_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:11.37 -22:28:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217802_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217802_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217803_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217803_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217804_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217804_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:48.48 -22:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217806_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217806_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:07.62 -24:57:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217809_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 217809_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217812_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217812_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:09.18 -28:20:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217813_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217813_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:07.72 -22:29:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217814_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217814_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:13.98 -24:38:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217815_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217815_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:00.87 -27:40:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217817_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217817_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217819_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217819_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:10.20 -22:28:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217823_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217823_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.23 -30:48:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:24.18 -21:28:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217825_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217825_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:57.84 -30:14:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217829_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217829_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:03.63 -30:13:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217836_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217836_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:39.95 -23:52:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217839_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217839_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.40 -27:38:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217846_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217846_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.29 -24:07:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217847_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217847_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:32.82 -25:13:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217848_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217848_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:44.94 -21:27:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217853_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217853_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:23.00 -26:58:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217855_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217855_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.86 -22:22:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217857_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217857_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:28.33 -26:55:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217858_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217858_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:04.23 -27:23:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217859_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217859_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:12.54 -24:37:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217861_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217861_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:44.01 -27:40:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217862_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217862_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:44.93 -28:07:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217866_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217866_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:06.01 -26:44:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217867_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217867_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:04.00 -22:30:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217873_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217873_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:44.60 -26:10:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:16.82 -24:58:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217876_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217876_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:34.17 -30:31:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217877_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217877_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:25.60 -24:53:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217878_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217878_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:06.10 -28:31:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217881_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217881_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217884_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217884_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217888_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217888_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:37.49 -24:55:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217889_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217889_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:18.70 -30:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217890_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217890_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.34 -29:11:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217895_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217895_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:13.60 -24:48:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217899_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217899_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:34.23 -25:09:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:20.64 -29:19:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217912_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217912_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:40.26 -30:32:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217917_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217917_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:57.39 -22:32:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217924_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217924_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:09.30 -24:44:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217925_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217925_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:48.04 -31:04:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217929_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217929_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:17.94 -22:20:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217930_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217930_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:05.17 -26:29:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217935_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217935_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:07.91 -29:50:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217936_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217936_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:16.30 -29:49:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217939_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217939_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:52.93 -30:18:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:00.52 -21:23:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217961_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217961_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:22.84 -25:08:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217964_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217964_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:15.44 -29:08:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217975_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217975_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:10.21 -27:42:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217979_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217979_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:36.63 -28:31:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217980_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217980_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.29 -25:02:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217982_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217982_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:04.98 -26:23:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217986_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217986_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:00.42 -25:22:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217993_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217993_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:33.15 -30:44:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217998_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217998_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:51.93 -25:15:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217999_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 217999_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:08.07 -28:49:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218002_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218002_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:13.96 -21:51:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218006_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218006_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:16.96 -27:22:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218009_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218009_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218010_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218010_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:28.33 -27:32:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218012_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218012_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:02.54 -27:25:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218015_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218015_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:07.30 -28:19:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218017_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218017_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:18.26 -26:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218018_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218018_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:57.63 -26:01:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218019_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218019_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:21.63 -28:44:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218020_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218020_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:49.29 -27:38:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218026_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218026_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:38.40 -29:47:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218032_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218032_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:40.74 -27:36:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218033_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218033_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:00.99 -30:01:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218036_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218036_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:14.64 -28:33:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218041_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218041_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:36.05 -31:04:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218045_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218045_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:04.96 -30:43:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218048_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218048_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:28.78 -25:13:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218052_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218052_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:19.03 -28:29:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218056_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218056_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.27 -30:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218059_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218059_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:01.42 -30:07:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218064_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218064_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:51.45 -30:36:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218067_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218067_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:41.33 -26:26:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218069_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218069_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:11.83 -26:46:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218074_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218074_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:07.33 -30:52:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:59.20 -23:54:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218077_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218077_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:22.18 -30:43:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218079_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218079_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:54.63 -22:22:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218081_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218081_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.19 -29:28:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218090_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 218090_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:33.32 -22:22:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147292_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 147292_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:31.31 -27:51:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148218_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 148218_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:00.63 -28:23:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:04.01 -30:39:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139618_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 139618_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:36.56 -28:25:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99177_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 99177_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:31.53 -26:10:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.402 4053031032337397760 274.63175869049 -26.16754293084 13.3143 11.5540 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.402#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138129_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 138129_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:32.92 -28:10:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 55824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:23.72 -23:28:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 206630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:01.03 -28:24:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 110696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.37 -26:58:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76728_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 76728_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42422_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 42422_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.64 -25:29:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 88075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:49.45 -25:05:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111516_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 111516_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:33.81 -26:57:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 27536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:57.98 -22:01:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:21.61 -29:01:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 204536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.25 -28:06:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203398_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 203398_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 169919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:11.22 -29:28:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179438_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 179438_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:43.28 -29:34:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 56887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.07 -24:05:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148706_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 148706_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:14.19 -27:57:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41052_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 41052_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:29.20 -23:02:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76973_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 76973_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.78 -25:06:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21460_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21460_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96226_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96226_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:58.08 -26:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100482_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 100482_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:08.01 -25:48:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143611_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 143611_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:06.21 -28:15:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63603_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 63603_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169724_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 169724_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:41.60 -30:09:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46880_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 46880_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:50.13 -23:30:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144016_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 144016_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:38.89 -28:24:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137245_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 137245_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:04.32 -28:11:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161501_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 161501_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:03.74 -29:58:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 53875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:34.18 -23:00:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53554_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 53554_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:32.93 -23:06:58.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.543 4068692514704558848 267.88685018137 -23.11608701850 11.7583 10.0640 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159920_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 159920_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:21.02 -30:18:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.609 4044221676422336640 269.83643201441 -30.30640789087 11.3883 9.7169 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145966_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 145966_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:59.38 -28:25:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 58710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_20-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
