NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-04-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 340200 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 340200 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits

renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1549.1597 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 447.0207 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1563.8193 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 448.4920 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.20923 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T06:09:34.1382177' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T11:09:34.1382177' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.464978449 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T11:09:44.0409343' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.4650930557 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996171568887 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999920352709 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9308333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.1725 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82726928825425 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits :) Spent 0.500255 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T06:10:27.9118068' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T11:10:27.9118068' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.4656008217 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T11:10:37.8160020' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.4657154628 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996171567213 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999920893827 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0047222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.2519444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.80940233685989 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits :) Spent 0.506193 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.96509419 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Image size: 939.8'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0521 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Image size: 939.8'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KbVWwudZWl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XDaHO3XSN9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.brvf6rtKYT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z2h6gobt6k Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.890400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.890400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.KbVWwudZWl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=1672, passed=7332 Got 7332 stars (including 5274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1452 n_q2=848 n_q3=1641 n_q4=954 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.XDaHO3XSN9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=1659, passed=7282 Got 7282 stars (including 5242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1451 n_q2=838 n_q3=1650 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.brvf6rtKYT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=526, passed=2956 Got 2956 stars (including 2268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2956 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2224 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2531 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2224 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2531 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2220 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2531 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 2220 stars left (next iteration limit 2442) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2220 robust_rms=5.804 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.798 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2220 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.721 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2220 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2220 robust_rms_before=1.437 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.490 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.505 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.490 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=2220 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=710 n_q2=312 n_q3=782 n_q4=416 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Z2h6gobt6k (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=177, bad_region=526, passed=2932 Got 2932 stars (including 2262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2932 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2217 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2217 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2211 stars left (next iteration limit 2432) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2211 robust_rms=5.910 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.857 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2211 robust_rms=0.604 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.693 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2211 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.518 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2211 robust_rms_before=1.458 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.458 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.518 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.458 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=2211 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=702 n_q2=301 n_q3=791 n_q4=417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.173 ref2=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.152 new1=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.169 new2=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.059 reference average sigma_overall=0.4 worst_q_ratio=1.1625 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393_astrometric_residuals.png (2220 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (2211 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Image size: 939.8'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0521 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Image size: 939.8'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:46.254 +62:02:45.54 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:44.935 +62:02:27.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DFIknBqa16 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.shkX4v6URI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7OtiqKuoZX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztdrZ6T1Hi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.DFIknBqa16 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1765, bad_region=7377, passed=37316 Got 37316 stars (including 28488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37316 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1449 n_q2=842 n_q3=1676 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.shkX4v6URI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1739, bad_region=7420, passed=37478 Got 37478 stars (including 28617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1448 n_q2=847 n_q3=1676 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.7OtiqKuoZX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=733, bad_region=2975, passed=17774 Got 17774 stars (including 14221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17774 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=5.787 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.186 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.742 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.554 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.477 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.452 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.488 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.554 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.488 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1553 n_q2=716 n_q3=1679 n_q4=923 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ztdrZ6T1Hi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=552, bad_region=2887, passed=17758 Got 17758 stars (including 14373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17758 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15563 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15563 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15563 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=5.890 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.273 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.650 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.745 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.507 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.498 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.568 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.498 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1543 n_q2=728 n_q3=1684 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:12:11.49 +63:14:14.9: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:52:05.19 +62:26:31.6: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:03:22.31 +62:50:00.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:52:05.19 +62:26:31.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:03:22.31 +62:50:00.6: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:12:11.49 +63:14:14.9: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:52:05.19 +62:26:31.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2089 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:22.31 +62:50:00.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6017 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:11.49 +63:14:14.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6269 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.73 +61:33:07.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:03:55.30 +61:23:06.2: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.73 +61:33:07.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.73 +61:33:07.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4468 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:03:55.30 +61:23:06.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:55.30 +61:23:06.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6638 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52066_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52066_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.46509    2461292.96509    13.63    11:12:11.41 +63:14:14.8   1607 4345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.62    11:12:11.57 +63:14:15.0   1608 4347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52070_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52070_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.46509    2461292.96509    13.28    11:52:05.14 +62:26:31.8   4264 3463   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.15    11:52:05.24 +62:26:31.5   4266 3466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52071_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52071_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.39    11:28:34.74 +60:31:57.2   2445 2515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:28:34.63 +60:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52073_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52073_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.46509    2461292.96509    12.65    12:03:22.23 +62:50:00.7   5057 3662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.56    12:03:22.40 +62:50:00.5   5059 3665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52117_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52117_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.28    11:46:49.21 +62:00:31.5   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52121_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52121_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.44    11:09:31.34 +60:01:37.6   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52133_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52133_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.41    12:30:49.63 +59:13:48.7   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52137_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52137_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.79    11:04:12.80 +64:03:38.6   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52151_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52151_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.97    11:39:42.87 +61:24:06.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    10.95    12:28:01.95 +58:19:19.6   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52178_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52178_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    11.39    11:50:01.85 +60:19:36.4   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52179_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52179_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    11.43    11:06:19.38 +62:25:33.5   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52209_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52209_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    11.99    11:05:11.73 +59:50:58.4   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52216_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52216_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    11.63    11:14:04.05 +57:16:27.1   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52221_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52221_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    11.95    12:01:30.25 +64:42:35.8   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52223_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52223_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.15    11:07:56.29 +65:04:51.2   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52247_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52247_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.27    11:08:42.79 +58:40:11.3   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52266_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52266_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.50    11:04:04.45 +61:47:49.7   0840 3634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:04:04.37 +61:47:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52280_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52280_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.46    11:25:52.74 +65:37:26.1   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52299_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52299_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.68    11:18:49.83 +63:19:37.3   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52330_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52330_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.64    12:23:00.38 +60:07:56.8   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52341_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52341_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.62    12:32:48.80 +65:33:31.9   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52360_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52360_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.83    11:40:23.04 +57:57:08.7   3132 0842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:40:23.06 +57:57:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52371_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52371_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.94    11:24:40.39 +57:50:37.5   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52372_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52372_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.97    11:19:32.84 +63:47:25.3   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52391_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52391_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    12.96    11:18:29.99 +63:23:42.0   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52398_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52398_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.23    11:27:23.04 +57:47:06.7   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52436_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52436_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.17    11:09:53.14 +65:34:31.0   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52443_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52443_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.18    11:45:01.35 +64:47:36.2   3915 4922   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:45:01.40 +64:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52458_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52458_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.02    11:47:22.11 +66:02:37.7   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52464_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52464_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.67    11:03:00.73 +62:58:11.6   0951 4343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52467_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52467_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.21    11:46:01.22 +58:01:31.0   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52476_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52476_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.22    11:17:44.82 +59:41:17.4   1542 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52479_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52479_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.05    12:29:51.42 +61:33:16.6   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52483_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52483_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.21    11:52:49.13 +65:58:19.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52490_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52490_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.13    12:36:16.61 +64:35:32.7   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52495_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52495_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.35    11:05:01.88 +63:42:46.9   1201 4745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52501_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52501_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.24    12:07:33.27 +65:03:26.0   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52541_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52541_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.02    12:29:02.86 +58:37:19.1   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52547_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52547_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.27    11:23:29.15 +62:03:38.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52549_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52549_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.03    12:19:07.32 +62:28:00.3   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52568_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52568_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.40    11:58:21.26 +61:26:11.0   4673 2835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:58:21.19 +61:26:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52620_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52620_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.42    11:25:14.35 +62:44:29.3   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52645_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52645_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.46509    2461292.96509    13.39    12:35:53.77 +61:33:07.8   7374 2975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.53    12:35:53.68 +61:33:08.0   7376 2979   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52648_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52648_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.77    11:01:39.36 +63:18:51.1   0915 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52654_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52654_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.84    11:59:58.93 +59:05:40.8   4731 1417   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits **** FOUND 11:59:58.86 +59:05:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52661_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52661_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.76    11:27:59.06 +59:41:07.5   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52662_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52662_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.52    12:21:11.39 +63:01:16.0   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52670_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52670_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.79    11:52:58.49 +64:55:09.1   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52674_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52674_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.73    11:13:27.98 +62:08:13.8   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52679_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52679_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.51    11:53:01.55 +59:13:19.8   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52685_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52685_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.40    11:35:47.83 +57:46:12.5   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52718_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52718_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.53    11:07:15.81 +62:57:18.1   1236 4260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52726_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52726_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.72    12:20:08.36 +65:55:39.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52729_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52729_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.56    12:23:05.81 +58:07:36.3   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52739_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52739_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.68    12:22:22.11 +61:44:22.1   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52742_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52742_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.39    11:19:16.67 +64:33:00.9   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52753_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52753_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.83    11:21:30.77 +61:36:02.7   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52758_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52758_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.72    11:42:44.11 +58:06:15.7   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52773_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52773_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.54    11:15:58.75 +65:19:33.1   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52774_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52774_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.46509    2461292.96509    13.73    12:03:55.05 +61:23:03.8   5071 2787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-09-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.63    12:03:55.55 +61:23:08.6   5074 2791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52781_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52781_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.82    11:43:56.36 +65:25:55.8   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52786_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52786_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.84    11:08:12.86 +64:46:07.6   1564 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52797_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52797_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.79    11:14:30.56 +59:29:45.0   1272 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52809_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52809_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.72    12:32:18.68 +58:32:52.9   7268 1143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52812_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52812_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    14.07    11:04:35.96 +60:32:56.4   0684 2888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52814_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52814_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    14.09    12:19:01.93 +63:43:22.6   6121 4207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52816_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52816_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.76    12:38:03.01 +64:20:28.1   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    14.44    11:13:06.06 +63:03:54.6   1646 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52822_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 The candidate 52822_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.46572    2461292.96572    13.85    12:29:31.15 +64:24:22.4   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_063251_TTUQ2b1x1_1703958_yQRMuVNk/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-10-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0394.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.96509419 -observatory V36 11:52:24.11 +01:45:57.9 Mercury (-0.7mag) 13:41:25.20 -15:19:28.1 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:19:49.71 +22:50:17.5 Mars (1.2mag) 09:10:49.77 +16:50:00.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:13.45 +02:35:02.5 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:42.42 +21:02:02.6 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:32.40 -00:04:37.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:26.79 -23:40:06.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:51:55.36 +13:10:09.1 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 9 06:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.96509419: 09:10:45.58 +16:50:22.2 Io (6.2mag) 09:11:00.22 +16:49:09.3 Europa (6.3mag) 09:10:35.48 +16:51:12.9 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:10:40.61 +16:50:47.9 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:08:40.54 +17:07:29.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:10:51.65 +16:49:52.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:08:16.38 +17:01:23.4 Elara (17.7mag) 09:14:40.21 +16:16:57.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:11:45.38 +17:08:23.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:00.84 +02:35:16.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:17.88 +02:34:52.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:51:22.72 +02:37:20.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:29.27 +02:34:47.4 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:49:57.97 +02:24:34.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 9 06:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.96509419: 22:21:05.44 +03:13:18.1 JWST 16:55:16.06 +42:17:00.1 Chandra 13:06:07.25 -62:24:49.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 9 06:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.96509419 -observatory V36 03:41:39.77 +19:26:18.8 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:42.70 -34:10:14.2 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:21:05.85 -70:25:20.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:55.72 +33:45:24.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:11:45.99 +28:24:12.3 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:11:48.78 +25:56:21.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:51:29.75 +27:08:56.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:50:02.64 +05:13:16.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:58.80 -15:50:21.6 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:40:16.56 +33:01:39.9 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:53.03 +15:17:52.7 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:32:17.62 +43:05:22.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:23:13.81 +49:10:49.7 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:36:44.44 -13:03:24.6 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:12:21.27 +18:06:28.8 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:21:29.22 +18:35:58.5 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:21:25.32 -00:03:32.5 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:47:11.26 +73:40:15.1 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:04:40.50 +46:03:47.1 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:15:17.16 +11:27:37.3 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:27:47.52 -35:09:43.9 7.8mag 10P/Tempel 11:49:37.53 -05:37:53.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:12:56.34 -05:46:46.5 17.6mag 63P/Wild 06:43:30.18 +19:05:04.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:16:07.35 -26:11:48.6 17.1mag 84P/Giclas 03:17:20.24 +15:01:19.9 17.2mag 88P/Howell 05:45:27.39 +29:27:28.1 16.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:38:12.63 +24:15:18.3 15.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:32:43.75 +20:24:23.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:51:23.37 -22:05:29.6 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:20:01.33 +20:34:16.6 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:23:20.67 -17:19:56.3 11.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:58:54.79 +37:31:34.4 16.4mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:34:22.88 +12:25:38.9 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:26:10.99 +08:17:32.2 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 04:53:53.21 +36:59:41.4 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:37:40.30 +35:28:06.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:39.46 -00:29:32.3 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:29:39.23 +16:44:22.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 9 06:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 9 06:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 9 06:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:08:23.870 +02:55:51.33 AT 2026yuy 2026-08-06.84 21.87 01:16:59.610 +05:02:09.95 AT 2026yux 2026-08-06.84 22.17 01:03:17.160 +01:55:16.75 AT 2026yuw 2026-08-06.84 21.78 01:01:06.200 -01:23:37.06 AT 2026yuv 2026-08-06.84 21.44 23:00:49.110 +05:32:39.05 AT 2026yuu 2026-08-07.78 22.37 23:39:57.990 +03:21:50.80 AT 2026yut 2026-08-06.76 22.1 23:34:24.590 +00:59:42.41 AT 2026yus 2026-08-05.79 22.26 23:11:22.440 +03:34:45.08 AT 2026yur 2026-08-06.81 22.15 23:52:10.400 +03:53:48.67 AT 2026yuq 2026-08-06.76 22.26 01:28:25.390 -00:33:31.00 AT 2026yup 2026-07-22.87 22.24 06:19:46.733 +50:57:31.05 AT 2026yuo 2026-08-13.50 19.744 23:24:50.114 +15:25:58.38 AT 2026yun 2026-08-10.05 19.96 00:25:27.120 +20:14:05.91 SN 2026yum 2026-08-13.09 18.04 22:02:49.666 -13:05:30.39 AT 2026yul 2026-08-12.92 18.89 21:45:50.911 -04:08:31.57 AT 2026yuk 2026-08-12.78 19.08 01:02:47.624 -06:59:05.24 AT 2026yuj 2026-08-13.05 19.25 23:50:13.455 +20:53:14.83 AT 2026yui 2026-08-12.94 19.46 22:53:22.575 -18:00:52.62 AT 2026yuh 2026-08-12.37 19.1729 01:03:55.125 -10:40:35.60 AT 2026yug 2026-08-10.42 20.3834 22:18:45.584 -09:23:49.69 AT 2026yuf 2026-08-08.36 20.7186 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 9 06:35 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 100 C - WARNING