NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-10-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 343761 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 343761 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits

renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5322.1761 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1474.4135 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5806.6138 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1617.6101 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 12.3318 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.089 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T06:26:27.3684243' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T11:26:27.3684243' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.476705648 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T11:26:37.2714369' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.4768202663 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.996886318552 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0002018115109 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9213888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3452777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.829565389283 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29551 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29551 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits :) Spent 0.542621 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T06:27:10.5177771' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T11:27:10.5177771' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.4772050581 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T11:27:20.4205827' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.477319676 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.996886293952 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0002018446104 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0286111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.4175 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.8036622254521 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29551 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29551 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits :) Spent 0.508020 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.97682139 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:29.079 +46:01:31.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:29.079 +46:01:31.93 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:29.079 +46:01:31.93 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00410 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgzyVs1v6R Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vCqfJVSa2I Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.llBDSicHEX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.16VhKO2qrk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3417 to +51.2581 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3417 to 51.2581 deg Loaded 4272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3282 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3282 out of 6367 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.4 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 13.3 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 13.3 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.bgzyVs1v6R (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6977 Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1200 n_q3=1294 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vCqfJVSa2I (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=6367 Got 6367 stars (including 6003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.llBDSicHEX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=148, bad_region=0, passed=1517 Got 1517 stars (including 1368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1517 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1310 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1510 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1311 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 1309 stars left (next iteration limit 1439) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1309 robust_rms=9.788 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.443 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1309 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1309 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1309 robust_rms_before=1.572 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.567 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.553 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.567 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=1309 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=339 n_q2=292 n_q3=385 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.446 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.16VhKO2qrk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=147, bad_region=0, passed=1478 Got 1478 stars (including 1328 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1273 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1265 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1468 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1273 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1467 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1467 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 1272 stars left (next iteration limit 1399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1272 robust_rms=9.882 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.407 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1272 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.682 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1272 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1272 robust_rms_before=1.581 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.622 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.541 verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:29.152 +46:01:30.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1478 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1559482.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.581 -> 0.422 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=1272 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=332 n_q2=279 n_q3=378 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.188 ref2=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.100 new1=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.446 new2=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.335 reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.144 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (4852 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4854 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (1309 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (1272 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:29.152 +46:01:30.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:29.152 +46:01:30.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0841 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:28.135 +46:01:20.94 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:29.152 +46:01:30.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00395 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BBqvyEkEwu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LYqPXMCpa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HhKcHsHwBC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DIRYVEnNba Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3147 to +51.2657 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3147 to 51.2657 deg Loaded 4300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3058 out of 3292 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3292 out of 30481 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 13.5 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 13.5 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.BBqvyEkEwu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1513, bad_region=9, passed=34161 Got 34161 stars (including 32570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34161 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1293 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0LYqPXMCpa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1294, bad_region=0, passed=30460 Got 30460 stars (including 29132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1174 n_q2=1335 n_q3=1141 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HhKcHsHwBC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=394, bad_region=0, passed=10356 Got 10356 stars (including 9949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10356 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5304) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=8.917 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.249 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.653 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.806 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.678 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4821 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.505 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.625 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.678 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.625 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1340 n_q2=916 n_q3=1476 n_q4=1089 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DIRYVEnNba (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=856, bad_region=0, passed=10637 Got 10637 stars (including 9762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10637 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10637 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10637 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10637 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5299) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=8.988 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.864 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.680 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.796 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.663 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4819 robust_rms_before=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.618 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.663 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.618 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1340 n_q2=924 n_q3=1478 n_q4=1077 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-26-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52178_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52178_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.36    10:04:05.66 +46:01:22.1   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52189_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52189_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.50    10:38:33.08 +47:55:52.0   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52190_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52190_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.38    10:49:40.95 +41:39:56.8   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52205_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52205_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.71    11:09:56.42 +44:28:32.1   7133 2477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits **** FOUND 11:09:56.46 +44:28:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52209_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52209_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.91    10:42:55.78 +43:49:05.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52213_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52213_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.14    10:32:12.44 +48:24:48.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52232_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52232_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    10.92    11:22:04.25 +42:54:21.2   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52239_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52239_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.64    10:13:31.11 +44:06:54.8   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52252_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52252_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.45    10:55:26.16 +49:38:53.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52266_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52266_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.96    10:41:39.06 +48:58:24.3   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52278_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52278_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.97    10:37:02.43 +42:04:46.3   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52304_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52304_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.86    11:22:38.81 +43:28:31.5   8590 2078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits **** FOUND 11:22:38.77 +43:28:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52374_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52374_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    12.17    10:56:18.67 +43:26:54.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52377_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52377_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    12.20    11:16:46.07 +49:26:49.9   7432 5549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits **** FOUND 11:16:46.13 +49:26:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52394_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52394_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    11.98    11:23:04.05 +41:48:07.5   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52408_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52408_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    12.15    10:59:47.10 +45:15:51.3   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52531_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52531_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    12.95    10:09:23.44 +40:57:12.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52606_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 The candidate 52606_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.47732    2461292.97732    12.76    11:20:39.60 +45:00:34.7   8229 2960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_062757_TTUQ1b1x1_1507718_YhAsPccK/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits **** FOUND 11:20:39.63 +45:00:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.97682139 -observatory V36 11:52:28.44 +01:45:25.1 Mercury (-0.7mag) 13:41:26.95 -15:19:43.6 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:19:51.59 +22:50:14.7 Mars (1.2mag) 09:10:50.35 +16:49:58.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:13.28 +02:35:01.3 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:42.42 +21:02:02.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:32.33 -00:04:37.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:26.74 -23:40:06.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:52:33.70 +13:06:46.4 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 9 06:31 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.97682139: 09:10:46.03 +16:50:20.4 Io (6.2mag) 09:11:00.86 +16:49:06.6 Europa (6.3mag) 09:10:36.02 +16:51:10.6 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:10:41.29 +16:50:44.9 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:08:41.14 +17:07:27.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:10:51.87 +16:49:51.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:08:16.97 +17:01:21.3 Elara (17.7mag) 09:14:40.77 +16:16:54.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:11:45.90 +17:08:21.0 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:00.64 +02:35:15.6 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:17.69 +02:34:51.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:51:22.52 +02:37:19.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:29.09 +02:34:46.3 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:49:57.79 +02:24:33.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 9 06:31 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.97682139: 22:21:10.26 +03:13:57.3 JWST 16:57:28.10 +42:02:01.7 Chandra 13:16:28.57 -62:26:01.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 9 06:31 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.97682139 -observatory V36 03:41:40.14 +19:26:20.6 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:42.98 -34:10:13.4 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:21:06.37 -70:25:23.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:55.79 +33:45:25.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:11:45.44 +28:24:07.0 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:11:49.30 +25:56:20.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:51:30.40 +27:08:55.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:50:03.08 +05:13:15.8 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:58.64 -15:50:25.3 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:40:17.16 +33:01:42.7 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:53.14 +15:17:52.2 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:32:17.23 +43:05:20.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:23:12.87 +49:10:47.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:36:44.80 -13:03:25.3 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:12:21.49 +18:06:20.3 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:21:30.36 +18:35:55.2 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:21:25.91 -00:03:35.9 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:47:13.26 +73:40:07.8 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:04:40.10 +46:03:45.5 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:15:17.82 +11:27:40.8 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:27:48.08 -35:09:45.1 7.8mag 10P/Tempel 11:49:38.01 -05:37:56.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:12:57.77 -05:46:59.8 17.6mag 63P/Wild 06:43:31.51 +19:05:01.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:16:07.18 -26:11:50.2 17.1mag 84P/Giclas 03:17:20.21 +15:01:20.3 17.2mag 88P/Howell 05:45:29.72 +29:27:44.2 16.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:38:14.68 +24:15:07.3 15.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:32:45.31 +20:24:14.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:51:24.94 -22:05:44.3 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:20:02.16 +20:34:15.3 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:23:17.53 -17:19:50.1 11.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:58:56.80 +37:31:32.2 16.4mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:34:22.05 +12:25:15.1 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:26:11.49 +08:17:28.5 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 04:53:55.04 +36:59:54.4 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:37:42.16 +35:28:02.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:39.93 -00:29:37.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:29:39.83 +16:44:20.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 9 06:31 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 9 06:31 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 9 06:31 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:08:23.870 +02:55:51.33 AT 2026yuy 2026-08-06.84 21.87 01:16:59.610 +05:02:09.95 AT 2026yux 2026-08-06.84 22.17 01:03:17.160 +01:55:16.75 AT 2026yuw 2026-08-06.84 21.78 01:01:06.200 -01:23:37.06 AT 2026yuv 2026-08-06.84 21.44 23:00:49.110 +05:32:39.05 AT 2026yuu 2026-08-07.78 22.37 23:39:57.990 +03:21:50.80 AT 2026yut 2026-08-06.76 22.1 23:34:24.590 +00:59:42.41 AT 2026yus 2026-08-05.79 22.26 23:11:22.440 +03:34:45.08 AT 2026yur 2026-08-06.81 22.15 23:52:10.400 +03:53:48.67 AT 2026yuq 2026-08-06.76 22.26 01:28:25.390 -00:33:31.00 AT 2026yup 2026-07-22.87 22.24 06:19:46.733 +50:57:31.05 AT 2026yuo 2026-08-13.50 19.744 23:24:50.114 +15:25:58.38 AT 2026yun 2026-08-10.05 19.96 00:25:27.120 +20:14:05.91 SN 2026yum 2026-08-13.09 18.04 22:02:49.666 -13:05:30.39 AT 2026yul 2026-08-12.92 18.89 21:45:50.911 -04:08:31.57 AT 2026yuk 2026-08-12.78 19.08 01:02:47.624 -06:59:05.24 AT 2026yuj 2026-08-13.05 19.25 23:50:13.455 +20:53:14.83 AT 2026yui 2026-08-12.94 19.46 22:53:22.575 -18:00:52.62 AT 2026yuh 2026-08-12.37 19.1729 01:03:55.125 -10:40:35.60 AT 2026yug 2026-08-10.42 20.3834 22:18:45.584 -09:23:49.69 AT 2026yuf 2026-08-08.36 20.7186 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 9 06:31 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C