This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4627 2461292.9627 13.99 03:02:43.33 +16:14:14.7
163.08796 -36.19833 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.149 Medusa -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 03:02:43.33 +16:14:14.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 03:02:43.33 +16:14:14.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4627* 03 02 43.33 +16 14 14.7 14.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9627,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4627 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4627 2461292.9627 14.32 02:35:39.98 +14:22:44.0
157.48808 -41.39493 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.257 Silesia -0 -0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:35:39.98 +14:22:44.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:35:39.98 +14:22:44.0: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4627* 02 35 39.98 +14 22 44.0 14.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9627,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4627 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4627 2461292.9627 14.44 02:57:25.66 +15:35:48.5
162.27972 -37.46803 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.494 Virtus 0 0 0 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:57:25.66 +15:35:48.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:57:25.66 +15:35:48.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4627* 02 57 25.66 +15 35 48.5 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9627,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4627 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4627 2461292.9627 14.77 02:41:43.78 +10:33:08.0
162.01162 -43.79329 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.99 Dike -0 -1 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:41:43.78 +10:33:08.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:41:43.78 +10:33:08.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4627* 02 41 43.78 +10 33 08.0 14.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9627,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4627 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65708573 09.01.2026 03:46:02.207 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
First image: 2461049.65708573 09.01.2026 03:46:02.207 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Last image: 2461292.96294338 09.09.2026 11:06:28.308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5664
Objects passed selection criteria: 5660
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5490.5
Average stars matched: 5388 (98.1331 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 06:12:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65708573 09.01.2026 03:46:02.207 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
First image: 2461049.65708573 09.01.2026 03:46:02.207 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Last image: 2461292.96294338 09.09.2026 11:06:28.308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 247
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34137
Objects passed selection criteria: 34068
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32788.8
Average stars matched: 31827.2 (97.0676 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 06:13:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.96247828
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76
Second-epoch image center 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0026 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76
Second-epoch image center 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89
Second-epoch second image center 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00592 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E8Z8q6YOYs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SjTupPZl8Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F1k0vZ6hkK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pRhwezsgKV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7516 to 48.3015 deg, Dec +8.6571 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7516 to 48.3015 deg, Dec 8.6571 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.943200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.943200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7516 to 48.3015 deg, Dec +8.6571 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7516 to 48.3015 deg, Dec 8.6571 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7516 to 48.3014 deg, Dec +8.6570 to +19.2905 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7516 to 48.3014 deg, Dec 8.6570 to 19.2905 deg
Loaded 4352 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3558 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.0 pix Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
15.4 mag. Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.E8Z8q6YOYs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, bad_region=1667, passed=7398
Got 7398 stars (including 5327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1710 n_q2=892 n_q3=1393 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SjTupPZl8Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, bad_region=1672, passed=7374
Got 7374 stars (including 5304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1712 n_q2=887 n_q3=1379 n_q4=890 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.F1k0vZ6hkK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1605, passed=6937
Got 6937 stars (including 4998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=6.836 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.116 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.449 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.913 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.338 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.331
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1720 n_q2=927 n_q3=1330 n_q4=889 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pRhwezsgKV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, bad_region=1574, passed=6891
Got 6891 stars (including 4954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=6.790 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.961 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4825 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.357
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=1714 n_q2=924 n_q3=1314 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.238
ref2=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.209
new1=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.061
new2=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.049
reference average sigma_overall=0.2825 worst_q_ratio=1.2235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (4868 matched stars from wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (4825 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ari-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:36:11.79 +15:09:36.6: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:35:24.21 +14:00:37.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:36:11.79 +15:09:36.6: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:35:24.21 +14:00:37.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:36:11.79 +15:09:36.6: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0844 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:35:24.21 +14:00:37.3: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4306 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 20284_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20285_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 20285_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05052_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 05052_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:45.50 +12:19:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ari-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76
Second-epoch image center 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0026 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:40:00.532 +13:59:54.76
Second-epoch image center 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:40:00.880 +13:59:46.89
Second-epoch second image center 02:40:01.961 +13:59:32.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00592 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.98PAPz1plG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hKUGO316FN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ar58805O3n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fKQbzZAbHa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits and wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42040 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7291 to 48.3263 deg, Dec +8.6136 to +19.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7291 to 48.3263 deg, Dec 8.6136 to 19.2864 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3380 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 42040 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.828450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.828450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42040 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7291 to 48.3263 deg, Dec +8.6136 to +19.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7291 to 48.3263 deg, Dec 8.6136 to 19.2864 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3380 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 42040 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 42245 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.7296 to 48.3258 deg, Dec +8.6525 to +19.2994 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.7296 to 48.3258 deg, Dec 8.6525 to 19.2994 deg
Loaded 4373 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3765 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3765 out of 42245 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 139 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
1.9 pix Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
15.6 mag. Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.98PAPz1plG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1797, bad_region=7731, passed=42030
Got 42030 stars (including 32812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=1713 n_q2=884 n_q3=1421 n_q4=861 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hKUGO316FN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1828, bad_region=7788, passed=42236
Got 42236 stars (including 32941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1712 n_q2=873 n_q3=1421 n_q4=872 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ar58805O3n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1650, bad_region=6229, passed=37790
Got 37790 stars (including 30286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=6.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.913 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.333 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1731 n_q2=884 n_q3=1381 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fKQbzZAbHa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1516, bad_region=6260, passed=37848
Got 37848 stars (including 30389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=6.642 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.354 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.365 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.354
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.365 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1730 n_q2=897 n_q3=1373 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-05-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_061048_TTUQ2b1x1_961537_Sw3QTlCs/wcs_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ari-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:55:27.65 +14:30:25.9: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 03:06:44.13 +15:24:38.9: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:48:06.14 +14:37:58.6: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:57:38.32 +16:23:31.0: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:22:52.37 +11:20:52.1: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:57:20.32 +13:28:34.7: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:57:38.32 +16:23:31.0: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:57:20.32 +13:28:34.7: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:48:06.14 +14:37:58.6: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:22:52.37 +11:20:52.1: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 03:06:44.13 +15:24:38.9: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:55:27.65 +14:30:25.9: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:38.32 +16:23:31.0: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3267 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:06.14 +14:37:58.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9142 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:20.32 +13:28:34.7: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0201 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:52.37 +11:20:52.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4630 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:27.65 +14:30:25.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6925 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:44.13 +15:24:38.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7151 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:55:43.65 +14:41:31.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:55:43.65 +14:41:31.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:43.65 +14:41:31.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3317 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 03:02:43.33 +16:14:14.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:53:51.20 +15:25:52.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:25:52.12 +17:32:05.1: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:53:51.20 +15:25:52.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:25:52.12 +17:32:05.1: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 03:02:43.33 +16:14:14.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:53:51.20 +15:25:52.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9390 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:52.12 +17:32:05.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1618 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:27:38.79 +09:51:46.1: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:38:56.42 +11:54:06.8: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:30:30.16 +13:17:32.5: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:35:39.98 +14:22:44.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:27:38.79 +09:51:46.1: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:38.79 +09:51:46.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2516 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:31:13.83 +12:32:04.4: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:45:30.49 +14:33:53.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:38:56.42 +11:54:06.8: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:38:56.42 +11:54:06.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3001 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:30:30.16 +13:17:32.5: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:35:39.98 +14:22:44.0: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:30.16 +13:17:32.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3162 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:31:13.83 +12:32:04.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:13.83 +12:32:04.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3119 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:45:30.49 +14:33:53.7: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:30.49 +14:33:53.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2490 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:57:25.66 +15:35:48.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:57:25.66 +15:35:48.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:41:43.78 +10:33:08.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:45:18.84 +15:57:00.5: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:36:27.73 +10:28:37.1: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:47:18.76 +15:23:14.6: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:41:43.78 +10:33:08.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:45:18.84 +15:57:00.5: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:18.84 +15:57:00.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8296 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:36:27.73 +10:28:37.1: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:36:27.73 +10:28:37.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8975 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:47:18.76 +15:23:14.6: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:18.76 +15:23:14.6: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9536 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:30:01.70 +16:47:28.2: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:30:01.70 +16:47:28.2: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:01.70 +16:47:28.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9260 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:35:34.02 +17:32:24.2: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:52:10.53 +14:50:56.2: 15.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:34:05.30 +10:26:43.1: 15.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:35:34.02 +17:32:24.2: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:35:34.02 +17:32:24.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9545 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 03:06:09.68 +16:11:49.3: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:47:29.82 +18:04:59.7: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:52:10.53 +14:50:56.2: 15.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:34:05.30 +10:26:43.1: 15.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:52:10.53 +14:50:56.2: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0501 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:05.30 +10:26:43.1: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9413 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 03:06:09.68 +16:11:49.3: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:09.68 +16:11:49.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0185 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:47:29.82 +18:04:59.7: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:29.82 +18:04:59.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0482 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:28:39.20 +17:43:12.2: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:42:16.05 +16:32:45.1: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:50:45.28 +17:33:14.4: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:28:39.20 +17:43:12.2: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:39.20 +17:43:12.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1460 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits at 02:57:35.36 +10:27:08.6: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:42:16.05 +16:32:45.1: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:50:45.28 +17:33:14.4: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:42:16.05 +16:32:45.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9921 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:50:45.28 +17:33:14.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1117 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-46-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits at 02:57:35.36 +10:27:08.6: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:35.36 +10:27:08.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0425 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52697.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52528_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52530_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52533_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52537_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52540_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52546_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52554_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52556_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52557_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52558_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52560_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52561_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52562_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52564_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52568_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52569_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52570_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52571_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52573_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52579_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52583_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52584_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52585_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52586_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52592_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52593_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52594_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52596_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52602_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52606_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52607_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52609_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52610_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52611_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52612_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52616_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52621_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52623_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52625_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52626_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52627_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52628_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52630_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52631_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
Preparing report for the candidate 52634_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52635_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52639_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52641_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52642_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52643_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52644_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52645_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52651_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52653_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52654_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52654_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52656_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52658_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52660_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52664_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52670_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52672_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52674_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52676_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52676_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52682_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52684_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52685_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52688_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52689_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52692_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52693_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52695_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
Preparing report for the candidate 52697_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52700_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52701_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52703_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52704_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52708_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52708_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52710_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52711_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52714_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52716_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52717_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52718_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52719_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52720_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
Preparing report for the candidate 52721_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52726_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52733_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52736_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52740_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52741_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52742_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52743_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52747_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52750_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52754_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52757_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52758_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
Preparing report for the candidate 52763_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52764_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52767_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52770_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52772_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52774_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52774_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52776_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52777_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52778_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52780_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52784_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52785_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52787_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52789_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52793_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52796_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52800_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52804_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52806_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52807_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52809_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52811_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52820_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52823_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52828_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52830_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52839_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52840_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52843_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52848_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52850_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52852_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52853_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52855_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52858_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52861_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52863_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52870_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 52881_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41054_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 41054_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:45.48 +12:19:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24643_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390
The candidate 24643_fd_Ari-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_06-06-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0390 did not pass the final checks