This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,7.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 7.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4502 2461292.9502 11.23 07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0
195.65065 15.09036 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 0 0 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461292.9502,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260909.4502 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4502 2461292.9502 13.14 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5
194.48582 18.70562 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX11" Gaia DR3 866933414917774336
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.940 G 19.090 G 4.471160000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5: 15.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 866933414917774336,2461292.9502,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 866933414917774336 20260909.4502 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4502 2461292.9502 13.52 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7
197.80085 11.68646 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 2 1 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7: 15.83 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.83 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4502 2461292.9502 13.79 07:24:20.80 +23:56:42.2
194.49319 17.54537 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia -0 0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:20.80 +23:56:42.2: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:20.80 +23:56:42.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4502 2461292.9502 14.30 07:25:16.54 +21:41:43.6
196.75105 16.87087 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.171 Ophelia -1 -0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:16.54 +21:41:43.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:25:16.54 +21:41:43.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9502,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4502 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461292.95053856 09.09.2026 10:48:36.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18797
Objects passed selection criteria: 18726
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13733.8
Average stars matched: 12332 (89.7934 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 06:03:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461292.95053856 09.09.2026 10:48:36.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 188
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 127915
Objects passed selection criteria: 127541
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99022.2
Average stars matched: 88594.8 (89.4695 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 509412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 06:04:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.94995255
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.700 +22:00:36.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.700 +22:00:36.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0368 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:53.344 +22:01:20.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:53.344 +22:01:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:54.700 +22:00:36.53
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:53.344 +22:01:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XID3kmtMzz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QEVedHQRfQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KQLRjwxWC4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fa4G8JBvV2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XID3kmtMzz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QEVedHQRfQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KQLRjwxWC4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1027, bad_region=2363, passed=14344
Got 14344 stars (including 11079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=6.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.592 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.733 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=0.929 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.547 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.478
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.650 +22:00:35.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14344 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky419701.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.929 -> 0.429 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1760 n_q2=802 n_q3=1536 n_q4=684 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fa4G8JBvV2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1052, bad_region=2337, passed=14345
Got 14345 stars (including 11082 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=6.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.254 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.595 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=0.949 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.569 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.494
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:53.289 +22:01:19.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14345 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky419710.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.949 -> 0.446 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1753 n_q2=810 n_q3=1549 n_q4=677 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits sigma_overall=0.477 worst_q_ratio=1.149
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4782 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372_astrometric_residuals.png (4789 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:39.9: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1680 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6212 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3327 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 30881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 31113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 31198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31918_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 31918_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32663_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 32663_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 32761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 32939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33312_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 33312_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33425_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 33425_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.62 +24:13:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33617_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 33617_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 34733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:16:25.52 +21:57:40.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.650 +22:00:35.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.650 +22:00:35.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0370 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:53.289 +22:01:19.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:53.289 +22:01:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:54.650 +22:00:35.93
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:53.289 +22:01:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SJ46e89rAf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l0dc4juw5c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cJ6p85BRhr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AatcJePq2e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 170 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SJ46e89rAf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.l0dc4juw5c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cJ6p85BRhr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=7765, bad_region=11585, passed=99492
Got 99492 stars (including 80659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=6.713 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4778 robust_rms_before=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.479 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.477
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=1748 n_q2=838 n_q3=1464 n_q4=728 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AatcJePq2e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7869, bad_region=11721, passed=100257
Got 100257 stars (including 81246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=6.676 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.909 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.681 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.487 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.487 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1724 n_q2=850 n_q3=1467 n_q4=727 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_060055_TTUQ2b1x1_340475_TSA0R3oN/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:51.65 +22:39:12.1: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:12.04 +19:08:45.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:04.28 +20:43:42.6: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:09.00 +22:08:33.5: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.3: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:02.32 +21:47:58.1: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:17.83 +22:51:29.9: 14.50 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:51.65 +22:39:12.1: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:09.00 +22:08:33.5: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.3: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:04.28 +20:43:42.6: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:02.32 +21:47:58.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:37:12.04 +19:08:45.7: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:17.83 +22:51:29.9: 14.44 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:51.65 +22:39:12.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6442 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:09.00 +22:08:33.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1020 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4764 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:12.04 +19:08:45.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4528 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:02.32 +21:47:58.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2872 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:04.28 +20:43:42.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5999 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:17.83 +22:51:29.9: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.5901 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:41.92 +19:28:19.3: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:41.92 +19:28:19.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:39.08 +24:33:37.7: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:03.25 +19:45:50.7: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.34 +19:46:44.2: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:41.92 +19:28:19.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9347 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:18.81 +25:12:48.1: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.91 +20:54:37.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:10.85 +23:57:27.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:39.08 +24:33:37.7: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:14.86 +18:59:00.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:03.25 +19:45:50.7: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.34 +19:46:44.2: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:18.81 +25:12:48.1: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:39.08 +24:33:37.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6266 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:03.25 +19:45:50.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9013 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:18.81 +25:12:48.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8321 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.34 +19:46:44.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7488 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.91 +20:54:37.8: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.17 +19:41:48.1: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:10.85 +23:57:27.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:14.86 +18:59:00.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.91 +20:54:37.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2223 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1397 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:10.85 +23:57:27.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0976 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:14.86 +18:59:00.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0735 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:09.99 +23:48:40.9: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.17 +19:41:48.1: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:07.26 +19:34:49.2: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.17 +19:41:48.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7034 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:09.99 +23:48:40.9: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:07.26 +19:34:49.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:09.99 +23:48:40.9: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8625 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:07.26 +19:34:49.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7490 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.16 +23:05:33.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:31.03 +20:04:45.0: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:40.16 +23:05:33.8: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.16 +23:05:33.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4298 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.2: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5246 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:31.03 +20:04:45.0: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.6293 delta=-1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:31.03 +20:04:45.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6541 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.2: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6104 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:50.79 +18:51:17.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5: 15.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.15 +18:36:01.4: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:50.79 +18:51:17.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:50.79 +18:51:17.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0424 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.74 +19:46:46.5: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:29:02.55 +24:23:28.5: ref_mag=15.96 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.1415 delta=2.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:25.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:04.15 +18:36:01.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.74 +19:46:46.5: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.15 +18:36:01.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3027 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.74 +19:46:46.5: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2448 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7: 15.83 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:25.5: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:25.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4361 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.83 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:51.70 +18:39:15.7: ref_mag=15.83 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.5152 delta=2.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:42.3: 12.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.26 +22:51:11.2: 13.67 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:42.3: 13.00 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6747 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:42.3: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.6470 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.26 +22:51:11.2: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.26 +22:51:11.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.6879 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:23.46 +25:40:31.9: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:21.61 +21:33:15.9: 13.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:23.46 +25:40:31.9: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:05.37 +20:55:34.5: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:53.6: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:23.46 +25:40:31.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8239 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:45.86 +22:54:26.9: 11.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:05.37 +20:55:34.5: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:21.61 +21:33:15.9: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:53.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:20.80 +23:56:42.2: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:05.37 +20:55:34.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7903 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:21.61 +21:33:15.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8090 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:45.86 +22:54:26.9: 11.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:53.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7687 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:20.80 +23:56:42.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.03 +20:12:12.6: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.13 +19:51:29.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:02.67 +20:50:00.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:33.03 +20:12:12.6: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.03 +20:12:12.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7783 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:02.67 +20:50:00.2: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:38.13 +19:51:29.8: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.67 +20:50:00.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9370 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.13 +19:51:29.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9190 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:25.96 +18:58:29.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:12.9: 11.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:29.36 +18:53:44.9: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:25.96 +18:58:29.8: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:25.96 +18:58:29.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8573 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:29.36 +18:53:44.9: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:12.9: 11.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:29.36 +18:53:44.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8492 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:12.9: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0389 delta=-2.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:02.39 +20:48:55.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:55.4: 13.59 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:23.83 +19:52:22.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:02.39 +20:48:55.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:02.39 +20:48:55.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9449 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:16.18 +23:55:46.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:23.83 +19:52:22.5: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:55.4: 13.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:09.75 +18:31:45.1: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:23.83 +19:52:22.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0297 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.36 +22:55:55.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.0287 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:16.18 +23:55:46.2: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:16.18 +23:55:46.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0338 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:37:09.75 +18:31:45.1: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:09.75 +18:31:45.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0490 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:39.94 +21:17:32.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:09.18 +20:34:50.7: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:39.94 +21:17:32.0: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:39.94 +21:17:32.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0509 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.2: 13.12 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:18.08 +22:13:45.5: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:09.18 +20:34:50.7: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:09.18 +20:34:50.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2357 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:16.54 +21:41:43.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.2: 10.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.31 +22:46:27.0: 13.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.2: 13.11 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:18.08 +22:13:45.5: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:54.2: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.3434 delta=-1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:59.81 +20:18:50.9: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:18.08 +22:13:45.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1602 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:41.8: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:25:16.54 +21:41:43.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.2: 11.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.31 +22:46:27.0: 13.65 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:11.30 +21:28:35.6: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.2: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3474 delta=-3.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.31 +22:46:27.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.2740 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:59.81 +20:18:50.9: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:59.81 +20:18:50.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3154 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:41.8: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:41.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1867 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:11.30 +21:28:35.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:11.30 +21:28:35.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2050 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.26 +23:28:22.9: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:39.58 +26:09:13.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.26 +23:28:22.9: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.26 +23:28:22.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3074 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.69 +22:55:55.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: 11.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:39.58 +26:09:13.6: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:22.42 +23:04:29.4: 14.36 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:57.25 +21:45:04.7: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:39.58 +26:09:13.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2813 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.69 +22:55:55.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.69 +22:55:55.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: 11.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:57.25 +21:45:04.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:22.42 +23:04:29.4: 14.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.61 +22:59:21.8: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4171 delta=-2.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:57.25 +21:45:04.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4446 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:33.05 +22:57:54.2: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:22.42 +23:04:29.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.3967 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:20.56 +22:01:44.1: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:33.05 +22:57:54.2: 14.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:33.05 +22:57:54.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7513 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:33.79 +21:07:13.1: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:07.17 +21:49:53.4: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:20.56 +22:01:44.1: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:20.56 +22:01:44.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8395 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:31.00 +19:40:11.7: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:33.79 +21:07:13.1: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:33.79 +21:07:13.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7986 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:07.17 +21:49:53.4: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:07.17 +21:49:53.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5214 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:31.00 +19:40:11.7: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:31.00 +19:40:11.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8841 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out189150.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182667.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:51.09 +19:43:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.29 +21:48:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.27 +21:31:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.81 +17:52:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171840_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171840_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.32 +21:13:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:19.23 +20:37:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171859_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171859_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:37.45 +19:32:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.41 +24:00:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.40 +19:59:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171878_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171878_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 171890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 171911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 173669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:25.51 +21:57:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174266_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 174266_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 174521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 175921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 176989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.40 +22:56:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 177113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.87 +19:42:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 177177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.90 +23:02:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 177254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:43.04 +18:04:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177462_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 177462_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 177644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 178464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178693_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 178693_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 178751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.29 +24:55:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 178850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179313_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 179313_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.15 +22:10:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179459_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 179459_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 180174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.48 +21:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180243_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 180243_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181013_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 181013_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 182667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 182799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.17 +22:52:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 182801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.37 +21:31:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 183058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.06 +22:43:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183312_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 183312_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.48 +24:54:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183413_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 183413_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.30 +24:32:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 183974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.17 +22:57:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.61 +20:31:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.46 +20:05:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.03 +20:06:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184527_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184527_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.61 +22:49:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184626_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184626_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184671_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 184671_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.11 +22:57:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 185045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.84 +22:49:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 185497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 185920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.10 +22:50:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 186003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.12 +18:14:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186201_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 186201_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.66 +19:56:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186304_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 186304_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.09 +22:39:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 186883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.64 +19:09:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187174_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.77 +24:17:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187183_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187183_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187302_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187302_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.04 +21:04:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.47 +24:24:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.93 +18:19:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187935_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187935_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.57 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 187950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.11 +22:57:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.60 +21:21:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188347_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188347_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.62 +20:00:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.85 +18:10:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.76 +20:49:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 188985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189139_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 189139_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.17 +22:51:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 189150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:45.86 +22:54:26.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 189254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189356_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 189356_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:19.00 +18:19:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189590_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 189590_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.40 +19:32:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189748_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 189748_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190019_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190019_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190371_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190371_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.50 +23:06:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:01.89 +18:32:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190723_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190723_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.41 +18:18:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.06 +21:35:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 190967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:35.99 +18:11:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 191027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.45 +25:10:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 191429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 191820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192050_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192050_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192089_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192089_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.01 +25:27:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192221_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192221_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.63 +22:51:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192265_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192265_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:23.89 +22:25:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.67 +22:47:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192391_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192391_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:39.13 +18:56:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.11 +22:26:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.74 +19:59:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 192890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193038_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193038_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.64 +23:02:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193144_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193144_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.95 +21:26:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.04 +19:26:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.78 +22:50:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.77 +20:41:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.85 +18:56:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 193930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:04.63 +23:31:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194269_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194269_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194279_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194279_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:23.20 +20:55:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194330_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194330_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.10 +22:55:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.64 +24:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:18.32 +18:00:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194704_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194704_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:31.01 +18:03:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:05.31 +24:19:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 194868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.10 +25:14:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 195242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:19.85 +20:47:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 195576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.13 +19:50:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
Preparing report for the candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:57.72 +22:13:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 196989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:17.34 +18:31:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197051_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197051_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.67 +23:02:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.85 +22:52:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:05.09 +22:57:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 197967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.75 +22:58:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:06.54 +20:47:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.31 +22:48:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198255_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198255_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:50.37 +22:57:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 198848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:31.94 +22:51:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:54.83 +18:27:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199426_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199426_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:42.78 +22:50:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 199984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 200017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:36.11 +18:55:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_05-48-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0372 did not pass the final checks
