This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 04 13 42.08 +21 02 01.8 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,7.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 7.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 12.39 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1
166.96909 -27.31321 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 12.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 37 11.33 +21 03 13.1 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 04 13 42.08 +21 02 01.7 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,7.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 7.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 12.92 03:26:56.62 +18:41:11.6
166.66659 -30.67984 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 -0 0 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:56.62 +18:41:11.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:56.62 +18:41:11.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 26 56.62 +18 41 11.6 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 13.45 03:59:27.75 +17:48:08.6
173.72288 -26.00375 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:27.75 +17:48:08.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:27.75 +17:48:08.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 59 27.75 +17 48 08.6 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 13.79 03:08:14.89 +25:31:57.4
157.95012 -27.88152 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.188 Menippe -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:14.89 +25:31:57.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:14.89 +25:31:57.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 08 14.89 +25 31 57.4 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.20 03:11:34.78 +21:56:09.8
161.04611 -30.37244 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.514 Armida -1 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:34.78 +21:56:09.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:34.78 +21:56:09.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 11 34.78 +21 56 09.8 14.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.52 04:08:33.43 +22:13:23.5
171.83520 -21.40815 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -1 1 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:33.43 +22:13:23.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:33.43 +22:13:23.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 04 08 33.43 +22 13 23.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.61 03:26:34.23 +19:12:22.5
166.19784 -30.34105 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:34.23 +19:12:22.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:34.23 +19:12:22.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 26 34.23 +19 12 22.5 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.52 03:47:16.22 +16:54:25.1
172.15097 -28.70871 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -1 -1 2 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:16.22 +16:54:25.1: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:16.22 +16:54:25.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 47 16.22 +16 54 25.1 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.51 03:26:46.31 +22:44:37.9
163.66046 -27.58598 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:46.31 +22:44:37.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:46.31 +22:44:37.9: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 26 46.31 +22 44 37.9 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.76 03:37:51.55 +26:01:39.1
163.50035 -23.44691 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.613 Ginevra -1 -1 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:51.55 +26:01:39.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:51.55 +26:01:39.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 37 51.55 +26 01 39.1 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 14.89 03:45:30.68 +20:57:20.9
168.65146 -26.07895 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 0 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:30.68 +20:57:20.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:30.68 +20:57:20.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 45 30.68 +20 57 20.9 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4386 2461292.9386 15.16 03:37:16.47 +20:06:04.5
167.70125 -28.01102 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita -0 1 1 15.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:16.47 +20:06:04.5: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:16.47 +20:06:04.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4386* 03 37 16.47 +20 06 04.5 15.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9386,15.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4386 15.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461292.93894845 09.09.2026 10:31:55.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11561
Objects passed selection criteria: 11553
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11046.5
Average stars matched: 10750 (97.3159 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:34:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461292.93894845 09.09.2026 10:31:55.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70398
Objects passed selection criteria: 70224
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 67058
Average stars matched: 64678.2 (96.4512 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 522372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:35:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.93824682
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:17.441 +22:03:43.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:17.441 +22:03:43.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0886 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:20.161 +22:04:17.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:20.161 +22:04:17.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0893 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:17.441 +22:03:43.16
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:20.161 +22:04:17.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01412 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tDhWAlJGH1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cXeojVU5Fj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DLb2U6XJhU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5BlmgxETuS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.tDhWAlJGH1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cXeojVU5Fj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DLb2U6XJhU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=669, bad_region=0, passed=10862
Got 10862 stars (including 10178 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=9.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.496 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=1.297 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1065 n_q3=1221 n_q4=1537 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5BlmgxETuS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=689, bad_region=0, passed=10931
Got 10931 stars (including 10234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=9.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.266 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.300
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1228 n_q4=1543 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-30-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_053242_TTUQ1b1x1_2794585_U6CoCvJR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:07.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.85 +21:42:44.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.11 +22:39:50.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:16.03 +21:58:16.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:34.28 +17:48:02.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.11 +22:39:50.3: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:16.03 +21:58:16.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.85 +21:42:44.9: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:07.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.11 +22:39:50.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4195 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:16.03 +21:58:16.0: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4860 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3542 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.85 +21:42:44.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4564 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:07.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4277 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2913 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4180 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:34.28 +17:48:02.7: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.28 +17:48:02.7: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4807 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20752_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20752_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20769_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20778_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20778_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86928_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86928_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86975_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86975_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86980_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86980_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86984_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86984_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.88 +25:06:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86987_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86987_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:54.64 +18:15:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86988_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86988_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.77 +18:58:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.85 +18:13:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:55.63 +25:00:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 86998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.17 +24:32:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:11.33 +21:03:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87265_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87265_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87285_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 87285_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87338_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87338_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:42.96 +18:12:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87410_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87410_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87436_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87436_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87442_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87442_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.49 +26:35:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 87476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:00.72 +19:54:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 87619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.46 +24:53:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87666_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87666_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:52.24 +18:47:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87785_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87785_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87804_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87804_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 87806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.11 +26:26:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87865_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87865_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 87955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88035_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88035_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.85 +24:28:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.50 +24:18:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88206_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88206_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88233_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88233_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88248_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88248_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88268_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88268_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88296_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88296_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88350_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88350_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88380_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88380_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88400_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88400_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88433_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88433_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88435_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88435_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88438_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88438_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88457_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88457_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88461_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88461_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88473_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88473_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88525_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88525_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88529_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88529_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88546_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
Preparing report for the candidate 88546_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88557_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88557_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88576_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88576_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88588_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88588_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88702_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 88702_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-31-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341 did not pass the final checks
