######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 406018 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 406018 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1106.7358
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 419.1217
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1105.8826
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 419.3525
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.9233
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.3099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T04:02:17.7448461' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T09:02:17.7448461' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3765942594 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T09:02:27.6486940' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3767088889 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.999546226581 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998671317405 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.9022222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 5.02916666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.66462367078137 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.3099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.3099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 6.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits :)
Spent 0.496026 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T04:03:29.0070554' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T09:03:29.0070554' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3774190624 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T09:03:38.9085028' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3775336575 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.999546230599 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998672113243 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.9236111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 5.09416666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.66218777166794 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 6.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits :)
Spent 0.711064 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits

fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.87671000
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0521 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00568 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ur8tnGbQfu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nYk0xb2aUg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Bsq7vV0H0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dpynlp35AC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.856250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.856250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg
Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.3 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ur8tnGbQfu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=2248, passed=8935
Got 8935 stars (including 6153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1387 n_q2=891 n_q3=1706 n_q4=923 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nYk0xb2aUg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=2150, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 6846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1425 n_q2=914 n_q3=1671 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1Bsq7vV0H0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, bad_region=1318, passed=5890
Got 5890 stars (including 4343 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4269 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4268 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4268 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4270 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4269 stars left (next iteration limit 4694)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4269 robust_rms=6.818 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4269 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4269 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4269 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.447
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4269 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1203 n_q2=740 n_q3=1530 n_q4=796 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Dpynlp35AC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=1300, passed=5861
Got 5861 stars (including 4319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4241 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4241 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4241 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4242 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4242 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4242 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4242 stars left (next iteration limit 4665)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4242 robust_rms=6.794 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.231 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4242 robust_rms=0.654 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.742 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4242 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4242 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.457 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits N_match=4242 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1190 n_q2=722 n_q3=1538 n_q4=792 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.275
ref2=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.134
reference average sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.1685
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4903 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4269 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (4242 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0521 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:29.210 +77:32:15.40
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:32.219 +77:32:33.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00568 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOlTTVXmLW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BNaHqAjw9a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FvZK4cxFS7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uwtLvfIUzh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg
Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.2 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AOlTTVXmLW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2563, bad_region=10197, passed=51546
Got 51546 stars (including 39295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1383 n_q2=893 n_q3=1694 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BNaHqAjw9a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=10008, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 36451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1429 n_q2=934 n_q3=1639 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FvZK4cxFS7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1291, bad_region=7401, passed=34112
Got 34112 stars (including 25700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=6.789 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=1.105 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.431 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.442
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1428 n_q2=893 n_q3=1657 n_q4=926 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uwtLvfIUzh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1287, bad_region=7554, passed=34512
Got 34512 stars (including 25954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=6.767 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.645 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=1.124 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.442 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.442 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1434 n_q2=906 n_q3=1647 n_q4=917 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:34:23.46 +77:01:25.1: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:26:40.71 +81:24:30.9: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:08:32.43 +74:35:19.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:08:32.43 +74:35:19.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:26:40.71 +81:24:30.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:34:23.46 +77:01:25.1: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:32.43 +74:35:19.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3946 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:26:40.71 +81:24:30.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7524 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:34:23.46 +77:01:25.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7310 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:39:27.77 +76:48:09.8: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:39:27.77 +76:48:09.8: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:27.77 +76:48:09.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4241 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67766_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67766_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 09.37671 | 2461292.87671 | 14.72 | 12:34:23.48 +77:01:26.7 | 5909 2863 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.74 | 12:34:23.44 +77:01:23.5 | 5907 2859 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67768_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67768_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.72 | 12:08:55.47 +75:07:30.1 | 4978 1717 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:08:55.49 +75:07:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67780_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67780_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 09.37671 | 2461292.87671 | 13.79 | 13:26:40.44 +81:24:30.6 | 6942 5709 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.73 | 13:26:40.98 +81:24:31.3 | 6941 5706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67781_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67781_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.96 | 13:14:53.54 +79:25:30.5 | 6948 4465 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 13:14:53.49 +79:25:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67788_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67788_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 09.37671 | 2461292.87671 | 13.47 | 13:08:32.58 +74:35:18.4 | 7352 1559 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.34 | 13:08:32.27 +74:35:19.9 | 7350 1556 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67789_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67789_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.24 | 09:54:00.09 +79:49:39.8 | 1784 5768 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67793_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67793_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 12.28 | 12:19:37.37 +74:03:12.8 | 5385 1054 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:19:37.36 +74:03:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67807_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67807_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 10.41 | 11:32:46.49 +77:22:44.4 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67828_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67828_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 10.89 | 09:54:15.54 +78:11:48.2 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67836_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67836_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 11.13 | 11:19:22.53 +76:39:47.7 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67854_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67854_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 11.56 | 10:29:09.24 +73:12:34.5 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67865_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67865_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 11.60 | 10:42:34.74 +72:00:27.1 | 0940 0773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67878_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67878_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 12.02 | 10:18:38.81 +74:14:06.7 | 0620 2464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67936_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67936_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 12.87 | 12:48:42.58 +75:36:52.2 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67948_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67948_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.04 | 10:25:42.45 +74:33:01.2 | 0970 2491 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67959_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67959_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.01 | 10:27:31.34 +78:29:38.6 | 2168 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67980_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 67980_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.12 | 12:21:13.99 +80:00:45.5 | 5470 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68009_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68009_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 12.89 | 10:28:36.99 +78:01:37.6 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68012_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68012_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.33 | 10:57:15.16 +74:22:23.6 | 2099 1863 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 10:57:15.28 +74:22:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68015_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68015_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.14 | 10:59:36.73 +72:50:23.2 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68016_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68016_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.30 | 10:40:36.10 +74:53:00.2 | 1599 2406 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 10:40:36.50 +74:53:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68017_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68017_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.10 | 13:23:19.96 +80:52:45.0 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68018_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68018_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.47 | 12:32:00.55 +74:50:12.8 | 5881 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:32:00.41 +74:50:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68020_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68020_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.16 | 13:02:52.47 +74:38:25.9 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68024_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68024_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.18 | 12:58:40.03 +74:03:20.6 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68031_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68031_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 12.91 | 09:59:04.24 +79:29:41.1 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68039_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68039_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.02 | 10:08:38.75 +76:44:22.8 | 1093 3964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68051_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68051_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.26 | 12:51:02.83 +81:24:43.0 | 6148 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68062_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68062_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.48 | 11:37:55.12 +73:24:26.0 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68066_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68066_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.48 | 11:39:18.66 +75:02:03.7 | 3827 1800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 11:39:18.50 +75:02:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68075_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68075_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.30 | 11:04:33.74 +72:50:37.4 | 2076 0882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68077_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68077_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.44 | 10:27:33.31 +78:04:54.7 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68080_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68080_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.53 | 11:19:40.37 +72:59:49.3 | 2750 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68085_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68085_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.60 | 10:41:55.22 +74:28:12.1 | 1542 2156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68100_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68100_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.73 | 11:35:00.73 +76:44:30.1 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68110_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68110_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.06 | 12:23:47.61 +75:51:21.8 | 5552 2144 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:23:47.87 +75:51:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68114_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68114_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.86 | 11:28:50.83 +73:01:45.4 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68124_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68124_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.42 | 13:04:48.43 +76:57:40.2 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68139_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68139_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.77 | 12:34:35.28 +76:02:05.6 | 5945 2264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:34:35.11 +76:02:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68146_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68146_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.43 | 11:21:26.22 +81:22:54.2 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68151_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68151_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.76 | 10:22:15.13 +79:12:39.1 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68168_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68168_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.70 | 11:36:20.52 +81:23:38.1 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68180_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68180_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.90 | 13:08:08.26 +79:38:37.9 | 6738 4555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68188_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68188_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.87 | 11:15:30.84 +75:07:35.9 | 2938 2067 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 11:15:30.76 +75:07:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68189_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68189_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.46 | 10:44:08.87 +76:56:25.6 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68191_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68191_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.69 | 09:57:06.91 +79:00:52.1 | 1564 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68203_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68203_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.57 | 12:16:52.53 +80:35:12.5 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68206_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68206_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.25 | 12:34:27.38 +75:39:11.6 | 5952 2033 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:34:27.27 +75:39:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68217_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68217_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.86 | 11:39:55.92 +80:21:01.1 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68220_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68220_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.97 | 09:54:21.68 +77:23:53.1 | 0915 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68224_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68224_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.58 | 11:49:40.97 +74:40:38.9 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68228_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68228_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.01 | 12:49:15.73 +77:13:15.7 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68240_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68240_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.92 | 13:03:06.23 +76:29:42.1 | 6933 2654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 13:03:06.18 +76:29:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68245_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68245_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.83 | 10:09:23.91 +79:49:42.7 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68255_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68255_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.95 | 11:00:58.38 +81:12:02.2 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68263_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68263_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.27 | 10:18:22.23 +77:35:14.6 | 1646 4231 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68265_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68265_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.79 | 09:59:08.42 +77:07:43.5 | 0951 4343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68266_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68266_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.96 | 10:14:39.41 +74:53:11.3 | 0684 2888 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68271_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68271_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.16 | 13:04:41.92 +73:56:43.7 | 7268 1143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68274_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68274_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.03 | 11:22:04.67 +80:54:28.8 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68290_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68290_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.93 | 10:06:06.81 +78:17:42.2 | 1540 4802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68300_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68300_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.76 | 09:58:17.65 +77:54:16.0 | 1201 4745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68303_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68303_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.00 | 10:23:56.65 +76:42:42.9 | 1547 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68317_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68317_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.95 | 12:43:29.45 +77:15:08.4 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68323_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68323_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.90 | 13:10:53.35 +79:47:37.2 | 6793 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68330_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68330_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 09.37671 | 2461292.87671 | 14.38 | 12:39:28.30 +76:48:11.7 | 6091 2741 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-02-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.48 | 12:39:27.25 +76:48:07.8 | 6088 2737 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68331_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68331_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.03 | 11:31:45.50 +73:26:28.0 | 3330 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68333_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68333_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.08 | 11:00:57.61 +74:43:46.8 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68335_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68335_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.06 | 11:26:37.92 +77:45:51.2 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68340_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68340_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.34 | 13:27:49.59 +79:51:54.7 | 7224 4812 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68343_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68343_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.46 | 10:17:46.83 +78:37:47.4 | 1951 4786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68347_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68347_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.20 | 12:44:22.69 +79:13:30.5 | 6121 4208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68351_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68351_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.84 | 12:08:25.28 +74:05:28.1 | 4921 1094 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68354_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68354_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.32 | 10:26:54.22 +78:59:12.2 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68357_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68357_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.62 | 12:57:45.87 +74:44:53.8 | 6906 1578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68368_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 68368_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 14.97 | 12:49:26.22 +78:38:35.3 | 6304 3874 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 66296_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 09.37753 | 2461292.87753 | 13.98 | 12:48:23.80 +78:30:27.3 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_041443_TTUQ2b1x1_1122623_4P08oC5W/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-03-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.87671000 -observatory V36
11:51:51.42 +01:50:05.2 Mercury (-0.7mag)
13:41:11.92 -15:17:31.9 Venus (-4.7mag)
07:19:35.52 +22:50:38.6 Mars (1.2mag)
09:10:45.43 +16:50:19.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:14.75 +02:35:11.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:42.40 +21:02:02.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:32.92 -00:04:33.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:27.15 -23:40:04.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
09:46:33.94 +13:35:42.6 Moon (-8.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 9 04:21 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.87671000:
09:10:42.49 +16:50:34.0 Io (6.2mag)
09:10:55.27 +16:49:30.6 Europa (6.3mag)
09:10:31.45 +16:51:29.4 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:10:35.43 +16:51:10.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:08:36.01 +17:07:45.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:10:49.42 +16:50:00.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:08:11.91 +17:01:39.5 Elara (17.7mag)
09:14:36.01 +16:17:16.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:11:41.43 +17:08:40.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:51:02.36 +02:35:26.6 Titan (8.3mag)
00:51:19.27 +02:35:00.0 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:51:24.27 +02:37:30.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:51:30.61 +02:34:55.4 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:49:59.35 +02:24:44.1 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 9 04:21 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.87671000:
22:20:38.74 +03:08:18.4 JWST
16:38:37.78 +44:20:53.0 Chandra
11:52:05.99 -61:14:28.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 9 04:21 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.87671000 -observatory V36
03:41:36.99 +19:26:04.6 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:40.58 -34:10:20.7 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:21:01.94 -70:25:02.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:55.20 +33:45:16.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
22:11:50.18 +28:24:52.3 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:11:44.85 +25:56:26.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:51:24.85 +27:09:07.5 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:49:59.28 +05:13:17.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:28:59.99 -15:49:53.8 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:40:12.00 +33:01:19.2 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:52.24 +15:17:56.4 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:32:20.65 +43:05:36.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:23:20.91 +49:11:09.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:36:41.78 -13:03:19.9 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:12:19.60 +18:07:32.7 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:21:20.56 +18:36:23.3 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:21:20.84 -00:03:06.7 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:46:56.31 +73:41:10.6 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:04:43.52 +46:03:58.4 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:15:12.17 +11:27:11.2 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:27:43.43 -35:09:33.8 7.8mag 10P/Tempel
11:49:33.94 -05:37:29.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:12:45.59 -05:45:06.2 17.6mag 63P/Wild
06:43:20.12 +19:05:29.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:16:08.75 -26:11:36.7 17.1mag 84P/Giclas
03:17:20.46 +15:01:17.0 17.2mag 88P/Howell
05:45:09.75 +29:25:26.2 16.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:37:57.08 +24:16:41.3 15.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:32:31.90 +20:25:31.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:51:11.51 -22:03:39.4 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:19:55.07 +20:34:26.5 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:23:44.21 -17:20:42.1 11.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:58:39.56 +37:31:50.6 16.4mag 162P/Siding Spring
09:34:29.02 +12:28:39.2 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:26:07.18 +08:17:59.8 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
04:53:39.34 +36:58:02.4 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:37:26.21 +35:28:40.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:26:35.88 -00:28:56.7 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:29:34.67 +16:44:38.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 9 04:21 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 9 04:21 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 9 04:21 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:16:59.610 +05:02:09.95 AT 2026yux 2026-08-06.84 22.17
01:03:17.160 +01:55:16.75 AT 2026yuw 2026-08-06.84 21.78
01:01:06.200 -01:23:37.06 AT 2026yuv 2026-08-06.84 21.44
23:00:49.110 +05:32:39.05 AT 2026yuu 2026-08-07.78 22.37
23:39:57.990 +03:21:50.80 AT 2026yut 2026-08-06.76 22.1
23:34:24.590 +00:59:42.41 AT 2026yus 2026-08-05.79 22.26
23:11:22.440 +03:34:45.08 AT 2026yur 2026-08-06.81 22.15
23:52:10.400 +03:53:48.67 AT 2026yuq 2026-08-06.76 22.26
01:28:25.390 -00:33:31.00 AT 2026yup 2026-07-22.87 22.24
06:19:46.733 +50:57:31.05 AT 2026yuo 2026-08-13.50 19.744
23:24:50.114 +15:25:58.38 AT 2026yun 2026-08-10.05 19.96
00:25:27.120 +20:14:05.91 SN 2026yum 2026-08-13.09 18.04
22:02:49.666 -13:05:30.39 AT 2026yul 2026-08-12.92 18.89
21:45:50.911 -04:08:31.57 AT 2026yuk 2026-08-12.78 19.08
01:02:47.624 -06:59:05.24 AT 2026yuj 2026-08-13.05 19.25
23:50:13.455 +20:53:14.83 AT 2026yui 2026-08-12.94 19.46
22:53:22.575 -18:00:52.62 AT 2026yuh 2026-08-12.37 19.1729
01:03:55.125 -10:40:35.60 AT 2026yug 2026-08-10.42 20.3834
22:18:45.584 -09:23:49.69 AT 2026yuf 2026-08-08.36 20.7186
20:49:39.970 +17:00:06.86 AT 2026yue 2026-08-10.93 20.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 9 04:21 tns_transients_list.txt