NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-05-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 421633 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 421633 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1180.7456 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 451.1553 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1178.8752 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 450.4918 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.05192 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T03:45:22.8499057' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T08:45:22.8499057' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3648477895 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T08:45:32.7517990' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3649623957 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999545544254 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4993104024646 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.6213888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.07555555555555 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.69705647030416 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits :) Spent 0.748901 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T03:46:18.4729727' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T08:46:18.4729727' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3654915742 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T08:46:28.3734097' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3656061688 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999545547274 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4993104662148 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.6355555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.12861111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.69540011694991 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits :) Spent 0.766325 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.86496353 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00337 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PtL7IaT0Vz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fHXrQGcylA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5a5ETzeihP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vdbn7eSnPP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.PtL7IaT0Vz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fHXrQGcylA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.5a5ETzeihP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=253, bad_region=0, passed=6621 Got 6621 stars (including 6358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6621 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=10.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.797 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.511 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=1.043 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.401 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.450 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1097 n_q2=1012 n_q3=1512 n_q4=1273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vdbn7eSnPP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=0, passed=6668 Got 6668 stars (including 6372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6668 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6668 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6668 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6668 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=10.649 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.788 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=1.031 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.385 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1097 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1500 n_q4=1273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.232 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.283 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.871 +77:29:58.26 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:05.750 +77:30:05.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00337 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aGhQYjRXbi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uwBGeUSKVK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G6dyfQqrRi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BzyYKhUhJz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 3.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 3.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.aGhQYjRXbi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.uwBGeUSKVK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.G6dyfQqrRi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1037, bad_region=24, passed=30789 Got 30789 stars (including 29675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30789 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30789 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30789 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30789 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=10.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.031 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.446 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.043 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.446 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.400 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1085 n_q2=998 n_q3=1531 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BzyYKhUhJz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1041, bad_region=25, passed=30908 Got 30908 stars (including 29792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30908 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=10.647 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.917 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.476 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.032 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1083 n_q2=1002 n_q3=1519 n_q4=1288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:07:25.98 +77:52:21.7: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 14:17:04.52 +79:43:00.2: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:02:48.61 +74:57:46.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:49:42.97 +75:34:55.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:17:04.52 +79:43:00.2: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:02:48.61 +74:57:46.5: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:07:25.98 +77:52:21.7: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:04.52 +79:43:00.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4787 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:25.98 +77:52:21.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4221 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:48.61 +74:57:46.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9766 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:49:42.97 +75:34:55.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:42.97 +75:34:55.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9734 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:33:29.47 +75:11:27.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.48 +74:50:12.2: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:33:29.47 +75:11:27.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:29.47 +75:11:27.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1751 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:10:34.51 +80:57:26.1: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.48 +74:50:12.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.48 +74:50:12.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3658 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:34.51 +80:57:26.1: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:34.51 +80:57:26.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8071 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69539_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69539_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.48    11:44:28.16 +78:45:35.8   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69543_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69543_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    14.45    14:17:04.31 +79:43:00.0   8159 5771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.53    14:17:04.72 +79:43:00.4   8159 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69553_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69553_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    13.97    10:02:48.42 +74:57:49.7   0390 2554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.01    10:02:48.80 +74:57:43.4   0389 2552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    13.43    13:07:26.23 +77:52:22.0   6864 3833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.42    13:07:25.73 +77:52:21.4   6862 3831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69580_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69580_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    10.43    09:48:27.22 +75:46:45.9   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69588_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69588_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    10.72    11:23:59.65 +79:17:37.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69591_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69591_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    10.56    12:03:26.08 +73:08:29.6   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69604_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69604_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    11.42    10:59:29.17 +79:35:22.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69616_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69616_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.01    12:28:39.76 +81:04:40.2   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    11.65    12:22:01.10 +74:53:07.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69629_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69629_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    11.92    12:02:07.45 +74:40:46.5   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69630_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69630_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.04    10:30:29.71 +73:54:18.4   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69633_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69633_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    11.89    11:56:49.77 +72:23:34.4   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69634_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69634_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.31    11:32:52.10 +80:23:20.1   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69641_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69641_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.47    11:53:02.80 +82:34:26.6   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69661_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69661_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.50    12:00:23.08 +76:47:27.4   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69665_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69665_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.62    14:33:05.29 +79:38:44.4   8531 6011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 14:33:05.37 +79:38:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69668_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69668_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.70    13:11:43.87 +80:27:50.1   6444 5342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 13:11:43.72 +80:27:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69682_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69682_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.75    14:15:56.40 +76:58:39.3   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69690_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69690_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.57    13:44:35.66 +73:51:44.9   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69698_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69698_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.74    11:31:54.54 +74:05:42.9   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69702_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69702_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.63    13:18:09.76 +73:27:15.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69715_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69715_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    12.99    13:49:43.07 +75:34:56.1   8782 3190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.96    13:49:42.87 +75:34:55.7   8780 3188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69718_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69718_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    12.86    10:16:05.55 +75:15:27.5   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.48    09:34:54.32 +77:15:24.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.63    10:59:45.59 +79:39:33.9   3099 4618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.67 +79:39:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69730_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69730_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.46    09:35:43.71 +77:42:09.0   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69732_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69732_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.07    13:28:49.95 +73:34:57.4   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.41    10:40:36.24 +74:53:00.8   1773 1979   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:40:36.60 +74:53:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69737_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69737_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.39    10:23:47.31 +78:20:02.2   1878 4142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:23:47.57 +78:20:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    13.17    12:33:29.69 +75:11:27.4   6138 1966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.18    12:33:29.25 +75:11:26.7   6136 1964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.71    14:17:49.72 +76:49:26.8   9229 4375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 14:17:49.60 +76:49:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.56    10:28:32.95 +81:12:18.1   2593 5730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:28:32.66 +81:12:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.20    10:45:44.73 +73:20:57.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69763_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69763_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.56    10:09:37.59 +76:51:58.3   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69765_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69765_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.19    10:27:51.79 +72:54:18.9   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.34    09:28:32.52 +78:00:48.5   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69773_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69773_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.13    10:36:19.18 +71:44:45.1   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69775_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69775_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    13.36    12:32:00.37 +74:50:11.6   6122 1745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.37    12:32:00.60 +74:50:12.8   6120 1744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69779_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69779_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.41    10:57:15.03 +74:22:23.8   2345 1517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:57:14.94 +74:22:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69782_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69782_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.12    14:01:51.50 +75:43:06.4   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69787_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69787_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.77    12:49:00.61 +79:11:59.2   6098 4431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 12:49:00.33 +79:11:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69788_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69788_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.68    10:24:22.97 +76:00:05.4   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69793_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69793_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.51    09:46:53.11 +76:41:28.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.36496    2461292.86496    13.81    11:10:34.54 +80:57:27.4   3513 5339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-45-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.81    11:10:34.47 +80:57:24.9   3511 5338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69800_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69800_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.46    10:02:40.10 +76:16:12.7   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69802_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69802_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.55    10:04:40.89 +74:18:28.8   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69803_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69803_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.56    10:22:21.03 +74:58:19.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69811_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69811_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.78    09:49:21.77 +75:54:35.4   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69812_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69812_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.87    12:12:29.55 +80:20:08.1   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69817_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69817_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.32    11:20:13.49 +73:19:40.4   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69819_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69819_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.85    12:20:08.91 +79:11:39.5   5300 4265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 12:20:09.16 +79:11:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.05    10:53:16.48 +81:19:16.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69826_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69826_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.35    12:16:19.75 +72:32:45.9   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69839_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69839_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.54    13:17:21.54 +73:54:03.4   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69840_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69840_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.18    10:55:47.44 +77:05:42.5   2652 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 10:55:47.52 +77:05:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69846_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69846_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.78    13:50:02.38 +77:38:54.1   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69856_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69856_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.99    11:15:45.63 +78:15:59.9   3411 3712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 11:15:45.37 +78:16:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69857_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69857_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.12    10:33:23.95 +73:11:23.1   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.79    12:18:28.06 +74:48:13.5   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69863_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69863_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.82    10:25:18.28 +73:22:53.6   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69869_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69869_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.08    13:03:06.36 +76:29:42.8   6994 2999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 13:03:06.57 +76:29:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69870_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69870_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.76    13:02:30.51 +73:58:30.8   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.33    11:32:37.71 +79:28:14.8   3973 4383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 11:32:37.19 +79:28:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.82    13:18:07.54 +72:57:07.1   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.05    13:45:26.82 +77:10:43.9   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.22    13:48:17.34 +77:15:13.1   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69902_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69902_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.24    11:44:31.56 +75:15:47.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.84    14:09:53.63 +76:35:51.6   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.96    10:57:03.27 +81:46:23.9   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.88    14:21:01.18 +79:43:19.3   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69919_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69919_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.97    12:45:03.92 +79:57:58.8   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.34    10:16:50.61 +77:26:57.2   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69928_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69928_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.04    13:16:42.51 +81:52:10.5   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69929_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69929_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.69    10:53:54.37 +72:14:46.4   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.08    10:10:39.45 +79:27:36.0   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69943_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69943_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.25    10:03:25.86 +73:58:10.2   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69944_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69944_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    13.81    13:03:34.67 +74:21:24.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69956_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69956_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.14    12:19:24.29 +75:29:44.1   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69957_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69957_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.12    11:14:38.29 +78:11:41.6   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69961_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69961_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.23    11:33:27.48 +76:33:55.5   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.74    10:14:02.73 +77:19:02.9   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69980_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69980_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.57    10:52:33.17 +78:20:09.9   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.71    11:04:10.50 +74:40:22.1   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.26    13:09:46.05 +74:06:50.3   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69995_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 69995_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.32    13:44:02.98 +77:24:32.4   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70008_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 70008_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.60    11:32:08.05 +77:21:13.1   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70011_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 70011_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.62    13:31:32.37 +78:14:27.2   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70019_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 70019_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.67    12:24:59.05 +80:17:44.7   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 70029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    14.44    12:01:49.57 +76:26:10.7   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 61687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    6.64    13:26:07.54 +72:23:29.7   8773 1016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 13:26:07.58 +72:23:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 16968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 The candidate 16968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.36561    2461292.86561    8.46    11:15:55.98 +75:08:34.5   3159 1847   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034657_TTUQ1b1x1_911829_schAyB6D/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_03-46-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits **** FOUND 11:15:56.01 +75:08:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.86496353 -observatory V36 11:51:47.06 +01:50:38.1 Mercury (-0.7mag) 13:41:10.16 -15:17:16.6 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:19:33.63 +22:50:41.4 Mars (1.2mag) 09:10:44.85 +16:50:21.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:14.92 +02:35:12.5 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:42.40 +21:02:02.5 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:32.99 -00:04:33.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:27.20 -23:40:04.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:45:47.29 +13:39:10.4 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 9 03:49 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.86496353: 09:10:42.12 +16:50:35.4 Io (6.2mag) 09:10:54.59 +16:49:33.5 Europa (6.3mag) 09:10:30.92 +16:51:31.5 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:10:34.74 +16:51:13.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:08:35.41 +17:07:47.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:10:49.00 +16:50:02.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:08:11.32 +17:01:41.7 Elara (17.7mag) 09:14:35.45 +16:17:19.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:11:40.90 +17:08:42.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:02.56 +02:35:27.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:19.45 +02:35:01.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:51:24.47 +02:37:31.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:30.78 +02:34:56.5 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:49:59.54 +02:24:45.3 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 9 03:49 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.86496353: 22:20:36.31 +03:07:37.8 JWST 16:36:26.40 +44:38:44.5 Chandra 11:42:59.47 -60:58:15.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 9 03:49 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.86496353 -observatory V36 03:41:36.62 +19:26:02.7 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:40.30 -34:10:21.6 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:21:01.42 -70:25:00.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:55.12 +33:45:14.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:11:50.74 +28:24:57.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:11:44.33 +25:56:27.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:51:24.19 +27:09:09.0 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:49:58.83 +05:13:18.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:29:00.15 -15:49:50.2 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:40:11.39 +33:01:16.5 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:52.14 +15:17:56.9 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:32:21.06 +43:05:38.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:23:21.85 +49:11:11.7 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:36:41.42 -13:03:19.2 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:12:19.37 +18:07:41.2 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:21:19.40 +18:36:26.6 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:21:20.25 -00:03:03.2 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:46:54.34 +73:41:18.0 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:04:43.92 +46:03:59.9 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:15:11.51 +11:27:07.8 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:27:42.90 -35:09:32.4 7.8mag 10P/Tempel 11:49:33.46 -05:37:26.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:12:44.16 -05:44:52.9 17.6mag 63P/Wild 06:43:18.77 +19:05:32.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:16:08.95 -26:11:35.1 17.1mag 84P/Giclas 03:17:20.49 +15:01:16.6 17.2mag 88P/Howell 05:45:07.40 +29:25:10.0 16.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:37:55.01 +24:16:52.3 15.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:32:30.33 +20:25:40.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:51:09.93 -22:03:24.8 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:19:54.24 +20:34:27.8 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:23:47.32 -17:20:48.1 11.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:58:37.54 +37:31:52.7 16.4mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:34:29.82 +12:29:03.2 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:26:06.67 +08:18:03.4 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 04:53:37.49 +36:57:49.2 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:37:24.33 +35:28:45.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:35.40 -00:28:52.0 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:29:34.06 +16:44:41.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 9 03:49 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 9 03:49 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 9 03:49 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:16:59.610 +05:02:09.95 AT 2026yux 2026-08-06.84 22.17 01:03:17.160 +01:55:16.75 AT 2026yuw 2026-08-06.84 21.78 01:01:06.200 -01:23:37.06 AT 2026yuv 2026-08-06.84 21.44 23:00:49.110 +05:32:39.05 AT 2026yuu 2026-08-07.78 22.37 23:39:57.990 +03:21:50.80 AT 2026yut 2026-08-06.76 22.1 23:34:24.590 +00:59:42.41 AT 2026yus 2026-08-05.79 22.26 23:11:22.440 +03:34:45.08 AT 2026yur 2026-08-06.81 22.15 23:52:10.400 +03:53:48.67 AT 2026yuq 2026-08-06.76 22.26 01:28:25.390 -00:33:31.00 AT 2026yup 2026-07-22.87 22.24 06:19:46.733 +50:57:31.05 AT 2026yuo 2026-08-13.50 19.744 23:24:50.114 +15:25:58.38 AT 2026yun 2026-08-10.05 19.96 00:25:27.120 +20:14:05.91 SN 2026yum 2026-08-13.09 18.04 22:02:49.666 -13:05:30.39 AT 2026yul 2026-08-12.92 18.89 21:45:50.911 -04:08:31.57 AT 2026yuk 2026-08-12.78 19.08 01:02:47.624 -06:59:05.24 AT 2026yuj 2026-08-13.05 19.25 23:50:13.455 +20:53:14.83 AT 2026yui 2026-08-12.94 19.46 22:53:22.575 -18:00:52.62 AT 2026yuh 2026-08-12.37 19.1729 01:03:55.125 -10:40:35.60 AT 2026yug 2026-08-10.42 20.3834 22:18:45.584 -09:23:49.69 AT 2026yuf 2026-08-08.36 20.7186 20:49:39.970 +17:00:06.86 AT 2026yue 2026-08-10.93 20.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 9 03:49 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C