This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,7.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 7.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 11.12 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1
195.38213 14.64452 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,7.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 7.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 12.03 07:14:04.78 +23:36:41.5
193.85906 15.25228 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:04.78 +23:36:41.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:04.78 +23:36:41.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 13.27 07:27:13.61 +24:27:41.5
194.25326 18.34908 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -1 0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:13.61 +24:27:41.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:13.61 +24:27:41.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 13.55 07:23:10.43 +17:57:41.8
200.10136 14.92034 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.114 Kassandra -0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:10.43 +17:57:41.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:10.43 +17:57:41.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 13.71 07:05:33.33 +18:42:16.7
197.62103 11.42727 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -0 0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:33.33 +18:42:16.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:33.33 +18:42:16.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 13.70 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6
194.37429 17.28917 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6: 15.88 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9660,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4660 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 869513281514305280,2461291.9660,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 869513281514305280 20260908.4660 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 14.57 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0
197.60022 18.87161 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461291.9660,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260908.4660 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4660 2461291.9660 14.38 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6
191.73021 13.74069 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461291.9660,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260908.4660 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461291.96620564 08.09.2026 11:11:10.167 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18687
Objects passed selection criteria: 18629
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13734
Average stars matched: 12352.2 (89.9392 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 06:14:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461291.96620564 08.09.2026 11:11:10.167 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 268
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128842
Objects passed selection criteria: 128438
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97929.2
Average stars matched: 87278.5 (89.124 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 06:16:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.96577375
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.886 +22:00:08.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.886 +22:00:08.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.723 +22:00:10.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.723 +22:00:10.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:05.886 +22:00:08.66
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:05.723 +22:00:10.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00084 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00084 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aNgYVjqbVn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EecSTYsGgH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ihROV03wY7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cfk9mJpaUs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.aNgYVjqbVn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EecSTYsGgH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ihROV03wY7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=995, bad_region=2189, passed=14220
Got 14220 stars (including 11161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=6.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.039 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=0.836 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.479 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.429
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.869 +22:00:07.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14220 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3947795.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.836 -> 0.405 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1780 n_q2=768 n_q3=1558 n_q4=677 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cfk9mJpaUs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1010, bad_region=2190, passed=14140
Got 14140 stars (including 11074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=6.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.002 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.558 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=0.860 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.490 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.430
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.706 +22:00:09.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14140 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3947779.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.860 -> 0.403 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1766 n_q2=774 n_q3=1571 n_q4=670 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.1: 10.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.1: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.0: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3059 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.1: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1716 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:42.9: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6346 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=11.1236 delta=3.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32576.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 30881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31112_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31180_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31180_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 31925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32340_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32340_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:33.29 +26:08:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 32576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32670_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32670_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 33128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.53 +24:13:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33168_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 33168_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 33612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.58 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 34874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.56 +22:52:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:14:12.86 +22:01:11.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.869 +22:00:07.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.869 +22:00:07.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.706 +22:00:09.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.706 +22:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:05.869 +22:00:07.84
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:05.706 +22:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00083 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00083 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ueR4uWUkes
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EZaVngZerh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.40bkxoEs7W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r86htCq32R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 219 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ueR4uWUkes (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EZaVngZerh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.40bkxoEs7W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7175, bad_region=9475, passed=95039
Got 95039 stars (including 79088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=6.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.430 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.438
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.430 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1759 n_q2=758 n_q3=1541 n_q4=716 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.r86htCq32R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7170, bad_region=9530, passed=95855
Got 95855 stars (including 79879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=6.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.842 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.426 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.428
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1764 n_q2=757 n_q3=1537 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_061221_TTUQ2b1x1_3930324_KWHTWUhP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:12.27 +23:43:13.6: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:17.81 +23:51:33.4: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:17.75 +24:24:48.5: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:02.29 +21:47:57.7: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:53.86 +25:02:29.5: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:58.17 +23:18:11.2: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:07.40 +17:52:47.5: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:27.36 +24:58:52.5: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:39.68 +18:33:02.0: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:07.40 +17:52:47.5: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:53.86 +25:02:29.5: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:17.75 +24:24:48.5: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:17.81 +23:51:33.4: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:12.27 +23:43:13.6: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:02.29 +21:47:57.7: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:58.17 +23:18:11.2: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:07.40 +17:52:47.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3186 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:17.75 +24:24:48.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4984 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:53.86 +25:02:29.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1612 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:12.27 +23:43:13.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8069 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:17.81 +23:51:33.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5580 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:02.29 +21:47:57.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1221 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:58.17 +23:18:11.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5737 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:22:27.36 +24:58:52.5: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:27.36 +24:58:52.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1080 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:39.68 +18:33:02.0: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:39.68 +18:33:02.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0324 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:17.41 +22:26:39.5: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:23.26 +23:12:34.9: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:03.27 +19:45:48.9: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.4: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:23.26 +23:12:34.9: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:17.41 +22:26:39.5: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:03.27 +19:45:48.9: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:23.26 +23:12:34.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0506 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:20.17 +23:20:52.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:17.41 +22:26:39.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7907 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:03.27 +19:45:48.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8715 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7440 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:14.93 +18:59:00.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.2: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:39.96 +18:49:28.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0833 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:20.17 +23:20:52.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3043 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.17 +23:20:52.4: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2516 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7812 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:14.93 +18:59:00.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:14.93 +18:59:00.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9632 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:57.78 +20:58:17.4: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6899 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:04.78 +23:36:41.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:57.78 +20:58:17.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:57.78 +20:58:17.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5732 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:04.78 +23:36:41.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:58.07 +25:16:53.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.9: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.6299 delta=-1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5140 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:58.07 +25:16:53.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:58.07 +25:16:53.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7349 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:13.61 +24:27:41.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:13.61 +24:27:41.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.1: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:43.0: 12.92 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.1: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4155 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:10.43 +17:57:41.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.6: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:43.0: 13.00 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.58 +22:49:43.0: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.6275 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:10.43 +17:57:41.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:33.33 +18:42:16.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6362 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:27.18 +23:56:42.8: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.8: 13.70 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:33.33 +18:42:16.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.8: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:27.18 +23:56:42.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.7459 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:27.18 +23:56:42.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6668 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:28.76 +19:21:19.2: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:28.76 +19:21:19.2: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:28.76 +19:21:19.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6935 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:33.7: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:33.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:05.57 +20:55:33.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7889 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.38 +22:55:55.4: 13.60 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6: 15.88 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:23:07.24 +23:57:05.6: ref_mag=15.96 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.6935 delta=2.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:01.41 +20:29:01.4: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.38 +22:55:55.4: 13.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.38 +22:55:55.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.8697 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:01.41 +20:29:01.4: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.41 +20:29:01.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8356 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:29.42 +17:38:57.0: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:29.42 +17:38:57.0: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:29.42 +17:38:57.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8180 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:48.76 +25:12:11.1: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:48.76 +25:12:11.1: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.10 +19:51:29.7: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:48.76 +25:12:11.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9339 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:38.10 +19:51:29.7: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.10 +19:51:29.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0270 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:45.12 +23:50:51.7: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:26:45.12 +23:50:51.7: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:45.12 +23:50:51.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0694 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.04 +20:12:13.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.89 +21:22:42.2: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:25.89 +21:22:42.2: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:33.04 +20:12:13.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.89 +21:22:42.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1592 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.04 +20:12:13.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0080 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:24.72 +24:48:07.8: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:24.72 +24:48:07.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:24.72 +24:48:07.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2055 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:09.33 +20:34:50.6: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:59.85 +20:18:50.3: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:09.33 +20:34:50.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:09.33 +20:34:50.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2222 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:59.85 +20:18:50.3: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:59.85 +20:18:50.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1935 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.1: 10.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:11.28 +21:28:35.6: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.30 +23:28:23.2: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.1: 11.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:58.13 +22:58:19.1: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2792 delta=-3.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:50.44 +22:57:55.6: 11.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:11.28 +21:28:35.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:11.28 +21:28:35.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2994 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.30 +23:28:23.2: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.70 +23:01:53.6: 13.11 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.30 +23:28:23.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2130 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:50.44 +22:57:55.6: 11.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.70 +23:01:53.6: 13.07 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.70 +23:01:53.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.2295 delta=-1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.51 +23:02:06.9: 13.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:48.64 +22:47:33.6: 13.33 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:10.25 +22:48:21.4: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.51 +23:02:06.9: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:22.43 +23:04:29.1: 14.36 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:14.27 +24:22:07.4: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:42.95 +22:50:16.2: 14.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:48.64 +22:47:33.6: 13.35 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:10.25 +22:48:21.4: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:48.64 +22:47:33.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.5541 delta=-1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:10.25 +22:48:21.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5112 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:22.43 +23:04:29.1: 14.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.02 +22:51:09.2: 13.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:22.43 +23:04:29.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5807 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:14.27 +24:22:07.4: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:14.27 +24:22:07.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3441 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:42.95 +22:50:16.2: 14.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:33.90 +21:43:31.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.02 +22:51:09.2: 13.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.71 +22:55:56.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:25.94 +23:03:09.2: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:09.34 +24:56:52.5: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:26.11 +22:45:55.2: 14.77 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.71 +22:55:56.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.71 +22:55:56.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:25.94 +23:03:09.2: 14.33 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:25.94 +23:03:09.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=14.5910 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:23.00 +24:53:43.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:09.34 +24:56:52.5: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:09.34 +24:56:52.5: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3585 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:26.11 +22:45:55.2: 14.83 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:26.11 +22:45:55.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.7494 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:27.73 +22:57:19.9: 13.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:27.73 +22:57:19.9: 13.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:51.91 +22:08:59.8: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.58 +22:59:21.6: 11.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:51.91 +22:08:59.8: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:51.91 +22:08:59.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6619 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:37.58 +22:41:58.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:09.13 +23:11:18.9: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.58 +22:59:21.6: 11.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.58 +22:59:21.6: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5964 delta=-3.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:37.58 +22:41:58.6: 14.94 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:37.58 +22:41:58.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=14.7505 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:09.13 +23:11:18.9: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:09.13 +23:11:18.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7684 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196275.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197066.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out199318.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out199583.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out200367.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.27 +19:11:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.80 +17:52:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:32.74 +25:09:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:58.36 +22:14:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.31 +21:13:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171834_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171834_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.24 +21:31:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.22 +23:00:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.27 +19:58:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171860_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171860_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:43.72 +21:58:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.38 +19:59:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171863_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171863_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171872_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171872_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.95 +24:41:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171877_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171877_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.17 +19:25:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171892_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 171892_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 174122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 174543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.58 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175674_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 175674_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 175794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 176978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177877_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 177877_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.92 +23:02:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 178267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178398_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 178398_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 178692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.31 +25:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178856_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 178856_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 178946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.12 +22:10:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.91 +22:42:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 179945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180268_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180268_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.45 +21:18:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180653_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180653_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.75 +23:56:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 180853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.36 +18:39:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181066_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 181066_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.81 +18:51:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181565_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 181565_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.10 +22:43:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.15 +22:52:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 182581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183344_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 183344_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.31 +21:31:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183393_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 183393_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 183643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.32 +24:32:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 183795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.30 +24:26:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183982_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 183982_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.79 +22:49:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184720_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184720_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.43 +19:28:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 184843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.13 +22:57:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185272_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185272_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185450_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185450_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.61 +22:49:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.12 +24:39:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 185974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.88 +18:19:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.07 +24:22:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.01 +22:39:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186225_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186225_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.98 +20:06:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.66 +20:31:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 186789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.43 +20:05:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187280_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187280_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187460_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187460_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.79 +19:37:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187553_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 187553_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187587_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187587_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.10 +22:50:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187927_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187927_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.20 +18:14:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 187957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 187983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188205_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188205_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188456_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188456_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.68 +21:27:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.60 +20:00:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.62 +22:39:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188993_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 188993_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:13.83 +21:04:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.00 +21:35:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:37.87 +19:20:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189216_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189216_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189268_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189268_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.11 +22:51:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189318_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189318_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189349_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189349_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189439_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189439_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.63 +21:21:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189449_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189449_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.77 +24:19:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 189529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189595_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189595_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:16.62 +21:43:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.50 +20:16:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.22 +22:57:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 189963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.88 +18:10:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190377_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190377_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190391_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190391_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.74 +22:50:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.61 +19:09:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.06 +25:27:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.37 +18:53:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.96 +22:53:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190903_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190903_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.33 +18:18:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:56.81 +22:00:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 190949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.38 +19:32:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191101_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191101_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.75 +20:49:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:01.83 +18:32:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191549_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191549_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:19.02 +18:19:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 191829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.13 +22:55:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:41.71 +20:52:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192300_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192300_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.47 +25:10:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.34 +24:47:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192383_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192383_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:38.58 +20:40:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 192987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193000_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193000_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:11.50 +21:00:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193005_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193005_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.64 +20:49:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193283_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193283_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.76 +20:41:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193588_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193588_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.71 +24:10:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.92 +19:59:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193713_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193713_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:35.93 +18:11:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 193802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.67 +22:51:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 193831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194123_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194123_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.73 +18:56:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194254_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194403_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194403_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:39.07 +18:56:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194491_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194491_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194522_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194522_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:05.15 +22:57:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194565_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194565_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.31 +22:48:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 194944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195331_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195331_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195379_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195379_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.70 +22:47:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195489_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195489_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:14.88 +22:54:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195666_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195666_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.42 +24:02:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195925_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195968_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 195968_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196001_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196001_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196020_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196020_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.94 +21:35:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:50.44 +22:57:55.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.557 3368422286229045760 106.46029283249 +22.96534230189 14.2251 13.6885 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.557#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196324_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196324_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.89 +22:52:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196352_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196352_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.07 +19:26:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196422_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.69 +23:02:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196544_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196544_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.01 +21:26:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 196729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.72 +22:58:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197066_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 197066_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:08.51 +23:02:06.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197124_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 197124_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 197172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 197842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197901_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 197901_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 198387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198909_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 198909_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 198926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199136_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199136_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:24.31 +21:11:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199308_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199318_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199318_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:42.95 +22:50:16.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.332 3368229321938139136 106.67898529461 +22.83774460319 14.5177 14.0480 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 199472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:32.02 +22:51:09.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.856 3368232311235410688 106.38344810373 +22.85279151885 14.4001 13.7045 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.856#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 199851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
Preparing report for the candidate 199938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200095_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200095_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200282_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200282_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200367_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200367_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:27.73 +22:57:19.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200434_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200434_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200522_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200522_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 200940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.58 +24:13:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171432_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 171432_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70599_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 70599_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-11-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0455 did not pass the final checks
