This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 11.82 04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2
176.65047 -12.21915 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 0 1 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 52 02.80 +24 43 18.2 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 12.68 04:40:52.63 +25:16:16.4
174.58758 -13.85257 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 1 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:52.63 +25:16:16.4: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:52.63 +25:16:16.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 40 52.63 +25 16 16.4 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 13.55 04:35:07.67 +22:41:49.7
175.77438 -16.50556 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 11.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 1 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:07.67 +22:41:49.7: 16.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:07.67 +22:41:49.7: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 35 07.67 +22 41 49.7 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 13.61 04:52:53.45 +23:28:15.6
177.78527 -12.83091 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 11.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 0 0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:53.45 +23:28:15.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:53.45 +23:28:15.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 52 53.45 +23 28 15.6 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 14.02 04:37:54.92 +20:08:14.4
178.27721 -17.62313 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -1 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:54.92 +20:08:14.4: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:54.92 +20:08:14.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 37 54.92 +20 08 14.4 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 14.32 04:17:24.04 +24:26:48.0
171.58829 -18.40646 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 11.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:24.04 +24:26:48.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:24.04 +24:26:48.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 17 24.04 +24 26 48.0 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 14.38 04:39:36.55 +25:10:58.1
174.46962 -14.12997 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 11.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:36.55 +25:10:58.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:36.55 +25:10:58.1: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 39 36.55 +25 10 58.1 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.9647,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.4647 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.4647 2461291.9647 15.05 04:34:36.65 +18:02:43.6
179.48436 -19.54049 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 11.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-19xs
Type: CV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 g 18.300 g 0.085800000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:36.65 +18:02:43.6: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:36.65 +18:02:43.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.4647* 04 34 36.65 +18 02 43.6 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-19xs,2461291.9647,15.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-19xs 20260908.4647 15.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461291.96507752 08.09.2026 11:09:32.698 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10338
Objects passed selection criteria: 10311
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7902.25
Average stars matched: 7299.5 (92.3724 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 06:12:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461291.96507752 08.09.2026 11:09:32.698 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 127
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76201
Objects passed selection criteria: 75983
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59311.8
Average stars matched: 54746.2 (92.3025 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 291780 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 06:13:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.96424392
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.454 +22:00:04.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.454 +22:00:04.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.454 +22:00:04.36
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01869 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCeMZkvBNV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X8URFiDWE0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6WmHF7GwaD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7togA6HcXy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.oCeMZkvBNV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X8URFiDWE0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6WmHF7GwaD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=629, bad_region=3075, passed=9924
Got 9924 stars (including 6385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=7.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.113 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.441 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.479 +22:00:03.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9924 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3887171.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.113 -> 0.375 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1446 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1488 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7togA6HcXy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=636, bad_region=3081, passed=9967
Got 9967 stars (including 6405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=7.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.281 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.518 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.101 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.439 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.397
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.439 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1444 n_q2=1131 n_q3=1476 n_q4=818 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.094
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.9: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.51 +21:14:33.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5086 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4295 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.9: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4896 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.86 +24:18:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20728_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 20728_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.27 +17:54:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21278_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 21278_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21882_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21882_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21978_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21998_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21998_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.56 +20:15:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:52:02.80 +24:43:18.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.479 +22:00:03.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.479 +22:00:03.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0076 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.479 +22:00:03.55
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.352 +22:00:58.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01882 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztHn21Y03F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rzyXZ1P5Xy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NPxNCG9FhD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dyOaQpgpB0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ztHn21Y03F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rzyXZ1P5Xy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NPxNCG9FhD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4113, bad_region=15441, passed=64964
Got 64964 stars (including 46905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=7.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.401 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.399
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1466 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1496 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dyOaQpgpB0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4102, bad_region=15267, passed=64540
Got 64540 stars (including 46613 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=7.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.097 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.430 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.405
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.430 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1474 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1485 n_q4=818 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-08-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_061017_TTUQ2b1x1_3672457_Goswf0Es/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:37.56 +24:08:10.1: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:38.40 +18:39:21.3: 15.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:58.75 +23:37:03.0: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.3: 15.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:31.25 +20:25:44.7: 15.02 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:57.99 +20:47:13.5: 15.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:37.90 +22:25:10.8: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.85 +23:08:13.6: 14.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:08.86 +22:40:33.5: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:41.24 +23:28:46.7: 14.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:58.75 +23:37:03.0: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.3: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:38.40 +18:39:21.3: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:37.56 +24:08:10.1: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:37.90 +22:25:10.8: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:57.99 +20:47:13.5: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:31.25 +20:25:44.7: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.85 +23:08:13.6: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:08.86 +22:40:33.5: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:38.40 +18:39:21.3: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.2107 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:58.75 +23:37:03.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6861 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:57.99 +20:47:13.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0620 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.41 +25:10:25.3: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9671 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:37.90 +22:25:10.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0951 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:37.56 +24:08:10.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9161 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:08.86 +22:40:33.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0160 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.85 +23:08:13.6: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5773 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:31.25 +20:25:44.7: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9030 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:41.24 +23:28:46.7: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:41.24 +23:28:46.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5288 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:41.59 +23:57:26.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:24.97 +18:12:23.6: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:41.27 +25:30:54.2: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:56.03 +19:14:59.1: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:17.59 +20:33:29.4: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:41.70 +19:51:08.4: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:52.63 +25:16:16.4: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:41.59 +23:57:26.6: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:17.59 +20:33:29.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:41.27 +25:30:54.2: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:24.97 +18:12:23.6: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.59 +23:57:26.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7050 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:56.03 +19:14:59.1: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:41.70 +19:51:08.4: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:17.59 +20:33:29.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8283 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:41.27 +25:30:54.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2551 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:24.97 +18:12:23.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3766 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:56.03 +19:14:59.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4497 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:41.70 +19:51:08.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5318 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:52.63 +25:16:16.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:07.67 +22:41:49.7: 16.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:53.45 +23:28:15.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:40.77 +20:13:57.6: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:07.67 +22:41:49.7: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.9: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:54.92 +20:08:14.4: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:07.7: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:53.45 +23:28:15.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:40.77 +20:13:57.6: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:40.77 +20:13:57.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7728 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.07 +23:28:50.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.75 +24:00:00.4: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.9: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:54.92 +20:08:14.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8509 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:07.7: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:07.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9537 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.07 +23:28:50.2: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.07 +23:28:50.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1991 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.75 +24:00:00.4: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.75 +24:00:00.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1265 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:11.08 +23:04:45.3: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.03 +24:08:02.5: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:17.5: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.71 +20:33:17.2: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:11.08 +23:04:45.3: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:11.08 +23:04:45.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9963 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.03 +24:08:02.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:38.2: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.03 +24:08:02.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1582 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:24.04 +24:26:48.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:17.5: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:17.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2571 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.71 +20:33:17.2: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.71 +20:33:17.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2297 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:38.2: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:38.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2744 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:24.04 +24:26:48.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:36.55 +25:10:58.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:53.8: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3942 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.57 +23:59:01.6: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:36.55 +25:10:58.1: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:53.8: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:53.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2079 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.35 +17:51:20.9: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.57 +23:59:01.6: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.57 +23:59:01.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5543 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.35 +17:51:20.9: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:53.27 +24:49:15.0: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.35 +17:51:20.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4409 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:54.32 +20:03:34.0: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:53.27 +24:49:15.0: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:53.27 +24:49:15.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5703 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.34 +19:42:38.9: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:54.32 +20:03:34.0: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:54.32 +20:03:34.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5476 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:59.80 +23:02:15.4: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.34 +19:42:38.9: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.34 +19:42:38.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3565 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:59.80 +23:02:15.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:59.80 +23:02:15.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4486 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:10.36 +22:14:38.7: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.11 +22:09:14.1: 14.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:10.64 +20:42:18.1: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:10.36 +22:14:38.7: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:10.36 +22:14:38.7: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4736 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:00.73 +24:25:12.6: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.11 +22:09:14.1: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.11 +22:09:14.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7673 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:10.64 +20:42:18.1: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:10.64 +20:42:18.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8621 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:00.73 +24:25:12.6: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:00.73 +24:25:12.6: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8688 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:29.08 +17:54:15.8: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:38.52 +24:07:27.5: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:31.72 +21:09:35.9: 15.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:29.08 +17:54:15.8: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:20.04 +26:08:03.3: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:29.08 +17:54:15.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:38.52 +24:07:27.5: 15.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:38.52 +24:07:27.5: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9034 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:31.72 +21:09:35.9: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.72 +21:09:35.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9372 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:20.04 +26:08:03.3: 15.63 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:20.04 +26:08:03.3: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9645 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:26.24 +25:26:35.9: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:05.36 +21:33:49.4: 15.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:36.85 +21:08:34.2: 15.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:26.24 +25:26:35.9: 15.76 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:23.28 +22:09:07.5: 15.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:26.24 +25:26:35.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9477 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:05.36 +21:33:49.4: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:05.36 +21:33:49.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8984 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:36.85 +21:08:34.2: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:36.85 +21:08:34.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9894 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:23.28 +22:09:07.5: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:23.28 +22:09:07.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9735 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.61 +20:58:30.5: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:21.21 +19:10:26.3: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:41.15 +19:44:03.5: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:45.61 +20:58:30.5: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:49.82 +18:40:31.4: 14.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:21.21 +19:10:26.3: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.61 +20:58:30.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9667 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:21.21 +19:10:26.3: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0146 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:41.15 +19:44:03.5: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:41.15 +19:44:03.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0420 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:49.82 +18:40:31.4: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:49.82 +18:40:31.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8954 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:08.49 +20:39:42.7: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:19.33 +20:35:25.0: 15.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:52.25 +20:57:54.8: 15.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:31.04 +19:05:21.3: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:08.49 +20:39:42.7: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.85 +22:32:58.4: 15.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:19.33 +20:35:25.0: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:08.49 +20:39:42.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1242 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:19.33 +20:35:25.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0417 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:36.65 +18:02:43.6: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:52.25 +20:57:54.8: 15.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:31.04 +19:05:21.3: 15.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:52.25 +20:57:54.8: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1163 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:31.04 +19:05:21.3: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0387 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.85 +22:32:58.4: 15.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.85 +22:32:58.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0894 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:36.65 +18:02:43.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:58.45 +22:27:01.9: 15.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:42.54 +23:07:10.8: 15.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:34.72 +21:22:55.4: 15.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.1: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:43.73 +24:24:38.7: 15.96 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:58.45 +22:27:01.9: 15.78 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:58.45 +22:27:01.9: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1503 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:25.52 +22:55:44.4: 15.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:29.73 +21:16:53.8: 15.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:42.54 +23:07:10.8: 15.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:42.54 +23:07:10.8: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2298 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:17.30 +22:33:58.8: 15.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:34.72 +21:22:55.4: 15.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.1: 15.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:34.72 +21:22:55.4: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2101 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1513 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:43.73 +24:24:38.7: 15.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.80 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:43.73 +24:24:38.7: ref_mag=15.80 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2378 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:25.52 +22:55:44.4: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:29.73 +21:16:53.8: 15.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.52 +22:55:44.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1997 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:29.73 +21:16:53.8: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1495 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:17.30 +22:33:58.8: 15.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:17.30 +22:33:58.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1156 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:03.23 +24:54:35.2: 15.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:37.87 +22:31:29.5: 15.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.47 +20:35:37.0: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:55.02 +21:36:58.9: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:48.54 +21:12:03.7: 15.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:03.23 +24:54:35.2: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:03.23 +24:54:35.2: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2705 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:10.66 +22:31:20.5: 15.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:19.60 +18:29:50.9: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:37.84 +22:13:23.7: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.47 +20:35:37.0: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:37.87 +22:31:29.5: 15.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.47 +20:35:37.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9497 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:37.87 +22:31:29.5: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0611 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:55.02 +21:36:58.9: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:55.02 +21:36:58.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0378 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:48.54 +21:12:03.7: 15.73 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:48.54 +21:12:03.7: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1230 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:13.2: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:19.60 +18:29:50.9: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:10.66 +22:31:20.5: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:19.60 +18:29:50.9: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1606 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:10.66 +22:31:20.5: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1187 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:37.84 +22:13:23.7: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:37.84 +22:13:23.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0345 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:38.12 +20:05:47.7: 15.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:13.2: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:00.72 +19:12:13.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1782 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:41.42 +18:49:19.4: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:38.12 +20:05:47.7: 15.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:38.12 +20:05:47.7: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1669 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:41.42 +18:49:19.4: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:41.42 +18:49:19.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2168 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102490.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104924.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106271.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108085.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111800.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100432_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100432_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100439_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100439_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100465_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100465_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:29.27 +21:46:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100477_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100477_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:02.14 +24:43:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100485_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100485_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.87 +24:18:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101176_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 101176_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 101501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.79 +24:43:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 102146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.29 +19:28:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 102490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 102556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.16 +22:48:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103251_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 103251_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.44 +22:42:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 103802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 104094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.25 +19:58:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 104504_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.86 +21:31:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 104536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104568_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 104568_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:27.10 +19:11:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104648_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 104648_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.72 +22:10:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104818_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 104818_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.60 +21:52:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104924_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 104924_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105286_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 105286_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.06 +21:45:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105315_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 105315_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.53 +18:42:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 105332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 105700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.59 +17:55:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105775_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 105775_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:43.00 +22:12:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 106271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106416_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106416_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.89 +21:03:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106875_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106875_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.42 +23:36:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106963_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106963_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106994_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 106994_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.03 +20:19:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107005_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107005_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107007_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107007_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107183_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107183_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107377_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107377_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 107536_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 107681_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:31.23 +24:17:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108018_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108018_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108085_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 108085_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108180_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108180_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.17 +22:53:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108265_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108265_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.59 +23:36:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108624_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108624_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108723_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108723_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108817_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108817_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108864_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108864_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 108880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109387_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 109387_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.88 +23:58:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109526_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 109526_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109685_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 109685_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110365_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 110365_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 110479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110531_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 110531_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110790_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 110790_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110871_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 110871_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111060_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111060_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111096_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111096_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111105_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111105_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111124_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111124_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111233_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111233_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111426_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111426_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111533_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111533_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111600_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111600_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111627_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111627_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111657_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111657_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111692_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111692_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 111800_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111904_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111904_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111954_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111954_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 111959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112009_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112009_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112026_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112026_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112040_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112040_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112105_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112105_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112147_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112147_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112153_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112153_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112165_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112168_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112168_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112210_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112210_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112290_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112290_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112296_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112296_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:35.01 +20:26:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 112475_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.41 +24:28:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_06-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
