######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 601907 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 601907 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1670.6963
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 554.5807
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1074.8298
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 495.4424
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1075.3178
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 494.6240
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.643342
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-08T04:43:54.9596290' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-08T09:43:54.9596290' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61291.4054972106 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-08T09:44:04.8635797' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61291.4056118401 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.999495518592 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000248062405 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.3097222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.06166666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.03656778744482 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits :)
Spent 0.535636 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-08T04:45:02.3738835' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-08T09:45:02.3738835' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61291.4062774652 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-08T09:45:12.2740639' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61291.4063920602 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.999495532622 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000248913711 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.3225 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.08694444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.03576574168676 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits :)
Spent 0.525830 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.90561295
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94
Second-epoch image center 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94
Second-epoch image center 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00900 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1K9HUz6r4m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vP6xYxaFby
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lNepMQurES
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8mWPrYxNpf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec +77.2225 to +89.8322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec 77.2225 to 89.8322 deg
Loaded 21381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5420 out of 5647 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5647 out of 6849 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.853150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.853150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec +77.2225 to +89.8322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec 77.2225 to 89.8322 deg
Loaded 21381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5420 out of 5647 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5647 out of 6849 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 8333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4452 to 324.7233 deg, Dec +76.9983 to +89.8805 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4452 to 324.7233 deg, Dec 76.9983 to 89.8805 deg
Loaded 22550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5987 out of 6211 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6211 out of 8333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
15.0 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.1K9HUz6r4m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, bad_region=0, passed=6849
Got 6849 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0234 through 0 to 179.9707, gap 179.9707 to 180.0234
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0231 through 0 to 179.9708, gap 179.9708 to 180.0231
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1252 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vP6xYxaFby (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=512, bad_region=0, passed=8333
Got 8333 stars (including 7805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0230 through 0 to 179.9701, gap 179.9701 to 180.0230
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0206 through 0 to 179.9702, gap 179.9702 to 180.0206
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1281 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lNepMQurES (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=411, bad_region=0, passed=8776
Got 8776 stars (including 8357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0287 through 0 to 179.9718, gap 179.9718 to 180.0287
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0265 through 0 to 179.9704, gap 179.9704 to 180.0265
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=10.809 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.011 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=0.895 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.271 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.315 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.315 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1060 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8mWPrYxNpf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, bad_region=0, passed=8733
Got 8733 stars (including 8313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0283 through 0 to 179.9720, gap 179.9720 to 180.0283
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0247 through 0 to 179.9699, gap 179.9699 to 180.0247
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=10.850 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.103 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=0.905 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.271 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.321 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1061 n_q3=1413 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.202
ref2=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.090
new1=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.140
new2=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.116
reference average sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 11:44:13.33 +84:10:23.1: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 11:44:13.33 +84:10:23.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:44:13.33 +84:10:23.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6196 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21662_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 21662_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 11.57 | 11:44:13.07 +84:10:24.6 | 4566 2696 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 11.69 | 11:44:13.60 +84:10:21.6 | 4566 2690 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21670_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 21670_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 11.20 | 17:10:34.65 +83:50:29.6 | 8348 5550 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 17:10:34.71 +83:50:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94
Second-epoch image center 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94
Second-epoch image center 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:04.605 +85:00:04.15
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:07.876 +85:00:36.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00900 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1faMKc330l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x7a8lGoI2V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H5M484eRIW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPlIoCktDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec +77.0878 to +89.9623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec 77.0878 to 89.9623 deg
Loaded 25682 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6015 out of 6573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6573 out of 41325 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.702900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.702900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec +77.0878 to +89.9623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec 77.0878 to 89.9623 deg
Loaded 25682 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6015 out of 6573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6573 out of 41325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 52763 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 7.1598 to 354.2235 deg, Dec +76.9098 to +89.9629 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 7.1598 to 354.2235 deg, Dec 76.9098 to 89.9629 deg
Loaded 27007 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6012 out of 6623 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6623 out of 52763 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
15.1 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1faMKc330l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1852, bad_region=0, passed=41308
Got 41308 stars (including 39383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0064 through 0 to 179.9931, gap 179.9931 to 180.0064
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0070 through 0 to 179.9935, gap 179.9935 to 180.0070
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4933 stars left (next iteration limit 5426)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=4933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1229 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.x7a8lGoI2V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2240, bad_region=19, passed=52747
Got 52747 stars (including 50384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0011 through 0 to 179.9997, gap 179.9997 to 180.0011
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0012 through 0 to 179.9985, gap 179.9985 to 180.0012
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1292 n_q3=1186 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.H5M484eRIW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1750, bad_region=33, passed=42543
Got 42543 stars (including 40713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0009 through 0 to 179.9945, gap 179.9945 to 180.0009
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0205 through 0 to 179.9937, gap 179.9937 to 180.0205
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=10.821 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=0.904 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.315 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.325
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.315 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1422 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WPlIoCktDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1747, bad_region=37, passed=42463
Got 42463 stars (including 40629 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42463 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0124 through 0 to 179.9928, gap 179.9928 to 180.0124
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0044 through 0 to 179.9912, gap 179.9912 to 180.0044
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=10.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.753 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.327 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=0.913 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.315 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.327
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.315 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1425 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:48:49.06 +85:50:06.7: 14.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:49:46.79 +81:18:41.5: 14.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:54:44.63 +83:27:48.7: 14.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 06:59:54.37 +82:18:40.6: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 15:02:42.51 +80:43:38.8: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 05:48:12.14 +83:33:20.5: 13.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:40:14.34 +82:39:21.5: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:54:44.63 +83:27:48.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:44.63 +83:27:48.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:49:46.79 +81:18:41.5: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 15:02:42.51 +80:43:38.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:48:49.06 +85:50:06.7: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:40:14.34 +82:39:21.5: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 06:59:54.37 +82:18:40.6: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 05:48:12.14 +83:33:20.5: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:49:46.79 +81:18:41.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7181 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:49.06 +85:50:06.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4004 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:42.51 +80:43:38.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7101 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:14.34 +82:39:21.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0575 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:54.37 +82:18:40.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1140 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:12.14 +83:33:20.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1272 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:10:50.45 +83:01:43.1: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 16:11:47.20 +87:29:57.2: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:51:06.95 +82:40:04.9: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:10:50.45 +83:01:43.1: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:50.45 +83:01:43.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0266 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 06:41:39.24 +82:33:05.5: 14.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 06:27:49.88 +83:18:38.2: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:53:30.87 +82:26:33.5: 14.43 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 06:44:22.84 +83:04:40.6: 14.69 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 16:11:47.20 +87:29:57.2: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:53:30.87 +82:26:33.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:30.87 +82:26:33.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:47.20 +87:29:57.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9098 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:51:06.95 +82:40:04.9: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:06.95 +82:40:04.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2624 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:53:56.52 +83:37:56.4: 14.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:53:56.52 +83:37:56.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:56.52 +83:37:56.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 06:41:39.24 +82:33:05.5: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:39.24 +82:33:05.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4335 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 06:27:49.88 +83:18:38.2: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:30:20.30 +83:26:09.4: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:49.88 +83:18:38.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2903 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 06:44:22.84 +83:04:40.6: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:22.84 +83:04:40.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2994 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:28:33.72 +82:31:02.5: 14.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:30:20.30 +83:26:09.4: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:20.30 +83:26:09.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3682 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:18:54.50 +82:40:33.8: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 09:06:30.73 +80:57:53.2: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:25:43.28 +82:16:07.3: 14.78 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:31:55.29 +82:06:26.3: 14.75 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:35:50.92 +81:13:31.0: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:28:33.72 +82:31:02.5: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:33.72 +82:31:02.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4420 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:53:47.58 +83:06:33.7: 14.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:53:47.58 +83:06:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:47.58 +83:06:33.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:48:17.64 +82:09:51.2: 14.67 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:18:54.50 +82:40:33.8: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:54.50 +82:40:33.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3692 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 09:06:30.73 +80:57:53.2: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:25:43.28 +82:16:07.3: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:06:30.73 +80:57:53.2: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2115 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:43.28 +82:16:07.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3620 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:31:55.29 +82:06:26.3: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:55.29 +82:06:26.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3526 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:35:50.92 +81:13:31.0: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:35:50.92 +81:13:31.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2749 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 09:31:40.07 +82:31:15.5: 14.82 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:48:17.64 +82:09:51.2: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:17.64 +82:09:51.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4014 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 10:04:12.99 +84:38:53.2: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 09:31:40.07 +82:31:15.5: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 09:26:16.49 +83:11:33.1: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:40.07 +82:31:15.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3097 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:53:31.02 +82:58:27.1: 14.59 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:20:11.08 +82:31:39.9: 14.82 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:53:31.02 +82:58:27.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:31.02 +82:58:27.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 10:04:12.99 +84:38:53.2: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:04:12.99 +84:38:53.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3774 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 09:26:16.49 +83:11:33.1: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:20:11.08 +82:31:39.9: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:26:16.49 +83:11:33.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2902 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:11.08 +82:31:39.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3039 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63289_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63289_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.36 | 07:48:49.03 +85:50:06.4 | 2481 4970 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.46 | 07:48:49.09 +85:50:07.0 | 2481 4965 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63294_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63294_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 13.76 | 15:02:42.76 +80:43:38.1 | 8831 2444 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.68 | 15:02:42.27 +80:43:39.5 | 8830 2438 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63296_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63296_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.06 | 17:54:44.67 +83:27:48.5 | 8647 6281 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.34 | 17:54:44.58 +83:27:48.9 | 8647 6275 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63301_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63301_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.16 | 06:59:55.62 +82:18:40.2 | 0209 4828 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.09 | 06:59:53.12 +82:18:41.0 | 0209 4825 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63302_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63302_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.07 | 07:40:14.80 +82:39:21.0 | 0717 4166 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.04 | 07:40:13.87 +82:39:21.9 | 0717 4162 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63303_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63303_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.16 | 05:48:11.45 +83:33:18.6 | 0748 6266 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.10 | 05:48:12.83 +83:33:22.3 | 0749 6261 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63306_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63306_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 13.64 | 08:49:46.88 +81:18:41.5 | 0937 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.82 | 08:49:46.69 +81:18:41.4 | 0936 2503 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63313_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63313_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 10.59 | 08:03:07.51 +81:03:29.5 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63328_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63328_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 11.72 | 10:03:00.21 +80:20:51.3 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63340_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63340_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 12.41 | 09:32:33.09 +77:49:52.0 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63347_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63347_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 12.81 | 08:09:42.05 +81:42:13.6 | 0538 3342 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 08:09:41.85 +81:42:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63364_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63364_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.38 | 07:24:21.41 +81:55:39.2 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63373_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63373_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.07 | 09:52:13.19 +80:08:48.3 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63376_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63376_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.46 | 06:35:31.95 +83:27:36.3 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63382_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63382_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.26 | 09:26:44.11 +79:22:19.6 | 0884 0997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63386_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63386_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.41 | 07:49:02.12 +81:48:34.5 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63387_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63387_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.32 | 07:03:22.74 +82:20:38.2 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63390_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63390_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.45 | 08:28:19.51 +84:52:02.0 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63394_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63394_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.53 | 08:19:50.24 +82:36:21.5 | 1110 3496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63395_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63395_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.32 | 15:23:26.75 +81:20:48.4 | 8855 3055 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 15:23:26.93 +81:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63396_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63396_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.13 | 09:45:51.83 +78:25:13.7 | 1029 0203 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63397_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63397_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.32 | 09:02:24.83 +81:12:27.8 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63399_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63399_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.62 | 08:41:32.94 +80:09:33.6 | 0284 2160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63401_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63401_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.42 | 08:57:29.98 +79:14:14.1 | 0189 1455 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63403_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63403_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.49 | 08:54:52.16 +82:12:29.3 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63406_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63406_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.42 | 08:17:32.80 +81:53:24.2 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63407_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63407_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.66 | 08:02:49.69 +81:11:57.8 | 0193 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63410_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63410_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.27 | 10:10:55.17 +79:12:36.7 | 1913 0287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63417_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63417_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.56 | 09:19:44.65 +79:46:22.4 | 0877 1308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63424_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63424_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 13.95 | 07:10:50.57 +83:01:41.9 | 0696 4767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.13 | 07:10:50.32 +83:01:44.2 | 0697 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63426_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63426_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.71 | 06:38:43.08 +85:16:31.2 | 1871 5615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63433_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63433_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.90 | 06:26:08.66 +84:48:24.6 | 1559 5727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63436_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63436_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.26 | 05:50:48.14 +86:03:37.5 | 2283 6211 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63443_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63443_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 13.91 | 16:11:47.85 +87:29:57.0 | 6042 5574 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.91 | 16:11:46.55 +87:29:57.4 | 6042 5568 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63448_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63448_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.56 | 09:03:12.55 +79:11:36.9 | 0292 1326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63449_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63449_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.21 | 06:21:40.05 +83:29:05.8 | 0747 5682 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63457_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63457_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.84 | 09:33:32.04 +79:45:30.4 | 1175 1084 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63464_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63464_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.29 | 06:32:00.96 +83:34:07.5 | 0828 5514 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 06:32:00.99 +83:34:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63470_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63470_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.15 | 07:51:07.10 +82:40:04.6 | 0827 3985 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.51 | 07:51:06.79 +82:40:05.2 | 0827 3981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63479_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63479_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.21 | 06:18:25.50 +85:07:59.2 | 1741 5856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 06:18:26.39 +85:07:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63481_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63481_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.33 | 05:48:46.45 +84:15:48.6 | 1184 6246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63486_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63486_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.39 | 06:41:38.91 +82:33:05.8 | 0252 5221 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.58 | 06:41:39.57 +82:33:05.2 | 0252 5217 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63488_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63488_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.29 | 06:27:50.20 +83:18:38.0 | 0658 5564 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.29 | 06:27:49.56 +83:18:38.4 | 0658 5559 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63490_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63490_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.58 | 07:36:17.33 +82:28:26.0 | 0582 4181 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 07:36:17.54 +82:28:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63495_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63495_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.30 | 06:44:22.68 +83:04:40.7 | 0580 5243 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.30 | 06:44:23.00 +83:04:40.5 | 0580 5238 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63496_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63496_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.06 | 17:53:30.09 +82:26:33.2 | 9277 6268 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.05 | 17:53:31.65 +82:26:33.7 | 9277 6262 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63498_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63498_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.84 | 07:26:50.82 +84:46:04.8 | 1779 4918 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63501_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63501_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.05 | 17:53:57.11 +83:37:58.4 | 8543 6266 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.90 | 17:53:55.93 +83:37:54.4 | 8544 6259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63510_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63510_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.09 | 17:26:33.35 +82:09:37.0 | 9417 5701 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 17:26:33.18 +82:09:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63511_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63511_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.32 | 07:30:20.73 +83:26:09.5 | 1064 4539 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.44 | 07:30:19.87 +83:26:09.3 | 1063 4534 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63514_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63514_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.32 | 07:21:58.33 +83:06:32.6 | 0819 4590 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63521_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63521_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.38 | 07:28:33.38 +82:31:03.7 | 0539 4335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.59 | 07:28:34.05 +82:31:01.4 | 0538 4331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63535_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63535_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.22 | 08:21:59.86 +83:18:37.8 | 1475 3725 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63536_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63536_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.31 | 08:18:54.84 +82:40:35.3 | 1134 3541 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.48 | 08:18:54.16 +82:40:32.3 | 1133 3536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63540_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63540_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.21 | 09:06:30.90 +80:57:53.1 | 1080 2087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.22 | 09:06:30.57 +80:57:53.3 | 1079 2083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63556_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63556_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.29 | 08:25:42.77 +82:16:07.6 | 1021 3282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.48 | 08:25:43.78 +82:16:06.9 | 1021 3277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63571_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63571_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.35 | 08:31:54.81 +82:06:27.9 | 1028 3122 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.36 | 08:31:55.77 +82:06:24.6 | 1027 3116 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63574_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63574_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.29 | 08:35:50.69 +81:13:31.8 | 0677 2705 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.26 | 08:35:51.15 +81:13:30.1 | 0676 2700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63578_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63578_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.20 | 17:53:48.15 +83:06:34.0 | 8865 6268 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.31 | 17:53:47.02 +83:06:33.4 | 8865 6261 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63580_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63580_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.22 | 09:10:26.18 +84:58:54.5 | 2721 3885 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63584_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63584_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.32 | 08:48:17.78 +82:09:53.1 | 1285 2895 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.55 | 08:48:17.49 +82:09:49.3 | 1284 2890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63602_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63602_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.50 | 08:51:39.73 +79:31:43.6 | 0195 1697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63610_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63610_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.32 | 09:31:40.11 +82:31:16.4 | 2096 2499 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.30 | 09:31:40.02 +82:31:14.5 | 2095 2494 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63615_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63615_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.08 | 09:04:22.85 +81:04:44.2 | 1087 2168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63618_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63618_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.31 | 10:04:12.90 +84:38:51.7 | 3224 3321 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.48 | 10:04:13.08 +84:38:54.7 | 3223 3317 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63624_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63624_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.29 | 09:26:17.05 +83:11:34.5 | 2249 2888 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.29 | 09:26:15.94 +83:11:31.7 | 2248 2883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63647_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63647_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.26 | 17:20:11.32 +82:31:40.7 | 9174 5605 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.37 | 17:20:10.83 +82:31:39.1 | 9174 5598 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63667_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63667_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 08.40561 | 2461291.90561 | 14.29 | 17:53:31.26 +82:58:27.4 | 8949 6264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-43-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.23 | 17:53:30.79 +82:58:26.8 | 8949 6258 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63724_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63724_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 14.03 | 09:43:28.59 +78:51:17.9 | 1108 0468 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09940_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 09940_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 13.37 | 12:37:04.17 +82:16:38.8 | 5595 1640 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32368_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 32368_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 08.40639 | 2461291.90639 | 11.22 | 17:10:34.58 +83:50:29.6 | 8348 5550 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_044542_TTUQ1b1x1_1693774_E3SAHDWl/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_04-45-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits |
**** FOUND 17:10:34.65 +83:50:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461291.90561295 -observatory V36
11:45:51.54 +02:35:29.5 Mercury (-0.8mag)
13:38:50.61 -14:56:05.8 Venus (-4.7mag)
07:16:58.99 +22:54:35.0 Mars (1.2mag)
09:09:57.79 +16:53:41.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:28.50 +02:36:48.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:42.00 +21:02:01.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:38.49 -00:03:56.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:31.04 -23:39:52.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
08:53:55.14 +18:58:36.7 Moon (-9.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 8 04:46 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461291.90561295:
09:10:01.54 +16:53:24.2 Io (6.2mag)
09:09:52.99 +16:54:05.9 Europa (6.3mag)
09:09:52.41 +16:54:07.5 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:09:39.53 +16:55:12.7 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:07:46.28 +17:10:43.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:09:56.74 +16:53:46.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:07:22.84 +17:04:39.0 Elara (17.7mag)
09:13:49.83 +16:20:56.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:10:58.01 +17:11:46.4 Carme (19.0mag)
00:51:19.39 +02:37:09.7 Titan (8.3mag)
00:51:29.07 +02:36:27.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:51:40.73 +02:39:13.4 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:51:44.20 +02:36:23.8 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:50:14.11 +02:26:26.4 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 8 04:46 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461291.90561295:
22:12:39.49 +02:08:34.4 JWST
08:59:23.32 +05:02:23.9 Chandra
06:46:18.94 +07:19:38.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 8 04:46 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461291.90561295 -observatory V36
03:41:04.27 +19:23:29.0 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:18.46 -34:11:25.9 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:20:18.47 -70:21:46.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:49.03 +33:43:44.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:52:59.20 +45:38:34.1 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:52:59.20 +45:38:34.1 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:52:59.20 +45:38:34.1 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:52:59.20 +45:38:34.1 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:52:59.20 +45:38:34.1 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:12:36.14 +28:32:05.4 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:11:02.14 +25:57:29.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:50:31.23 +27:11:11.0 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:49:22.48 +05:13:37.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:29:14.40 -15:44:47.3 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:39:21.74 +32:57:39.8 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:44.24 +15:18:36.2 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:32:55.17 +43:07:56.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:24:39.39 +49:14:29.7 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:36:11.67 -13:02:30.4 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:12:00.56 +18:19:17.2 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:19:46.20 +18:40:57.5 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:20:32.40 +00:01:36.6 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:44:18.29 +73:51:01.6 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:14.34 +46:06:00.0 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:14:18.05 +11:22:25.5 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:26:54.67 -35:06:37.9 13.4mag 10P/Tempel
01:21:12.87 +37:15:30.8 17.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:48:54.90 -05:33:05.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:10:48.29 -05:26:43.3 17.6mag 63P/Wild
00:44:02.91 -07:08:26.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:41:28.45 +19:10:02.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:17:19.82 +15:00:42.7 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:41:54.77 +29:03:17.9 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:35:05.41 +24:31:55.3 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:30:22.21 +20:37:56.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:49:02.66 -21:43:28.2 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:18:45.43 +20:36:17.8 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:27:50.35 -17:28:38.4 15.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:35:47.44 +13:02:58.5 12.1mag 169P/NEAT
03:25:21.39 +08:22:59.9 14.5mag 220P/McNaught
04:51:03.51 +36:40:04.9 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:34:51.04 +35:35:00.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:25:57.38 -00:22:24.8 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:28:44.58 +16:47:37.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Sep 8 04:46 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 8 04:46 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 8 04:46 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:14:17.800 +05:25:54.92 AT 2026yri 2026-08-09.85 22.24
23:46:15.460 +04:59:58.22 AT 2026yrh 2026-08-09.84 22.79
23:45:31.680 +04:12:25.91 AT 2026yrg 2026-08-09.84 22.24
23:34:02.330 +05:36:00.22 AT 2026yrf 2026-08-09.84 22.45
23:38:02.390 +00:14:40.53 AT 2026yre 2026-08-09.84 22.14
23:18:04.980 -00:02:33.02 AT 2026yrd 2026-08-09.84 22.73
23:23:35.450 +01:51:19.14 AT 2026yrc 2026-08-09.84 22.04
02:27:46.320 +06:27:55.03 AT 2026yrb 2026-08-08.89 21.91
01:42:01.270 +05:25:04.33 AT 2026yra 2026-08-08.88 22.29
01:29:31.810 +00:24:39.44 AT 2026yqz 2026-08-08.88 21.48
01:23:28.630 -00:36:31.37 AT 2026yqy 2026-08-08.87 21.73
01:51:19.720 +05:16:35.98 AT 2026yqx 2026-08-06.88 21.88
00:57:23.960 +00:53:10.73 AT 2026yqw 2026-08-06.86 21.88
01:42:48.000 +01:40:21.94 AT 2026yqv 2026-08-06.85 21.59
01:31:04.960 +05:16:26.69 AT 2026yqu 2026-08-06.84 22.08
01:32:45.190 +05:46:00.54 AT 2026yqt 2026-08-06.84 21.93
01:00:35.640 -00:42:49.92 AT 2026yqs 2026-08-06.84 21.85
23:40:09.820 +04:52:55.41 AT 2026yqr 2026-08-06.82 21.72
00:20:42.880 -00:04:24.55 AT 2026yqq 2026-08-06.76 21.86
23:35:40.200 +05:59:50.67 AT 2026yqp 2026-08-04.81 21.62
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 8 04:46 tns_transients_list.txt