This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461291.8253,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260908.3253 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461291.8253,9.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260908.3253 9.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3253 2461291.8253 12.85 05:36:24.55 +23:58:44.6
183.12304 -4.36849 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -1 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:24.55 +23:58:44.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:24.55 +23:58:44.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 36 24.55 +23 58 44.6 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8253,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3253 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3253 2461291.8253 13.29 05:13:30.65 +17:20:39.8
185.77207 -12.48060 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso -1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.65 +17:20:39.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.65 +17:20:39.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 13 30.65 +17 20 39.8 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8253,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3253 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3253 2461291.8253 13.58 05:25:35.29 +20:17:59.2
184.87370 -8.46575 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX20" ZTF J052536.20+201814.7
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.684 r Y 0.158 r 2458585.63580 0.290012200000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -0 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:35.29 +20:17:59.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:35.29 +20:17:59.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 25 35.29 +20 17 59.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J052536.20+201814.7,2461291.8253,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J052536.20+201814.7 20260908.3253 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3253 2461291.8253 12.48 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5
187.11900 -2.09533 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0553506+214506
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.070 g Y 0.374 g 2458351.71510 161.339571800000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3253* 05 53 50.63 +21 45 09.5 12.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0553506+214506,2461291.8253,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0553506+214506 20260908.3253 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461291.82563405 08.09.2026 07:48:44.782 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20337
Objects passed selection criteria: 20259
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15639.5
Average stars matched: 15416 (98.5709 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 02:51:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461291.82563405 08.09.2026 07:48:44.782 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150962
Objects passed selection criteria: 150592
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 115721
Average stars matched: 112128 (96.8953 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 02:53:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.82496137
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 943.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.213 +21:59:39.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.213 +21:59:39.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.213 +21:59:39.25
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01586 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JKRMdlG4hV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zkYjqGcwsh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WnJHBBKql8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jBaa0OeOIZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.JKRMdlG4hV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zkYjqGcwsh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WnJHBBKql8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=0, passed=9472
Got 9472 stars (including 9049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=8.697 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.753 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4724 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.588 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.497
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 943.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.251 +21:59:38.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9472 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky402605.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.033 -> 0.385 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4724 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=973 n_q2=1387 n_q3=826 n_q4=1538 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jBaa0OeOIZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, bad_region=0, passed=9523
Got 9523 stars (including 9069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=8.935 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.701 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4726 robust_rms_before=1.013 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.584 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.532
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.584 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4726 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=984 n_q2=1387 n_q3=823 n_q4=1532 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.301
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.274
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (4724 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4726 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 30822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.64 +19:28:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.42 +19:25:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.46 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.96 +20:10:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.10 +17:45:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.38 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.40 +20:16:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.00 +23:15:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 943.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.251 +21:59:38.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.251 +21:59:38.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.251 +21:59:38.18
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:23.164 +21:58:59.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01555 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sBHSIVTx08
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4iY2nzRKRt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JzRhkuY79e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nM8f3YDYRM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 140 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sBHSIVTx08 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4iY2nzRKRt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JzRhkuY79e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3320, bad_region=8, passed=66992
Got 66992 stars (including 63568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013101 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010481 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=9.070 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.590 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.757 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4723 robust_rms_before=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.503 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.503 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=997 n_q2=1324 n_q3=843 n_q4=1559 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nM8f3YDYRM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3420, bad_region=10, passed=67647
Got 67647 stars (including 64128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67647 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=9.190 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.531 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.513
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.531 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=993 n_q2=1334 n_q3=844 n_q4=1550 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-47-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024927_TTUQ1b1x1_282322_wuQKrfMK/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:40.95 +19:19:58.4: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:46.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:14.52 +20:39:01.2: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:17.19 +18:20:15.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:07.83 +24:25:08.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:40.95 +19:19:58.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:46.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:40.95 +19:19:58.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2063 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.09 +19:55:46.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3768 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:14.52 +20:39:01.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:17.19 +18:20:15.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:07.83 +24:25:08.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.0: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.52 +20:39:01.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0608 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:17.19 +18:20:15.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8919 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.83 +24:25:08.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0496 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.0: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2684 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.8: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2781 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:11.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:41.68 +23:02:26.1: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:11.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:11.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5274 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:41.68 +23:02:26.1: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:41.68 +23:02:26.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7973 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:24.55 +23:58:44.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:22.96 +26:25:59.6: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.32 +24:18:47.2: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:24.55 +23:58:44.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:22.96 +26:25:59.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:22.96 +26:25:59.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7483 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.32 +24:18:47.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.32 +24:18:47.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8692 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:13.02 +20:07:35.2: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:22.00 +17:52:58.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:02.95 +18:33:59.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:13.02 +20:07:35.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:22.00 +17:52:58.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:13.02 +20:07:35.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9770 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:22.00 +17:52:58.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0512 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.72 +22:34:33.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:02.95 +18:33:59.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:02.95 +18:33:59.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9068 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.72 +22:34:33.1: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.72 +22:34:33.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9360 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2895 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:52.55 +27:10:50.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.65 +17:20:39.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:46.89 +22:42:22.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:40.15 +23:42:09.0: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:52.55 +27:10:50.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.65 +17:20:39.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:52.55 +27:10:50.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:46.89 +22:42:22.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:46.89 +22:42:22.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2161 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:40.15 +23:42:09.0: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:40.15 +23:42:09.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2076 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:15.73 +25:11:35.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:56.19 +22:27:00.7: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:35.29 +20:17:59.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:04.90 +23:13:53.3: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:33.68 +21:19:55.2: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:15.73 +25:11:35.9: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:56.19 +22:27:00.7: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:15.73 +25:11:35.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6550 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:56.19 +22:27:00.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6749 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:35.29 +20:17:59.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:04.90 +23:13:53.3: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:33.68 +21:19:55.2: 16.14 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:04.90 +23:13:53.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9134 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:33.68 +21:19:55.2: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2173 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4773 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:47.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:47.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:47.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8071 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out191986.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:16.23 +23:41:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.36 +19:47:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.24 +17:57:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:55.27 +23:19:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.33 +18:25:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:16.72 +26:53:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.98 +25:15:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:41.33 +23:23:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.92 +23:00:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190607_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190607_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.88 +24:49:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:43.88 +24:25:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:54.38 +18:06:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.88 +20:08:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.70 +16:41:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.93 +26:19:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190876_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190876_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.68 +26:44:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190954_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190954_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.82 +25:55:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190983_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190983_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.83 +23:48:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190984_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 190984_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.72 +22:27:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.93 +26:25:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.02 +18:33:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191090_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191090_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.79 +26:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191097_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191097_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.96 +23:48:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.21 +18:59:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:33.00 +16:41:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.95 +20:10:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191250_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191250_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.14 +20:26:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.82 +25:24:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191282_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191282_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.10 +23:12:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191286_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191286_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.85 +18:25:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191299_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191299_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.24 +22:45:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.91 +26:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191304_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191304_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.73 +21:51:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191306_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191306_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.76 +22:03:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.41 +18:33:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.78 +22:40:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191340_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191340_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.65 +22:27:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.71 +21:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191394_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191394_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.14 +25:24:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.15 +23:00:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.66 +25:09:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:33.95 +18:37:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.87 +23:55:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.58 +20:02:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.75 +19:32:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191430_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191430_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.16 +20:53:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191440_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191440_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:00.30 +25:58:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.98 +19:35:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191463_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191463_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.67 +22:22:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.43 +20:26:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191496_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191496_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.50 +24:25:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191502_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191502_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.29 +18:40:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191507_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.33 +26:25:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191516_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191516_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191527_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191527_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.78 +23:11:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191528_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191528_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.30 +25:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:29.37 +19:49:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.41 +19:41:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.09 +25:25:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.68 +22:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.86 +17:11:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.22 +23:07:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.43 +20:56:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.44 +25:08:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191671_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191671_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.68 +23:19:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.36 +20:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191699_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191699_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.45 +20:26:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.00 +20:15:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191717_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191717_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:49.07 +24:13:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191732_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.05 +22:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.36 +18:54:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191751_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191751_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.58 +25:41:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.77 +24:21:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191838_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191838_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.05 +24:22:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191859_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.31 +24:57:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191892_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 191892_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.68 +21:19:55.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.572 3402328372970039680 080.89023347333 +21.33212891955 14.6607 13.1785 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.93 +23:05:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.41 +20:16:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.71 +20:01:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.07 +24:59:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.42 +26:13:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.75 +23:10:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.10 +24:10:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:46.80 +22:35:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.16 +17:07:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.32 +20:19:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.72 +19:21:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.53 +21:25:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.14 +17:59:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.70 +22:47:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.17 +20:22:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.36 +25:01:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.45 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.09 +17:45:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.42 +19:25:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.73 +16:57:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.05 +21:51:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.39 +23:51:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.56 +19:44:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.85 +21:13:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.50 +20:28:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.95 +21:55:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.95 +20:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.40 +20:16:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.00 +23:15:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.09 +20:08:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.03 +17:43:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-48-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
