This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2635 2461291.7635 11.86 20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5
39.45478 -31.43066 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.7635,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.2635 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2635 2461291.7635 13.18 20:53:05.85 -12:51:09.3
34.77735 -32.73168 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:05.85 -12:51:09.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:05.85 -12:51:09.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.7635,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.2635 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2635 2461291.7635 13.18 20:33:45.52 -10:23:42.1
35.06644 -27.40269 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:45.52 -10:23:42.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:45.52 -10:23:42.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.2635* 20 33 45.52 -10 23 42.1 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.7635,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.2635 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2635 2461291.7635 13.80 20:40:47.74 -06:46:47.6
39.58460 -27.36839 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia 0 -1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:47.74 -06:46:47.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:47.74 -06:46:47.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.7635,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.2635 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461291.76375867 08.09.2026 06:19:38.749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10549
Objects passed selection criteria: 10543
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9644.5
Average stars matched: 9403.5 (97.5012 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 01:28:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461291.76375867 08.09.2026 06:19:38.749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 119
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70476
Objects passed selection criteria: 70360
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65133.5
Average stars matched: 62916.8 (96.5966 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 533472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 01:30:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.76325346
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00956 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9mH2hd8a0Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2pGP6HqdDq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6mr9ZTkHKH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hRu8nKdtSS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9mH2hd8a0Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=3560, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 10329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2pGP6HqdDq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=3538, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 10373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6mr9ZTkHKH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=601, bad_region=2320, passed=10804
Got 10804 stars (including 8031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10804 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=6.692 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.987 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.745 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.429 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1541 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1428 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hRu8nKdtSS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=617, bad_region=2306, passed=10760
Got 10760 stars (including 7996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=6.608 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.746 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.429 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=1536 n_q2=1007 n_q3=1427 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.103
reference average sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.1505
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.2: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.2: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.2: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4503 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 20680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20829_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 20829_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.65 -07:32:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20859_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
Preparing report for the candidate 20859_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08626_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 08626_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:58.74 -10:43:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.32 -07:21:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:55:13.39 -08:42:52.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.689 -09:59:46.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.100 -10:00:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00956 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eKlSJj7pQs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ejPDRkITS1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.elLqqsgZAo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLcKiuQVND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eKlSJj7pQs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6181, bad_region=22296, passed=95415
Got 95415 stars (including 68383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1535 n_q2=964 n_q3=1443 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ejPDRkITS1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6280, bad_region=22525, passed=95786
Got 95786 stars (including 68372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1544 n_q2=948 n_q3=1446 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.elLqqsgZAo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5084, bad_region=11182, passed=68753
Got 68753 stars (including 54327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=6.567 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.754 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.419 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.401
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=1582 n_q2=957 n_q3=1472 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gLcKiuQVND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=5226, bad_region=11369, passed=69608
Got 69608 stars (including 54964 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69608 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=6.423 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.806 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.753 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.426 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.397
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=1577 n_q2=960 n_q3=1475 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-18-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_012507_TTUQ2b1x1_1936461_u4un6ytO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:38.04 -13:57:26.0: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:38.91 -08:20:48.5: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:10.95 -13:16:28.3: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:52.46 -12:23:08.1: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:52.26 -13:03:48.5: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:39.03 -12:50:29.5: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:11.36 -09:57:38.0: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:06.73 -10:33:39.2: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:32.83 -12:11:01.7: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:59.66 -12:04:14.0: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:10.95 -13:16:28.3: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:38.91 -08:20:48.5: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:38.04 -13:57:26.0: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:52.46 -12:23:08.1: 14.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:11.36 -09:57:38.0: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:52.26 -13:03:48.5: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:32.83 -12:11:01.7: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:06.73 -10:33:39.2: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:10.95 -13:16:28.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9600 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:38.91 -08:20:48.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3013 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:38.04 -13:57:26.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0517 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:52.46 -12:23:08.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2902 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:11.36 -09:57:38.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8641 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:32.83 -12:11:01.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2977 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:39.03 -12:50:29.5: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:52.26 -13:03:48.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3691 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:06.73 -10:33:39.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8145 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:39.03 -12:50:29.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4760 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:59.66 -12:04:14.0: 14.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:59.66 -12:04:14.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2619 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.7: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:31.8: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:33.01 -13:52:55.9: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:51.12 -14:10:41.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:46.03 -11:22:43.3: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:44.45 -13:55:26.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:02.49 -13:52:00.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:15.19 -13:07:21.4: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:32.2: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.7: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.2: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:02.49 -13:52:00.3: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3385 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:51.12 -14:10:41.5: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9312 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:02.49 -13:52:00.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4471 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:51.12 -14:10:41.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5999 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:31.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:33.01 -13:52:55.9: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:46.03 -11:22:43.3: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:44.45 -13:55:26.0: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:31.8: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1674 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:33.01 -13:52:55.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6595 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:15.19 -13:07:21.4: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:46.03 -11:22:43.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5523 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.45 -13:55:26.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8905 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:15.19 -13:07:21.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4420 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:32.2: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:32.2: ref_mag=10.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5382 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:05.85 -12:51:09.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:33.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:45.52 -10:23:42.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:34.72 -11:01:17.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:22.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:58.92 -10:36:18.5: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:40.16 -06:42:38.2: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.70 -08:15:07.1: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:12.30 -10:37:16.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:05.85 -12:51:09.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:33.4: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:23:36.22 -14:02:09.2: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:33.4: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9929 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:22.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:34.72 -11:01:17.3: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:58.92 -10:36:18.5: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:22.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2706 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:45.52 -10:23:42.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.72 -11:01:17.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4733 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.92 -10:36:18.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1999 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:40.16 -06:42:38.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.16 -06:42:38.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3944 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.70 -08:15:07.1: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:12.30 -10:37:16.9: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.70 -08:15:07.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7867 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:23:36.22 -14:02:09.2: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:12.30 -10:37:16.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6487 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:36.22 -14:02:09.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6657 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.28 -10:57:26.6: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:42.76 -09:50:34.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:47.74 -06:46:47.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.08 -08:11:46.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:59.0: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:14.66 -09:06:49.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:10.92 -10:41:36.5: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:09.33 -06:00:32.9: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.28 -10:57:26.6: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.28 -10:57:26.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7444 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:42.76 -09:50:34.3: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:47.74 -06:46:47.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:42.76 -09:50:34.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8343 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:59.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.08 -08:11:46.9: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:59.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9495 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.08 -08:11:46.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6458 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:14.66 -09:06:49.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:14.66 -09:06:49.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9133 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:10.92 -10:41:36.5: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.92 -10:41:36.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9775 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:09.33 -06:00:32.9: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:09.33 -06:00:32.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1118 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:53.13 -11:52:53.0: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:27.20 -11:12:41.9: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:47.58 -07:50:42.4: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:28.82 -06:03:19.7: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:16.39 -06:21:32.1: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:07.78 -13:59:25.0: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:53.13 -11:52:53.0: 15.15 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:53.13 -11:52:53.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4602 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:27.20 -11:12:41.9: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:27.20 -11:12:41.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4096 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:47.58 -07:50:42.4: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:28.82 -06:03:19.7: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:47.58 -07:50:42.4: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3769 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:28.82 -06:03:19.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5511 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:16.39 -06:21:32.1: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:07.78 -13:59:25.0: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:16.39 -06:21:32.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5129 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:07.78 -13:59:25.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5207 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:48.40 -13:03:06.2: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:48.40 -13:03:06.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:41.03 -09:01:29.3: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:48.40 -13:03:06.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5135 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:28.42 -13:19:05.5: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:09.79 -11:33:48.3: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:36.99 -07:10:44.2: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:12.06 -11:44:09.8: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:57.18 -12:45:39.6: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:41.03 -09:01:29.3: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.03 -09:01:29.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5769 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:28.42 -13:19:05.5: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:28.42 -13:19:05.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5703 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:09.79 -11:33:48.3: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:36.99 -07:10:44.2: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:09.79 -11:33:48.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:36.99 -07:10:44.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4406 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:12.06 -11:44:09.8: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:57.18 -12:45:39.6: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:12.06 -11:44:09.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6213 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:08.74 -06:50:49.6: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:57.18 -12:45:39.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5360 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:47:49.48 -13:51:58.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:08.74 -06:50:49.6: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:56.58 -10:07:43.8: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:08.74 -06:50:49.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5805 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:10.77 -09:13:32.7: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:21.95 -08:22:43.2: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:08.27 -11:57:38.9: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:18.84 -08:11:41.2: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:47:49.48 -13:51:58.0: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:49.48 -13:51:58.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5111 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:56.58 -10:07:43.8: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:10.77 -09:13:32.7: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:56.58 -10:07:43.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5358 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:10.77 -09:13:32.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6000 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:21.95 -08:22:43.2: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:21.95 -08:22:43.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4182 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:08.27 -11:57:38.9: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:08.27 -11:57:38.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5540 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:18.84 -08:11:41.2: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:18.84 -08:11:41.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6627 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:48.18 -11:43:21.8: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:12.51 -13:38:03.5: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:41.21 -13:53:03.6: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:43.49 -09:10:46.1: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:48.18 -11:43:21.8: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:14.94 -14:07:34.7: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:48.18 -11:43:21.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5026 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:30.00 -10:12:54.6: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:51.01 -13:37:29.8: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:12.51 -13:38:03.5: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:12.51 -13:38:03.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5417 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:41.21 -13:53:03.6: 15.39 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:41.21 -13:53:03.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5033 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:43.49 -09:10:46.1: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:14.94 -14:07:34.7: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:43.49 -09:10:46.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6054 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:14.94 -14:07:34.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6733 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:30.00 -10:12:54.6: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:51.01 -13:37:29.8: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:30.00 -10:12:54.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6822 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:51.01 -13:37:29.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7076 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:44.11 -06:11:44.4: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:44.11 -06:11:44.4: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:44.11 -06:11:44.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6370 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112507.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111593_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111593_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111598_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111598_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111601_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111601_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111604_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111604_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111622_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111622_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111639_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111639_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111647_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111647_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111814_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111814_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.66 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111823_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 111823_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:13.38 -08:42:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112070_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112070_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112129_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
Preparing report for the candidate 112129_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112171_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112171_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112172_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112172_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.98 -07:43:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112182_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
Preparing report for the candidate 112182_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112225_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112225_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112260_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112260_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112337_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112337_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112428_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112428_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112448_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112448_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112451_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112451_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112463_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112463_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112505_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112505_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
Preparing report for the candidate 112507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112574_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112574_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112653_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112653_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112785_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112785_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112833_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112833_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112836_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112836_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112923_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112923_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112924_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112924_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112936_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112936_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112938_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112938_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.94 -09:18:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112951_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112951_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112969_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112969_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112973_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112973_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112980_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112980_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112981_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 112981_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113013_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113013_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113021_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113021_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113023_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113023_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113041_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113041_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113042_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113042_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113050_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113050_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113053_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113053_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113059_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113059_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113071_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113071_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113082_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113082_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113088_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113088_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113123_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113123_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113128_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113128_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113152_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 113152_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:58.74 -10:43:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:09.14 -12:20:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0226 did not pass the final checks