This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.1738 2461291.6738 12.96 20:22:47.00 -30:16:56.1
12.53282 -31.88455 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:47.00 -30:16:56.1: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:47.00 -30:16:56.1: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.6738,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.1738 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.1738 2461291.6738 10.60 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1
8.93910 -32.50980 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J202209-3323.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.570 V Y 0.530 V 2452332.00000 307.017548000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202209-3323.0,2461291.6738,10.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202209-3323.0 20260908.1738 10.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.1738 2461291.6738 12.02 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5
8.52118 -38.68613 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CX Mic
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 V < 14.900 V 2453545.00000 239.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5: 13.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.1738* 20 51 09.00 -34 53 53.5 12.0 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CX Mic,2461291.6738,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CX Mic 20260908.1738 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461200.88596046 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461200.88596046 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461291.67423465 08.09.2026 04:10:43.874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4105
Objects passed selection criteria: 4101
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3816.75
Average stars matched: 3605.5 (94.4652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 230608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 23:13:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461200.88596046 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461200.88596046 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461291.67423465 08.09.2026 04:10:43.874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27254
Objects passed selection criteria: 27185
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24589.2
Average stars matched: 23615.5 (96.0399 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 23:14:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.67336920
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 940.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26
Second-epoch image center 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0818 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 940.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26
Second-epoch image center 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01486 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i4jlOaUFSN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jo89rsk9ok
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.exUTAgjFCN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vqHi0Xth2v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg
Loaded 8112 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3059 out of 3109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3109 out of 3631 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.306400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.306400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg
Loaded 8112 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3059 out of 3109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3109 out of 3631 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 3667 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2757 to -28.4866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2757 to -28.4866 deg
Loaded 8121 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3072 out of 3121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3121 out of 3667 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
3.7 pix fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
3.7 pix fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.8 mag. Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.i4jlOaUFSN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, bad_region=0, passed=3631
Got 3631 stars (including 3351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3289 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3289 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 3285 stars left (next iteration limit 3613)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=3285 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=896 n_q2=731 n_q3=899 n_q4=759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jo89rsk9ok (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, bad_region=0, passed=3667
Got 3667 stars (including 3382 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 3313 stars left (next iteration limit 3644)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=3313 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=886 n_q2=749 n_q3=917 n_q4=761 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.exUTAgjFCN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=4036
Got 4036 stars (including 3832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4036 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 3763 stars left (next iteration limit 4139)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3763 robust_rms=9.117 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3763 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3763 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3763 robust_rms_before=0.961 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.489 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.470
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=3763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=943 n_q2=745 n_q3=1182 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vqHi0Xth2v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=0, passed=4016
Got 4016 stars (including 3812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3750 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3750 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 3742 stars left (next iteration limit 4116)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3742 robust_rms=9.193 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3742 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3742 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3742 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.487 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.487 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=3742 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=926 n_q2=733 n_q3=1178 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.471 worst_q_ratio=1.129
ref2=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.121
new1=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.249
new2=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.268
reference average sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (3285 matched stars from wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (3313 matched stars from wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (3763 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (3742 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mic-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:51:39.49 -35:31:48.0: 10.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:58:20.54 -29:17:49.1: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:09.39 -33:23:02.3: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:21:00.48 -29:44:31.6: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:10:20.88 -30:30:55.5: 11.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:54:57.91 -36:02:56.5: 11.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:31:29.37 -33:45:49.1: 11.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:24:22.06 -28:57:46.0: 10.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:19:56.73 -31:16:03.3: 10.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:09.39 -33:23:02.3: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:09.39 -33:23:02.3: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.4838 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:10:20.88 -30:30:55.5: 11.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:58:20.54 -29:17:49.1: 11.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:21:00.48 -29:44:31.6: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:20.88 -30:30:55.5: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9405 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:24:22.06 -28:57:46.0: 10.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:51:39.49 -35:31:48.0: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:00.48 -29:44:31.6: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9641 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:20.54 -29:17:49.1: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9650 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:22.06 -28:57:46.0: ref_mag=10.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8724 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:39.49 -35:31:48.0: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9347 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:54:57.91 -36:02:56.5: 11.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:57.91 -36:02:56.5: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8459 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:19:56.73 -31:16:03.3: 10.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:56.73 -31:16:03.3: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3334 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:44:32.30 -35:05:48.7: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:31:29.37 -33:45:49.1: 11.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:29.37 -33:45:49.1: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9682 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:44:32.30 -35:05:48.7: 10.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:32.30 -35:05:48.7: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9696 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:46:57.76 -32:57:01.6: 11.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:46:57.76 -32:57:01.6: 11.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:57.76 -32:57:01.6: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9871 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20192_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20193_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20216_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:36.79 -33:16:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20268_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20299_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20299_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20303_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20317_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20318_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20319_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20319_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20320_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20321_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20322_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03310_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 03310_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:44.01 -29:51:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00316_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 00316_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:56.56 -38:00:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mic-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 940.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26
Second-epoch image center 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0818 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 940.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26
Second-epoch image center 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:52:26.572 -33:56:30.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:52:23.799 -33:57:11.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01486 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZircXndQYl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YXpM76bjzl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fP1ku0oSOr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TqMLhhHGmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0287 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2736 to -28.4829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0287 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2736 to -28.4829 deg
Loaded 8138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6392 out of 6649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6649 out of 27845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.137450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.137450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0287 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2736 to -28.4829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0287 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2736 to -28.4829 deg
Loaded 8138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6392 out of 6649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6649 out of 27845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 27855 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0287 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2802 to -28.4866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0287 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2802 to -28.4866 deg
Loaded 8143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6382 out of 6646 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6646 out of 27855 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.1 pix Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
3.3 pix fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
3.3 pix fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.9 mag. Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZircXndQYl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=875, bad_region=0, passed=27840
Got 27840 stars (including 26926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1381 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YXpM76bjzl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=894, bad_region=0, passed=27849
Got 27849 stars (including 26917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1075 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fP1ku0oSOr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=715, bad_region=0, passed=21662
Got 21662 stars (including 20920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -27.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -27.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=8.644 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.975 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.537 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.530
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.537 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1240 n_q2=970 n_q3=1541 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TqMLhhHGmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=741, bad_region=0, passed=21811
Got 21811 stars (including 21049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -27.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -27.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=8.677 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.268 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.977 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1234 n_q2=962 n_q3=1542 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-09-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_231127_TTUQ1b1x1_2426301_VDH9gqaQ/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mic-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:34:48.32 -34:16:58.6: 12.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:39:12.60 -32:51:18.9: 12.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:19:56.71 -31:16:03.5: 10.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:38:36.35 -29:22:31.3: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:26.17 -31:00:28.6: 12.97 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:45:09.94 -31:21:48.1: 12.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:43:56.87 -29:03:29.5: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:40:07.47 -28:47:40.3: 12.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:47.00 -30:16:56.1: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:20:31.04 -28:57:13.1: 13.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:26.17 -31:00:28.6: 12.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:39:12.60 -32:51:18.9: 12.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:38:36.35 -29:22:31.3: 13.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:43:56.87 -29:03:29.5: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:45:09.94 -31:21:48.1: 12.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:19:56.71 -31:16:03.5: 10.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:34:48.32 -34:16:58.6: 12.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:26.17 -31:00:28.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8059 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:12.60 -32:51:18.9: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4815 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:36.35 -29:22:31.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4119 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:56.87 -29:03:29.5: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3712 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:09.94 -31:21:48.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6724 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:48.32 -34:16:58.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3194 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:56.71 -31:16:03.5: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4851 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:40:07.47 -28:47:40.3: 12.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:47.00 -30:16:56.1: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:07.47 -28:47:40.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0572 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:20:31.04 -28:57:13.1: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:31.04 -28:57:13.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2426 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:20:40.29 -30:26:41.7: 14.21 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:25:05.54 -30:54:28.6: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:25:36.02 -28:46:43.9: 13.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:32:37.83 -30:16:59.5: 13.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:28:04.44 -30:51:08.8: 13.78 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:18:36.80 -28:49:28.2: 13.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:20:15.04 -28:57:14.8: 13.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:28.03 -29:37:42.7: 13.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:27:53.89 -30:52:06.9: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:20:40.29 -30:26:41.7: 14.27 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:20:40.29 -30:26:41.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.2253 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:25:05.54 -30:54:28.6: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:25:36.02 -28:46:43.9: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:32:37.83 -30:16:59.5: 13.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:20:15.04 -28:57:14.8: 14.24 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:18:36.80 -28:49:28.2: 13.97 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:28.03 -29:37:42.7: 13.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:28:04.44 -30:51:08.8: 13.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:05.54 -30:54:28.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2063 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:36.80 -28:49:28.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2851 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:15.04 -28:57:14.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4351 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:36.02 -28:46:43.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3801 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:37.83 -30:16:59.5: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0635 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:28.03 -29:37:42.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1845 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:04.44 -30:51:08.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.1429 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:27:53.89 -30:52:06.9: 13.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.89 -30:52:06.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2993 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:19:06.69 -28:55:25.5: 13.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:35:34.03 -28:55:02.8: 13.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:38.23 -30:34:14.6: 13.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:25:55.26 -30:22:31.7: 14.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:28:25.94 -28:55:53.2: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:21:02.16 -30:01:56.6: 14.05 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:12.89 -28:37:16.5: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:36:12.74 -33:18:11.2: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:38.23 -30:34:14.6: 13.52 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:28:25.94 -28:55:53.2: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:19:06.69 -28:55:25.5: 13.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:38.23 -30:34:14.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2874 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:25.94 -28:55:53.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5337 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:12.89 -28:37:16.5: 13.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:21:02.16 -30:01:56.6: 13.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:25:55.26 -30:22:31.7: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:06.69 -28:55:25.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4959 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:35:34.03 -28:55:02.8: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:12.89 -28:37:16.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1887 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:55.26 -30:22:31.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4127 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:02.16 -30:01:56.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4607 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:34.03 -28:55:02.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4229 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:36:12.74 -33:18:11.2: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:12.74 -33:18:11.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2258 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:25:03.67 -28:37:26.5: 13.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:24:52.53 -28:52:14.6: 13.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:26:57.92 -30:19:08.0: 13.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:41.74 -29:39:01.4: 13.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:17.34 -29:51:14.3: 13.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:03.00 -29:14:30.0: 13.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:57.09 -30:50:55.7: 13.70 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:35:19.77 -31:40:02.3: 13.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:25:03.67 -28:37:26.5: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:03.67 -28:37:26.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4252 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:02.70 -29:21:00.3: 13.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:24:52.53 -28:52:14.6: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:41.74 -29:39:01.4: 13.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:52.53 -28:52:14.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5914 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:41.74 -29:39:01.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4959 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:03.00 -29:14:30.0: 13.51 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:26:57.92 -30:19:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:17.34 -29:51:14.3: 13.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:57.09 -30:50:55.7: 13.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:03.00 -29:14:30.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4619 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:17.34 -29:51:14.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4046 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:35:19.77 -31:40:02.3: 13.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:57.09 -30:50:55.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2794 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:57.92 -30:19:08.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4789 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:19.77 -31:40:02.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4772 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:02.70 -29:21:00.3: 13.79 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:02.70 -29:21:00.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4649 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:00.82 -29:28:56.8: 13.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:40.67 -33:24:55.6: 13.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:24:58.69 -30:34:13.7: 13.81 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:43:26.86 -31:57:07.2: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:57.69 -30:03:51.2: 13.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:21:36.55 -30:22:41.5: 13.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:08:13.48 -31:35:36.0: 13.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:10.02 -32:59:27.1: 13.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:00.82 -29:28:56.8: 13.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:49.32 -31:18:03.7: 13.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:00.82 -29:28:56.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5596 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:24:58.69 -30:34:13.7: 13.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:57.69 -30:03:51.2: 13.79 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:43:26.86 -31:57:07.2: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:08:13.48 -31:35:36.0: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:58.69 -30:34:13.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5284 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:21:36.55 -30:22:41.5: 13.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:57.69 -30:03:51.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5535 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:26.86 -31:57:07.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4698 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:40.67 -33:24:55.6: 13.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:10.02 -32:59:27.1: 13.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:13.48 -31:35:36.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5272 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:36.55 -30:22:41.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4774 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:10.02 -32:59:27.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3263 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:40.67 -33:24:55.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1463 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:49.32 -31:18:03.7: 13.76 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:49.32 -31:18:03.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4112 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:26:13.67 -30:45:44.4: 14.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:26:13.67 -30:45:44.4: 13.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:13.67 -30:45:44.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.3902 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:09.41 -33:23:02.1: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.5987 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5: 13.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:51:09.00 -34:53:53.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.0157 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33010.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32867.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32327_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32327_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32331_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32331_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32343_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32346_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32346_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32348_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32348_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32349_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.57 -29:11:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32555_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.90 -30:10:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32752_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32752_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32760_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32760_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:30.92 -28:38:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32804_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32804_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32867_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 32867_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32884_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32884_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.18 -30:48:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32931_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32931_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32947_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32947_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32948_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32948_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32968_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 32968_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33009_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33009_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33010_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33010_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:40.29 -30:26:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.400 6797170334472820480 305.16818903185 -30.44463752152 13.3972 12.9714 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.400#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33030_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33030_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33042_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33042_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33047_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33053_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33053_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33056_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33056_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33064_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33064_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33078_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33078_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33083_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33083_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33090_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33090_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33091_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33095_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33095_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33105_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33105_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33110_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33110_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33121_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33121_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33128_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33141_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33141_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33173_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33173_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33184_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33184_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33190_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33190_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33193_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33193_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33202_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33202_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33210_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33210_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33238_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33238_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33240_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33240_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33241_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33241_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33249_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33249_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33264_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33264_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33267_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33267_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33268_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33268_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33283_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33283_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33292_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33292_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33314_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 33314_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14125_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 14125_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10498_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 10498_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15018_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 15018_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:36.79 -33:16:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 01803_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:56.56 -38:00:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18605_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 18605_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.98 -29:51:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16628_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 16628_fd_Mic-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_23-10-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks