This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4557 2461290.9557 14.04 04:30:29.94 +04:33:23.0
190.69185 -28.39924 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.618 Elfriede -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:30:29.94 +04:33:23.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:30:29.94 +04:33:23.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4557* 04 30 29.94 +04 33 23.0 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9557,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4557 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4557 2461290.9557 14.21 03:59:27.29 +04:11:16.6
185.71746 -34.88995 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.483 Seppina -1 0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:27.29 +04:11:16.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:27.29 +04:11:16.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4557* 03 59 27.29 +04 11 16.6 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9557,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4557 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4557 2461290.9557 14.54 04:05:59.00 +08:07:38.8
183.21266 -31.18238 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.404 Arsinoe -1 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:05:59.00 +08:07:38.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:05:59.00 +08:07:38.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4557* 04 05 59.00 +08 07 38.8 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9557,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4557 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461290.95603341 07.09.2026 10:56:31.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8935
Objects passed selection criteria: 8929
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8419.25
Average stars matched: 8149.75 (96.799 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 06:02:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461290.95603341 07.09.2026 10:56:31.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48738
Objects passed selection criteria: 48635
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45360.2
Average stars matched: 44093.8 (97.2079 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 06:04:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.95536559
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0940 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1036 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14
Second-epoch second image center 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00991 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p59ZasXBy0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FxZML4j810
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PJkIWEvnqP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jY9lD74TS6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec +0.7253 to +11.3032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec 0.7253 to 11.3032 deg
Loaded 5008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4066 out of 4298 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4298 out of 7732 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.1 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
3.4 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
3.4 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.1 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.p59ZasXBy0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=0, passed=8663
Got 8663 stars (including 7997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.212 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1452 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FxZML4j810 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=626, bad_region=0, passed=7732
Got 7732 stars (including 7100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1094 n_q3=1448 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PJkIWEvnqP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, bad_region=0, passed=8752
Got 8752 stars (including 8325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=10.703 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.368 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.351
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=946 n_q2=1419 n_q3=1106 n_q4=1429 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jY9lD74TS6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=409, bad_region=0, passed=8734
Got 8734 stars (including 8320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=10.802 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.206 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.363 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.346
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=946 n_q2=1413 n_q3=1100 n_q4=1437 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new1=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.254
new2=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.222
reference average sigma_overall=0.2925 worst_q_ratio=1.2545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:00.81 +05:53:43.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:43:44.65 +06:39:04.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:51.09 +05:00:23.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:21.31 +09:23:32.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:15:59.63 +07:52:59.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:40.02 +03:45:44.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:03.52 +09:26:02.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:25:26.48 +07:07:38.5: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:24:26.54 +05:10:07.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:51.09 +05:00:23.5: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:21.31 +09:23:32.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:15:59.63 +07:52:59.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:43:44.65 +06:39:04.3: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:03.52 +09:26:02.4: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:40.02 +03:45:44.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:00.81 +05:53:43.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:51.09 +05:00:23.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1566 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:21.31 +09:23:32.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2289 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:59.63 +07:52:59.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2321 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:44.65 +06:39:04.3: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2656 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:03.52 +09:26:02.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1822 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:40.02 +03:45:44.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1276 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:00.81 +05:53:43.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2506 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:25:26.48 +07:07:38.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:24:26.54 +05:10:07.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:25.12 +06:53:06.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2872 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:26.54 +05:10:07.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2798 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:26.48 +07:07:38.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2836 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:30.45 +07:24:46.1: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:30.45 +07:24:46.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:30.45 +07:24:46.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3379 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:33.55 +04:12:50.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3264 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:07.53 +04:56:57.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3347 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:43.05 +06:37:25.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3165 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.43 +06:43:58.4: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3416 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20360_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20361_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:24.03 +06:34:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20366_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20368_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20371_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.47 +06:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20378_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20380_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20381_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20383_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20385_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20385_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:22.55 +05:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20391_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20393_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20399_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20399_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20402_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20402_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20403_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20405_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20407_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02769_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 02769_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:06.24 +07:55:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.65 +09:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0940 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1036 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:16:54.355 +05:59:24.14
Second-epoch second image center 04:16:52.153 +05:59:38.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00991 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JPELhkoay2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0k4npnSG49
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TDfpFNijUx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EMTn0XGHUW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 48772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2863 to 72.2642 deg, Dec +0.7157 to +11.3031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2863 to 72.2642 deg, Dec 0.7157 to 11.3031 deg
Loaded 5014 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4392 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4392 out of 48772 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
1.9 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JPELhkoay2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2672, bad_region=14, passed=52184
Got 52184 stars (including 49407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.215 n_q1=1397 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1447 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0k4npnSG49 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2468, bad_region=1, passed=48757
Got 48757 stars (including 46206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1406 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1440 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TDfpFNijUx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1785, bad_region=36, passed=40806
Got 40806 stars (including 38948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=10.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.870 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.843 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.370 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.348
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.370 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=943 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1123 n_q4=1435 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EMTn0XGHUW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1854, bad_region=39, passed=41043
Got 41043 stars (including 39108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=11.019 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.361 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.351
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=946 n_q2=1391 n_q3=1122 n_q4=1439 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-55-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_2264842_UN1pgivq/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:51.38 +02:44:33.1: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:53.69 +07:07:13.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:30.36 +08:25:14.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:42:23.89 +06:52:42.5: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:56:45.86 +07:56:28.7: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:40.34 +10:19:02.6: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:08.64 +02:27:44.5: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:46:38.44 +08:34:51.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:30:29.94 +04:33:23.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:21.98 +07:57:56.2: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:30.36 +08:25:14.5: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:51.38 +02:44:33.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:08.64 +02:27:44.5: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:53.69 +07:07:13.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:56:45.86 +07:56:28.7: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:42:23.89 +06:52:42.5: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:30.36 +08:25:14.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9346 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:51.38 +02:44:33.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9792 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:40.34 +10:19:02.6: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.69 +07:07:13.9: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7748 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:45.86 +07:56:28.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7498 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:08.64 +02:27:44.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3631 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:23.89 +06:52:42.5: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5458 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:40.34 +10:19:02.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9802 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:46:38.44 +08:34:51.6: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:30:29.94 +04:33:23.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:38.44 +08:34:51.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2269 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:21.98 +07:57:56.2: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:21.98 +07:57:56.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1660 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:22.70 +10:35:32.4: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:05:59.00 +08:07:38.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:35:21.10 +06:39:41.4: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:27.29 +04:11:16.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:38:58.01 +09:53:30.2: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:49.80 +10:21:08.0: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:37.72 +07:00:14.5: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:54:08.73 +10:39:23.2: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:29:38.81 +10:50:13.6: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:22.70 +10:35:32.4: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:05:59.00 +08:07:38.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:35:21.10 +06:39:41.4: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:49.80 +10:21:08.0: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:22.70 +10:35:32.4: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4130 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:37.72 +07:00:14.5: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:21.10 +06:39:41.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1623 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:49.80 +10:21:08.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6239 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:38:58.01 +09:53:30.2: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:27.29 +04:11:16.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:37.72 +07:00:14.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5382 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:58.01 +09:53:30.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3472 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:54:08.73 +10:39:23.2: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:08.73 +10:39:23.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4423 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:29:38.81 +10:50:13.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:38.81 +10:50:13.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5905 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:37.96 +08:37:28.5: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:27:48.16 +10:54:47.4: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:34.57 +08:04:33.9: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:48:37.30 +07:59:10.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:37:48.92 +10:43:36.7: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:18.89 +10:23:19.9: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:57:51.07 +10:17:06.0: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:34.57 +08:04:33.9: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:27:48.16 +10:54:47.4: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:34.57 +08:04:33.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6185 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:48.16 +10:54:47.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5658 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:48:37.30 +07:59:10.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:37:48.92 +10:43:36.7: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:37.96 +08:37:28.5: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:37.30 +07:59:10.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7296 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:48.92 +10:43:36.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6309 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:37.96 +08:37:28.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5554 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:18.89 +10:23:19.9: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:18.89 +10:23:19.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7275 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:57:51.07 +10:17:06.0: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:51.07 +10:17:06.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8530 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:04:33.57 +07:21:47.1: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:06.69 +07:42:22.3: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:54:02.41 +08:06:28.1: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:24.30 +09:23:28.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:49.61 +04:14:47.6: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:46:28.91 +09:59:12.8: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:45:34.57 +08:56:48.0: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:06.69 +07:42:22.3: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:04:33.57 +07:21:47.1: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:06.69 +07:42:22.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7042 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:33.57 +07:21:47.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7758 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:54:02.41 +08:06:28.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:02.41 +08:06:28.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8791 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:24.30 +09:23:28.1: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:24.30 +09:23:28.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6625 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:49.61 +04:14:47.6: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:46:28.91 +09:59:12.8: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:49.61 +04:14:47.6: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6615 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:28.91 +09:59:12.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7942 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:45:34.57 +08:56:48.0: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:34.57 +08:56:48.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8439 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:51:44.28 +09:41:23.5: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:58:19.85 +10:24:11.7: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:00:27.65 +11:01:47.9: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:02:53.96 +08:25:13.0: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:29:07.41 +07:01:15.3: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:55:01.47 +10:59:09.1: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:53:15.69 +10:24:44.5: 15.49 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:51:44.28 +09:41:23.5: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:44.28 +09:41:23.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7905 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:58:19.85 +10:24:11.7: 15.37 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:00:27.65 +11:01:47.9: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:19.85 +10:24:11.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8478 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:27.65 +11:01:47.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8612 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:29:07.41 +07:01:15.3: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:07.41 +07:01:15.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6995 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:02:53.96 +08:25:13.0: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:53.96 +08:25:13.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8742 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:55:01.47 +10:59:09.1: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:01.47 +10:59:09.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9376 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:53:15.69 +10:24:44.5: 15.20 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:15.69 +10:24:44.5: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8452 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:51.83 +07:54:28.1: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:50:41.68 +04:53:48.3: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:08:26.35 +10:04:54.9: 15.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:49:39.69 +10:26:50.9: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:40.04 +07:10:06.5: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:04:31.72 +06:22:21.9: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:49:39.69 +10:26:50.9: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:51.83 +07:54:28.1: 15.48 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:39.69 +10:26:50.9: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9790 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:08:26.35 +10:04:54.9: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:51.83 +07:54:28.1: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9166 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:50:41.68 +04:53:48.3: 15.34 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:26.35 +10:04:54.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8886 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:41.68 +04:53:48.3: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8023 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:40.04 +07:10:06.5: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:40.04 +07:10:06.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7575 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:04:31.72 +06:22:21.9: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:31.72 +06:22:21.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8138 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65739.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64771_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 64771_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64787_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 64787_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 64788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:40.88 +09:44:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64789_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 64789_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64792_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 64792_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65116_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65116_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65410_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65410_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65411_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65411_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:16.55 +07:59:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65485_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65485_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.10 +10:13:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65519_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65519_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65637_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 65637_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65709_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65709_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65716_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65716_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65739_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 65739_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65744_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65744_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65756_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65756_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65808_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 65808_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65847_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65847_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65854_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65854_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65870_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65870_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65879_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65879_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65892_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65892_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65893_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65893_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65904_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65904_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65946_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65946_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65970_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65970_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65980_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65980_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65986_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65995_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65995_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66003_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66003_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66004_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66004_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66007_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66007_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66017_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66017_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66025_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66025_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66026_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66026_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66027_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66027_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66029_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66029_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66043_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66043_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66046_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66046_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66052_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66052_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66076_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66076_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66078_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66078_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66079_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66079_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66086_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66086_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66094_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66094_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66123_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66123_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66126_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66126_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66131_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66131_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66132_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66132_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66146_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 66146_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24664_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 24664_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:23.97 +06:34:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.64 +09:56:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16427_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 16427_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks