This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 11.72 04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3
176.44881 -12.45840 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 1 1 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 50 40.94 +24 43 48.3 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 12.59 04:39:37.46 +25:13:27.0
174.43904 -14.10094 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 0 0 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:37.46 +25:13:27.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:37.46 +25:13:27.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 39 37.46 +25 13 27.0 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 13.54 04:34:35.49 +22:36:12.6
175.76686 -16.66057 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:35.49 +22:36:12.6: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:35.49 +22:36:12.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 34 35.49 +22 36 12.6 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 13.63 04:51:40.55 +23:30:35.8
177.57928 -13.02792 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:40.55 +23:30:35.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:40.55 +23:30:35.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 51 40.55 +23 30 35.8 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 14.11 04:37:01.99 +20:12:07.8
178.08796 -17.74375 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:01.99 +20:12:07.8: 16.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:01.99 +20:12:07.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 37 01.99 +20 12 07.8 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 14.31 04:38:22.28 +25:09:51.8
174.29956 -14.35714 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:22.28 +25:09:51.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:22.28 +25:09:51.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 38 22.28 +25 09 51.8 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3692 2461290.8692 14.87 04:42:16.69 +20:36:34.5
178.55704 -16.52909 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula 1 0 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:16.69 +20:36:34.5: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:16.69 +20:36:34.5: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.3692* 04 42 16.69 +20 36 34.5 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8692,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3692 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461290.86959549 07.09.2026 08:52:03.050 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9972
Objects passed selection criteria: 9935
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7377
Average stars matched: 6857.25 (92.9545 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 03:56:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461290.86959549 07.09.2026 08:52:03.050 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 74080
Objects passed selection criteria: 73883
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56525.5
Average stars matched: 52436 (92.7652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 292892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 03:57:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.86886458
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:38.109 +21:58:58.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:38.109 +21:58:58.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0702 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:38.109 +21:58:58.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00788 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RfakW5LqwY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b9g4MlhALD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JWFXogG1X4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.75Nm5X1hHS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RfakW5LqwY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b9g4MlhALD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JWFXogG1X4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=523, bad_region=2596, passed=8434
Got 8434 stars (including 5448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=7.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.707 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.466 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.440
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.466 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1510 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.75Nm5X1hHS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=559, bad_region=2611, passed=8396
Got 8396 stars (including 5363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=7.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.631 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.123 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.513 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.462
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:38.132 +21:58:57.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8396 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3339444.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.123 -> 0.414 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1423 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1507 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.134
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.120
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7196 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.13 +22:54:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 20268_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21206_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 21206_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21208_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 21208_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.56 +20:15:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:50:40.94 +24:43:48.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:38.132 +21:58:57.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:38.132 +21:58:57.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:37.345 +21:59:24.32
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:38.132 +21:58:57.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00812 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M01NRbU6NO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sQpSHV8CBQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AWwnQWNv3b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g4mOff1Idc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 117 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M01NRbU6NO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sQpSHV8CBQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AWwnQWNv3b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3112, bad_region=12854, passed=56214
Got 56214 stars (including 41273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=7.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.094 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.450 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.440
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1478 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1491 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g4mOff1Idc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3406, bad_region=13180, passed=57443
Got 57443 stars (including 42090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.708 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.462 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.462 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1467 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1500 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0413.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_035406_TTUQ2b1x1_2959105_VOtlUnyo/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.85 +23:07:53.1: 14.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.03 +23:22:08.4: 14.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:44.18 +24:15:23.1: 14.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:52.89 +18:38:36.5: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:06.03 +24:29:01.9: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:13.74 +21:44:42.0: 14.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:55.22 +23:01:42.5: 14.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:39.13 +18:06:39.7: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:41.60 +23:57:27.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:55.22 +23:01:42.5: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:06.03 +24:29:01.9: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:39.13 +18:06:39.7: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.03 +23:22:08.4: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.85 +23:07:53.1: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:52.89 +18:38:36.5: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:44.18 +24:15:23.1: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:13.74 +21:44:42.0: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:41.60 +23:57:27.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:55.22 +23:01:42.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3455 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:06.03 +24:29:01.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5721 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:39.13 +18:06:39.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1088 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.03 +23:22:08.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2408 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.85 +23:07:53.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8155 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:52.89 +18:38:36.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5307 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:44.18 +24:15:23.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5228 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:13.74 +21:44:42.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3870 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.60 +23:57:27.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7237 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:37.46 +25:13:27.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:35.49 +22:36:12.6: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:13.76 +25:16:23.9: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7907 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:37.46 +25:13:27.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:40.55 +23:30:35.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:35.49 +22:36:12.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:40.55 +23:30:35.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:19.83 +20:42:08.8: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.5: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:01.99 +20:12:07.8: 16.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.6: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:39.0: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:11.16 +23:04:45.0: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:19.83 +20:42:08.8: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:19.83 +20:42:08.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0588 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.5: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:01.99 +20:12:07.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.25 +22:58:07.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9319 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:00.5: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.13 +23:28:50.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2096 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:11.16 +23:04:45.0: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:39.0: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:11.16 +23:04:45.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1758 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.24 +26:03:39.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2721 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:00.5: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.96 +24:00:00.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1023 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.32 +19:20:17.9: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:12.09 +18:28:57.7: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.32 +19:20:17.9: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.32 +19:20:17.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2050 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:12.09 +18:28:57.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:12.09 +18:28:57.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0721 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.08 +24:08:02.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:22.28 +25:09:51.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:22.28 +25:09:51.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:41.58 +19:51:05.8: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:54.1: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.31 +19:42:37.9: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:54.1: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:41.58 +19:51:05.8: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.78 +18:49:54.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2881 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:41.58 +19:51:05.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4715 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:53.33 +24:49:16.3: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.31 +19:42:37.9: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.31 +19:42:37.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3633 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:54.46 +20:03:35.3: 14.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:53.33 +24:49:16.3: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:53.33 +24:49:16.3: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5755 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:54.46 +20:03:35.3: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:54.46 +20:03:35.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5496 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.52 +17:44:04.3: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:58.73 +23:37:00.6: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:07.33 +21:24:52.7: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.52 +17:44:04.3: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.52 +17:44:04.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4732 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3928 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:58.73 +23:37:00.6: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:58.73 +23:37:00.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5683 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:07.33 +21:24:52.7: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:07.33 +21:24:52.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6546 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:21.11 +22:55:30.2: 14.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:21.11 +22:55:30.2: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:21.11 +22:55:30.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6096 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.30 +19:10:14.8: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:16.69 +20:36:34.5: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:43.15 +18:23:26.9: 15.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.30 +19:10:14.8: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.30 +19:10:14.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7225 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:16.69 +20:36:34.5: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:05.24 +21:33:50.2: 15.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:43.15 +18:23:26.9: 15.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:43.15 +18:23:26.9: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9276 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:05.24 +21:33:50.2: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:05.24 +21:33:50.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0450 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:01.61 +19:57:20.4: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:52.12 +22:09:16.2: 15.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:01.61 +19:57:20.4: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:01.61 +19:57:20.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0206 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:52.12 +22:09:16.2: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:52.12 +22:09:16.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.1054 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:52.22 +22:46:49.9: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:46.63 +21:16:03.3: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:44.12 +22:40:17.5: 15.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:10.64 +20:43:50.1: 15.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:52.22 +22:46:49.9: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:52.22 +22:46:49.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1362 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:46.63 +21:16:03.3: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:46.63 +21:16:03.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8289 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:44.12 +22:40:17.5: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:44.12 +22:40:17.5: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2319 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:10.64 +20:43:50.1: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:10.64 +20:43:50.1: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1071 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104959.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106690.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100438_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100438_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100439_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100439_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:09.70 +25:21:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100443_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100444_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100444_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100885_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100885_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100999_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 100999_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101154_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 101154_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101385_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 101385_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:40.95 +24:43:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.27 +19:28:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102382_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 102382_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102743_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 102743_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.17 +22:48:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103279_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 103279_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.39 +22:42:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103727_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 103727_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.68 +22:56:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 103831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.80 +21:00:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 103839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:18.09 +23:01:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104032_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104032_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104199_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104199_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104231_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104231_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.87 +21:31:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 104353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104537_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104537_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.03 +23:18:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104809_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104809_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:27.23 +19:11:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.64 +22:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.41 +24:06:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 104959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:43.02 +22:12:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104986_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104986_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.44 +18:42:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 104995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.57 +21:52:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105064_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 105064_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.02 +21:45:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105543_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 105543_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105746_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 105746_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.21 +17:55:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105852_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 105852_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105920_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 105920_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106138_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106138_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106269_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106269_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106320_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106320_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:37.47 +21:31:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106665_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106665_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.65 +24:19:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106690_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 106690_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106703_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106703_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106742_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106742_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106837_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106837_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106841_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106841_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106902_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106902_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106921_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106921_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106954_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106954_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106994_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 106994_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107072_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107072_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107225_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107225_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107304_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107304_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107310_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107310_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.90 +21:03:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:31.20 +24:17:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107379_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107379_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107402_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107402_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.47 +23:36:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107412_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107412_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 107442_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107592_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107592_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107662_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107662_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.01 +20:19:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107775_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107775_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 107973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:37.09 +19:15:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108079_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108079_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108095_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108095_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108223_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108223_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108373_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108373_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108438_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108438_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108638_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108638_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.59 +23:36:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108674_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108674_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.73 +20:33:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108675_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108675_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108854_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108854_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.82 +23:20:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108988_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 108988_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109114_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109114_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:25.68 +19:11:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109198_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109291_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109291_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109333_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109333_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109410_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109410_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109478_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109478_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109903_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 109903_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110012_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110012_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110209_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110209_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110249_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110249_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110342_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110342_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.02 +23:58:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110388_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110388_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110506_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
Preparing report for the candidate 110506_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110560_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110560_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:34.98 +20:26:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110641_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.15 +22:53:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110922_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 110922_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111062_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111062_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111081_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111081_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111098_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111098_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111123_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111123_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111186_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111186_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111205_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111205_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111235_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111235_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111250_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111250_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111275_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 111275_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.57 +20:15:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40803_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 40803_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07914_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 07914_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:28.58 +26:10:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 46659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:42.93 +21:46:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_03-52-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414 did not pass the final checks
