NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866320 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866320 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1290.4671 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 434.7768 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1289.5610 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 436.4782 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.42058 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-07T02:30:05.0018773' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-07T07:30:05.0018773' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61290.3125578822 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-07T07:30:14.9036042' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61290.3126724884 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.9966362481 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 70.0001929807444 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.2794444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 11.0927777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.52601478310461 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits :) Spent 0.882679 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.7099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-07T02:30:42.3773569' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-07T07:30:42.3773569' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61290.3129904745 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-07T07:30:52.2774324' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61290.3131050579 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.996636147868 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 70.0001930206456 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.305 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 11.1430555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.52077534580798 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.7099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.7099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits :) Spent 0.676146 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.81267362 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Image size: 937.9'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 937.8'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00281 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H8pqA2pmW9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qGqhAUNy61 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Aj6YrW4S7M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SHv9X85aQQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.863700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.863700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.H8pqA2pmW9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=2580, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 5709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1040 n_q3=1488 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qGqhAUNy61 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=2596, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=1470 n_q2=1032 n_q3=1493 n_q4=898 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Aj6YrW4S7M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, bad_region=627, passed=4630 Got 4630 stars (including 3764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4630 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3674 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4165 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3675 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4165 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4165 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 3670 stars left (next iteration limit 4037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3670 robust_rms=6.143 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.416 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3670 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.554 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3670 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3670 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits N_match=3670 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1165 n_q2=478 n_q3=1391 n_q4=636 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.SHv9X85aQQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=265, bad_region=626, passed=4627 Got 4627 stars (including 3760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4627 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 3667 stars left (next iteration limit 4033) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=6.140 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.120 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.509 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3667 robust_rms_before=0.975 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.436 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=3667 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1154 n_q2=484 n_q3=1413 n_q4=616 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.256 ref2=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.275 new1=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.107 new2=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.045 reference average sigma_overall=0.4045 worst_q_ratio=1.2655 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331_astrometric_residuals.png (3670 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (3667 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Image size: 937.9'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 937.8'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:11.731 +69:59:44.96 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:12.425 +69:59:35.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00281 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3FcnjpPnHO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rtA3R2ZI1G Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K0bG6jhBfw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aRyBcroZw1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.3FcnjpPnHO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2624, bad_region=12474, passed=51522 Got 51522 stars (including 37098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51522 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1494 n_q4=896 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rtA3R2ZI1G (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2687, bad_region=12460, passed=51868 Got 51868 stars (including 37397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51868 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1497 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1496 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.K0bG6jhBfw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=905, bad_region=3060, passed=27018 Got 27018 stars (including 23115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27018 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=6.159 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.181 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.556 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.469 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.469 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=1526 n_q2=639 n_q3=1851 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.aRyBcroZw1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=882, bad_region=3109, passed=27148 Got 27148 stars (including 23220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27148 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=6.210 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.715 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.516 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.968 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.396 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.436 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1522 n_q2=638 n_q3=1867 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 64886_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 64886_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    10.44    09:18:33.45 +69:54:24.6   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65591_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 65591_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    11.52    09:23:40.51 +68:14:30.2   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67349_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 67349_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.61    10:07:41.57 +68:05:47.9   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67564_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 67564_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.83    10:23:12.23 +73:29:32.3   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67662_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 67662_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.82    08:45:58.80 +73:20:58.9   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67997_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 67997_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.90    10:26:35.70 +69:55:23.7   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68057_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68057_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.02    09:18:43.11 +67:14:22.6   3661 1638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 09:18:43.19 +67:14:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68067_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68067_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.02    09:48:59.93 +72:27:09.2   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68384_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68384_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.07    08:51:53.85 +65:34:49.1   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68413_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68413_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.05    08:59:18.93 +67:23:44.1   2561 1927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 08:59:18.97 +67:23:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68597_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68597_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.39    08:50:43.88 +73:45:56.4   3040 5778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 08:50:43.89 +73:45:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68609_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 68609_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.35    09:13:06.58 +69:38:49.3   3570 3122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 09:13:06.51 +69:38:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69098_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69098_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.50    09:34:45.28 +69:51:31.2   4708 3119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 09:34:45.46 +69:51:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69328_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69328_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.57    09:25:33.08 +72:50:46.0   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69453_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69453_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.29    09:09:17.01 +69:15:22.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69454_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69454_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.53    09:16:39.16 +73:56:28.6   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69668_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69668_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.53    08:46:50.87 +69:46:32.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69762_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69762_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.26    10:17:15.98 +69:30:05.3   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69890_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 69890_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.59    09:46:29.32 +73:01:35.2   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70102_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70102_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.55    08:55:25.01 +65:32:47.7   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70213_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70213_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.66    08:48:32.09 +70:28:19.1   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70306_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70306_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.45    09:24:41.45 +73:53:52.7   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70448_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70448_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.73    10:13:56.58 +66:16:30.2   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70507_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70507_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.69    09:19:28.82 +69:15:42.5   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70700_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70700_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.34    10:07:28.96 +66:05:24.5   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70840_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 70840_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.71    09:28:02.52 +67:09:01.8   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71118_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71118_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.99    10:19:34.58 +66:29:16.5   7268 1143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71120_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71120_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.84    10:16:27.85 +72:11:29.9   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71222_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71222_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.79    09:19:19.77 +65:55:11.3   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71237_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71237_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.11    10:07:07.55 +69:42:17.0   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71367_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71367_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.84    09:05:13.70 +73:51:57.5   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71422_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71422_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.62    09:12:44.32 +65:34:57.6   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71783_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71783_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.27    08:44:39.44 +69:17:49.6   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71807_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71807_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.40    09:15:01.79 +70:19:00.3   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71988_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 71988_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.91    08:54:52.84 +67:26:57.2   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72076_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 72076_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.03    09:16:14.95 +73:28:03.3   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72128_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 72128_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.03    10:05:44.66 +70:59:18.2   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72334_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 72334_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.22    09:31:27.81 +72:38:35.1   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72354_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 72354_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    14.30    10:29:57.68 +72:15:03.9   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 46118_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 46118_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    13.14    10:15:20.28 +66:34:19.9   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.76    08:50:31.43 +67:26:25.4   2068 2070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits **** FOUND 08:50:31.42 +67:26:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62644_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 The candidate 62644_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 07.31311    2461290.81311    12.84    10:17:50.19 +67:10:30.2   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023208_TTUQ2b1x1_1928992_6DAmosUg/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_02-30-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461290.81267362 -observatory V36 11:39:00.53 +03:26:47.3 Mercury (-0.9mag) 13:36:06.85 -14:31:30.5 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:14:02.14 +22:58:49.8 Mars (1.2mag) 09:09:03.86 +16:57:29.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:43.77 +02:38:36.3 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:41.32 +21:01:59.5 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:44.72 -00:03:14.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:35.52 -23:39:37.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 07:49:15.15 +23:37:55.6 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 7 02:47 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461290.81267362: 09:09:07.04 +16:57:14.0 Io (6.2mag) 09:08:59.42 +16:57:52.6 Europa (6.3mag) 09:09:13.06 +16:56:42.9 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:08:39.38 +16:59:30.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:06:50.13 +17:14:02.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:09:08.26 +16:57:09.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:06:27.37 +17:08:00.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:12:57.48 +16:25:03.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:10:08.84 +17:15:16.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:39.65 +02:38:59.7 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:37.34 +02:38:29.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:51:58.93 +02:41:07.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:57.98 +02:38:03.2 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:30.51 +02:28:20.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 7 02:47 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461290.81267362: 22:04:21.91 +01:01:15.7 JWST 17:40:51.96 +33:36:35.1 Chandra 11:01:34.10 -59:24:03.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 7 02:47 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461290.81267362 -observatory V36 03:40:26.07 +19:20:28.3 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:54.86 -34:12:39.5 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:19:29.03 -70:18:08.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:41.71 +33:42:02.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:51:27.01 +45:28:53.8 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:27.01 +45:28:53.8 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:27.01 +45:28:53.8 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:27.01 +45:28:53.8 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:27.01 +45:28:53.8 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:13:28.33 +28:40:06.9 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:10:12.36 +25:58:42.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:49:30.75 +27:13:31.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:48:40.84 +05:13:58.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:29:31.72 -15:39:02.2 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:38:24.47 +32:53:35.6 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:35.74 +15:19:22.1 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:33:35.81 +43:10:27.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:26:08.79 +49:18:03.5 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:35:37.04 -13:01:36.2 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:11:38.26 +18:32:25.2 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:18:00.41 +18:46:04.3 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:19:38.25 +00:06:54.2 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:41:25.14 +74:01:54.5 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:47.35 +46:08:05.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:13:17.20 +11:17:03.3 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:26:00.81 -35:02:33.7 13.4mag 10P/Tempel 01:19:30.69 +37:02:09.8 17.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:48:10.92 -05:28:09.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:08:36.14 -05:05:59.2 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:44:39.56 -07:04:14.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:39:21.87 +19:15:03.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:17.01 +14:59:55.6 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:38:16.55 +28:38:14.5 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:31:51.06 +24:48:45.7 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:27:55.78 +20:51:52.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:46:38.04 -21:20:38.9 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:17:26.26 +20:38:19.7 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:32:09.90 -17:36:39.2 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:37:34.65 +13:43:45.9 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:24:27.42 +08:28:26.2 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:48:07.07 +36:19:34.6 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:31:55.34 +35:41:58.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:25:14.64 -00:15:03.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:27:48.00 +16:50:58.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Sep 7 02:47 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 7 02:47 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 7 02:47 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:22:03.224 +06:31:13.73 AT 2026yqa 2026-08-07.28 20.41 00:34:06.502 +12:42:13.91 AT 2026ypz 2026-08-08.10 20 21:30:05.008 +02:38:33.95 AT 2026ypy 2026-08-06.53 20.21 21:00:04.179 -04:29:11.16 AT 2026ypx 2026-08-10.99 20.06 02:37:12.256 +15:20:39.63 AT 2026ypw 2026-08-12.19 20.13 20:30:21.422 +77:41:45.40 AT 2026ypv 2026-08-02.23 20.4969 13:32:08.201 +00:21:43.54 AT 2026ypu 2026-08-05.16 19.6868 14:07:14.862 +00:31:05.95 AT 2026ypt 2026-08-08.16 20.0684 17:39:38.555 +44:15:43.22 AT 2026yps 2026-07-22.33 20.9161 23:51:42.078 +03:04:27.33 AT 2026ypr 2026-08-12.07 20.05 02:34:15.880 +40:31:56.36 AT 2026ypq 2026-08-11.58 18.82 15:38:07.902 +06:01:37.84 AT 2026ypp 2026-08-11.26 20.34 15:24:17.953 +11:26:31.29 AT 2026ypo 2026-08-11.26 20.8 14:21:16.003 +25:15:33.98 AT 2026ypn 2026-08-11.26 18.72 16:23:56.085 +09:36:23.21 AT 2026ypm 2026-08-11.28 20.97 20:54:11.595 +10:54:51.15 SN 2026ypl 2026-08-09.34 20.4 00:40:25.122 +24:26:45.82 AT 2026ypk 2026-08-07.45 20.4501 17:05:06.872 +77:16:36.60 AT 2026ypj 2026-08-11.31 18.807 20:49:46.878 -06:36:38.40 AT 2026ypi 2026-08-09.29 20.4359 00:12:21.150 -17:28:55.44 AT 2026yph 2026-08-08.42 20.4034 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 7 02:47 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C