NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Mic-01-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 06 09.38596    2461200.88596    9.87    21:12:54.42 -36:15:11.2   7322 1766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 06 09.38661    2461200.88661    9.88    21:12:54.45 -36:15:11.1   7328 1770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.19310    2461290.69310    8.95    21:12:54.55 -36:15:10.7   2251 4613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 09 07.19381    2461290.69381    8.99    21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.3   2258 4612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 07.1935  2461290.6935   8.97  21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0
  7.44600 -43.24091 galactic  Mic  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.6 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  ASAS J211254-3615.2           
Type: MISC
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    10.250   V       Y     0.700   V         2452424.33000        173.671417000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0:  9.89 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0:  9.90 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  9.90 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Mic-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Mic-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Mic-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Mic-01-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 93636 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 93636 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.png' -> 'transient_report/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits_preview.png'
Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits

renamed 'Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.png' -> 'transient_report/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits_preview.png'
Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3359.5586 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 789.9961 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4638.1028 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1134.9732 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4536.3595 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1064.4270 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.38057 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.066 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T23:37:54.2016084' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-07T04:37:54.2016084' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61290.1929884376 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-07T04:38:04.1059461' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61290.1931030671 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 313.042585378247 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -34.0000386819856 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.3519444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 180.371388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.6143949188658 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Mic-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 52 10' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 349.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/d_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits :) Spent 0.547530 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/d_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T23:38:55.3999630' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-07T04:38:55.3999630' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61290.1936967475 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-07T04:39:05.3030757' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61290.1938113775 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 313.042585369331 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -34.0000386598972 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.3502777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 180.603888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.61457730552833 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Mic-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 52 10' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.3299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 13.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/d_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :) Spent 0.531554 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/d_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits


fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.69310418 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Image size: 936.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:52:10.962 -34:00:22.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 Second-epoch image center 20:52:10.962 -34:00:22.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Image size: 936.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:52:14.151 -34:00:28.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 Second-epoch image center 20:52:14.151 -34:00:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 20:52:10.962 -34:00:22.87 Second-epoch second image center 20:52:14.151 -34:00:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01112 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DCCcm339Ik Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RxSzGG9iDA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x92evOZzFB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eT6XOViVUz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg Loaded 8112 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3059 out of 3109 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3109 out of 3631 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.306400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.306400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0622 deg, Dec -39.2678 to -28.4865 deg Loaded 8112 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3059 out of 3109 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3109 out of 3631 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 3667 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 303.0803 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2757 to -28.4866 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 303.0803 to 323.0580 deg, Dec -39.2757 to -28.4866 deg Loaded 8121 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3072 out of 3121 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3121 out of 3667 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 2.3 pix fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 2.3 pix fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.8 mag. Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 13.8 mag. Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.DCCcm339Ik (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, bad_region=736, passed=3631 Got 3631 stars (including 2699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2650 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3025 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3025 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3025 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2650 stars left (next iteration limit 2915) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=2650 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=896 n_q2=434 n_q3=899 n_q4=421 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141 The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RxSzGG9iDA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, bad_region=746, passed=3667 Got 3667 stars (including 2716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3667 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2668 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2668 stars left (next iteration limit 2934) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=2668 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=886 n_q2=443 n_q3=917 n_q4=422 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.x92evOZzFB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=140, bad_region=144, passed=1642 Got 1642 stars (including 1366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1642 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1334 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1334 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1510 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1335 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1335 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 1335 stars left (next iteration limit 1467) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1335 robust_rms=5.051 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=29.285 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1335 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.551 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1335 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=1335 robust_rms_before=0.898 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.570 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.551 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.570 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=1335 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=471 n_q2=176 n_q3=543 n_q4=145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.eT6XOViVUz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=151, bad_region=162, passed=1715 Got 1715 stars (including 1410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1715 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1380 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1372 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1564 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1381 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1376 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1563 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1376 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1563 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 1376 stars left (next iteration limit 1512) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=5.068 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.507 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=1376 robust_rms_before=0.881 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.572 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.572 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=1376 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=476 n_q2=189 n_q3=561 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.141 ref2=Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.109 new1=fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.286 new2=fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.241 reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.125 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (2650 matched stars from wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (2668 matched stars from wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (1335 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (1376 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0: 9.89 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0: 9.90 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.9705 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 The candidate 20427_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 07.19381    2461290.69381    9.18    21:04:36.76 -33:16:48.3   3226 2774   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits **** FOUND 21:04:36.77 -33:16:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00996_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 Preparing report for the candidate 00996_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Last image: 2461290.69310418 07.09.2026 04:37:54.201 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1943 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2769437.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2769437.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 69.986 (2.48054e+30), 18 match, 0 conflict, 48 distractors, 98 index. RA,Dec = (313.061,-34.015), pixel scale 5.93405 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--------+--++--+----+--+--------+--+---++---+--+---+---++--+----+(best)---------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2769437.solved to indicate this. Field: out2769437.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (313.045401, -34.005277) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:52:10.896, -34:00:18.998). Field size: 15.7192 x 10.5412 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.825 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 7 00:26 fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 7 00:26 out2769437.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2769437.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2769437.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6483 degrees of RA,Dec (313.044,-34.0061) log-odds ratio 38.1305 (3.62963e+16), 6 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 23 index. RA,Dec = (313.049,-34.0121), pixel scale 5.94561 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++---+--+--------------++(best)-----------------------------------+-------------------------+------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2769437.solved to indicate this. Field: out2769437.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (313.046683, -34.005530) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:52:11.204, -34:00:19.908). Field size: 15.6995 x 10.5425 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.829 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 7 00:26 fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 7 00:26 out2769437.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 9738 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4685, 951.431] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 81.833 (3.46426e+35), 11 match, 0 conflict, 114 distractors, 11 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+----------------+-++-----------------------------+----------++-----------------------+------- --> log-odds 81.833 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 236.232 (3.92747e+102), 23 match, 0 conflict, 210 distractors, 23 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---++------++----++-++-++-----------------------------+----------++-----+----------+------+------- --> log-odds 236.232 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 481.016 (7.98959e+208), 45 match, 0 conflict, 188 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+++------+++---+++++-++---++--+---+------+-+-+--+--++-----+-+--++-----+-----+----+------+------- --> log-odds 481.016 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 986.417 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 663 distractors, 98 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++-+--+++++--+++++++++--++-++--+++---+++-+-++-+-+++++--++-+--++-+---+--+-+++--++-+----++-+---- --> log-odds 986.417 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1849.9 (inf), 183 match, 0 conflict, 576 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++-++++-++-++++-+++-+++++++---++++++++++++++-++-++-+++++ --> log-odds 1849.9 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3494.31 (inf), 369 match, 0 conflict, 1245 distractors, 374 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++ --> log-odds 3494.31 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6303.31 (inf), 713 match, 0 conflict, 2279 distractors, 722 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 6303.31 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11502.3 (inf), 1402 match, 0 conflict, 2107 distractors, 1435 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 11502.3 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4685, 951.431] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 81.833 (3.46426e+35), 11 match, 0 conflict, 114 distractors, 11 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+----------------+-++-----------------------------+----------++-----------------------+------- --> log-odds 81.833 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 236.232 (3.92747e+102), 23 match, 0 conflict, 210 distractors, 23 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---++------++----++-++-++-----------------------------+----------++-----+----------+------+------- --> log-odds 236.232 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 481.016 (7.98959e+208), 45 match, 0 conflict, 188 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+++------+++---+++++-++---++--+---+------+-+-+--+--++-----+-+--++-----+-----+----+------+------- --> log-odds 481.016 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 986.417 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 663 distractors, 98 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++-+--+++++--+++++++++--++-++--+++---+++-+-++-+-+++++--++-+--++-+---+--+-+++--++-+----++-+---- --> log-odds 986.417 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1849.9 (inf), 183 match, 0 conflict, 576 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++-++++-++-++++-+++-+++++++---++++++++++++++-++-++-+++++ --> log-odds 1849.9 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3494.31 (inf), 369 match, 0 conflict, 1245 distractors, 374 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++ --> log-odds 3494.31 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6303.31 (inf), 713 match, 0 conflict, 2279 distractors, 722 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 6303.31 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11502.3 (inf), 1402 match, 0 conflict, 2107 distractors, 1435 index. RA,Dec = (313.048,-34.0047), pixel scale 5.96135 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 11502.3 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (313.046676, -34.005526) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:52:11.202, -34:00:19.895). Field size: 15.7009 x 10.5412 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.824 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Generating wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Image size: 936.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:52:10.962 -34:00:22.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 12534 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2807506.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:52:09.616 -33:59:56.26 Second-epoch image center 20:52:10.962 -34:00:22.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0087 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits The above guess is bExcluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 10 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-09T09:15:36.9849690 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-09T09:15:36.9849690 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-09T09:15:36.984 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Exposure 20 sec, 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461200.88596046 mid. exp. The reference image star 7755.134 33.658 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7901.379 14.156 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9325.267 9.642 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9496.988 6.403 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9499.343 5.621 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7593.360 6.021 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9006.503 2.909 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8624.274 19.420 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9018.762 36.997 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7729.166 20.560 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 23811, (23811 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 4 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3875 * rejected close to frame edge: 110 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 45 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.15 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -8.1 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -7.5 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.6 Selected detection limit= -8.6 Final detection limit= -8.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 74 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 23807 * detected, using 499/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018857, number_of_ambiguous_matches=449 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=21847 inliers=21847 rms 0.61 -> 0.60 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.012305, number_of_ambiguous_matches=293 21831 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=21831 inliers=21831 rms 0.42 -> 0.42 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006258, number_of_ambiguous_matches=149 21805 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=2 pairs=21805 inliers=21805 rms 0.28 -> 0.27 pix, max corner correction 0.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001890, number_of_ambiguous_matches=45 21795 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.005 23807 stars detected, 21795 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 21160, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 21160 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 21158 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00391 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 20140 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.14 25823 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 210560 kB used, 248152 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-07T04:37:54.2016084 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-07T04:37:54.2016084 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-09-07T04:37:54.201 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits The star 9354.751 10.339 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8626.266 2.097 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7702.733 1.271 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8169.580 29.051 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7771.330 32.349 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9485.720 31.210 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9514.405 27.557 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8379.035 62.446 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9346.640 46.529 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8075.085 41.492 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 11579 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 890 * rejected close to frame edge: 50 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 11579 * detected, using 243/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000658, number_of_ambiguous_matches=17 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=7450 inliers=7450 rms 1.19 -> 0.27 pix, max corner correction 5.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000387, number_of_ambiguous_matches=10 7449 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=7449 inliers=7449 rms 0.22 -> 0.21 pix, max corner correction 1.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000310, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 7449 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=7449 inliers=7449 rms 0.21 -> 0.21 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000232, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6 7449 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.749 11579 stars detected, 7449 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 7143, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 7143 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 6691 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00022*X_pix -0.00003*Y_pix -0.88633 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 6691 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.30  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  25823 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 210024 kB used, 248152 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-07T04:38:55.3999630 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-07T04:38:55.3999630 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-09-07T04:38:55.399 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits The star 9362.025 9.813 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8633.248 1.887 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8524.915 18.476 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9522.312 26.558 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8477.068 22.512 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7778.279 31.621 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8386.217 61.810 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9492.842 30.670 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8177.485 28.738 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8082.368 40.794 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 12069 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 970 * rejected close to frame edge: 61 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 14 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 12069 * detected, using 253/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000775, number_of_ambiguous_matches=20 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=7915 inliers=7915 rms 0.87 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 4.7 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000542, number_of_ambiguous_matches=14 7913 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=7913 inliers=7913 rms 0.25 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 1.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000426, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11 7913 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=7913 inliers=7913 rms 0.24 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000271, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 7910 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.747 12069 stars detected, 7910 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 7571, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 7571 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 7192 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00022*X_pix -0.00004*Y_pix -0.82588 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 7192 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.29  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  25823 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 211412 kB used, 248152 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 47618 (47618 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4769 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6015 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3123 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2547 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5341 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 6 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 21704 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Mic-01-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 09.06.2026 09:15:36.984 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461200.88596046 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 23811 *matched= 23811 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-15-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exp_start= 09.06.2026 09:16:32.719 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461200.88660554 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.005 *detected= 23807 *matched= 21795 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_04-16-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exp_start= 07.09.2026 04:37:54.201 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461290.69310418 ap= 4.7 rotation= 179.749 *detected= 11579 *matched= 7449 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-37-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exp_start= 07.09.2026 04:38:55.399 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461290.69381249 ap= 4.7 rotation= 179.747 *detected= 12069 *matched= 7910 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_233943_TTUQ2b1x1_1984979_4avcNCKr/fd_Mic-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_23-38-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits ########### Completed Mic-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 ################################################################################### 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 21:12:54.55 -36:15:11.0 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461290.69310418 -observatory V36 11:38:14.97 +03:32:24.7 Mercury (-0.9mag) 13:35:48.31 -14:28:49.4 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:13:42.59 +22:59:16.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:08:57.88 +16:57:54.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:45.44 +02:38:47.9 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:41.21 +21:01:59.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:45.40 -00:03:09.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:36.03 -23:39:35.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 07:39:53.70 +23:54:27.0 Moon (-9.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 7 00:24 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461290.69310418: 09:09:03.32 +16:57:27.9 Io (6.2mag) 09:08:55.29 +16:58:08.4 Europa (6.3mag) 09:09:08.47 +16:57:01.1 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:08:32.97 +16:59:57.1 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:06:43.92 +17:14:23.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:09:00.80 +16:57:41.0 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:06:21.23 +17:08:22.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:12:51.67 +16:25:30.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:10:03.39 +17:15:39.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:41.93 +02:39:11.3 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:38.77 +02:38:43.1 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:52:00.93 +02:41:19.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:59.42 +02:38:14.1 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:32.32 +02:28:32.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 7 00:24 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461290.69310418: 22:04:08.96 +00:53:51.2 JWST 17:32:08.55 +37:06:31.1 Chandra 09:50:39.59 -55:05:06.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 7 00:24 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461290.69310418 -observatory V36 03:40:21.80 +19:20:07.4 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:52.42 -34:12:48.2 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:19:23.53 -70:17:44.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:40.86 +33:41:51.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:51:16.44 +45:27:42.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:16.44 +45:27:42.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:16.44 +45:27:42.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:16.44 +45:27:42.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:51:16.44 +45:27:42.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:13:34.13 +28:40:59.2 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:10:06.83 +25:58:50.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:49:24.08 +27:13:47.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:48:36.23 +05:14:01.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:29:33.69 -15:38:24.7 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:38:18.07 +32:53:08.9 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:34.83 +15:19:27.3 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:33:40.45 +43:10:44.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:26:18.73 +49:18:26.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:35:33.17 -13:01:30.2 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:11:35.70 +18:33:50.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:17:48.78 +18:46:38.0 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:19:32.32 +00:07:28.8 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:41:06.63 +74:03:07.1 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:50.87 +46:08:17.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:13:10.48 +11:16:28.1 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:25:55.73 -35:02:03.1 13.4mag 10P/Tempel 01:19:19.87 +37:00:37.3 17.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:48:06.07 -05:27:37.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:08:21.59 -05:03:43.0 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:44:43.61 -07:03:46.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:39:07.86 +19:15:35.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:16.59 +14:59:49.1 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:37:52.62 +28:35:27.9 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:31:29.58 +24:50:34.5 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:27:39.62 +20:53:23.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:46:22.15 -21:18:09.2 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:17:17.48 +20:38:32.4 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:32:37.35 -17:37:26.8 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:37:46.79 +13:48:22.3 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:24:21.38 +08:29:00.5 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:47:47.60 +36:17:16.3 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:31:35.90 +35:42:43.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:25:10.00 -00:14:14.7 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:27:41.74 +16:51:20.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Sep 7 00:24 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 7 00:24 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 7 00:24 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:34:06.502 +12:42:13.91 AT 2026ypz 2026-08-08.10 20 21:30:05.008 +02:38:33.95 AT 2026ypy 2026-08-06.53 20.21 21:00:04.179 -04:29:11.16 AT 2026ypx 2026-08-10.99 20.06 02:37:12.256 +15:20:39.63 AT 2026ypw 2026-08-12.19 20.13 20:30:21.422 +77:41:45.40 AT 2026ypv 2026-08-02.23 20.4969 13:32:08.201 +00:21:43.54 AT 2026ypu 2026-08-05.16 19.6868 14:07:14.862 +00:31:05.95 AT 2026ypt 2026-08-08.16 20.0684 17:39:38.555 +44:15:43.22 AT 2026yps 2026-07-22.33 20.9161 23:51:42.078 +03:04:27.33 AT 2026ypr 2026-08-12.07 20.05 02:34:15.880 +40:31:56.36 AT 2026ypq 2026-08-11.58 18.82 15:38:07.902 +06:01:37.84 AT 2026ypp 2026-08-11.26 20.34 15:24:17.953 +11:26:31.29 AT 2026ypo 2026-08-11.26 20.8 14:21:16.003 +25:15:33.98 AT 2026ypn 2026-08-11.26 18.72 16:23:56.085 +09:36:23.21 AT 2026ypm 2026-08-11.28 20.97 20:54:11.595 +10:54:51.15 SN 2026ypl 2026-08-09.34 20.4 00:40:25.122 +24:26:45.82 AT 2026ypk 2026-08-07.45 20.4501 17:05:06.872 +77:16:36.60 AT 2026ypj 2026-08-11.31 18.807 20:49:46.878 -06:36:38.40 AT 2026ypi 2026-08-09.29 20.4359 00:12:21.150 -17:28:55.44 AT 2026yph 2026-08-08.42 20.4034 00:48:58.972 +17:28:17.78 AT 2026ypg 2026-08-05.48 20.2336 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 7 00:24 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C