This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 13.52 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4
182.05297 11.44592 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda -0 -3 3 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.9752,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.4752 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 11.92 06:54:52.29 +31:12:52.5
184.89509 14.34229 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:52.29 +31:12:52.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:52.29 +31:12:52.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.9752,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.4752 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 13.31 07:20:50.53 +30:14:19.7
188.02807 19.14829 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:50.53 +30:14:19.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:50.53 +30:14:19.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.9752,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.4752 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 13.84 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2
185.37815 13.50455 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala -0 -0 0 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.07 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.9752,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.4752 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 11.99 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1
186.34787 19.93086 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 886926281522836736
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.490 G 14.510 G F
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia -0 -0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1: 15.87 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.87 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 886926281522836736,2461289.9752,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 886926281522836736 20260906.4752 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4752 2461289.9752 12.58 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9
184.75211 17.52741 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9: 16.13 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9: 15.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.03 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.9752,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.4752 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461289.97542976 06.09.2026 11:24:27.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22920
Objects passed selection criteria: 22799
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15727.8
Average stars matched: 15262.8 (97.0434 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 06:27:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461289.97542976 06.09.2026 11:24:27.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 154975
Objects passed selection criteria: 154595
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114518
Average stars matched: 109990 (96.0456 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 06:28:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.97489887
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.451 +29:59:42.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:38.451 +29:59:42.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0790 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.153 +30:00:14.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:38.153 +30:00:14.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:38.451 +29:59:42.76
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:38.153 +30:00:14.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00890 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SrXz6q1ZU4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j3Si81lwPA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KrPGcxaelA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.06INO6iskR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SrXz6q1ZU4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j3Si81lwPA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1411 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KrPGcxaelA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=813, bad_region=0, passed=7647
Got 7647 stars (including 6821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7647 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=10.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.108 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=0.936 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.437 +29:59:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7647 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky734218.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.936 -> 0.301 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1438 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1266 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.06INO6iskR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=839, bad_region=0, passed=7476
Got 7476 stars (including 6622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=10.975 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.035 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=0.960 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.403 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.348
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.140 +30:00:13.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7476 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky734132.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.960 -> 0.326 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1431 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1072 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:04.57 +25:21:28.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:04.57 +25:21:28.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:04.57 +25:21:28.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31429_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 31429_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31656_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 31656_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:51.97 +31:52:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31739_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 31739_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.26 +33:22:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.03 +25:59:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.06 +30:16:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.437 +29:59:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:38.437 +29:59:42.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0790 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:38.140 +30:00:13.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:38.140 +30:00:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:38.437 +29:59:42.04
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:38.140 +30:00:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00889 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.26RGEX4mN6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MH6hHjLULa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eRTsrdTUGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VW6vJ4GoWZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 131 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.26RGEX4mN6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MH6hHjLULa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eRTsrdTUGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2940, bad_region=2, passed=62970
Got 62970 stars (including 59893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=10.666 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.951 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1454 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VW6vJ4GoWZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2983, bad_region=2, passed=63212
Got 63212 stars (including 60102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4758 stars left (next iteration limit 5232)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=10.724 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.722 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4758 robust_rms_before=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.346 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.345
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.346 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4758 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1452 n_q2=1025 n_q3=1204 n_q4=1077 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-23-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0397.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_062501_TTUQ1b1x1_679018_nCzFIniC/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:25:35.20 +29:29:30.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:27:17.28 +29:11:20.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:25:35.20 +29:29:30.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:27:17.28 +29:11:20.1: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:37:04.98 +32:33:32.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5048 delta=1.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:35.20 +29:29:30.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3348 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:17.28 +29:11:20.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8304 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:34.62 +29:50:25.5: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:49:02.59 +29:16:38.6: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:34.62 +29:50:25.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:34.62 +29:50:25.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4386 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:49:02.59 +29:16:38.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:02.59 +29:16:38.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2272 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:40.20 +28:25:35.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:01.11 +26:06:15.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:39:40.74 +27:39:52.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:04.58 +25:21:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:40.20 +28:25:35.3: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:40.20 +28:25:35.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2413 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:39:40.74 +27:39:52.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:01.11 +26:06:15.4: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:40.74 +27:39:52.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9996 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:01.11 +26:06:15.4: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9518 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:52.29 +31:12:52.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:04.58 +25:21:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:04.58 +25:21:28.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:52.29 +31:12:52.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:27.12 +26:25:33.9: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:27.12 +26:25:33.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.12 +26:25:33.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6106 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:23.05 +32:12:17.5: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:03.55 +32:44:39.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:44.28 +27:23:04.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:23.05 +32:12:17.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:23.05 +32:12:17.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7919 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:34.35 +28:24:04.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:03.55 +32:44:39.0: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:44.28 +27:23:04.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:03.55 +32:44:39.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1368 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:44.28 +27:23:04.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0934 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:34.35 +28:24:04.7: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:34.35 +28:24:04.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2212 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:42.51 +25:21:35.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:12:43.23 +25:31:54.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:54.32 +32:38:10.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:14.53 +26:58:08.6: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:42.51 +25:21:35.6: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:42.51 +25:21:35.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2060 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:13.09 +30:08:40.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:12:43.23 +25:31:54.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:43.23 +25:31:54.0: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1717 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:54.32 +32:38:10.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:54.32 +32:38:10.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3638 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:50.53 +30:14:19.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:14.53 +26:58:08.6: 13.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:14.53 +26:58:08.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5079 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:13.09 +30:08:40.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:13.09 +30:08:40.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2543 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:50.53 +30:14:19.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:59.24 +33:17:38.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:59.24 +33:17:38.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:59.24 +33:17:38.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3729 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:05.67 +30:55:13.0: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:05.67 +30:55:13.0: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:05.67 +30:55:13.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4086 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.07 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:09.90 +30:27:01.2: ref_mag=16.07 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.8299 delta=2.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1: 15.87 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9: 16.13 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.87 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:21:40.21 +31:59:46.1: ref_mag=15.87 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=11.9885 delta=3.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9: 15.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.03 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:08:30.03 +32:33:15.9: ref_mag=16.03 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=12.5797 delta=3.45 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147964.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191893_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191893_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:32.36 +32:36:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:18.57 +30:59:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.76 +32:45:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191900_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191900_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:04.17 +33:32:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.04 +29:27:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:30.10 +27:05:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191910_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 191910_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:27.17 +33:36:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.90 +31:14:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191922_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191922_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:56.07 +32:38:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:33.74 +29:22:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:31.03 +28:48:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:18.63 +26:59:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.32 +33:49:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:26.64 +32:18:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:58.44 +30:49:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191939_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191939_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:02.90 +28:11:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191943_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191943_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:19.57 +28:10:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.42 +27:20:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.28 +25:15:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.14 +29:01:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:27.91 +31:40:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.50 +26:48:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:17.60 +26:58:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191956_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191956_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:39.46 +31:31:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191959_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191959_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:21.39 +27:08:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191960_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191960_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.88 +29:29:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.46 +26:33:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.95 +29:19:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191967_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191967_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:29.50 +30:24:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191968_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191968_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.15 +27:36:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 191969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:47.86 +29:38:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.62 +24:47:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192303_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192303_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.12 +27:55:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192389_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192389_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.81 +34:13:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192551_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192551_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.52 +27:49:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192609_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 192609_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:28.37 +27:17:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192723_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192723_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.73 +29:41:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192833_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192833_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.88 +28:00:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192963_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192963_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.08 +28:18:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 192970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.78 +27:48:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193032_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193032_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.40 +28:00:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.15 +27:38:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:01.84 +31:53:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.00 +29:45:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193154_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193154_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193208_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193208_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.53 +29:47:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193234_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193234_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.01 +32:48:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.49 +32:29:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.03 +29:43:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193297_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193297_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:44.98 +32:52:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193313_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193313_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.94 +29:19:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:32.42 +29:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193391_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193391_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.11 +27:14:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:39.17 +27:46:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.38 +27:03:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193435_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193435_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.82 +33:40:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193439_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193439_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:36.69 +25:30:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193503_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193503_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:31.42 +27:26:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193511_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193511_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.48 +26:22:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193526_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193526_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:53.78 +32:48:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193551_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193551_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:23.56 +25:04:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193596_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193596_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:38.29 +29:46:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193600_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193600_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193695_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193695_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193718_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193718_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.22 +27:58:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193737_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193737_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193770_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193770_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.68 +33:53:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193818_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193818_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.57 +26:08:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193820_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193820_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.27 +32:38:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193828_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193828_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.97 +30:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.52 +29:16:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193886_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193886_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.61 +30:33:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.58 +28:32:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.04 +32:21:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193928_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193928_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:16.73 +26:58:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:21.38 +26:58:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 193978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.69 +29:43:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.71 +33:20:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194106_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194106_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:36.79 +30:36:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194141_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 194141_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194181_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194181_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:17.57 +35:04:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194193_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194193_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.30 +26:27:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.90 +25:33:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.97 +25:18:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.29 +33:08:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:46.41 +27:46:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194272_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194272_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.54 +31:22:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194304_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194304_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:46.70 +31:55:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194311_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194311_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:37.98 +34:16:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.57 +26:48:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.10 +34:14:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194334_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194334_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.30 +27:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194357_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194357_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.24 +32:38:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194453_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194453_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.98 +32:46:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.52 +33:13:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194479_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194479_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194495_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194495_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.98 +33:15:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194647_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194647_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.75 +26:58:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194658_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194658_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.86 +32:24:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194749_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194749_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.78 +30:35:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:58.09 +33:24:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194949_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194979_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 194979_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.60 +32:22:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 195005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.67 +27:15:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179669_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 179669_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.86 +29:41:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.65 +31:35:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.39 +26:47:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 147964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
Preparing report for the candidate 138752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.20 +33:22:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.02 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-24-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398 did not pass the final checks
