This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.09 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9
234.50974 -2.05305 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0724401-200510
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.680 r Y 0.850 r 2458238.24620 125.888367000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9: 13.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0724401-200510,2461289.9635,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0724401-200510 20260906.4635 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 11.99 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4
235.48472 -5.46644 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J071338.03-223202.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.440 g Y 0.420 g 2458560.66300 256.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J071338.03-223202.5,2461289.9635,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J071338.03-223202.5 20260906.4635 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.27 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7
236.48786 -0.15017 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" GDS_J0735513-205431
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.560 i Y 1.520 i M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0735513-205431,2461289.9635,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0735513-205431 20260906.4635 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.51 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8
233.26541 -6.50809 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J070519.96-210207.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.690 V 14.700 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070519.96-210207.2,2461289.9635,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070519.96-210207.2 20260906.4635 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.54 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4
232.97308 -10.60678 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 2.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J064854.00-223351.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.330 V 13.960 V 2457659.90000 466.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J064854.00-223351.3,2461289.9635,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J064854.00-223351.3 20260906.4635 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.62 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0
233.76875 -5.75786 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 2.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J070910.14-210842.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.970 V 14.400 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0: 13.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070910.14-210842.4,2461289.9635,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070910.14-210842.4 20260906.4635 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.49 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5
233.04434 -2.22682 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0721057-185233
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.860 r Y 0.510 r C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0721057-185233,2461289.9635,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0721057-185233 20260906.4635 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.4635 2461289.9635 12.47 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8
233.29335 -3.97095 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J071502.21-195425.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.950 V 14.650 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J071502.21-195425.8,2461289.9635,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J071502.21-195425.8 20260906.4635 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.78189103 21.01.2026 06:45:45.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
First image: 2461061.78189103 21.01.2026 06:45:45.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Last image: 2461289.96376517 06.09.2026 11:07:39.311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22561
Objects passed selection criteria: 22518
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18180
Average stars matched: 17978.5 (98.8916 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 06:13:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.78189103 21.01.2026 06:45:45.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
First image: 2461061.78189103 21.01.2026 06:45:45.385 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Last image: 2461289.96376517 06.09.2026 11:07:39.311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 165353
Objects passed selection criteria: 164990
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 132750
Average stars matched: 130200 (98.0783 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 570324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 06:14:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.96325412
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.230 -18:00:10.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40
Second-epoch image center 07:06:40.230 -18:00:10.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:40.230 -18:00:10.55
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00330 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HEiB9oL7lp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wnwTDwey09
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xzfH7fnMaI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TpEdGxXr5r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits) and catalog (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3173 to 115.3156 deg, Dec -23.3308 to -12.4222 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3173 to 115.3156 deg, Dec -23.3308 to -12.4222 deg
Loaded 27127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17905 out of 19533 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19533 out of 28217 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.861100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.861100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3173 to 115.3156 deg, Dec -23.3308 to -12.4222 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3173 to 115.3156 deg, Dec -23.3308 to -12.4222 deg
Loaded 27127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17905 out of 19533 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19533 out of 28217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 22694 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2665 to 115.2375 deg, Dec -23.2865 to -12.5136 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2665 to 115.2375 deg, Dec -23.2865 to -12.5136 deg
Loaded 26687 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15990 out of 17083 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17083 out of 22694 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
2.5 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
3.2 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
3.2 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
14.5 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
13.5 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
13.5 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HEiB9oL7lp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3026, bad_region=0, passed=28217
Got 28217 stars (including 25157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1023 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wnwTDwey09 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2115, bad_region=0, passed=22694
Got 22694 stars (including 20556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.763 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.729 n_q1=1310 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1384 n_q4=1124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xzfH7fnMaI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=613, bad_region=1, passed=11135
Got 11135 stars (including 10512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4842 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=8.645 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.608 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.124 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4842 robust_rms_before=1.429 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.753 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.634
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.292 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11135 stars ###
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4038813.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.429 -> 0.488 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4842 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1209 n_q2=1058 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.341
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TpEdGxXr5r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=0, passed=11158
Got 11158 stars (including 10534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=8.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4843 robust_rms_before=1.399 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.683 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.656
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.683 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1205 n_q2=1065 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.454
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.057
ref2=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.585 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits sigma_overall=0.517 worst_q_ratio=1.341
new2=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.454
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.18
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383_astrometric_residuals.png (4842 matched stars from wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384_astrometric_residuals.png (4843 matched stars from wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field CMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:44:43.15 -16:45:37.8: 9.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:44:43.15 -16:45:37.8: 9.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:43.15 -16:45:37.8: ref_mag=9.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.5470 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30419_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 30419_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30555_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 30555_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:01.92 -14:56:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30567_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 30567_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:45.74 -19:54:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30631_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 30631_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:49.39 -21:28:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30653_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 30653_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:44.74 -16:10:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11864_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 11864_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:08.13 -17:19:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08637_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 08637_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:35.16 -15:44:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15772_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 15772_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:27.55 -19:00:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27695_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 27695_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.08 -22:48:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24491_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 24491_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:15.18 -22:16:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field CMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.292 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40
Second-epoch image center 07:06:40.292 -18:00:11.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:44.094 -17:59:34.40
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:40.292 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.700 -18:00:19.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XjkwGS8kFc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ByxELrBbPn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GFjAzNBn8I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xOu91KVJ96
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits) and catalog (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 205704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3098 to 115.3420 deg, Dec -23.3320 to -12.3839 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3098 to 115.3420 deg, Dec -23.3320 to -12.3839 deg
Loaded 27284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15800 out of 22509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22509 out of 205704 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 205704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3098 to 115.3420 deg, Dec -23.3320 to -12.3839 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3098 to 115.3420 deg, Dec -23.3320 to -12.3839 deg
Loaded 27284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15800 out of 22509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22509 out of 205704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 169156 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2666 to 115.2431 deg, Dec -23.2876 to -12.5001 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2666 to 115.2431 deg, Dec -23.2876 to -12.5001 deg
Loaded 26743 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16991 out of 22058 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22058 out of 169156 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 156 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
2.3 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
2.9 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
3.0 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
14.7 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
13.7 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
13.6 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XjkwGS8kFc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=31065, bad_region=6, passed=205681
Got 205681 stars (including 174294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 205681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 205681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 205681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1400 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.000
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ByxELrBbPn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=21260, bad_region=1, passed=169104
Got 169104 stars (including 147640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 169104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.725 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.713 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1359 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GFjAzNBn8I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4938, bad_region=3, passed=79711
Got 79711 stars (including 74684 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=8.847 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.141 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.474 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.636 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.640
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.636 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1220 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.527
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xOu91KVJ96 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4999, bad_region=4, passed=79418
Got 79418 stars (including 74313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=8.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4854 robust_rms_before=1.402 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.720 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.666
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.720 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1294 n_q4=1320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.521
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_3719710_rE7HvCTC/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field CMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:15:12.17 -14:30:49.3: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:17:46.54 -13:38:36.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:35:50.03 -17:47:58.2: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:33:31.11 -13:25:40.0: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:06:27.69 -13:09:16.9: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:14:16.33 -14:07:27.9: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:06:35.36 -13:45:56.4: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:25:58.70 -14:09:24.7: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:06:21.61 -19:05:22.2: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:35:50.03 -17:47:58.2: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:33:31.11 -13:25:40.0: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:17:46.54 -13:38:36.1: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:06:27.69 -13:09:16.9: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:15:12.17 -14:30:49.3: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:14:16.33 -14:07:27.9: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:12:23.59 -20:56:27.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:46.54 -13:38:36.1: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8843 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:12.17 -14:30:49.3: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9600 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:31.11 -13:25:40.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6191 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:50.03 -17:47:58.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1228 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:16.33 -14:07:27.9: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1675 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:27.69 -13:09:16.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3130 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:25:58.70 -14:09:24.7: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:12:23.59 -20:56:27.7: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:06:35.36 -13:45:56.4: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:06:21.61 -19:05:22.2: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:58.70 -14:09:24.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6628 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:23.59 -20:56:27.7: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4203 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.36 -13:45:56.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0903 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:21.61 -19:05:22.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5177 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:47:14.43 -21:39:21.6: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:37:01.05 -19:08:23.4: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:46:30.41 -21:09:45.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:27:30.69 -22:51:46.2: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:45:02.50 -17:49:44.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:37:01.05 -19:08:23.4: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:53:37.96 -17:06:35.5: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:46:30.41 -21:09:45.4: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:29:09.28 -21:52:28.9: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:01.05 -19:08:23.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9459 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:30.41 -21:09:45.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5363 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:47:14.43 -21:39:21.6: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:14.43 -21:39:21.6: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6565 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:43:05.38 -14:28:06.4: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:27:30.69 -22:51:46.2: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:30.69 -22:51:46.2: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9117 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:45:02.50 -17:49:44.2: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:29:09.28 -21:52:28.9: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:53:37.96 -17:06:35.5: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:02.50 -17:49:44.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8377 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:09.28 -21:52:28.9: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8286 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:37.96 -17:06:35.5: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6877 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:06:21.13 -16:38:12.2: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:43:05.38 -14:28:06.4: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:05.38 -14:28:06.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8272 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:43:31.05 -22:08:49.4: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:45:28.00 -15:14:16.0: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:06:21.13 -16:38:12.2: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:21.13 -16:38:12.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3849 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:43:31.05 -22:08:49.4: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:31.05 -22:08:49.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1729 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:45:28.00 -15:14:16.0: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:28.00 -15:14:16.0: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3208 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:37:34.87 -14:24:29.3: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:56:03.48 -12:46:40.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:33:43.86 -14:29:29.3: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:37:18.60 -18:31:09.3: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:37:34.87 -14:24:29.3: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:34.87 -14:24:29.3: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5764 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:34:24.43 -13:52:27.0: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:18:52.82 -19:17:10.8: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:56:03.48 -12:46:40.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:03.48 -12:46:40.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:33:43.86 -14:29:29.3: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:43.86 -14:29:29.3: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8685 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:37:18.60 -18:31:09.3: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:18.60 -18:31:09.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2432 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:34:24.43 -13:52:27.0: 12.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:33:36.44 -20:58:54.9: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:18:52.82 -19:17:10.8: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:24.43 -13:52:27.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9825 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:52.82 -19:17:10.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9611 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:33:36.44 -20:58:54.9: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:36.44 -20:58:54.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4411 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:44:55.64 -18:34:32.5: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:05:10.63 -20:11:38.6: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:00:01.44 -22:59:18.9: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:35:47.36 -16:05:35.7: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:48:50.14 -20:26:51.6: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:44:55.64 -18:34:32.5: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:55.64 -18:34:32.5: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7185 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:05:10.63 -20:11:38.6: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:10.63 -20:11:38.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3322 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:08:21.17 -17:34:28.3: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:00:01.44 -22:59:18.9: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:01.44 -22:59:18.9: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2603 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:35:47.36 -16:05:35.7: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:47.36 -16:05:35.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9142 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:48:50.14 -20:26:51.6: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:50.14 -20:26:51.6: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5209 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:44:40.76 -12:51:11.4: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:08:21.17 -17:34:28.3: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:21.17 -17:34:28.3: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5607 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:44:40.76 -12:51:11.4: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:40.76 -12:51:11.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1566 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:26:40.16 -13:11:24.4: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:48:26.36 -13:26:26.3: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:41:45.99 -16:12:00.9: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:40:19.34 -13:06:21.1: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:00:08.31 -16:20:10.8: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:39:24.60 -17:31:05.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:26:40.16 -13:11:24.4: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:40.16 -13:11:24.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6142 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:48:26.36 -13:26:26.3: 13.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:26.36 -13:26:26.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1804 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:41:45.99 -16:12:00.9: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:45.99 -16:12:00.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0759 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:40:19.34 -13:06:21.1: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:19.34 -13:06:21.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3698 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:00:08.31 -16:20:10.8: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:08.31 -16:20:10.8: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9949 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:39:24.60 -17:31:05.3: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:24.60 -17:31:05.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2470 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:40:57.92 -13:21:05.3: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:38:03.66 -14:27:09.7: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:40:57.92 -13:21:05.3: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:57.92 -13:21:05.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6120 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:01:13.88 -19:33:36.7: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:38:03.66 -14:27:09.7: 14.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:03.66 -14:27:09.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8811 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:01:13.88 -19:33:36.7: 15.11 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:01:13.88 -19:33:36.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1015 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9: 13.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:36:07.39 -13:20:34.9: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:35:03.47 -19:34:20.1: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:24:40.16 -20:05:09.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0813 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:36:07.39 -13:20:34.9: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:07.39 -13:20:34.9: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5872 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:13:37.93 -22:32:01.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9889 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:35:03.47 -19:34:20.1: 13.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:03.47 -19:34:20.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8858 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:22:37.53 -19:38:00.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:22:37.53 -19:38:00.3: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:37.53 -19:38:00.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1531 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:35:51.07 -20:54:29.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2544 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:25:19.04 -15:45:24.2: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:25:19.04 -15:45:24.2: 14.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:25:19.04 -15:45:24.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5457 delta=1.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:05:19.95 -21:02:07.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4989 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:15:08.79 -18:12:26.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:15:08.79 -18:12:26.4: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:08.79 -18:12:26.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4633 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:48:54.02 -22:33:50.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5444 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0: 13.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:09:10.22 -21:08:41.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6097 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:21:05.61 -18:52:33.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4733 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:15:02.16 -19:54:25.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4742 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_00-45-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 07:37:02.10 -19:32:54.3: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-20-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 07:37:02.10 -19:32:54.3: 14.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:37:02.10 -19:32:54.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.3217 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out135637.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out143552.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65377.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150420.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162742.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185693.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222891_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222891_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222899_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222899_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222902_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222902_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222903_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222903_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:56.54 -13:38:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222905_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222905_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:52.87 -15:31:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222910_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222910_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:38.21 -18:54:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222913_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222913_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:31.12 -14:25:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222916_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222916_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222917_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222917_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222920_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222920_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222921_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222921_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:42.69 -13:13:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222922_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222922_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222924_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222924_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222925_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222925_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222927_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222927_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.81 -13:38:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222930_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222930_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:06.37 -13:51:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222933_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222933_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222939_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222939_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222940_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222940_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222941_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222941_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:00.95 -20:53:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222942_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222942_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222943_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222943_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:54.14 -18:57:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:07.58 -16:50:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222949_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222949_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222952_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222952_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222953_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222953_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:43.26 -19:25:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222954_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222954_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222955_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222955_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:06.14 -18:22:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222956_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222956_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222958_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222958_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:08.82 -14:22:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222959_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222959_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:42.00 -13:55:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222960_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222960_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222961_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222961_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222962_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222962_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:06.92 -19:11:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222963_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222963_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222965_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222965_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222966_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222966_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:31.92 -22:40:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222967_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 222967_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:37.01 -16:00:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223231_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223231_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:49.41 -21:28:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223269_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223269_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:12.87 -16:35:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223281_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223281_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:53.71 -21:16:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223301_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223301_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:18.72 -16:48:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223315_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223315_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223416_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223416_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223468_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223468_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:46.86 -19:19:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223503_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223503_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:32.10 -14:28:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223591_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223591_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:07.93 -15:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223607_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223607_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223662_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223662_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:04.62 -14:28:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223684_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223684_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223707_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223707_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:53.42 -19:46:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223750_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223750_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:10.99 -20:44:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223768_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223768_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223838_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223838_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223852_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223852_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:00.93 -13:45:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223889_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223889_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:24.66 -19:01:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223896_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223896_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223904_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223904_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223940_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223940_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223948_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223948_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223971_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223971_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223973_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 223973_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:18.13 -14:05:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224088_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224088_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224129_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224129_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:26.33 -14:27:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224131_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224131_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:10.06 -15:15:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224159_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224159_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:07.47 -19:26:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224164_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224164_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224167_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224167_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:19.87 -13:19:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224180_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224180_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:24.36 -13:49:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224228_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224228_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:45.43 -14:29:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224304_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224304_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:18.87 -18:02:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224317_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224317_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224352_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224352_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224354_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224354_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:35.29 -20:52:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224376_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224376_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:48.84 -18:59:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224392_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224392_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224410_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224410_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:05.56 -14:30:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224439_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224439_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224461_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224461_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:53.18 -13:03:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224468_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224468_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224502_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224502_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224504_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224504_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224543_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224543_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:11.26 -15:25:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224577_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224577_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:36.67 -13:39:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224597_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224597_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224629_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224629_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:43.38 -20:07:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224665_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224665_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:16.87 -18:56:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:02.59 -13:56:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224712_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224712_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:23.71 -19:02:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224749_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224749_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224759_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224759_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224812_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224812_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224850_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224850_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:08.83 -13:46:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 224946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225048_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225048_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225068_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225068_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225088_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225088_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:15.68 -13:26:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225141_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225141_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225153_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225153_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225158_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225158_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:36.48 -14:53:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225330_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225330_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225400_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225400_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225471_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225471_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225483_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 225483_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110726_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 110726_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:49.01 -18:00:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130423_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 130423_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.80 -19:07:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135637_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 135637_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:13.88 -19:33:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.539 2932732591751448448 105.30780941443 -19.55976761665 13.2249 11.6744 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.539#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176346_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 176346_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.81 -21:33:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218245_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 218245_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:05.84 -15:00:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150420_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 150420_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91290_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 91290_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169253_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 169253_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:12.46 -22:11:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161682_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 161682_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218754_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 218754_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:09.97 -21:05:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218106_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 218106_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:43.73 -14:28:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217512_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 217512_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:02.94 -21:50:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217296_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 217296_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216910_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 216910_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140909_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 140909_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146517_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 146517_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:45.71 -19:54:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121036_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 121036_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185693_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 185693_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33746_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 33746_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:38.19 -14:07:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70103_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 70103_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:44.74 -16:10:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132070_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 132070_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:04.73 -18:55:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65377_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 65377_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:19.04 -15:45:24.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.535 3028479782285332224 111.32902987133 -15.75703274360 12.1512 10.2833 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.535#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185858_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 185858_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:17.63 -21:04:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 174946_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148092_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 148092_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:55.07 -19:53:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50760_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 50760_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:15.75 -15:02:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189956_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 189956_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190816_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 190816_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170232_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 170232_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:23.58 -22:07:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111199_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 111199_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183203_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 183203_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:39.10 -20:58:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65528_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 65528_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:35.19 -15:44:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 157711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.08 -22:48:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162742_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 162742_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48151_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 48151_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:01.88 -14:56:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187902_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 187902_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181547_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 181547_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.88 -21:26:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125662_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 125662_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144726_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
Preparing report for the candidate 144726_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143552_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 143552_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:02.10 -19:32:54.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.435 5716413183908004224 114.25884565840 -19.54833607729 12.3691 10.8736 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.435#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177881_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 177881_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:09.60 -21:33:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132299_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 132299_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.32 -19:07:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171609_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 171609_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:50.86 -21:54:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73409_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 73409_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:58.63 -15:55:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151214_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 151214_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:59.64 -19:52:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126478_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 126478_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:27.55 -19:00:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167901_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 167901_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:15.18 -22:16:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159821_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384
The candidate 159821_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_06-07-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384 did not pass the final checks
