NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Aqr-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits
Field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits
Field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aqr-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aqr-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 212760 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 212760 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.png' -> 'transient_report/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits_preview.png'
Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits

renamed 'Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.png' -> 'transient_report/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits_preview.png'
Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 551.2712 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 473.6292 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2589.6349 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 703.5097 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2495.7134 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 691.1000 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.69757 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.018 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T03:30:52.4145839' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T08:30:52.4145839' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61289.35477331 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T08:31:02.3460243' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61289.3548882641 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 334.281701670735 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99970852367132 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.4338888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 231.633611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.53980841578582 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aqr-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '22 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/d_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) Spent 0.488743 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/d_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T03:31:38.2386289' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T08:31:38.2386289' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61289.3553036805 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T08:31:48.1427753' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61289.35541831 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 334.281701644981 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99970853926018 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.3083333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 231.824166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.54376483318843 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aqr-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '22 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/d_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits :) Spent 0.485919 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/d_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits


fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.85488905 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 22:17:09.355 -02:00:05.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 22:17:09.856 -02:00:28.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 22:17:09.355 -02:00:05.25 Second-epoch image center 22:17:09.856 -02:00:28.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 22:17:10.587 -02:01:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 22:17:09.355 -02:00:05.25 Second-epoch image center 22:17:10.587 -02:01:02.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 22:17:09.856 -02:00:28.66 Second-epoch second image center 22:17:10.587 -02:01:02.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00996 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.if7BrOyfXF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gRyKQcImKm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CILzuygu6y Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vkt5HWz6uS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits and wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits and wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits and wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 326.4297 to 342.1786 deg, Dec -7.2616 to +3.2651 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 326.4297 to 342.1786 deg, Dec -7.2616 to 3.2651 deg Loaded 5154 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4414 out of 4557 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4557 out of 7776 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.640350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.640350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 326.4297 to 342.1786 deg, Dec -7.2616 to +3.2651 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 326.4297 to 342.1786 deg, Dec -7.2616 to 3.2651 deg Loaded 5154 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4414 out of 4557 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4557 out of 7776 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7733 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 326.4352 to 342.1813 deg, Dec -7.2521 to +3.2799 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 326.4352 to 342.1813 deg, Dec -7.2521 to 3.2799 deg Loaded 5154 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4402 out of 4552 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4552 out of 7733 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits 2.3 pix Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits 2.0 pix fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 2.0 pix fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits 15.1 mag. Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits 12.5 mag. fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 12.9 mag. fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.if7BrOyfXF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, bad_region=0, passed=7776 Got 7776 stars (including 7348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7776 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4564 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4544 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4544 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4544 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7776 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4565 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4545 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7776 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4545 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7776 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4545 stars left (next iteration limit 4998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits N_match=4545 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1032 n_q2=1269 n_q3=1017 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits -region wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.gRyKQcImKm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=0, passed=7733 Got 7733 stars (including 7277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7733 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4564 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4543 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4543 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4542 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4542 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4542 stars left (next iteration limit 4997) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits N_match=4542 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.482 n_q1=1033 n_q2=1270 n_q3=1019 n_q4=1220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits -region wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.CILzuygu6y (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=43, bad_region=0, passed=686 Got 686 stars (including 643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 686 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 416 to 470 (Dec -6.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 583 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 574 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 574 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 416 to 470 (Dec -6.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 583 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 575 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 618 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 575 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 618 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 575 stars left (next iteration limit 631) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 575 catalog matches do not cover the frame (134/355/10/76 per quadrant, need 35 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=575 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.708 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.702 n_q1=134 n_q2=355 n_q3=10 n_q4=76 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.004 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vkt5HWz6uS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=54, bad_region=0, passed=833 Got 833 stars (including 778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 833 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 414 to 470 (Dec -7.1 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 716 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 661 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 414 to 470 (Dec -7.1 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 717 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Excluding outliers - 709 stars left (next iteration limit 778) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 709 catalog matches do not cover the frame (171/422/25/91 per quadrant, need 44 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.914 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.738 n_q1=171 n_q2=422 n_q3=25 n_q4=91 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.120 ref2=Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.073 new1=fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.705 worst_q_ratio=1.004 new2=fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.655 worst_q_ratio=1.396 reference average sigma_overall=0.4495 worst_q_ratio=1.0965 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013_astrometric_residuals.png (4545 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014_astrometric_residuals.png (4542 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (575 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.60 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (709 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Last image: 2461289.85488905 06.09.2026 08:30:52.414 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1113 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out121338.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out121338.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 284.058 (2.31535e+123), 53 match, 0 conflict, 105 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (334.293,-2.00549), pixel scale 5.97015 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++---++---+++++-+++--++-++--+++-++++-----+--+++++-+-+-+-----+++++--------++-++--+---+--+---------+- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out121338.solved to indicate this. Field: out121338.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (334.291465, -2.006026) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (22:17:09.952, -02:00:21.694). Field size: 15.7954 x 10.5787 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.32 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 6 03:33 fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 6 03:33 out121338.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out121338.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out121338.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.725 degrees of RA,Dec (334.291,-2.0068) log-odds ratio 24.6892 (5.27715e+10), 5 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (334.297,-2.00122), pixel scale 5.97589 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++-+-----+(best)-------+---------------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out121338.solved to indicate this. Field: out121338.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (334.291370, -2.007576) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (22:17:09.929, -02:00:27.275). Field size: 15.7726 x 10.5777 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.324 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 6 03:33 fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 6 03:33 out121338.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 5324 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7181, 955.174] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 98.5 (5.99777e+42), 11 match, 0 conflict, 103 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-++----------+---------+-+--+---------------------------------------------+-+----------------- --> log-odds 98.5 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 173.741 (2.84816e+75), 17 match, 0 conflict, 97 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+++++----+--+-+---------+++--+----------------+----------------------------+-+----------------- --> log-odds 173.741 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 434.174 (3.62558e+188), 40 match, 0 conflict, 137 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+++++-++-++++++++----+--++++-++------+-+-----++-+------+-----+------------++-+--+-+------------ --> log-odds 434.174 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 804.514 (inf), 82 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--++++++++-++++++++++-++--++++++++-+-+-+++---+-++-+---+--+-----+-+---+-+++--++++-++-+----+----++- --> log-odds 804.514 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1673.43 (inf), 178 match, 0 conflict, 650 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++--+-++++--+++++-----++++-+++++++-++++++++++-++++++-++- --> log-odds 1673.43 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2901.63 (inf), 325 match, 0 conflict, 783 distractors, 383 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---+-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- --> log-odds 2901.63 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5015.42 (inf), 604 match, 0 conflict, 1315 distractors, 738 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 5015.42 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8721.71 (inf), 1123 match, 0 conflict, 1557 distractors, 1455 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 8721.71 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7181, 955.174] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 98.5 (5.99777e+42), 11 match, 0 conflict, 103 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-++----------+---------+-+--+---------------------------------------------+-+----------------- --> log-odds 98.5 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 173.741 (2.84816e+75), 17 match, 0 conflict, 97 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+++++----+--+-+---------+++--+----------------+----------------------------+-+----------------- --> log-odds 173.741 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 434.174 (3.62558e+188), 40 match, 0 conflict, 137 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+++++-++-++++++++----+--++++-++------+-+-----++-+------+-----+------------++-+--+-+------------ --> log-odds 434.174 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 804.514 (inf), 82 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--++++++++-++++++++++-++--++++++++-+-+-+++---+-++-+---+--+-----+-+---+-+++--++++-++-+----+----++- --> log-odds 804.514 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1673.43 (inf), 178 match, 0 conflict, 650 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++--+-++++--+++++-----++++-+++++++-++++++++++-++++++-++- --> log-odds 1673.43 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2901.63 (inf), 325 match, 0 conflict, 783 distractors, 383 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---+-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- --> log-odds 2901.63 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5015.42 (inf), 604 match, 0 conflict, 1315 distractors, 738 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 5015.42 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8721.71 (inf), 1123 match, 0 conflict, 1557 distractors, 1455 index. RA,Dec = (334.292,-2.0068), pixel scale 5.9848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++---++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 8721.71 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (334.291952, -2.007185) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (22:17:10.068, -02:00:25.865). Field size: 15.7731 x 10.5758 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.322 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Generating wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 22:17:09.856 -02:00:28.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7775 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky122635.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 22:17:09.355 -02:00:05.25 Second-epoch image center 22:17:09.856 -02:00:28.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0068 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.3,4.3,3.9,4.7,5.1,5.6 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.3,4.3,3.9,4.8,5.2,5.6 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-21T10:23:17.2439889 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-21T10:23:17.2439889 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-21T10:23:17.243 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits Exposure 20 sec, 21.07.2026 10:23:17.243 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461242.93295420 mid. exp. The reference image star 8804.839 4308.324 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 46516, (46515 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 28 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1 * rejected close to frame edge: 221 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 97 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.29 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8 Selected detection limit= -7.8 Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 109 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 46959 * detected, using 504/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013863, number_of_ambiguous_matches=651 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=43161 inliers=43161 rms 0.59 -> 0.58 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013884, number_of_ambiguous_matches=652 43163 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=43163 inliers=43163 rms 0.59 -> 0.59 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009157, number_of_ambiguous_matches=430 43020 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=2 pairs=43020 inliers=43020 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003918, number_of_ambiguous_matches=184 42996 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.001 46959 stars detected, 42996 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 41048, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 41048 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 41045 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00022 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 38890 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.29 50479 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 230216 kB used, 266084 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T08:30:52.4145839 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T08:30:52.4145839 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-09-06T08:30:52.414 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits The star 8497.993 872.013 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 352.001 1876.039 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 7713 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2 * rejected close to frame edge: 47 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.3 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 7713 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000198, number_of_ambiguous_matches=10 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=7234 inliers=7234 rms 1.09 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 4.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000158, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 7235 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=7235 inliers=7235 rms 0.28 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000158, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 7233 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=7233 inliers=7233 rms 0.25 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000119, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6 7231 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -3.846 7713 stars detected, 7231 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 6577, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 6577 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4731 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00012*X_pix +0.00034*Y_pix +0.24626 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 4731 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.70  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  50479 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 223988 kB used, 266084 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T08:31:38.2386289 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T08:31:38.2386289 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-09-06T08:31:38.238 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits The star 8498.006 872.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1152.068 919.103 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 351.983 1876.012 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 9250 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3 * rejected close to frame edge: 47 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.3 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 22 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 9250 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000139, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=8762 inliers=8762 rms 0.68 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 2.7 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000139, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 8762 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=8762 inliers=8762 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000139, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 8759 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=8759 inliers=8759 rms 0.25 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000119, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6 8754 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -3.854 9250 stars detected, 8754 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 8017, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 8017 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 5963 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00010*X_pix +0.00036*Y_pix +0.13385 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 5963 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.67  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  50479 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 223988 kB used, 266084 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 93475 (93475 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7599 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 11819 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6641 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5574 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 11363 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 42735 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 21.07.2026 10:23:17.243 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461242.93295420 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 46516 *matched= 46516 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1013.fits exp_start= 21.07.2026 10:24:02.439 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461242.93347730 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.001 *detected= 46959 *matched= 42996 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-24-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1014.fits exp_start= 06.09.2026 08:30:52.414 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461289.85488905 ap= 4.3 rotation= -3.846 *detected= 7713 *matched= 7231 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-30-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exp_start= 06.09.2026 08:31:38.238 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461289.85541942 ap= 4.3 rotation= -3.854 *detected= 9250 *matched= 8754 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_033216_TTUQ1b1x1_90088_zrfLRpPt/fd_Aqr-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_03-31-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits ########### Completed Aqr-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.85488905 -observatory V36 11:32:55.43 +04:11:51.7 Mercury (-0.9mag) 13:33:40.82 -14:09:33.1 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:11:26.67 +23:02:25.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:08:16.43 +17:00:49.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:56.87 +02:40:09.6 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:40.50 +21:01:57.5 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:50.12 -00:02:37.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:39.52 -23:39:24.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 06:50:12.33 +26:30:21.9 Moon (-9.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 6 03:33 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.85488905: 09:08:14.30 +17:01:01.5 Io (6.2mag) 09:08:26.37 +17:00:01.6 Europa (6.3mag) 09:08:33.12 +16:59:27.4 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:07:49.97 +17:02:59.1 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:06:00.85 +17:16:56.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:08:14.88 +17:00:57.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:05:38.62 +17:10:58.0 Elara (17.7mag) 09:12:11.35 +16:28:41.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:09:25.57 +17:18:20.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:57.57 +02:40:30.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:52.63 +02:40:15.1 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:52:14.51 +02:42:44.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:52:08.76 +02:39:30.8 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:44.62 +02:29:59.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 6 03:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.85488905: 21:56:35.00 +00:01:57.2 JWST 15:28:00.61 +50:47:34.3 Chandra 06:27:04.35 +18:12:42.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 6 03:33 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.85488905 -observatory V36 03:39:51.13 +19:17:46.2 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:35.34 -34:13:42.4 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:18:45.32 -70:14:59.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:34.93 +33:40:33.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:50:02.06 +45:20:16.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:50:02.06 +45:20:16.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:50:02.06 +45:20:16.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:50:02.06 +45:20:16.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:14:14.33 +28:47:02.9 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:09:28.21 +25:59:47.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:48:37.77 +27:15:36.8 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:48:04.24 +05:14:17.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:29:48.03 -15:33:59.2 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:37:33.77 +32:50:05.6 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:28.83 +15:20:02.1 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:34:12.93 +43:12:33.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:27:27.94 +49:20:59.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:35:06.00 -13:00:51.2 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:11:17.97 +18:43:52.6 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:16:28.21 +18:50:32.4 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:18:51.24 +00:11:31.4 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:38:58.20 +74:11:12.5 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:06:14.46 +46:09:48.0 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:12:24.11 +11:12:20.5 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:25:12.84 -34:58:13.0 13.4mag 10P/Tempel 01:18:00.47 +36:50:07.5 17.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:47:32.52 -05:23:51.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:06:40.44 -04:47:46.6 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:45:10.77 -07:00:33.6 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:37:30.10 +19:19:22.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:12.35 +14:59:08.1 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:35:06.25 +28:16:14.0 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:28:59.85 +25:03:17.4 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:25:47.30 +21:04:00.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:44:31.95 -21:00:33.8 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:16:16.19 +20:40:04.6 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:35:42.27 -17:42:58.9 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:39:27.37 +14:21:36.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:23:37.51 +08:33:02.8 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:45:31.18 +36:01:26.1 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:29:20.54 +35:47:59.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:24:37.79 -00:08:35.3 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:26:58.26 +16:53:55.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.1K Sep 6 03:33 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 6 03:33 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 6 03:33 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:07:41.150 -00:00:30.93 AT 2026yng 2026-08-06.84 21.99 01:00:19.600 +05:13:13.68 AT 2026ynf 2026-08-06.84 21.4 00:02:10.680 +04:29:05.91 AT 2026yne 2026-08-06.83 22.4 00:13:33.330 +04:19:21.34 AT 2026ynd 2026-08-06.77 22.15 23:51:06.360 +01:51:14.34 AT 2026ync 2026-08-06.76 22.21 23:15:09.720 +02:58:45.37 AT 2026ynb 2026-08-06.75 22.52 22:50:40.350 +05:31:47.83 AT 2026yna 2026-08-05.73 21.56 22:48:01.050 +02:29:57.95 AT 2026ymz 2026-08-05.73 21.98 22:56:40.110 +02:46:51.37 AT 2026ymy 2026-08-04.80 21.96 01:44:34.660 +05:27:13.55 AT 2026ymx 2026-08-01.88 21.27 01:29:50.630 +00:07:42.35 AT 2026ymw 2026-07-21.86 22.34 01:20:55.160 +01:31:29.58 AT 2026ymv 2026-07-20.88 22.17 23:25:01.600 +02:19:39.37 AT 2026ymu 2026-07-20.78 22.49 22:52:58.240 +03:42:25.38 AT 2026ymt 2026-08-05.73 21.81 23:42:43.162 +19:31:30.19 AT 2026yms 2026-08-09.94 19.57 21:20:13.290 -37:42:51.98 AT 2026ymr 2026-08-09.45 19.171 17:37:51.010 -21:58:53.20 AT 2026ymq 2026-08-09.59 14.86 22:57:17.960 +47:07:41.80 AT 2026ymp 2026-08-09.33 14.3 21:11:14.725 +16:08:57.69 AT 2026ymo 2026-08-04.97 19.97 00:45:33.395 +25:23:53.86 AT 2026ymn 2026-08-10.09 19.737 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 6 03:33 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 77 C