This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.68 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8
28.92818 14.46442 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V3149 Oph
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V < 14.000 V 2454356.00000 245.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3149 Oph,2461289.7692,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3149 Oph 20260906.2692 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.80 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7
30.61576 17.39788 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J174509+0551.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.870 V Y 0.330 V 2452306.60000 43.491141000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J174509+0551.3,2461289.7692,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J174509+0551.3 20260906.2692 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 12.51 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4
29.68746 15.73548 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V3106 Oph
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.900 pg 15.600 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3106 Oph,2461289.7692,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3106 Oph 20260906.2692 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 12.69 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7
29.48629 15.80778 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J174853.56+041019.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.620 g Y 0.470 g 2459277.82700 61.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174853.56+041019.4,2461289.7692,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174853.56+041019.4 20260906.2692 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 12.22 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4
29.55297 14.67299 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2759 Oph
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 V 14.300 V 2451450.19000 29.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2759 Oph,2461289.7692,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2759 Oph 20260906.2692 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.85 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0
29.02674 14.57358 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J175229+0312.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.850 V Y 0.270 V 2452298.90000 48.578144000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175229+0312.9,2461289.7692,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175229+0312.9 20260906.2692 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.87 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0
28.78288 15.41234 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J174903.81+032318.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.940 V 13.320 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174903.81+032318.9,2461289.7692,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174903.81+032318.9 20260906.2692 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.78 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0
27.38464 16.08631 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J174411+0230.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V Y 0.790 V 2452487.60000 123.318911000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J174411+0230.2,2461289.7692,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J174411+0230.2 20260906.2692 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 13.12 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7
29.87525 17.02138 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V3076 Oph
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.700 pg 16.800 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3076 Oph,2461289.7692,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3076 Oph 20260906.2692 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2692 2461289.7692 11.10 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5
27.65814 16.09016 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V3074 Oph
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.150 pg 14.700 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3074 Oph,2461289.7692,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3074 Oph 20260906.2692 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.89349593 12.05.2026 09:26:28.048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461172.89349593 12.05.2026 09:26:28.048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461289.76945719 06.09.2026 06:27:51.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17417
Objects passed selection criteria: 17329
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11571
Average stars matched: 10591.8 (91.537 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 01:32:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.89349593 12.05.2026 09:26:28.048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461172.89349593 12.05.2026 09:26:28.048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461289.76945719 06.09.2026 06:27:51.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 156752
Objects passed selection criteria: 156288
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109424
Average stars matched: 98344.8 (89.8745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 613868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 01:33:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.76890947
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.855 +06:00:13.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51
Second-epoch image center 17:59:59.855 +06:00:13.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0018 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:59.855 +06:00:13.32
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00864 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lD4tjGFbS8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U1lYmxjSei
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H0my4BZZ9F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U6ispt0cb4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22429 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0335 to 277.9423 deg, Dec +0.7246 to +11.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0335 to 277.9423 deg, Dec 0.7246 to 11.2689 deg
Loaded 13077 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10363 out of 11285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11285 out of 22429 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22429 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0335 to 277.9423 deg, Dec +0.7246 to +11.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0335 to 277.9423 deg, Dec 0.7246 to 11.2689 deg
Loaded 13077 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10363 out of 11285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11285 out of 22429 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 22306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0336 to 277.9480 deg, Dec +0.7243 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0336 to 277.9480 deg, Dec 0.7243 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 13082 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10351 out of 11261 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11261 out of 22306 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
2.2 pix Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.1 mag. Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.lD4tjGFbS8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1991, bad_region=6302, passed=22429
Got 22429 stars (including 14732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22429 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4733 stars left (next iteration limit 5201)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits N_match=4733 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1327 n_q2=1096 n_q3=1353 n_q4=957 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.U1lYmxjSei (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1995, bad_region=6253, passed=22306
Got 22306 stars (including 14654 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22306 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4733 stars left (next iteration limit 5207)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits N_match=4733 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1333 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1363 n_q4=950 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.H0my4BZZ9F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=1460, passed=8497
Got 8497 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8497 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4719 stars left (next iteration limit 5188)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=6.056 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.980 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4719 robust_rms_before=0.747 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.538 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.571 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.507
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.812 +06:00:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8497 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1950256.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.747 -> 0.489 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=4719 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=2402 n_q2=654 n_q3=981 n_q4=682 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.U6ispt0cb4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=537, bad_region=1454, passed=8789
Got 8789 stars (including 6862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=5.992 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4716 robust_rms_before=0.780 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.499 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.562 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.524
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=2372 n_q2=658 n_q3=1014 n_q4=672 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.102
ref2=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new1=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.529 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.546 worst_q_ratio=1.062
reference average sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.115
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402_astrometric_residuals.png (4733 matched stars from wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403_astrometric_residuals.png (4733 matched stars from wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (4719 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (4716 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31767_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 31767_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:58.43 +07:53:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31857_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 31857_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:24.78 +03:22:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33304_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 33304_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:11.35 +08:25:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33524_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 33524_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:50.88 +08:47:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17702_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 17702_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:53.12 +09:07:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05553_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 05553_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:36.90 +03:41:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.812 +06:00:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51
Second-epoch image center 17:59:59.812 +06:00:12.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.476 +06:00:10.51
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:59.812 +06:00:12.96
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.635 +06:00:38.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00862 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vafx2gj7Ff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nZlnG3upCQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lzKeFLvHOg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HpKFJhbX6I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 193773 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0252 to 277.9460 deg, Dec +0.7202 to +11.2695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0252 to 277.9460 deg, Dec 0.7202 to 11.2695 deg
Loaded 13090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8316 out of 11682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11682 out of 193773 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.600350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.600350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 193773 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0252 to 277.9460 deg, Dec +0.7202 to +11.2695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0252 to 277.9460 deg, Dec 0.7202 to 11.2695 deg
Loaded 13090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8316 out of 11682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11682 out of 193773 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 194665 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.0253 to 277.9480 deg, Dec +0.7200 to +11.2691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.0253 to 277.9480 deg, Dec 0.7200 to 11.2691 deg
Loaded 13088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8301 out of 11685 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11685 out of 194665 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
2.0 pix Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.3 mag. Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Vafx2gj7Ff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=25450, bad_region=46499, passed=193732
Got 193732 stars (including 128554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 193732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4730 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits N_match=4730 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1403 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1383 n_q4=909 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nZlnG3upCQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=25691, bad_region=46848, passed=194613
Got 194613 stars (including 128921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 194613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 159381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 159381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 159381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4735 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits N_match=4735 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1036 n_q3=1384 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lzKeFLvHOg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=5459, bad_region=7934, passed=78815
Got 78815 stars (including 66254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78815 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=6.046 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.561 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4720 robust_rms_before=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.518 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.518 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=2388 n_q2=638 n_q3=1027 n_q4=667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HpKFJhbX6I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=5699, bad_region=7994, passed=81923
Got 81923 stars (including 69066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=5.944 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=0.796 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.560 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.560 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=2338 n_q2=645 n_q3=1075 n_q4=669 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_012955_TTUQ2b1x1_1942490_dJr8znbN/wcs_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:11:55.98 +08:33:41.0: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:07:16.82 +08:07:41.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:15:18.18 +07:01:25.2: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:08:40.33 +05:17:47.2: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:11:55.98 +08:33:41.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:15:18.18 +07:01:25.2: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:07:16.82 +08:07:41.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:55.98 +08:33:41.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5322 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:16.82 +08:07:41.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6168 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:18.18 +07:01:25.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3228 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:59:22.16 +09:21:33.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:08:40.33 +05:17:47.2: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:40.33 +05:17:47.2: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4978 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:10:23.68 +08:48:38.0: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:43:54.38 +09:55:55.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:59:22.16 +09:21:33.4: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:22.16 +09:21:33.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9866 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:03:55.89 +09:00:07.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:03:09.73 +09:45:21.1: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:53:57.72 +07:54:32.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:08:45.93 +09:26:14.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:10:23.68 +08:48:38.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:23.68 +08:48:38.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2682 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:43:54.38 +09:55:55.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:54.38 +09:55:55.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0739 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:13:23.31 +06:09:01.0: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:03:55.89 +09:00:07.7: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:55.89 +09:00:07.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3080 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:53:57.72 +07:54:32.0: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:08:45.93 +09:26:14.2: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:03:09.73 +09:45:21.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:57.72 +07:54:32.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0314 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:45.93 +09:26:14.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:09.73 +09:45:21.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5014 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:50:27.13 +07:24:42.6: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:17:00.78 +04:54:33.8: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:13:23.31 +06:09:01.0: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:23.31 +06:09:01.0: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3720 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:11:41.15 +07:22:55.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:10:17.81 +07:47:37.1: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:50:27.13 +07:24:42.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:27.13 +07:24:42.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1207 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:17:00.78 +04:54:33.8: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:00.78 +04:54:33.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4338 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:13:21.53 +06:07:00.6: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:59:02.86 +09:34:10.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:49:10.31 +08:16:44.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:11:41.15 +07:22:55.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:10:17.81 +07:47:37.1: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:41.15 +07:22:55.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4159 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:17.81 +07:47:37.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5099 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:12:34.76 +05:27:32.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:13:21.53 +06:07:00.6: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:21.53 +06:07:00.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4231 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:59:02.86 +09:34:10.9: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:06:48.22 +08:30:31.2: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:02.86 +09:34:10.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4998 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:49:10.31 +08:16:44.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:10.31 +08:16:44.7: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2679 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:12:34.76 +05:27:32.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:34.76 +05:27:32.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3929 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:06:48.22 +08:30:31.2: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:48.22 +08:30:31.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5988 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:45:09.51 +05:51:19.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8019 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:52:42.02 +03:04:46.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6727 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:49:30.29 +04:18:41.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5020 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:48:53.63 +04:10:18.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6810 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:53:03.78 +03:42:46.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2177 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:52:29.18 +03:12:52.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8437 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:49:03.97 +03:23:19.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8629 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:44:39.75 +02:44:18.5: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0954 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:45:13.84 +05:03:15.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1003 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:44:11.41 +02:30:13.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7593 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-26-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits at 18:07:41.04 +06:45:28.1: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-27-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits at 18:07:41.04 +06:45:28.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:41.04 +06:45:28.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9687 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30241.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36157.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94269.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218347_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218347_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218350_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218350_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:18.59 +06:55:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218354_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218354_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218360_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218360_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:25.56 +06:08:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218365_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218365_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:07.36 +09:07:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218366_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218366_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218374_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218374_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:53.65 +08:14:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218375_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218375_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:30.89 +06:07:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218376_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 218376_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:44.07 +07:08:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223393_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 223393_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:14.55 +10:13:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223691_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 223691_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:16.66 +08:56:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225883_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 225883_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:38.71 +04:33:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226463_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 226463_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:38.46 +02:36:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226594_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 226594_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:49.90 +03:58:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227192_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 227192_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:28.65 +08:58:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227475_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 227475_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227684_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 227684_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:17.55 +10:03:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227914_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 227914_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:37.68 +08:21:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228103_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 228103_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:42.09 +09:51:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228497_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 228497_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:47.26 +09:19:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228829_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 228829_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:45.29 +06:24:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229505_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 229505_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230424_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 230424_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:53.04 +05:52:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231615_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 231615_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:23.98 +02:31:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232288_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 232288_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232343_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 232343_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:37.26 +04:52:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232569_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 232569_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:04.58 +04:12:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233358_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 233358_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233572_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 233572_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233732_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 233732_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:43.45 +09:04:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234105_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 234105_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.46 +02:31:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234291_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 234291_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235275_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 235275_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235529_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 235529_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235727_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 235727_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:52.80 +09:29:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236050_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236050_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236162_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236162_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:27.62 +06:44:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236338_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236338_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236415_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236415_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:51.20 +09:44:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236511_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236511_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236773_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 236773_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237293_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 237293_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:44.14 +05:21:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237308_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 237308_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237438_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 237438_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237561_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 237561_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237846_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 237846_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238293_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238293_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:41.48 +07:58:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238513_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238513_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:27.64 +06:47:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238528_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238528_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238703_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238703_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:45.44 +09:08:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238888_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238888_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238890_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 238890_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:37.61 +08:01:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239055_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 239055_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:49.02 +06:29:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240155_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 240155_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:50.27 +10:04:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240193_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 240193_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:39.38 +06:11:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 242187_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:31.12 +09:38:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242656_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 242656_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:39.04 +10:06:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243171_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 243171_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:36.57 +06:15:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243185_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 243185_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:23.76 +02:56:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243381_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 243381_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244448_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 244448_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:42.69 +05:16:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50831_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 50831_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:36.89 +03:41:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124564_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 124564_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:18.23 +07:19:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185407_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 185407_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:53.15 +09:07:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70932_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 70932_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:58.87 +04:48:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106822_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 106822_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:57.26 +06:29:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36157_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 36157_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94269_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 94269_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40609_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 40609_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:49.65 +03:17:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148513_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148513_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:11.33 +08:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100042_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 100042_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:37.33 +06:06:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134984_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 134984_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:58.43 +07:53:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191992_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 191992_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:50.87 +08:47:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175530_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 175530_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:26.87 +09:43:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29251_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 29251_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:06.38 +02:43:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23373_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23373_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:09.66 +02:23:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61402_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 61402_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75948_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 75948_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:40.36 +05:01:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58267_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 58267_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184147_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 184147_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:27.42 +09:17:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84666_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 84666_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:54.96 +05:26:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12596_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 12596_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:20.72 +01:42:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41413_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 41413_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:24.78 +03:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66361_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 66361_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:46.93 +04:34:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48644_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 48644_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39228_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 39228_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42220_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 42220_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25620_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 25620_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76861_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 76861_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30241_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 30241_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21572_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 21572_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:05.99 +02:16:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112568_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 112568_fd_Oph-03-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_01-27-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
