This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.11 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1
150.83696 6.69192 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J044118.24+563228.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.080 V 12.420 V 2458206.57430 216.491325800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044118.24+563228.7,2461289.7439,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044118.24+563228.7 20260906.2439 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.47 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6
153.36379 0.27464 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 270668357959688960
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.210 G 12.380 G 0.227401000000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 06.2439* 04 21 22.24 +50 18 49.6 11.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 270668357959688960,2461289.7439,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 270668357959688960 20260906.2439 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.68 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3
150.41164 6.76587 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 277834635448407552 | 04:39:41.24 +56:54:29.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.398+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 277834635448407552,2461289.7439,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 277834635448407552 20260906.2439 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.91 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1
150.42821 6.13218 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX21" TCP J04361641+5628241
Type: UGSU
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 g 21.200 g
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TCP J04361641+5628241,2461289.7439,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TCP J04361641+5628241 20260906.2439 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.76 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2
150.24603 7.26559 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 277897582488888576 | 04:41:40.23 +57:21:37.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.238+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 277897582488888576,2461289.7439,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 277897582488888576 20260906.2439 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.74 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5
150.54169 6.04972 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 277409635547892608 | 04:36:24.96 +56:20:11.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.845+/-0.033 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 277409635547892608,2461289.7439,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 277409635547892608 20260906.2439 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.70 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3
151.25891 6.24283 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J044050.62+555549.9
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.990 V 13.130 V 2457231.12700 21.491000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044050.62+555549.9,2461289.7439,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044050.62+555549.9 20260906.2439 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.57 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7
150.40185 6.97756 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 277837384227410048 | 04:40:48.68 +57:03:17.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.362+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 277837384227410048,2461289.7439,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 277837384227410048 20260906.2439 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.52 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5
151.08878 6.36935 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J044043.98+560826.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.140 V 13.550 V 2458206.83330 86.743145300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044043.98+560826.0,2461289.7439,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044043.98+560826.0 20260906.2439 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2439 2461289.7439 11.48 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8
150.26794 7.44928 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J044248.90+572747.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.540 V 13.300 V 2458485.83530 341.526588200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044248.90+572747.9,2461289.7439,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044248.90+572747.9 20260906.2439 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
***** IMAGE PROCESSING ERROR (less than 4 images processed) *****
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461289.74412785 06.09.2026 05:51:22.646 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 105262
Objects passed selection criteria: 104806
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60217.2
Average stars matched: 57439.2 (95.3867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 575064 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 00:53:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Last image: 2461289.74363400 06.09.2026 05:50:39.978 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus?
Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits to check the telescope pointing
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 387 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out800834.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out800834.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 79.1206 (2.29958e+34), 14 match, 0 conflict, 32 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5543,53.9892), pixel scale 5.93945 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+----+-+----++-+-+---++--+-------+-------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out800834.solved to indicate this.
Field: out800834.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.543356, 53.998520) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:14:10.405, +53:59:54.671).
Field size: 15.7328 x 10.5399 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -1.52792 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 6 00:53 fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 6 00:53 out800834.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits (fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out800834.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out800834.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6567 degrees of RA,Dec (63.5447,53.9994)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 79.1206 (2.29958e+34), 14 match, 0 conflict, 32 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5543,53.9892), pixel scale 5.93945 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+----+-+----++-+-+---++--+-------+-------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out800834.solved to indicate this.
Field: out800834.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.541626, 53.999363) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:14:09.990, +53:59:57.707).
Field size: 15.724 x 10.5316 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -1.54592 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 6 00:53 fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 6 00:53 out800834.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 3388 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4756, 951.539] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 100.749 (5.68432e+43), 11 match, 0 conflict, 132 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++------++-------+------+----------------+-----------+-----------------------+----------------------
--> log-odds 100.749
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 180.032 (1.53791e+78), 19 match, 0 conflict, 124 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++-------+------+-------+---+--+-+-+----+----+-+---------------------+----------------------
--> log-odds 180.032
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 366.265 (1.16686e+159), 38 match, 0 conflict, 207 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----+++++---++-++---+-------+--++--++++++---+----+-++---+-----------+---++----------+-----------
--> log-odds 366.265
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 584.19 (5.13258e+253), 65 match, 0 conflict, 279 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----+++-++--++++++--+++-----+--++--+++++++--+-++-+-+++--+---------+-+---+++---------++-------+-+
--> log-odds 584.19
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1161.01 (inf), 136 match, 0 conflict, 588 distractors, 192 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++---+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-++--+---+++-----++++
--> log-odds 1161.01
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2084.6 (inf), 258 match, 0 conflict, 882 distractors, 385 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++---+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-+++-----++++
--> log-odds 2084.6
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3454.15 (inf), 430 match, 0 conflict, 710 distractors, 723 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++-+-+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-++++----++++
--> log-odds 3454.15
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5809 (inf), 782 match, 0 conflict, 1242 distractors, 1437 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++-+-+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-++++----++++
--> log-odds 5809
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4756, 951.539] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 100.749 (5.68432e+43), 11 match, 0 conflict, 132 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++------++-------+------+----------------+-----------+-----------------------+----------------------
--> log-odds 100.749
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 180.032 (1.53791e+78), 19 match, 0 conflict, 124 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++-------+------+-------+---+--+-+-+----+----+-+---------------------+----------------------
--> log-odds 180.032
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 366.265 (1.16686e+159), 38 match, 0 conflict, 207 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----+++++---++-++---+-------+--++--++++++---+----+-++---+-----------+---++----------+-----------
--> log-odds 366.265
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 584.19 (5.13258e+253), 65 match, 0 conflict, 279 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----+++-++--++++++--+++-----+--++--+++++++--+-++-+-+++--+---------+-+---+++---------++-------+-+
--> log-odds 584.19
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1161.01 (inf), 136 match, 0 conflict, 588 distractors, 192 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++---+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-++--+---+++-----++++
--> log-odds 1161.01
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2084.6 (inf), 258 match, 0 conflict, 882 distractors, 385 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++---+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-+++-----++++
--> log-odds 2084.6
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3454.15 (inf), 430 match, 0 conflict, 710 distractors, 723 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++-+-+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-++++----++++
--> log-odds 3454.15
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5809 (inf), 782 match, 0 conflict, 1242 distractors, 1437 index.
RA,Dec = (63.5403,53.9985), pixel scale 5.96202 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++----++++++--++++++--+++-+-+-++-++--++++++++-+-++-++++++++-+--++++-+-++-++++-+++++-+-++++----++++
--> log-odds 5809
Got 16 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.541577, 53.999068) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:14:09.978, +53:59:56.644).
Field size: 15.721 x 10.5317 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -1.55762 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:10.307 +53:59:59.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 408 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky801350.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:10.307 +53:59:59.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
###################################
The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0035 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.1,6.1,5.4,6.7,7.3,7.9 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.0,6.0,5.4,6.6,7.2,7.8 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:39:21.3817598
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:39:21.3817598
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-22T02:39:21.381
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461093.61077987 mid. exp.
The reference image star 7699.355 24.850 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8203.997 18.830 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8992.163 16.057 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9493.776 15.052 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9417.274 16.819 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7958.626 16.016 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8629.404 14.624 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9077.256 2.442 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9087.796 12.416 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9085.718 8.530 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 13240, (13240 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 4054
* rejected close to frame edge: 72
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.0 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 7
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.67
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.7 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -9.7
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -10.6
Selected detection limit= -10.6
Final detection limit= -10.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.06.1 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 5
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
13210 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015332, number_of_ambiguous_matches=203
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=12373 inliers=12373 rms 0.45 -> 0.45 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008384, number_of_ambiguous_matches=111
12362 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=2 pairs=12362 inliers=12362 rms 0.23 -> 0.23 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005514, number_of_ambiguous_matches=73
12360 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=12360 inliers=12360 rms 0.17 -> 0.17 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002644, number_of_ambiguous_matches=35
12356 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 0.010
13210 stars detected, 12356 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 11022, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 11022 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 11022 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00143
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 11021 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.69
14094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 204528 kB used, 239308 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T05:50:39.9781588
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T05:50:39.9781588
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-09-06T05:50:39.978
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
The star 8413.970 129.542 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9501.699 742.248 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7570.165 819.295 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8917.738 911.904 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8257.041 1143.262 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7527.068 1318.197 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9476.694 1423.831 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8610.160 1913.975 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7571.683 2000.848 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8184.190 2256.026 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 276
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 129
* rejected close to frame edge: 3
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.0 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
276 * detected, using 100/ 276 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=269 inliers=269 rms 0.57 -> 0.18 pix, max corner correction 4.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
269 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=269 inliers=269 rms 0.18 -> 0.18 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
269 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=269 inliers=269 rms 0.18 -> 0.18 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
269 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -174.529
276 stars detected, 269 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 133, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 133 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 132 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00023*X_pix +0.00008*Y_pix +1.10089
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 132 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.07
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
14094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 234352 kB used, 239308 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T05:51:22.6469906
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-06T05:51:22.6469906
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-09-06T05:51:22.646
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
The star 8411.850 122.815 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8661.785 666.789 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9499.591 735.557 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7567.974 812.630 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8915.561 905.160 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8254.817 1136.583 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7949.551 1207.100 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7524.956 1311.515 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9474.507 1417.125 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8608.136 1907.189 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 329
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 142
* rejected close to frame edge: 0
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.1 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
329 * detected, using 100/ 329 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=323 inliers=323 rms 0.90 -> 0.19 pix, max corner correction 4.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
323 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=323 inliers=323 rms 0.19 -> 0.19 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
323 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=323 inliers=323 rms 0.19 -> 0.19 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
323 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -174.533
329 stars detected, 323 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 178, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 178 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 173 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00020*X_pix +0.00003*Y_pix +1.05214
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 173 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.08
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
14094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 242164 kB used, 242200 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 26450 (26450 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3129 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3569 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2514 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1342 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1802 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found?
Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list
ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
..........................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 12243 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
ERROR running VaST on the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461093.61077987 ap= 6.0 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 13240 *matched= 13240 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
exp_start= 22.02.2026 02:40:33.353 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461093.61161288 ap= 6.1 rotation= 0.010 *detected= 13210 *matched= 12356 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
exp_start= 06.09.2026 05:50:39.978 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461289.74363400 ap= 6.0 rotation= -174.529 *detected= 276 *matched= 269 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
exp_start= 06.09.2026 05:51:22.646 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461289.74412785 ap= 6.1 rotation= -174.533 *detected= 329 *matched= 323 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.74363400
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:10.307 +53:59:59.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:10.307 +53:59:59.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:11.672 +54:00:39.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:11.672 +54:00:39.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:10.307 +53:59:59.70
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:11.672 +54:00:39.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01150 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EtF2oWelVo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lzAGAKXDVd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NsJC7yzaU8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjaEBkwllE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.786700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.786700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EtF2oWelVo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=14794, bad_region=23405, passed=140674
Got 140674 stars (including 104482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1402 n_q2=838 n_q3=1597 n_q4=1061 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lzAGAKXDVd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14593, bad_region=23295, passed=140165
Got 140165 stars (including 104241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1401 n_q2=849 n_q3=1588 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NsJC7yzaU8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=67, bad_region=1038, passed=4724
Got 4724 stars (including 3630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3537 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3538 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
Excluding outliers - 3500 stars left (next iteration limit 3850)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 3500 catalog matches do not cover the frame (662/1437/58/1343 per quadrant, need 218 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits N_match=3500 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.920 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.929 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.920 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.169 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.930 n_q1=662 n_q2=1437 n_q3=58 n_q4=1343 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jjaEBkwllE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=71, bad_region=1160, passed=5650
Got 5650 stars (including 4431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4284 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.99"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4284 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 4284 stars left (next iteration limit 4713)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 4284 catalog matches do not cover the frame (883/1633/105/1663 per quadrant, need 267 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits N_match=4284 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.955 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.969 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.985 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.002 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.912 n_q1=883 n_q2=1633 n_q3=105 n_q4=1663 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-50-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_005157_TTUQ2b1x1_796002_5ulszmTD/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:36:24.83 +56:20:10.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7145 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:39:41.15 +56:54:29.3: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6845 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:41:18.17 +56:32:28.1: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1125 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:41:40.24 +57:21:36.2: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7622 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:36:18.74 +56:28:31.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9201 delta=1.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:40:50.61 +55:55:48.3: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6976 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:21:22.24 +50:18:49.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4433 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:40:48.59 +57:03:16.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5765 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:42:48.64 +57:27:47.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4744 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:40:43.85 +56:08:26.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5194 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16825.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18417.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25050.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31942.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161752_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 161752_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:09.39 +50:02:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29305_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 29305_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113426_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 113426_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25050_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 25050_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31942_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 31942_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.83 +50:14:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18417_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 18417_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:44.45 +53:53:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33871_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 33871_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38031_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 38031_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22699_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 22699_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34901_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 34901_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16825_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
Preparing report for the candidate 16825_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.22 +50:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:42.96 +53:36:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63949_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 63949_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:01.50 +53:54:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121261_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 121261_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:11.40 +50:55:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:54.51 +53:04:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:14.65 +50:17:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:34.99 +50:21:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178
The candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_00-51-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0178 did not pass the final checks
