NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Ser-06-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.26    16:10:42.84 -05:39:41.7   5817 5434   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.22    16:10:43.00 -05:39:40.9   5812 5433   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 06.1713  2461289.6713  14.24  16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3
  6.34156  31.76496 galactic  Oph  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
304 Olga                    -1     -1       2  14.4     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3:  15.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Ser-06-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Ser-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Ser-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Ser-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 284491 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 284491 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits_preview.png'
Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits

renamed 'Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits_preview.png'
Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 662.4395 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 501.2341 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1357.4058 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.3515 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1358.0834 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 473.8717 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.0491 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T23:06:11.7537006' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T04:06:11.7537006' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61289.1709693633 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T04:06:21.6570069' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61289.1710839933 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 244.285130213347 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99988783203559 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.0477777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 250.649444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.54057461548045 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Ser-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 339.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/d_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits :) Spent 0.829613 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/d_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T23:06:52.5977921' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T04:06:52.5977921' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61289.1714420947 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T04:07:02.5052534' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61289.1715567708 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 244.285130226294 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99988782860224 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.9166666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 250.761666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.55413773098595 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Ser-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 339.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/d_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits :) Spent 0.600983 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/d_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits


fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.67108510 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 Second-epoch image center 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 Second-epoch image center 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 Second-epoch second image center 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00693 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xba6h5KXG1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vgN43lwNS5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MR05nSakbo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JE0P9NJmAl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to +3.7094 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to 3.7094 deg Loaded 5817 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4240 out of 4426 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 7891 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 2.3 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 2.3 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.Xba6h5KXG1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=1475, passed=7946 Got 7946 stars (including 6052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1888 n_q2=855 n_q3=1428 n_q4=759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.512 The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vgN43lwNS5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=1477, passed=7891 Got 7891 stars (including 5986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5420) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1893 n_q2=845 n_q3=1440 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.464 The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MR05nSakbo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, bad_region=1039, passed=5556 Got 5556 stars (including 4234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5556 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4187 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4175 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4187 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4175 stars left (next iteration limit 4592) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=6.240 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.442 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.616 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.449 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4175 robust_rms_before=0.916 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.453 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.449 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.453 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=4175 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=1668 n_q2=735 n_q3=1171 n_q4=601 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JE0P9NJmAl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=316, bad_region=1010, passed=5521 Got 5521 stars (including 4244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5521 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4196 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4183 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4196 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4183 stars left (next iteration limit 4601) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4183 robust_rms=6.182 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.473 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4183 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.583 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4183 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4183 robust_rms_before=0.896 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.429 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4183 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1668 n_q2=741 n_q3=1171 n_q4=603 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.512 ref2=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.464 new1=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.139 new2=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.094 reference average sigma_overall=0.39 worst_q_ratio=1.488 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (4930 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (4175 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (4183 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 Second-epoch image center 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 Second-epoch image center 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:17:27.757 -01:57:12.15 Second-epoch second image center 16:17:26.165 -01:57:19.43 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00693 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2W1EZ2ZPnW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AlQaKln61p Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2CZtrjYjXk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HV1sl37Rfj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.516200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.516200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=4.4) Read 63091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.7231 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.7231 deg Loaded 5852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4036 out of 4593 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4593 out of 63091 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=4.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 1.9 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 2.0 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.2W1EZ2ZPnW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3091, bad_region=9737, passed=62818 Got 62818 stars (including 50317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62818 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55260 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55260 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55260 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4934 stars left (next iteration limit 5426) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1889 n_q2=858 n_q3=1415 n_q4=772 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.405 The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AlQaKln61p (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=3189, bad_region=9814, passed=63066 Got 63066 stars (including 50426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63066 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4936 stars left (next iteration limit 5429) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1883 n_q2=858 n_q3=1430 n_q4=765 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.440 The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2CZtrjYjXk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1734, bad_region=4873, passed=42515 Got 42515 stars (including 36162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42515 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=5.833 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.141 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.607 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.453 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.462 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.453 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.462 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1904 n_q2=889 n_q3=1399 n_q4=734 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HV1sl37Rfj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1699, bad_region=4747, passed=42031 Got 42031 stars (including 35812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42031 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=5.807 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.031 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.435 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=0.893 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.425 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.435 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1901 n_q2=885 n_q3=1413 n_q4=728 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:43.14 -01:28:03.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:46.24 +00:11:44.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:31.56 -04:13:38.1: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:13:38.11 -02:55:08.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:46.24 +00:11:44.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:43.14 -01:28:03.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.14 -01:28:03.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2478 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:46.24 +00:11:44.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8137 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:31.56 -04:13:38.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:31.56 -04:13:38.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3851 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:13:38.11 -02:55:08.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:38.11 -02:55:08.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1802 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:31.80 -01:30:57.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:15:53.03 -02:22:18.3: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:41.57 +01:36:49.2: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:47.56 -03:51:43.7: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:31.80 -01:30:57.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:20.27 +00:40:28.7: 15.25 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:31.80 -01:30:57.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4227 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:07.83 +00:30:49.0: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:15:53.03 -02:22:18.3: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:41.57 +01:36:49.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:53.03 -02:22:18.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5095 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:37.60 -01:04:21.8: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:41.57 +01:36:49.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2415 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:47.56 -03:51:43.7: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:47.56 -03:51:43.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4290 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:20.27 +00:40:28.7: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:20.27 +00:40:28.7: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6779 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:23:31.49 -01:28:29.2: 15.48 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:07.83 +00:30:49.0: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:07.83 +00:30:49.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5989 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:37.60 -01:04:21.8: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:37.60 -01:04:21.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7295 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:23:31.49 -01:28:29.2: 15.55 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:31.49 -01:28:29.2: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6884 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78858.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77741_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77741_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.78    16:37:25.62 -05:44:32.9   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77747_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77747_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.52    16:09:01.53 -05:18:10.0   6066 5214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 16:09:01.51 -05:18:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77751_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77751_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    13.29    16:43:43.13 -01:28:03.8   0800 2932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.21    16:43:43.15 -01:28:03.5   0795 2930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77752_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77752_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.05    16:23:23.87 -04:54:42.6   3900 4990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 16:23:23.88 -04:54:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77754_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77754_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    12.81    16:41:46.26 +00:11:44.0   1089 1916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.81    16:41:46.21 +00:11:44.8   1085 1915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77790_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77790_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    10.53    16:23:29.65 -02:00:41.9   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77794_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77794_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    10.55    16:42:33.33 -00:44:55.5   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77819_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77819_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    11.06    16:41:11.30 -04:48:46.1   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77939_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77939_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.03    16:44:49.69 -00:42:01.8   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77961_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77961_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.17    16:41:50.51 -03:10:11.3   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77970_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 77970_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.23    16:38:39.21 -05:42:33.8   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78007_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78007_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    12.39    16:22:31.56 -04:13:38.6   4033 4575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.38    16:22:31.56 -04:13:37.6   4029 4573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78102_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78102_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.84    16:02:49.29 +00:36:40.0   6994 1628   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 16:02:49.32 +00:36:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78122_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78122_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.02    16:00:11.22 -02:04:34.4   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78159_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78159_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.87    16:02:58.22 -05:49:23.8   6983 5530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 16:02:58.22 -05:49:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78251_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78251_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    13.20    16:13:38.11 -02:55:07.8   5369 3775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.16    16:13:38.12 -02:55:08.5   5365 3774   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78263_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78263_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.27    16:34:49.59 -04:11:20.4   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78375_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78375_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.50    16:12:57.85 -04:22:32.1   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78390_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78390_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.65    16:30:48.21 +02:03:16.1   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78406_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78406_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.58    16:25:17.75 +01:56:34.7   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78407_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78407_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.28    16:30:51.28 -05:52:32.1   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78447_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78447_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.60    16:06:09.82 -00:05:02.4   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78494_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78494_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.54    16:24:44.00 -02:29:47.7   3690 3529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits **** FOUND 16:24:43.96 -02:29:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78580_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78580_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.86    16:36:37.02 +01:46:03.9   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78590_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78590_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    13.96    16:19:52.65 -04:51:43.5   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78698_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78698_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.27    16:35:29.51 -03:44:56.6   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78714_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78714_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.04    16:35:13.90 +01:52:59.8   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78771_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78771_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.20    16:21:17.77 +00:49:01.2   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78788_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78788_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.09    16:27:05.23 -01:29:20.1   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78838_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78838_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.34    16:33:31.76 -01:30:56.5   2357 2948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.58    16:33:31.84 -01:30:57.5   2353 2947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78853_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78853_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.30    16:35:35.15 -03:49:21.9   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78858_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 Preparing report for the candidate 78858_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78861_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78861_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.42    16:02:44.04 +01:22:01.3   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78886_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78886_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.50    16:15:53.03 -02:22:18.2   5028 3446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.54    16:15:53.04 -02:22:18.3   5024 3445   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78890_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78890_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.47    16:03:11.47 -01:33:22.6   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78910_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78910_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.68    16:01:01.19 +01:24:15.2   7268 1143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78926_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78926_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.48    16:33:41.54 +01:36:49.4   2317 1047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.16    16:33:41.60 +01:36:49.0   2312 1046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78931_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78931_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.50    16:22:47.61 -03:51:41.8   3991 4354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.37    16:22:47.51 -03:51:45.6   3988 4353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78953_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78953_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.30    16:22:29.62 -00:18:27.2   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.69    16:28:20.28 +00:40:28.6   3135 1615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.67    16:28:20.25 +00:40:28.8   3131 1614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78969_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78969_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.72    16:21:37.59 -01:04:22.4   4158 2667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.75    16:21:37.60 -01:04:21.2   4154 2666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78978_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78978_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.40    16:02:00.70 +00:44:35.8   7117 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78981_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78981_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.68    16:22:07.84 +00:30:49.0   4076 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.54    16:22:07.83 +00:30:49.0   4072 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 06.17109    2461289.67109    14.67    16:23:31.43 -01:28:29.9   3873 2912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    14.70    16:23:31.56 -01:28:28.5   3868 2911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51808_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 The candidate 51808_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 06.17156    2461289.67156    12.74    16:39:15.65 -05:23:50.8   1498 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_233239_TTUQ2b1x1_1316037_O6v4Oqb2/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_23-06-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3 ########### Completed Ser-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3 ################################################################################### 16:10:42.92 -05:39:41.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.67108510 -observatory V36 11:31:44.40 +04:20:31.4 Mercury (-1.0mag) 13:33:11.71 -14:05:20.8 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:10:56.54 +23:03:04.4 Mars (1.2mag) 09:08:07.21 +17:01:27.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:59.39 +02:40:27.3 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:40.30 +21:01:56.8 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:51.16 -00:02:30.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:40.32 -23:39:21.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 06:36:12.89 +26:31:25.7 Moon (-9.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 5 23:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.67108510: 09:08:02.58 +17:01:51.8 Io (6.2mag) 09:08:18.13 +17:00:35.0 Europa (6.3mag) 09:08:24.21 +17:00:04.5 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:07:40.78 +17:03:37.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:05:51.29 +17:17:29.4 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:08:06.80 +17:01:30.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:05:29.16 +17:11:31.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:12:02.38 +16:29:23.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:09:17.15 +17:18:56.1 Carme (19.0mag) 00:52:01.03 +02:40:47.4 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:56.47 +02:40:33.1 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:52:17.51 +02:43:03.0 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:52:10.77 +02:39:47.6 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:47.35 +02:30:17.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 5 23:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.67108510: 21:56:13.36 -00:09:26.8 JWST 14:16:54.93 +55:28:38.7 Chandra 01:19:29.22 +63:59:50.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 5 23:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.67108510 -observatory V36 03:39:44.33 +19:17:13.4 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:31.80 -34:13:55.7 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:18:36.80 -70:14:22.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:33.57 +33:40:16.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:49:45.20 +45:18:25.0 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:49:45.20 +45:18:25.0 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:49:45.20 +45:18:25.0 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:49:45.20 +45:18:25.0 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:14:23.30 +28:48:22.2 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:09:19.61 +25:59:59.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:48:27.50 +27:16:01.1 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:47:57.14 +05:14:20.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:29:51.24 -15:33:01.6 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:37:23.84 +32:49:25.1 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:27.53 +15:20:10.2 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:34:20.34 +43:12:58.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:27:43.37 +49:21:32.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:34:59.93 -13:00:42.4 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:11:13.91 +18:46:03.6 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:16:10.42 +18:51:23.8 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:18:42.19 +00:12:24.5 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:38:30.54 +74:13:01.9 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:06:19.58 +46:10:04.8 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:12:13.81 +11:11:26.4 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:25:05.00 -34:57:18.2 13.4mag 10P/Tempel 01:17:43.84 +36:47:41.9 18.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:47:25.09 -05:23:02.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:06:18.06 -04:44:16.8 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:45:16.86 -06:59:51.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:37:08.42 +19:20:11.0 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:11.34 +14:58:56.9 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:34:29.68 +28:11:57.1 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:28:26.66 +25:06:01.8 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:25:22.41 +21:06:19.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:44:07.60 -20:56:42.6 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:16:02.59 +20:40:23.7 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:36:21.83 -17:44:05.1 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:39:49.48 +14:29:05.2 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:23:27.82 +08:33:53.7 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:45:01.10 +35:57:51.2 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:28:50.52 +35:49:06.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:24:30.75 -00:07:20.8 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:26:48.61 +16:54:28.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.1K Sep 5 23:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 5 23:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 5 23:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:48:01.050 +02:29:57.95 AT 2026ymz 2026-08-05.73 21.98 22:56:40.110 +02:46:51.37 AT 2026ymy 2026-08-04.80 21.96 01:44:34.660 +05:27:13.55 AT 2026ymx 2026-08-01.88 21.27 01:29:50.630 +00:07:42.35 AT 2026ymw 2026-07-21.86 22.34 01:20:55.160 +01:31:29.58 AT 2026ymv 2026-07-20.88 22.17 23:25:01.600 +02:19:39.37 AT 2026ymu 2026-07-20.78 22.49 22:52:58.240 +03:42:25.38 AT 2026ymt 2026-08-05.73 21.81 23:42:43.162 +19:31:30.19 AT 2026yms 2026-08-09.94 19.57 21:20:13.290 -37:42:51.98 AT 2026ymr 2026-08-09.45 19.171 17:37:51.010 -21:58:53.20 AT 2026ymq 2026-08-09.59 14.86 22:57:17.960 +47:07:41.80 AT 2026ymp 2026-08-09.33 14.3 21:11:14.725 +16:08:57.69 AT 2026ymo 2026-08-04.97 19.97 00:45:33.395 +25:23:53.86 AT 2026ymn 2026-08-10.09 19.737 16:42:12.700 +21:20:23.08 AT 2026ymm 2026-08-09.32 19.568 00:16:26.794 -31:27:04.55 AT 2026yml 2026-08-09.54 18.69 20:46:11.408 +21:33:49.40 SN 2026ymk 2026-08-10.01 19.906 16:27:21.310 +63:36:15.74 AT 2026ymj 2026-08-08.31 19.192 00:43:25.659 +22:56:56.07 SN 2026ymi 2026-08-10.10 19.196 00:25:21.922 +28:26:14.78 AT 2026ymh 2026-08-09.50 19.349 00:12:57.521 -28:42:47.48 AT 2026ymg 2026-08-09.53 18.729 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 5 23:35 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C