This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,7.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 7.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4433 2461288.9433 9.07 00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9
116.98463 -55.18312 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa 1 1 1 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,9.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 9.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,7.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 7.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4433 2461288.9433 13.30 01:22:01.05 +05:03:26.3
137.00474 -56.97656 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:22:01.05 +05:03:26.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:22:01.05 +05:03:26.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4433 2461288.9433 13.74 00:36:24.58 +08:36:45.5
116.59244 -54.07402 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea 0 0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:36:24.58 +08:36:45.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:36:24.58 +08:36:45.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4433 2461288.9433 13.99 00:22:54.44 +02:23:28.9
108.70185 -59.68981 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:22:54.44 +02:23:28.9: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:22:54.44 +02:23:28.9: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4433 2461288.9433 14.22 01:11:59.67 +01:27:58.6
133.56899 -60.98021 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia 1 -1 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:11:59.67 +01:27:58.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:11:59.67 +01:27:58.6: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4433* 01 11 59.67 +01 27 58.6 14.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9433,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4433 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461288.94365216 05.09.2026 10:38:41.547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5635
Objects passed selection criteria: 5631
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5044.25
Average stars matched: 4944.25 (98.0175 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232036 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 05:43:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461288.94365216 05.09.2026 10:38:41.547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 110
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29888
Objects passed selection criteria: 29812
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28343.2
Average stars matched: 27138.8 (95.7503 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 05:44:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.94302661
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0812 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0710 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bPjH8eaMi3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.px19scxtPM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38qhFZQqGY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6VGypd2kMT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bPjH8eaMi3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.px19scxtPM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.38qhFZQqGY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, bad_region=0, passed=4494
Got 4494 stars (including 4199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4127 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4128 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4122 stars left (next iteration limit 4534)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4122 robust_rms=11.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.870 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4122 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4122 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4122 robust_rms_before=1.020 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.388 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.404
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4122 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=943 n_q2=963 n_q3=1127 n_q4=1089 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6VGypd2kMT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, bad_region=0, passed=4450
Got 4450 stars (including 4152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4081 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4081 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4076 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4076 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4076 stars left (next iteration limit 4484)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4076 robust_rms=11.858 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4076 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4076 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4076 robust_rms_before=1.034 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.419 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4076 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=923 n_q2=957 n_q3=1114 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4122 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383_astrometric_residuals.png (4076 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:12.22 +02:00:46.2: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:12.22 +02:00:46.2: 10.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:12.22 +02:00:46.2: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7267 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20205.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 20190_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 20205_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 20245_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 20317_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:37:45.22 +07:31:49.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0812 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0710 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:12.780 +06:03:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:15.853 +06:03:20.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kNGvWsNiwS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DGzxMJLcgC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UP78dQkN8N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GZH5appIRt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29557 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7730 deg, Dec +0.6731 to +11.2752 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7730 deg, Dec 0.6731 to 11.2752 deg
Loaded 4462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3659 out of 3874 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3874 out of 29557 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.514200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.514200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29557 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7730 deg, Dec +0.6731 to +11.2752 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7730 deg, Dec 0.6731 to 11.2752 deg
Loaded 4462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3659 out of 3874 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3874 out of 29557 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 30001 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8801 to 20.7868 deg, Dec +0.6843 to +11.2881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8801 to 20.7868 deg, Dec 0.6843 to 11.2881 deg
Loaded 4460 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3639 out of 3862 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3862 out of 30001 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.1 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
1.9 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
1.9 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.1 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kNGvWsNiwS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1115, bad_region=0, passed=29541
Got 29541 stars (including 28390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29541 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1287 n_q2=1238 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DGzxMJLcgC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1096, bad_region=0, passed=29985
Got 29985 stars (including 28851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UP78dQkN8N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=812, bad_region=28, passed=27336
Got 27336 stars (including 26446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=10.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.924 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.403
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.403 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1203 n_q3=1275 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GZH5appIRt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=851, bad_region=34, passed=27410
Got 27410 stars (including 26472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=10.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.100 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=1.027 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.426 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1174 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1276 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-37-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054103_TTUQ1b1x1_1974890_8FyfMi9o/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:22:57.69 +05:18:06.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:50:44.49 +04:07:05.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:15:45.10 +06:17:39.0: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:11:45.59 +01:35:43.7: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:55:59.61 +00:52:54.8: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:50.10 +08:05:11.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:55.64 +02:43:03.5: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:50:57.13 +09:39:48.4: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:07.45 +10:22:45.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:21.10 +02:48:03.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:50:44.49 +04:07:05.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:55:59.61 +00:52:54.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:15:45.10 +06:17:39.0: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:07.45 +10:22:45.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:50.10 +08:05:11.3: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:50:57.13 +09:39:48.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:11:45.59 +01:35:43.7: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:22:57.69 +05:18:06.7: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:55.64 +02:43:03.5: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:44.49 +04:07:05.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7405 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:57.13 +09:39:48.4: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4615 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:07.45 +10:22:45.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3471 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:59.61 +00:52:54.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2825 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:57.69 +05:18:06.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1739 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:45.59 +01:35:43.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5620 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:50.10 +08:05:11.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0714 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:45.10 +06:17:39.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2950 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:55.64 +02:43:03.5: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5754 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:21.10 +02:48:03.9: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:21.10 +02:48:03.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7312 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:32.85 +08:55:05.8: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:12.26 +02:00:45.8: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.8: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:11.39 +02:35:15.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:30.93 +07:28:42.9: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:04.06 +09:02:59.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:22:01.05 +05:03:26.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:32.85 +08:55:05.8: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:12.26 +02:00:45.8: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:11.39 +02:35:15.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:32.85 +08:55:05.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6072 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:30.93 +07:28:42.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1681 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:12.26 +02:00:45.8: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8259 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:11.39 +02:35:15.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5338 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:30.93 +07:28:42.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3390 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:36:24.58 +08:36:45.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:04.06 +09:02:59.0: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:04.06 +09:02:59.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1781 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:22:01.05 +05:03:26.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:36:24.58 +08:36:45.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:06:48.14 +07:35:11.5: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:22:54.44 +02:23:28.9: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:28.12 +01:25:15.9: 14.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:35:22.88 +09:41:34.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:38.99 +01:37:10.2: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:53.12 +01:29:13.4: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:06:48.14 +07:35:11.5: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:48.14 +07:35:11.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8304 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:22:54.44 +02:23:28.9: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:38.99 +01:37:10.2: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:28.12 +01:25:15.9: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:35:22.88 +09:41:34.4: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:38.99 +01:37:10.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1275 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:28.12 +01:25:15.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9102 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:22.88 +09:41:34.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9194 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:53.12 +01:29:13.4: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:53.12 +01:29:13.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0887 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:11:59.67 +01:27:58.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:41:49.44 +11:12:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:42.32 +02:58:14.6: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:54.40 +02:36:14.4: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:40.16 +00:52:16.0: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:15:37.26 +00:53:02.5: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:25:09.21 +07:51:15.0: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:11:59.67 +01:27:58.6: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:41:49.44 +11:12:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:49.44 +11:12:27.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:42.32 +02:58:14.6: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:42.32 +02:58:14.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2669 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:54.40 +02:36:14.4: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:15:37.26 +00:53:02.5: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:40.16 +00:52:16.0: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:54.40 +02:36:14.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2479 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:37.26 +00:53:02.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1703 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.16 +00:52:16.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2568 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:25:09.21 +07:51:15.0: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:09.21 +07:51:15.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0669 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:54.40 +01:13:24.6: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:07.15 +01:25:52.5: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:44.33 +00:56:18.8: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:24.90 +02:20:44.7: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:16.89 +01:42:32.8: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:44.64 +01:19:31.0: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:54.40 +01:13:24.6: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:54.40 +01:13:24.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1080 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:07.15 +01:25:52.5: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:44.33 +00:56:18.8: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:24.90 +02:20:44.7: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:44.64 +01:19:31.0: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:16.89 +01:42:32.8: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:07.15 +01:25:52.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0881 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:44.33 +00:56:18.8: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3287 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:24.90 +02:20:44.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2367 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:44.64 +01:19:31.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3150 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:16.89 +01:42:32.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2186 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:09.70 +02:00:26.2: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:46.73 +01:10:19.2: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:18:42.51 +02:51:16.9: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:46:09.05 +10:06:15.4: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:35.44 +01:55:49.6: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:36.44 +03:06:01.2: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:09.70 +02:00:26.2: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:09.70 +02:00:26.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3353 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:46:09.05 +10:06:15.4: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:35.44 +01:55:49.6: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:42.51 +02:51:16.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:36.44 +03:06:01.2: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:18:46.73 +01:10:19.2: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:09.05 +10:06:15.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3160 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:42.51 +02:51:16.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3243 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:46.73 +01:10:19.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3454 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:36.44 +03:06:01.2: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3125 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:35.44 +01:55:49.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2963 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:43.87 +08:25:49.4: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:13.75 +01:40:26.5: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:01.29 +01:15:13.7: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:22.33 +02:20:59.6: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:02.55 +02:12:35.7: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:43.87 +08:25:49.4: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:41.65 +03:04:35.4: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:01.29 +01:15:13.7: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:43.87 +08:25:49.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4507 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:13.75 +01:40:26.5: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:01.29 +01:15:13.7: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1215 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:02.55 +02:12:35.7: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:13.75 +01:40:26.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1903 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:02.55 +02:12:35.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2584 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:22.33 +02:20:59.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:22.33 +02:20:59.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2022 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:41.65 +03:04:35.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:41.65 +03:04:35.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4684 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:58.12 +03:33:05.6: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:09.26 +01:19:44.1: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:03.97 +02:55:03.9: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:21.79 +01:07:54.4: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:22.79 +03:08:28.5: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:58.12 +03:33:05.6: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.12 +03:33:05.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3774 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:03.97 +02:55:03.9: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:09.26 +01:19:44.1: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:22.79 +03:08:28.5: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:03.97 +02:55:03.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3836 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:09.26 +01:19:44.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1809 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:21.79 +01:07:54.4: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.79 +03:08:28.5: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4194 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:21.79 +01:07:54.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2524 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:47.49 +02:47:25.1: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:24:38.21 +10:53:51.5: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:15:30.48 +06:54:55.6: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:06.90 +03:18:15.7: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:07.93 +07:33:05.2: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:13.75 +03:45:53.3: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:47.49 +02:47:25.1: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:47.49 +02:47:25.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4612 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:24:38.21 +10:53:51.5: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:15:30.48 +06:54:55.6: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:38.21 +10:53:51.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3626 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:06.90 +03:18:15.7: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:30.48 +06:54:55.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5650 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.90 +03:18:15.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4501 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:13.75 +03:45:53.3: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:07.93 +07:33:05.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:13.75 +03:45:53.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2816 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:07.93 +07:33:05.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5797 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:57.03 +01:50:22.0: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:19:49.71 +01:26:46.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:21:32.32 +03:35:22.0: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:27:04.16 +11:01:16.9: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:26:11.00 +10:38:37.4: 15.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:09:18.12 +02:48:04.4: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:57.03 +01:50:22.0: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:57.03 +01:50:22.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4083 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:19:49.71 +01:26:46.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:49.71 +01:26:46.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3502 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:26:11.00 +10:38:37.4: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:27:04.16 +11:01:16.9: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:21:32.32 +03:35:22.0: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:11.00 +10:38:37.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4772 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:32.32 +03:35:22.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4141 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:04.16 +11:01:16.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3248 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:09:18.12 +02:48:04.4: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:18.12 +02:48:04.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5037 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:07.61 +08:10:46.3: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:23:56.93 +09:59:31.6: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:26:53.26 +10:53:04.3: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:55.13 +10:26:33.0: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:17.67 +02:24:42.3: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:04:43.67 +01:02:40.3: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:07.61 +08:10:46.3: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:07.61 +08:10:46.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5035 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:04.72 +01:14:59.6: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:52.35 +03:39:47.7: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:23:56.93 +09:59:31.6: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:26:53.26 +10:53:04.3: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:56.93 +09:59:31.6: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2597 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:53.26 +10:53:04.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4657 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:55.13 +10:26:33.0: 15.04 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:17.67 +02:24:42.3: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:55.13 +10:26:33.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6162 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:17.67 +02:24:42.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5536 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:04:43.67 +01:02:40.3: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:04:43.67 +01:02:40.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5560 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:04.72 +01:14:59.6: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:04.72 +01:14:59.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6635 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:52.35 +03:39:47.7: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:52.35 +03:39:47.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5307 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:55:57.16 +08:10:59.4: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:16:57.06 +01:45:01.6: 15.09 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:23:12.96 +10:58:00.4: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:22:08.30 +11:00:27.7: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:22:40.31 +10:45:32.0: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:23:27.73 +07:54:51.4: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:20:45.19 +06:40:37.4: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:55:57.16 +08:10:59.4: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:57.16 +08:10:59.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7286 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:16:57.06 +01:45:01.6: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:27:35.18 +08:16:58.3: 15.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:57.06 +01:45:01.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6134 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:23:12.96 +10:58:00.4: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:12.96 +10:58:00.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6537 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:22:08.30 +11:00:27.7: 15.16 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:22:40.31 +10:45:32.0: 15.10 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:08.30 +11:00:27.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6281 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:23:27.73 +07:54:51.4: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:40.31 +10:45:32.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6551 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:27.73 +07:54:51.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6568 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:20:45.19 +06:40:37.4: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:45.19 +06:40:37.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6027 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:27:35.18 +08:16:58.3: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:35.18 +08:16:58.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6245 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33100.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33240.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:32.88 +09:14:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 32487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:37:45.23 +07:31:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 32627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32744_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32812_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32812_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:11.54 +00:50:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32852_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 32852_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32940_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 32940_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33012_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33012_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.27 +00:53:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33100_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 33100_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33109_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33109_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33188_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33188_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33200_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33200_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 33202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33217_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33217_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33239_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33239_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:24.59 +09:00:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33240_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 33240_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33262_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33262_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33263_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33263_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33285_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33285_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33289_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33289_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33299_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33299_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33319_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33319_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33376_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33376_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33378_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33378_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:19.83 +00:49:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33413_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33413_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33418_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33418_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33428_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33428_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33445_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33445_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:31.04 +00:54:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:53.99 +01:26:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33462_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33462_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33493_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33493_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33526_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33526_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33553_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33553_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33565_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33565_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:15.50 +01:12:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33614_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33614_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33653_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33653_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:20.22 +03:18:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33654_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33654_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33708_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33708_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-38-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
