fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits
fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 05.43669 | 2461288.93669 | 13.58 | 03:56:35.65 +17:43:09.6 | 0286 5286 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.43757 | 2461288.93757 | 13.77 | 03:56:35.67 +17:43:11.2 | 0293 5293 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4371 2461288.9371 13.68 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4
173.26242 -26.55394 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
62 Erato -0 1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Tau-06-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 398944 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 398944 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2193.4699 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 749.6929 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2183.8171 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 749.3030 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.91829 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T05:28:39.7052977' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T10:28:39.7052977' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.4365706597 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T10:28:49.6102466' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.4366853009 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.662874941413 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9999664932627 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 58.4711111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 122.023333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.17269076179892 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29534 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29534 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 4.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits :) Spent 0.621382 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T05:29:56.2815772' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T10:29:56.2815772' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.4374569561 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T10:30:06.1832481' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.4375715624 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6628747898593 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.999966469138 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 58.6947222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 122.430555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.1699054086624 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29534 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29534 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 4.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits :) Spent 0.644600 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits
fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.93668640 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0385 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01540 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7bFeYtDtmr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2txKmHXQC3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AY6Z62HeME Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hru7osP5ie Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.3 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.7bFeYtDtmr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2txKmHXQC3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AY6Z62HeME (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, bad_region=0, passed=4707 Got 4707 stars (including 4323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4707 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4222 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4210 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4223 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4213 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4212 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4212 stars left (next iteration limit 4631) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4212 robust_rms=12.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.927 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4212 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.493 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4212 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4212 robust_rms_before=1.244 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.357 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.340 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits N_match=4212 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=894 n_q2=1234 n_q3=970 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.020 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Hru7osP5ie (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=4736 Got 4736 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4736 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4257 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4244 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4244 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4257 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4245 stars left (next iteration limit 4668) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=12.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.608 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4245 robust_rms_before=1.210 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.354 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits N_match=4245 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=912 n_q2=1239 n_q3=957 n_q4=1137 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.012 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263 ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.020 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.012 reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372_astrometric_residuals.png (4212 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373_astrometric_residuals.png (4245 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:51.56 +10:00:51.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:51.56 +10:00:51.7: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:51.56 +10:00:51.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 10.20 04:27:51.58 +10:00:52.0 5080 0815 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 10.26 04:27:51.55 +10:00:51.4 5086 0822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:52:02.22 +17:32:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 10.09 04:52:02.20 +17:32:15.9 8307 5615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.20 +16:33:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0385 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:49.349 +13:58:59.07 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:46.584 +13:58:20.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01540 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lCg8cvywuy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RiGnX0a3us Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qz9il0SPAu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Als1CTEsJR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 10.10 04:25:27.19 +16:33:23.3 4509 4738 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lCg8cvywuy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RiGnX0a3us (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299 Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Qz9il0SPAu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1112, bad_region=10, passed=33215 Got 33215 stars (including 32022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33215 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=12.201 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.109 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.231 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.353 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.344 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1422 n_q3=1110 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.010 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Als1CTEsJR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1142, bad_region=12, passed=33306 Got 33306 stars (including 32081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33306 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33306 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33306 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33306 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5362) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=12.268 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.552 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.206 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1419 n_q3=1121 n_q4=1266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:53:44.43 +09:46:36.1: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:30.95 +10:25:54.8: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:38.28 +09:29:18.8: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:54.87 +10:10:23.4: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:43.34 +09:32:59.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:32.1: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:03.67 +12:38:12.6: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:51.75 +13:59:57.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:09.52 +10:42:55.8: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:11.11 +10:38:44.7: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:53:44.43 +09:46:36.1: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:54.87 +10:10:23.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:03.67 +12:38:12.6: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:51.75 +13:59:57.0: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:38.28 +09:29:18.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:32.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:09.52 +10:42:55.8: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:30.95 +10:25:54.8: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:11.11 +10:38:44.7: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:43.34 +09:32:59.7: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:44.43 +09:46:36.1: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1234 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:03.67 +12:38:12.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2651 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:51.75 +13:59:57.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1708 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:54.87 +10:10:23.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7459 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:38.28 +09:29:18.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7467 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:32.1: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7884 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:09.52 +10:42:55.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2502 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:30.95 +10:25:54.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2944 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:11.11 +10:38:44.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0453 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:43.34 +09:32:59.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7382 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.7: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.49 +17:25:28.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:35:39.19 +16:08:30.9: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:11.13 +09:11:42.3: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:04.80 +10:03:09.3: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.37 +14:25:59.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.7: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.49 +17:25:28.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8737 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.49 +17:25:28.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3903 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:19.07 +12:36:41.1: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:52.82 +13:15:17.9: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:35:39.19 +16:08:30.9: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:39.19 +16:08:30.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7559 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:11.13 +09:11:42.3: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:04.80 +10:03:09.3: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.37 +14:25:59.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:11.13 +09:11:42.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7103 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.37 +14:25:59.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8146 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:04.80 +10:03:09.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7881 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:52.82 +13:15:17.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:19.07 +12:36:41.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.82 +13:15:17.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8246 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:19.07 +12:36:41.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8579 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:35.07 +16:56:44.3: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:35.07 +16:56:44.3: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:35.07 +16:56:44.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3151 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.29 04:17:30.95 +10:25:54.7 3533 0984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75628_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75628_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.30 04:17:30.96 +10:25:54.9 3539 0990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.28 04:13:03.60 +12:38:13.1 2814 2283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75629_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75629_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.25 04:13:03.73 +12:38:12.0 2821 2290 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.25 04:28:09.51 +10:42:56.0 5099 1241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75631_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75631_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.25 04:28:09.53 +10:42:55.6 5106 1248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.16 04:09:51.74 +13:59:56.8 2310 3085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.17 04:09:51.77 +13:59:57.1 2317 3091 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.02 04:02:11.14 +10:38:44.8 1240 1010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75638_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75638_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.08 04:02:11.08 +10:38:44.7 1246 1017 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.80 04:19:54.96 +10:10:23.5 3896 0846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.71 04:19:54.79 +10:10:23.3 3902 0852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.76 04:10:43.35 +09:32:58.3 2543 0399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.73 04:10:43.32 +09:33:01.1 2549 0406 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.72 04:07:38.22 +09:29:17.9 2082 0340 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.79 04:07:38.34 +09:29:19.7 2089 0347 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 11.77 04:02:38.76 +11:19:32.2 1296 1426 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 11.80 04:02:38.75 +11:19:32.0 1303 1433 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 11.22 04:53:44.48 +09:46:35.7 8955 0929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75827_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75827_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 11.05 04:53:44.38 +09:46:36.5 8961 0936 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.88 +15:35:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75913_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 75913_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 12.04 04:26:24.86 +15:35:08.1 4681 4161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:56:12.01 +13:30:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76008_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76008_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 12.47 04:56:12.03 +13:31:00.1 9129 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 12.84 04:19:30.82 +11:59:01.5 3783 1935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76038_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76038_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 12.91 04:19:30.74 +11:59:02.0 3789 1942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76105_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76105_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 12.96 04:10:47.85 +18:26:18.1 2343 5781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:00:43.13 +18:12:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76153_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76153_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.09 04:00:43.10 +18:12:30.5 0887 5602 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:48:42.09 +10:53:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76169_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76169_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.19 04:48:42.16 +10:53:53.8 8146 1560 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.64 +14:06:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76225_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76225_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.25 04:21:59.66 +14:06:15.2 4088 3236 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.38 04:38:35.48 +17:25:29.3 6361 5377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76242_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76242_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.41 04:38:35.49 +17:25:28.3 6368 5384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:45:56.31 +11:41:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76257_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 Preparing report for the candidate 76257_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76315_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76315_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.59 04:45:56.31 +11:41:26.8 7696 2009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:30:08.21 +15:39:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76321_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76321_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.56 04:30:08.24 +15:39:59.9 5217 4242 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.76 03:58:04.80 +10:03:08.5 0629 0624 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76328_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76328_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.87 03:58:04.79 +10:03:10.0 0636 0631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:30:13.74 +15:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76341_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76341_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.58 04:30:13.72 +15:39:27.3 5230 4237 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:00:49.59 +12:30:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76363_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76363_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.77 04:00:49.69 +12:30:10.1 1010 2137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.65 04:36:11.26 +09:11:42.2 6350 0394 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76400_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76400_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.80 04:36:11.00 +09:11:42.3 6356 0401 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.70 04:35:39.20 +16:08:30.8 5990 4573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.83 04:35:39.19 +16:08:30.9 5996 4580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.76 04:21:31.34 +14:25:59.0 4002 3423 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.89 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.8 4009 3430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:20:48.55 +13:50:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76462_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76462_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.89 04:20:48.54 +13:50:46.1 3923 3072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.84 04:34:19.07 +12:36:40.1 5935 2438 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76471_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76471_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.88 04:34:19.07 +12:36:42.1 5941 2445 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 13.83 04:33:52.83 +13:15:17.7 5846 2821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76622_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76622_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 13.82 04:33:52.81 +13:15:18.1 5852 2828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:33:58.30 +10:13:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.22 04:33:58.29 +10:13:55.5 5985 1008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:43:02.42 +08:58:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76702_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 76702_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.05 04:43:02.39 +08:58:50.9 7391 0337 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 05.43669 2461288.93669 14.32 04:17:35.11 +16:56:46.2 3356 4909 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-28-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0372.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 14.31 04:17:35.03 +16:56:42.3 3362 4915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.49 +11:10:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 12.62 04:54:18.48 +11:10:45.5 8971 1795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits **** FOUND 04:52:02.23 +17:32:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4 ################################################################################### 03:56:35.66 +17:43:10.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.93668640 -observatory V36 11:27:00.73 +04:55:08.0 Mercury (-1.0mag) 13:31:18.35 -13:48:10.3 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:08:57.14 +23:05:44.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:07:30.79 +17:04:01.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:52:09.19 +02:41:37.9 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:39.53 +21:01:55.0 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:55.25 -00:02:02.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:43.41 -23:39:10.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 05:50:24.37 +27:51:02.1 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 5 05:33 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.93668640: 09:07:35.98 +17:03:36.5 Io (6.2mag) 09:07:35.79 +17:03:37.7 Europa (6.3mag) 09:07:45.03 +17:02:53.3 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:07:05.74 +17:06:03.3 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:05:13.51 +17:19:42.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:07:32.10 +17:03:56.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:04:51.74 +17:13:47.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:11:26.89 +16:32:10.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:08:43.89 +17:21:17.9 Carme (19.0mag) 00:52:14.31 +02:41:53.0 Titan (8.3mag) 00:52:11.70 +02:41:37.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:52:29.11 +02:44:16.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:52:18.15 +02:40:55.3 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:57.92 +02:31:32.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 5 05:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.93668640: 21:49:08.59 -00:54:45.8 JWST 19:10:55.81 +00:59:47.3 Chandra 12:33:16.15 -62:08:50.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 5 05:33 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.93668640 -observatory V36 03:39:16.37 +19:15:06.9 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:17.67 -34:14:41.9 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:18:02.94 -70:11:59.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:28.12 +33:39:08.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:48:37.08 +45:11:49.3 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:48:37.08 +45:11:49.3 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:14:58.71 +28:53:36.5 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:08:45.38 +26:00:50.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:47:46.91 +27:17:38.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:47:29.08 +05:14:34.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:30:04.68 -15:29:08.3 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:36:44.67 +32:46:47.2 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:22.64 +15:20:40.8 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:34:49.88 +43:14:28.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:28:44.56 +49:23:36.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:34:35.65 -13:00:09.8 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:10:57.87 +18:54:48.5 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:15:00.23 +18:54:48.3 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:18:06.56 +00:15:56.2 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:36:41.53 +74:19:56.9 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:06:38.94 +46:11:18.7 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:11:33.34 +11:07:49.1 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:24:26.69 -34:53:22.0 13.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:46:55.83 -05:19:45.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:04:49.55 -04:30:17.1 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:45:40.06 -06:57:01.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:35:42.16 +19:23:26.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:05.97 +14:58:16.2 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:32:04.60 +27:55:04.4 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:26:14.86 +25:17:00.3 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:23:43.86 +21:15:35.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:42:31.53 -20:41:14.2 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:15:08.41 +20:41:43.2 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:38:53.58 -17:48:29.9 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:41:32.23 +14:59:51.5 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:22:47.51 +08:37:19.3 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:43:00.70 +35:43:51.5 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:26:51.39 +35:53:38.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:24:02.97 -00:02:22.9 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:26:10.47 +16:56:44.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep 5 05:33 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 5 05:33 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 5 05:33 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:45:11.456 -24:54:47.01 AT 2026ylq 2026-08-07.52 21.51 21:40:36.632 -18:23:26.57 AT 2026ylp 2026-08-06.46 20.99 20:14:00.673 -38:13:39.76 AT 2026ylo 2026-08-07.38 20.74 20:52:36.905 -39:33:55.53 AT 2026yln 2026-08-07.39 20.24 00:19:22.506 -22:44:58.83 AT 2026ylm 2026-08-07.52 20.42 15:48:59.118 +02:39:52.52 AT 2026yll 2026-08-07.28 20.42 23:44:28.070 -26:52:10.72 SN 2026ylk 2026-08-07.52 20.44 21:19:40.596 -20:14:18.67 AT 2026ylj 2026-08-07.43 20.61 15:18:13.061 +03:21:47.37 AT 2026yli 2026-08-07.28 21.08 20:52:51.054 -38:10:22.04 AT 2026ylh 2026-08-07.39 21.08 22:37:48.683 +14:31:17.67 AT 2026ylg 2026-08-07.38 20.64 15:22:10.313 +02:36:38.70 AT 2026ylf 2026-08-07.28 20.74 15:13:07.178 +04:34:04.44 AT 2026yle 2026-08-07.28 20.67 16:44:15.935 +15:58:23.98 AT 2026yld 2026-08-07.33 20.42 16:53:19.893 +23:20:52.77 AT 2026ylc 2026-08-07.34 20.62 21:51:46.429 +22:52:34.84 AT 2026ylb 2026-08-07.33 20.55 15:30:03.344 +01:16:22.04 AT 2026yla 2026-08-07.28 20.42 14:58:33.653 +00:08:16.26 AT 2026ykz 2026-08-07.28 20.51 20:30:15.393 +07:13:46.28 AT 2026yky 2026-08-09.29 19.6805 20:13:45.078 -03:03:56.96 AT 2026ykx 2026-08-09.28 19.8907 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 5 05:33 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 09 05.43757 2461288.93757 10.14 04:52:02.23 +17:32:16.0 8307 5615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_053129_TTUQ1b1x1_1595447_ORPbBv0p/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-29-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0373.fits
