This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3983 2461288.8983 9.65 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5
199.58255 13.64237 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J071724+1753.6
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V 12.100 V 2454826.00000 95.900000000000 M5-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J071724+1753.6,2461288.8983,9.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J071724+1753.6 20260905.3983 9.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3983 2461288.8983 11.68 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6
205.47030 8.89829 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 3.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J070955+1038.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.950 V Y 0.900 V 2452780.90000 121.426080000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070955+1038.7,2461288.8983,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070955+1038.7 20260905.3983 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3983 2461288.8983 12.05 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1
198.45641 12.12142 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J070939.84+181520.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.190 V 14.200 V 2458438.72630 206.261323400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070939.84+181520.2,2461288.8983,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070939.84+181520.2 20260905.3983 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3983 2461288.8983 11.26 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4
204.28766 8.46832 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" GN Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.870 V Y 0.730 V 2452638.70000 126.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GN Gem,2461288.8983,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GN Gem 20260905.3983 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461288.89852839 05.09.2026 09:33:42.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24575
Objects passed selection criteria: 24490
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15987
Average stars matched: 15696 (98.1798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 04:37:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461288.89852839 05.09.2026 09:33:42.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 165770
Objects passed selection criteria: 165264
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114276
Average stars matched: 111668 (97.7176 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 638800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 04:38:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.89802337
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00573 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HF9Tf1Eju7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Z3xg0aGq0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hgYodR6P3m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fDXR6FAncB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HF9Tf1Eju7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7Z3xg0aGq0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hgYodR6P3m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=0, passed=4995
Got 4995 stars (including 4744 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4575 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4510 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4510 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4510 stars left (next iteration limit 4963)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=6.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.001 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=0.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4510 robust_rms_before=1.522 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.605 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.755
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.605 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=4510 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=1542 n_q2=589 n_q3=1619 n_q4=760 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fDXR6FAncB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=234, bad_region=0, passed=5034
Got 5034 stars (including 4796 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4560 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4560 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4557 stars left (next iteration limit 5016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4557 robust_rms=6.603 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.980 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4557 robust_rms=0.599 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4557 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.681 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4557 robust_rms_before=1.483 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.537 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.655 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.681
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.655 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=4557 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.563 n_q1=1542 n_q2=605 n_q3=1630 n_q4=780 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits sigma_overall=0.539 worst_q_ratio=1.130
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits sigma_overall=0.526 worst_q_ratio=1.222
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316_astrometric_residuals.png (4510 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317_astrometric_residuals.png (4557 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5: ref_mag=10.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6466 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31113_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 31113_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.65 +12:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31119_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 31119_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.68 +10:45:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.62 +10:01:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.36 +11:44:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26130_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 26130_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:17:24.45 +17:53:34.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:38.318 +14:01:30.15
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.436 +14:01:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00573 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tvrGS7fou1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jZ6nulaCqn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hraeCovcuG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dr1F5VBWFG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tvrGS7fou1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jZ6nulaCqn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hraeCovcuG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1310, bad_region=1, passed=38378
Got 38378 stars (including 37023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38378 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4746 stars left (next iteration limit 5221)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4746 robust_rms=6.003 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=27.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4746 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4746 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.750 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4746 robust_rms_before=1.524 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.526 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.586 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.750
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.586 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=4746 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=1555 n_q2=606 n_q3=1797 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dr1F5VBWFG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1298, bad_region=2, passed=38643
Got 38643 stars (including 37285 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38643 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4753 stars left (next iteration limit 5229)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=6.019 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=28.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.597 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.292 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4753 robust_rms_before=1.491 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.543 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.658 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.677
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.658 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=4753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.562 n_q1=1563 n_q2=606 n_q3=1787 n_q4=797 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-32-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_043503_TTUQ1b1x1_3399213_HKeMcaGR/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:05.74 +13:39:55.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:49.93 +10:40:21.4: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:49.93 +10:40:21.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:05.74 +13:39:55.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:49.93 +10:40:21.4: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1234 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:05.74 +13:39:55.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6028 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:05.10 +17:07:47.9: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:55.51 +10:36:35.4: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:05.10 +17:07:47.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.00 +14:15:28.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:05.10 +17:07:47.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1755 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:13.70 +15:03:06.1: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:10.8: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:55.51 +10:36:35.4: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:55.51 +10:36:35.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9161 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.00 +14:15:28.9: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.00 +14:15:28.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1315 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:13.70 +15:03:06.1: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:13.70 +15:03:06.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5412 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:10.8: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:10.8: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7396 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:09:55.09 +10:38:40.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6743 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:09:39.84 +18:15:20.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0531 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:14.83 +11:30:18.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2527 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38643.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55452.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227462_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227462_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:06.40 +17:52:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227465_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227465_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.21 +16:43:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:50.55 +12:12:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.62 +19:12:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.60 +12:35:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227595_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227595_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227740_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227740_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227769_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227769_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.82 +16:09:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.78 +17:37:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.13 +13:15:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227856_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227856_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227870_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227870_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:39.84 +10:58:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 227999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228015_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228015_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228019_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228019_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228043_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228043_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.52 +12:07:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.65 +16:11:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228103_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228103_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228129_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228129_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228178_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228178_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:36.48 +16:48:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228244_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228244_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228258_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228258_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228261_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228261_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:56.02 +16:27:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228267_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228267_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:30.39 +16:25:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228288_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228288_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.35 +17:12:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228303_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228303_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:07.95 +16:04:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.59 +14:10:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228338_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228338_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228378_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228378_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228408_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228408_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228466_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228466_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.63 +16:56:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228487_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228487_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228559_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228559_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:47.93 +17:59:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.00 +15:07:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228730_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 228730_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 200286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:05.29 +16:32:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48911_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 48911_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:38.16 +10:57:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.41 +13:56:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:49.99 +12:12:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 38643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 168548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.67 +13:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 68738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:55.80 +12:05:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:57.18 +09:50:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.28 +16:51:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.62 +10:45:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 55452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:03.51 +12:26:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.32 +11:44:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 175524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:24.44 +17:53:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:40.90 +17:29:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.60 +12:22:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.63 +10:01:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70272_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 70272_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:32.41 +12:06:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154408_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 154408_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:22.26 +16:09:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 12184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:39.15 +09:11:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145805_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 145805_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:36.46 +15:49:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 11952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:38.81 +09:16:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 66828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:47.66 +12:00:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190235_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 190235_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
