######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 463150 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 463150 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1995.7998
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8986
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1990.6788
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 529.1895
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.74361
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T03:29:41.3148896' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T08:29:41.3148896' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.3539503934 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T08:29:51.2214046' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.3540650578 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997076825938 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0000011713185 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.7202777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 14.9994444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.08908673278185 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits :)
Spent 0.510126 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T03:31:11.7346208' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T08:31:11.7346208' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.3549969215 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T08:31:21.6347049' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.3551115044 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997076606559 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0000012795842 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.8013888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 15.1058333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.07648967959719 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits :)
Spent 0.506144 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.85406613
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0479 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4wbAfVSn0F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.woPh2cYjiS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pZmdR8lCFq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zBWPUxiGns
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4wbAfVSn0F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1443 n_q3=1095 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.woPh2cYjiS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1431 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pZmdR8lCFq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=180, bad_region=0, passed=3705
Got 3705 stars (including 3521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3705 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3436 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3436 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 3431 stars left (next iteration limit 3774)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3431 robust_rms=8.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3431 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3431 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3431 robust_rms_before=1.135 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.454 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=3431 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=930 n_q2=574 n_q3=1142 n_q4=785 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zBWPUxiGns (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=170, bad_region=0, passed=3680
Got 3680 stars (including 3507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3418 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3418 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 3414 stars left (next iteration limit 3755)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3414 robust_rms=8.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.701 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3414 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3414 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3414 robust_rms_before=1.093 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.424 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.533
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.424 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=3414 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=916 n_q2=579 n_q3=1140 n_q4=779 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.381
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.353
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.335
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.282
reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.367
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (3431 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (3414 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0479 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:45.096 +70:01:12.92
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:47.756 +70:00:32.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O8vVQDqEUJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3cdaFvgptV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WtEqelD92X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iDxnFV6m5f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
13.8 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
13.8 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.O8vVQDqEUJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, bad_region=3, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1412 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3cdaFvgptV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, bad_region=5, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1092 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WtEqelD92X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=529, bad_region=6, passed=18809
Got 18809 stars (including 18250 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=8.093 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.165 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.144 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.490 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.490 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1283 n_q2=811 n_q3=1676 n_q4=1107 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iDxnFV6m5f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=526, bad_region=12, passed=18809
Got 18809 stars (including 18244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=8.056 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.468 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.573
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.468 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1280 n_q2=816 n_q3=1665 n_q4=1113 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:37:18.96 +72:54:29.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:37:18.96 +72:54:29.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:37:18.96 +72:54:29.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4006 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 65336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 12.84 | 08:19:06.68 +68:06:52.2 | 0503 2515 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 08:19:06.91 +68:06:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65913_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 65913_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 12.98 | 08:12:29.62 +68:27:37.1 | 0201 2819 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 08:12:29.73 +68:27:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65918_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 65918_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.06 | 09:06:34.60 +73:11:40.8 | 3376 5126 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:06:34.16 +73:11:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65982_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 65982_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.02 | 09:34:08.08 +69:50:58.4 | 4656 3093 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:34:08.16 +69:50:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65985_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 65985_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.24 | 08:50:43.51 +73:45:55.8 | 2734 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 08:50:43.52 +73:45:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66043_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 66043_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 05.35407 | 2461288.85407 | 13.39 | 08:37:19.05 +72:54:29.9 | 2076 5123 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.41 | 08:37:18.87 +72:54:29.9 | 2073 5130 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66115_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 66115_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.00 | 09:13:06.58 +69:38:51.3 | 3561 2974 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:13:06.47 +69:38:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66134_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 66134_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 13.37 | 09:22:46.06 +73:33:02.2 | 4083 5312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:22:45.63 +73:33:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 11.58 | 08:04:00.54 +73:24:30.4 | 0727 5814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.49 +73:24:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 10.74 | 10:55:39.95 +71:52:08.5 | 8347 5107 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:39.95 +71:52:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34988_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 34988_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 11.35 | 09:35:34.24 +65:17:06.0 | 4854 0347 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:35:34.26 +65:17:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26816_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 26816_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 10.91 | 09:37:34.51 +69:58:41.3 | 4830 3179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 09:37:34.55 +69:58:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 7.16 | 10:44:37.88 +68:46:31.6 | 8460 3154 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:37.85 +68:46:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 29910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 6.61 | 10:45:03.57 +67:24:41.0 | 8752 2380 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:45:03.61 +67:24:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46718_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 46718_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 6.48 | 10:41:55.54 +65:42:56.0 | 8901 1344 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:41:55.55 +65:42:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 22705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 6.64 | 10:43:03.50 +69:04:33.0 | 8320 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:43:03.48 +69:04:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42456_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 42456_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 05.35511 | 2461288.85511 | 6.52 | 10:24:07.37 +65:33:58.6 | 7848 0952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_033145_TTUQ1b1x1_3000464_osD6sJ8y/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-31-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits |
**** FOUND 10:24:07.43 +65:33:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.85406613 -observatory V36
11:26:28.40 +04:59:01.6 Mercury (-1.0mag)
13:31:04.86 -13:46:14.0 Venus (-4.7mag)
07:08:43.66 +23:06:01.0 Mars (1.2mag)
09:07:26.64 +17:04:18.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:10.32 +02:41:45.8 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:39.44 +21:01:54.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:55.72 -00:01:59.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:43.77 -23:39:09.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
05:45:52.10 +27:41:40.3 Moon (-10.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 5 03:32 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.85406613:
09:07:33.06 +17:03:47.8 Io (6.2mag)
09:07:30.29 +17:04:01.5 Europa (6.3mag)
09:07:40.22 +17:03:13.9 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:07:01.89 +17:06:18.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:05:09.23 +17:19:57.4 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:07:30.20 +17:04:03.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:04:47.49 +17:14:03.0 Elara (17.7mag)
09:11:22.86 +16:32:29.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:08:40.11 +17:21:33.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:52:15.80 +02:42:00.2 Titan (8.3mag)
00:52:13.31 +02:41:43.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:52:30.44 +02:44:24.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:52:18.98 +02:41:02.9 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:50:59.14 +02:31:41.1 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 5 03:32 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.85406613:
21:48:47.76 -00:59:57.7 JWST
18:55:12.32 +08:10:00.9 Chandra
11:27:31.78 -60:29:14.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 5 03:32 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.85406613 -observatory V36
03:39:13.30 +19:14:52.0 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:16.09 -34:14:47.9 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:17:59.12 -70:11:43.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:27.50 +33:39:01.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:48:29.75 +45:10:58.8 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:48:29.75 +45:10:58.8 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:15:02.76 +28:54:12.0 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:08:41.51 +26:00:56.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:47:42.30 +27:17:49.1 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:47:25.90 +05:14:36.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:30:06.16 -15:28:42.2 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:36:40.20 +32:46:29.0 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:22.07 +15:20:44.4 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:34:53.25 +43:14:39.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:28:51.51 +49:23:50.7 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:34:32.92 -13:00:06.0 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:10:56.03 +18:55:47.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:14:52.27 +18:55:11.1 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:18:02.51 +00:16:20.0 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:36:29.12 +74:20:44.9 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:41.19 +46:11:26.1 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:11:28.72 +11:07:24.5 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:24:23.01 -34:52:57.4 13.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:46:52.50 -05:19:23.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:04:39.48 -04:28:42.6 17.6mag 63P/Wild
00:45:42.76 -06:56:43.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:35:32.44 +19:23:47.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:17:05.47 +14:58:10.9 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:31:48.42 +27:53:08.6 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:25:59.97 +25:18:12.8 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:23:32.67 +21:16:37.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:42:20.60 -20:39:29.5 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:15:02.31 +20:41:51.5 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:39:10.54 -17:48:57.8 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:41:43.87 +15:03:21.3 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:22:43.14 +08:37:41.7 14.5mag 220P/McNaught
04:42:47.33 +35:42:14.4 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:26:37.90 +35:54:08.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:23:59.81 -00:01:49.4 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:26:06.14 +16:56:59.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep 5 03:32 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 5 03:32 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 5 03:32 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:44:28.070 -26:52:10.72 SN 2026ylk 2026-08-07.52 20.44
21:19:40.596 -20:14:18.67 AT 2026ylj 2026-08-07.43 20.61
15:18:13.061 +03:21:47.37 AT 2026yli 2026-08-07.28 21.08
20:52:51.054 -38:10:22.04 AT 2026ylh 2026-08-07.39 21.08
22:37:48.683 +14:31:17.67 AT 2026ylg 2026-08-07.38 20.64
15:22:10.313 +02:36:38.70 AT 2026ylf 2026-08-07.28 20.74
15:13:07.178 +04:34:04.44 AT 2026yle 2026-08-07.28 20.67
16:44:15.935 +15:58:23.98 AT 2026yld 2026-08-07.33 20.42
16:53:19.893 +23:20:52.77 AT 2026ylc 2026-08-07.34 20.62
21:51:46.429 +22:52:34.84 AT 2026ylb 2026-08-07.33 20.55
15:30:03.344 +01:16:22.04 AT 2026yla 2026-08-07.28 20.42
14:58:33.653 +00:08:16.26 AT 2026ykz 2026-08-07.28 20.51
20:30:15.393 +07:13:46.28 AT 2026yky 2026-08-09.29 19.6805
20:13:45.078 -03:03:56.96 AT 2026ykx 2026-08-09.28 19.8907
22:16:15.314 +06:41:29.30 AT 2026ykw 2026-08-09.38 19.6275
22:53:23.090 +37:27:07.60 AT 2026ykv 2026-08-09.12 19.5
15:44:17.610 +55:40:01.02 AT 2026yku 2026-08-06.74 20.54
16:47:10.500 +18:23:40.41 AT 2026ykt 2026-08-05.64 21.21
00:00:24.760 +31:45:39.85 AT 2026yks 2026-08-01.71 20.53
23:52:44.920 +32:12:02.01 AT 2026ykr 2026-07-22.75 21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 5 03:32 tns_transients_list.txt