NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMi-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 470872 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 470872 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits

renamed 'UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 499.2566 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 584.8745 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1468.5301 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 512.3883 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1469.3990 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 512.0304 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.94143 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T03:21:49.3389236' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T08:21:49.3389236' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.3484877083 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T08:21:59.2407118' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.3486023149 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.999978687356 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5001605690027 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.4744444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 349.090277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.31510645534091 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) Spent 0.468766 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T03:22:42.4724176' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T08:22:42.4724176' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61288.3491026852 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T08:22:52.3840362' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61288.3492174074 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.999978984102 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5001605906926 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.4391666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 349.127777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.31807033592072 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) Spent 0.491064 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits


fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.84860345 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0324 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01197 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.15CPB51xeK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wrm0UhU6D5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DSZHA8NEHW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YDsOjhqyjH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec +70.5002 to +82.8178 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec 70.5002 to 82.8178 deg Loaded 12465 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6292 out of 6524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6524 out of 10169 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.3 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.2 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.15CPB51xeK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=0, passed=10690 Got 10690 stars (including 9914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1085 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1393 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wrm0UhU6D5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, bad_region=0, passed=10169 Got 10169 stars (including 9572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1430 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DSZHA8NEHW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, bad_region=1, passed=5740 Got 5740 stars (including 5443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=9.220 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.908 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.447 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.736 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.326 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.326 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1498 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1339 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.020 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.YDsOjhqyjH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=0, passed=5681 Got 5681 stars (including 5390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5681 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=9.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.427 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.717 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.343 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.338 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1493 n_q2=1116 n_q3=1340 n_q4=957 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.169 ref2=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.134 new1=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.020 new2=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.044 reference average sigma_overall=0.35 worst_q_ratio=1.1515 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20030_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 20030_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    10.45    14:19:02.62 +81:03:15.5   7292 0724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:19:02.61 +81:03:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0324 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:29.996 +77:31:40.19 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:33.506 +77:30:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01197 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.79MN0QqZkk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4NaCCLD6xo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ac1G5Yk1aT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1bs46vUiss Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 56082 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec +70.4438 to +82.8301 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec 70.4438 to 82.8301 deg Loaded 12608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 6691 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6691 out of 56082 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.79MN0QqZkk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3819, bad_region=47, passed=63015 Got 63015 stars (including 59032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63015 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1127 n_q2=1256 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4NaCCLD6xo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3064, bad_region=0, passed=56053 Got 56053 stars (including 52907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56053 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Ac1G5Yk1aT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1162, bad_region=17, passed=37269 Got 37269 stars (including 36019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37269 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37269 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37269 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37269 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=9.003 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.216 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.439 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.320 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.731 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.320 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1520 n_q2=1113 n_q3=1335 n_q4=939 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.1bs46vUiss (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1159, bad_region=19, passed=37314 Got 37314 stars (including 36072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37314 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=8.945 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.561 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4903 robust_rms_before=0.712 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1526 n_q2=1105 n_q3=1337 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.028 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:44:00.17 +80:08:30.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:24:13.45 +82:12:14.3: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:53:30.22 +75:33:08.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:49:25.12 +77:00:18.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:53:23.94 +77:10:23.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:29:15.03 +78:38:55.2: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:40:41.17 +76:05:05.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:31:00.31 +81:43:10.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:40:41.17 +76:05:05.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:49:25.12 +77:00:18.4: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:29:15.03 +78:38:55.2: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:31:00.31 +81:43:10.2: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:53:30.22 +75:33:08.4: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:53:23.94 +77:10:23.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:24:13.45 +82:12:14.3: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:44:00.17 +80:08:30.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:41.17 +76:05:05.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8738 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:25.12 +77:00:18.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3914 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:15.03 +78:38:55.2: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9569 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:30.22 +75:33:08.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4000 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:00.31 +81:43:10.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0217 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:23.94 +77:10:23.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6341 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:13.45 +82:12:14.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5309 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:00.17 +80:08:30.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1768 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:16:27.69 +71:36:42.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:50:59.15 +80:47:16.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:10:32.78 +75:06:29.8: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:55:57.12 +80:31:21.4: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:16:27.69 +71:36:42.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:27.69 +71:36:42.4: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3846 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:50:59.15 +80:47:16.2: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:10:32.78 +75:06:29.8: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:59.15 +80:47:16.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2817 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:32.78 +75:06:29.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7197 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:55:57.12 +80:31:21.4: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:57.12 +80:31:21.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4436 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75748_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75748_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    14.58    16:24:14.00 +82:12:14.0   4517 0321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    14.49    16:24:12.91 +82:12:14.5   4519 0314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75760_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75760_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    14.20    17:44:00.56 +80:08:30.2   2367 0848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    14.16    17:43:59.79 +80:08:31.5   2369 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75766_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75766_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.88    17:40:41.60 +76:05:05.1   1258 3042   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.87    17:40:40.75 +76:05:05.9   1261 3036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75774_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75774_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.42    17:53:30.17 +75:33:08.3   0680 3081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.38    17:53:30.27 +75:33:08.5   0682 3075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75775_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75775_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.09    15:31:00.13 +81:43:10.4   5618 0681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.97    15:31:00.48 +81:43:09.9   5620 0674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75776_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75776_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    12.65    17:53:23.83 +77:10:23.6   1205 2248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.61    17:53:24.05 +77:10:23.1   1207 2242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75778_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75778_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    12.39    17:49:25.19 +77:00:18.3   1268 2406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.39    17:49:25.06 +77:00:18.5   1270 2400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75780_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75780_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    11.27    17:12:38.16 +71:07:26.2   1057 6273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:12:38.13 +71:07:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75781_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75781_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    10.89    17:53:21.91 +78:54:40.9   1765 1349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:53:21.65 +78:54:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75828_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75828_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    11.98    15:29:14.95 +78:38:55.1   5764 2529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    11.94    15:29:15.11 +78:38:55.3   5766 2522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75838_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75838_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.09    13:13:03.41 +80:28:26.8   8879 0244   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 13:13:03.44 +80:28:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75847_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75847_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.72    16:56:12.42 +74:15:35.0   2411 4721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 16:56:12.47 +74:15:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75849_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75849_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.60    15:44:28.44 +80:57:35.8   5324 1141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 15:44:28.42 +80:57:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75863_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75863_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.78    16:30:41.51 +77:25:18.8   3808 3116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 16:30:41.63 +77:25:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75873_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75873_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.21    18:29:22.44 +77:33:54.4   0373 1342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 18:29:22.26 +77:33:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75877_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75877_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.15    18:19:30.40 +76:35:22.5   0257 2014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 18:19:30.37 +76:35:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75878_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75878_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.03    17:01:59.37 +82:10:36.3   3765 0131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:01:59.26 +82:10:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75879_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75879_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    12.61    14:50:25.23 +74:12:40.5   7505 4969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:50:25.45 +74:12:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75889_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75889_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.00    14:14:18.57 +81:49:36.1   7223 0247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:14:18.30 +81:49:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75913_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75913_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.02    14:58:45.55 +76:30:29.8   6906 3675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:58:45.26 +76:30:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75923_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75923_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.46    17:39:42.20 +72:54:29.3   0364 4753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:39:42.23 +72:54:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75938_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75938_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.41    17:16:27.77 +71:36:41.6   0995 5933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.36    17:16:27.61 +71:36:43.3   0998 5926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75945_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75945_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.15    14:01:06.57 +76:44:52.4   8787 2921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:01:06.63 +76:44:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75950_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75950_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.32    13:50:59.17 +80:47:16.2   7972 0600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.25    13:50:59.13 +80:47:16.2   7974 0592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75975_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75975_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    14.00    17:23:22.67 +73:37:34.9   1206 4674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:23:22.75 +73:37:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75978_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75978_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    13.74    17:10:32.90 +75:06:29.3   2041 4054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.70    17:10:32.66 +75:06:30.3   2044 4047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75980_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75980_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.89    17:33:48.99 +80:32:44.2   2713 0750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 17:33:48.90 +80:32:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75983_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75983_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.50    14:17:27.84 +79:51:17.4   7586 1388   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 14:17:27.79 +79:51:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75990_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 75990_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    13.83    15:50:24.87 +82:10:09.9   5207 0406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 15:50:24.67 +82:10:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76025_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 76025_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    14.22    18:23:11.20 +79:31:01.8   1284 0554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 18:23:11.04 +79:31:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76063_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 76063_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 05.34860    2461288.84860    14.45    15:55:57.63 +80:31:20.0   5036 1404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-21-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 05.34922    2461288.84922    14.44    15:55:56.61 +80:31:22.8   5038 1397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_032330_TTUQ1b1x1_2155949_4dc1VmbR/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_03-22-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMi-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.84860345 -observatory V36 11:26:26.26 +04:59:17.0 Mercury (-1.0mag) 13:31:03.97 -13:46:06.4 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:08:42.77 +23:06:02.1 Mars (1.2mag) 09:07:26.37 +17:04:19.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:52:10.40 +02:41:46.3 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:39.43 +21:01:54.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:55.75 -00:01:59.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:43.80 -23:39:09.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 05:45:32.21 +27:40:57.6 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 5 03:24 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.84860345: 09:07:32.85 +17:03:48.7 Io (6.2mag) 09:07:29.92 +17:04:03.1 Europa (6.3mag) 09:07:39.90 +17:03:15.3 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:07:01.64 +17:06:19.9 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:05:08.94 +17:19:58.4 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:07:30.04 +17:04:03.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:04:47.21 +17:14:04.0 Elara (17.7mag) 09:11:22.59 +16:32:30.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:08:39.86 +17:21:34.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:52:15.90 +02:42:00.7 Titan (8.3mag) 00:52:13.42 +02:41:44.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:52:30.52 +02:44:24.8 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:52:19.04 +02:41:03.4 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:50:59.22 +02:31:41.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 5 03:24 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.84860345: 21:48:46.81 -01:00:18.3 JWST 18:54:24.20 +08:34:41.7 Chandra 11:23:31.49 -60:20:17.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 5 03:24 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.84860345 -observatory V36 03:39:13.10 +19:14:51.0 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:15.99 -34:14:48.3 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:17:58.86 -70:11:42.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:27.46 +33:39:00.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:48:29.25 +45:10:55.4 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 04:48:29.25 +45:10:55.4 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:15:03.02 +28:54:14.3 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:08:41.25 +26:00:56.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:47:42.00 +27:17:49.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:47:25.68 +05:14:36.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:30:06.26 -15:28:40.5 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:36:39.91 +32:46:27.8 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:22.03 +15:20:44.6 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:34:53.47 +43:14:40.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:28:51.97 +49:23:51.6 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:34:32.74 -13:00:05.7 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:10:55.91 +18:55:50.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:14:51.75 +18:55:12.6 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:18:02.24 +00:16:21.5 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:36:28.30 +74:20:48.0 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:06:41.34 +46:11:26.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:11:28.41 +11:07:22.9 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:24:22.77 -34:52:55.7 13.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:46:52.28 -05:19:22.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:04:38.82 -04:28:36.3 17.6mag 63P/Wild 00:45:42.94 -06:56:41.7 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:35:31.80 +19:23:49.3 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:17:05.43 +14:58:10.6 16.7mag 88P/Howell 05:31:47.35 +27:53:01.0 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:25:58.98 +25:18:17.6 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:23:31.93 +21:16:42.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:42:19.88 -20:39:22.6 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:15:01.90 +20:41:52.1 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:39:11.66 -17:48:59.7 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:41:44.63 +15:03:35.3 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:22:42.85 +08:37:43.2 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:42:46.44 +35:42:07.9 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:26:37.00 +35:54:10.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:23:59.60 -00:01:47.2 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:26:05.86 +16:57:00.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep 5 03:24 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 5 03:24 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 5 03:24 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:44:28.070 -26:52:10.72 SN 2026ylk 2026-08-07.52 20.44 21:19:40.596 -20:14:18.67 AT 2026ylj 2026-08-07.43 20.61 15:18:13.061 +03:21:47.37 AT 2026yli 2026-08-07.28 21.08 20:52:51.054 -38:10:22.04 AT 2026ylh 2026-08-07.39 21.08 22:37:48.683 +14:31:17.67 AT 2026ylg 2026-08-07.38 20.64 15:22:10.313 +02:36:38.70 AT 2026ylf 2026-08-07.28 20.74 15:13:07.178 +04:34:04.44 AT 2026yle 2026-08-07.28 20.67 16:44:15.935 +15:58:23.98 AT 2026yld 2026-08-07.33 20.42 16:53:19.893 +23:20:52.77 AT 2026ylc 2026-08-07.34 20.62 21:51:46.429 +22:52:34.84 AT 2026ylb 2026-08-07.33 20.55 15:30:03.344 +01:16:22.04 AT 2026yla 2026-08-07.28 20.42 14:58:33.653 +00:08:16.26 AT 2026ykz 2026-08-07.28 20.51 20:30:15.393 +07:13:46.28 AT 2026yky 2026-08-09.29 19.6805 20:13:45.078 -03:03:56.96 AT 2026ykx 2026-08-09.28 19.8907 22:16:15.314 +06:41:29.30 AT 2026ykw 2026-08-09.38 19.6275 22:53:23.090 +37:27:07.60 AT 2026ykv 2026-08-09.12 19.5 15:44:17.610 +55:40:01.02 AT 2026yku 2026-08-06.74 20.54 16:47:10.500 +18:23:40.41 AT 2026ykt 2026-08-05.64 21.21 00:00:24.760 +31:45:39.85 AT 2026yks 2026-08-01.71 20.53 23:52:44.920 +32:12:02.01 AT 2026ykr 2026-07-22.75 21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 5 03:24 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C